The Fort Worth Press - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 66.265317
ALL 82.402569
AMD 381.470325
ANG 1.790403
AOA 916.999979
ARS 1453.268605
AUD 1.509548
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.702857
BAM 1.670125
BBD 2.014261
BDT 122.305906
BGN 1.668099
BHD 0.376979
BIF 2957.004398
BMD 1
BND 1.292857
BOB 6.910715
BRL 5.507299
BSD 1.000043
BTN 89.605322
BWP 14.066863
BYN 2.939243
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01128
CAD 1.376304
CDF 2263.999542
CHF 0.795075
CLF 0.023186
CLP 909.55992
CNY 7.04125
CNH 7.03524
COP 3839.13
CRC 499.453496
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.15748
CZK 20.73145
DJF 178.081198
DKK 6.370955
DOP 62.64303
DZD 129.712005
EGP 47.594796
ERN 15
ETB 155.358814
EUR 0.85271
FJD 2.283698
FKP 0.746974
GBP 0.74783
GEL 2.690094
GGP 0.746974
GHS 11.485979
GIP 0.746974
GMD 73.497012
GNF 8741.503569
GTQ 7.663012
GYD 209.225672
HKD 7.78115
HNL 26.346441
HRK 6.423501
HTG 131.121643
HUF 329.888957
IDR 16724
ILS 3.20465
IMP 0.746974
INR 89.539988
IQD 1310.106315
IRR 42124.999712
ISK 125.530155
JEP 0.746974
JMD 160.014687
JOD 0.708992
JPY 157.370503
KES 128.909986
KGS 87.449654
KHR 4013.337944
KMF 421.000173
KPW 899.985447
KRW 1477.289977
KWD 0.30717
KYD 0.83344
KZT 517.522287
LAK 21659.493801
LBP 89554.428391
LKR 309.628719
LRD 177.007549
LSL 16.776394
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.420684
MAD 9.166549
MDL 16.930526
MGA 4547.938655
MKD 52.499829
MMK 2099.831872
MNT 3551.409668
MOP 8.015336
MRU 40.022031
MUR 46.150071
MVR 15.460291
MWK 1734.125764
MXN 17.991495
MYR 4.076995
MZN 63.910085
NAD 16.776824
NGN 1460.590332
NIO 36.803634
NOK 10.14082
NPR 143.368515
NZD 1.736215
OMR 0.384493
PAB 1.000004
PEN 3.367746
PGK 4.254302
PHP 58.661031
PKR 280.1888
PLN 3.58817
PYG 6709.105581
QAR 3.645865
RON 4.340258
RSD 100.08902
RUB 80.399006
RWF 1456.129115
SAR 3.75098
SBD 8.140117
SCR 13.691136
SDG 601.498816
SEK 9.27457
SGD 1.291785
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.100902
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 570.499027
SRD 38.441502
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.921395
SVC 8.750043
SYP 11057.107339
SZL 16.774689
THB 31.423502
TJS 9.215425
TMT 3.51
TND 2.927212
TOP 2.40776
TRY 42.809255
TTD 6.787751
TWD 31.518502
TZS 2494.999799
UAH 42.285385
UGX 3577.131634
UYU 39.263238
UZS 12022.235885
VES 279.213397
VND 26312.5
VUV 121.400054
WST 2.789362
XAF 560.122791
XAG 0.015049
XAU 0.00023
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802353
XDR 0.695787
XOF 560.134749
XPF 101.83762
YER 238.450184
ZAR 16.73325
ZMK 9001.190753
ZMW 22.626123
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSD

    0.0000

    23.28

    0%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1500

    15.25

    -0.98%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    13.43

    0%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    23.25

    -0.17%

  • NGG

    0.4600

    76.85

    +0.6%

  • BCC

    -3.1420

    74.558

    -4.21%

  • RIO

    0.8270

    78.457

    +1.05%

  • BCE

    0.1950

    23.045

    +0.85%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    80.22

    0%

  • VOD

    0.0960

    12.896

    +0.74%

  • GSK

    0.5400

    48.83

    +1.11%

  • BTI

    -0.0450

    56.995

    -0.08%

  • AZN

    1.0300

    91.64

    +1.12%

  • RELX

    0.2300

    40.88

    +0.56%

  • BP

    0.7650

    34.075

    +2.25%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.