The Fort Worth Press - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.672494
AFN 62.496579
ALL 82.001718
AMD 366.494845
ANG 1.79046
AOA 917.999517
ARS 1401.013596
AUD 1.395245
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.702744
BAM 1.680241
BBD 2.006873
BDT 122.465636
BGN 1.66992
BHD 0.375773
BIF 2967.08208
BMD 1
BND 1.276235
BOB 6.88488
BRL 5.023195
BSD 0.996392
BTN 95.293814
BWP 13.475945
BYN 2.735739
BYR 19600
BZD 2.003952
CAD 1.38132
CDF 2255.000252
CHF 0.782105
CLF 0.022803
CLP 897.450269
CNY 6.79475
CNH 6.78283
COP 3681.61
CRC 450.945017
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.729381
CZK 20.859401
DJF 177.431271
DKK 6.420485
DOP 58.728522
DZD 133.075638
EGP 52.322399
ERN 15
ETB 160.632302
EUR 0.859198
FJD 2.199805
FKP 0.74448
GBP 0.741785
GEL 2.659765
GGP 0.74448
GHS 11.568729
GIP 0.74448
GMD 72.500316
GNF 8736.570692
GTQ 7.597938
GYD 208.427835
HKD 7.834875
HNL 26.50945
HRK 6.472973
HTG 130.537172
HUF 306.949499
IDR 17735
ILS 2.886797
IMP 0.74448
INR 95.218502
IQD 1305.24055
IRR 1323399.999635
ISK 123.499587
JEP 0.74448
JMD 157.293814
JOD 0.709017
JPY 158.918018
KES 129.750057
KGS 87.45006
KHR 3994.843146
KMF 425.000258
KPW 900.000037
KRW 1511.550177
KWD 0.30941
KYD 0.830326
KZT 470.541237
LAK 21836.769759
LBP 89248.453608
LKR 333.281787
LRD 182.33677
LSL 16.435137
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.349656
MAD 9.192096
MDL 17.282646
MGA 4186.426117
MKD 52.943526
MMK 2099.596302
MNT 3579.037371
MOP 8.042182
MRU 39.816151
MUR 47.28019
MVR 15.391712
MWK 1727.749141
MXN 17.273599
MYR 3.955502
MZN 63.8996
NAD 16.435137
NGN 1367.130497
NIO 36.682424
NOK 9.248097
NPR 152.469931
NZD 1.702145
OMR 0.384499
PAB 0.996392
PEN 3.397165
PGK 4.345361
PHP 61.372004
PKR 277.408419
PLN 3.63905
PYG 6072.164948
QAR 3.642955
RON 4.507802
RSD 100.860241
RUB 70.995597
RWF 1456.701031
SAR 3.740034
SBD 8.045182
SCR 14.841539
SDG 600.496467
SEK 9.293303
SGD 1.277401
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.59161
SLL 20969.502105
SOS 569.415808
SRD 37.153985
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.057155
SVC 8.718213
SYP 110.524992
SZL 16.431271
THB 32.449654
TJS 9.256529
TMT 3.5
TND 2.916838
TOP 2.40776
TRY 45.718201
TTD 6.762887
TWD 31.409705
TZS 2620.33502
UAH 44.098883
UGX 3773.195876
UYU 39.888316
UZS 11954.467354
VES 526.210498
VND 26361
VUV 118.84935
WST 2.724798
XAF 563.536942
XAG 0.012902
XAU 0.00022
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.79579
XDR 0.700859
XOF 563.536942
XPF 102.457045
YER 238.650272
ZAR 16.354249
ZMK 9001.19992
ZMW 18.756873
ZWL 321.999592
  • GSK

    -0.1500

    51.38

    -0.29%

  • AZN

    -2.7200

    187.03

    -1.45%

  • BCE

    0.2100

    24.6

    +0.85%

  • NGG

    0.1900

    86.61

    +0.22%

  • CMSD

    0.0100

    22.73

    +0.04%

  • RYCEF

    0.1600

    16.64

    +0.96%

  • CMSC

    0.0100

    22.66

    +0.04%

  • RELX

    -0.3300

    33.01

    -1%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    63.5

    0%

  • RIO

    -0.5300

    104.23

    -0.51%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    12.87

    +0.39%

  • VOD

    -0.1700

    14.94

    -1.14%

  • BCC

    0.0500

    67.16

    +0.07%

  • BTI

    -0.3700

    65.36

    -0.57%

  • BP

    -0.5100

    44.36

    -1.15%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.