The Fort Worth Press - Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 62.999871
ALL 82.06033
AMD 368.210332
ANG 1.79046
AOA 917.999626
ARS 1398.494498
AUD 1.408967
AWG 1.80225
AZN 1.700265
BAM 1.68319
BBD 2.014527
BDT 122.775311
BGN 1.66992
BHD 0.37725
BIF 2975
BMD 1
BND 1.281294
BOB 6.911598
BRL 5.059801
BSD 1.000207
BTN 96.503322
BWP 13.583201
BYN 2.726365
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011601
CAD 1.375599
CDF 2252.507696
CHF 0.789985
CLF 0.023008
CLP 905.53021
CNY 6.814991
CNH 6.815275
COP 3794.85
CRC 452.511274
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.374996
CZK 20.972802
DJF 177.719992
DKK 6.443302
DOP 58.849948
DZD 132.510767
EGP 53.093099
ERN 15
ETB 156.175858
EUR 0.86223
FJD 2.211044
FKP 0.745062
GBP 0.74675
GEL 2.670254
GGP 0.745062
GHS 11.445014
GIP 0.745062
GMD 72.999725
GNF 8777.494587
GTQ 7.625047
GYD 209.258494
HKD 7.83345
HNL 26.601892
HRK 6.496798
HTG 130.92646
HUF 311.887979
IDR 17711
ILS 2.928935
IMP 0.745062
INR 96.81795
IQD 1310.5
IRR 1320950.000434
ISK 123.649718
JEP 0.745062
JMD 158.241248
JOD 0.709023
JPY 158.943499
KES 129.329947
KGS 87.450396
KHR 4011.500431
KMF 423.999686
KPW 900.049483
KRW 1508.505015
KWD 0.30914
KYD 0.833513
KZT 471.023099
LAK 21950.000281
LBP 89549.999878
LKR 330.512012
LRD 183.274989
LSL 16.700885
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.359903
MAD 9.224586
MDL 17.303671
MGA 4196.357878
MKD 53.154241
MMK 2099.427985
MNT 3578.349826
MOP 8.069452
MRU 39.98983
MUR 47.249713
MVR 15.393488
MWK 1740.999859
MXN 17.424499
MYR 3.978023
MZN 63.909955
NAD 16.701504
NGN 1372.340219
NIO 36.807704
NOK 9.281505
NPR 154.405487
NZD 1.716897
OMR 0.384502
PAB 1.000207
PEN 3.422764
PGK 4.42356
PHP 61.703006
PKR 278.560536
PLN 3.66824
PYG 6125.724515
QAR 3.645916
RON 4.508703
RSD 101.211024
RUB 71.198762
RWF 1462.799604
SAR 3.752456
SBD 8.032258
SCR 13.044659
SDG 600.502191
SEK 9.41407
SGD 1.28215
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.604244
SLL 20969.502105
SOS 571.620366
SRD 37.227503
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.085063
SVC 8.751442
SYP 111.458438
SZL 16.701912
THB 32.739503
TJS 9.286861
TMT 3.5
TND 2.927516
TOP 2.40776
TRY 45.5903
TTD 6.780784
TWD 31.687989
TZS 2609.997991
UAH 44.17973
UGX 3771.214155
UYU 40.31911
UZS 12021.721544
VES 517.314498
VND 26330
VUV 118.295117
WST 2.706459
XAF 564.531176
XAG 0.013625
XAU 0.000224
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802644
XDR 0.702153
XOF 564.523888
XPF 102.636924
YER 238.650142
ZAR 16.73095
ZMK 9001.196241
ZMW 18.829392
ZWL 321.999592
  • RYCEF

    0.0600

    15.45

    +0.39%

  • CMSC

    -0.1800

    22.8

    -0.79%

  • BCC

    -2.1300

    65.47

    -3.25%

  • GSK

    0.7900

    51.05

    +1.55%

  • CMSD

    -0.2100

    22.75

    -0.92%

  • RBGPF

    0.7200

    63.23

    +1.14%

  • NGG

    0.3100

    84.15

    +0.37%

  • RIO

    -2.4100

    100.92

    -2.39%

  • BTI

    -0.2900

    66.06

    -0.44%

  • BCE

    0.1600

    23.98

    +0.67%

  • JRI

    -0.2300

    12.47

    -1.84%

  • AZN

    0.7200

    184.64

    +0.39%

  • VOD

    0.1500

    15.15

    +0.99%

  • BP

    0.4500

    46.14

    +0.98%

  • RELX

    -0.3800

    33.58

    -1.13%

Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam
Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam / Photo: © AFP

Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam

Feed an Iranian news dispatch or a literary classic into some text detectors, and they return the same verdict: AI-generated. Then comes the pitch: pay to "humanize" the writing, a pattern experts say bears the hallmarks of a scam.

Text size:

As AI falsehoods explode across social media, often outpacing the capacity of professional fact-checkers, bogus detectors risk adding another layer of deception to an already fractured information ecosystem.

While even reliable AI detectors can produce false results, researchers say a crop of fraudulent tools has emerged online, easily weaponized to discredit authentic content and tarnish reputations.

AFP's fact-checkers identified three such text detectors that claim to estimate what percentage is AI-generated. The tools -- prompted in four languages -- not only misidentified authentic text as AI-generated but also attempted to monetize those errors.

One detector, JustDone AI, processed a human-written report about the US-Iran war and wrongly concluded it contained "88% AI content." It then offered to scrub any trace of AI for a fee.

"Your AI text is humanizing," the site claimed, leading to a page where "100% unique text" was locked behind a paywall charging up to $9.99.

Two other tools -- TextGuard and Refinely -- produced similar false positives and sought to monetize them.

- 'Scams' -

AFP presented its findings to all three detectors.

"Our system operates using modern AI models, and the results it provides are considered accurate within our technology," TextGuard's support team told AFP.

"At the same time, we cannot guarantee or compare results with other systems."

JustDone also reiterated that "no AI detector can guarantee 100 percent accuracy."

It acknowledged the free version of its AI detector "may provide less precise results" due to "high demand and the use of a lighter model designed for quick access."

Echoing AFP's findings, one user on a review platform complained that "even with 100% human-written material, JustDone still flags it as AI."

AFP fed the tools multiple human-written samples -- in Dutch, Greek, Hungarian, and English. All were wrongly flagged as having high AI content, including passages from an acclaimed 1916 Hungarian classic.

The tools returned AI flags regardless of input -- even for nonsensical text.

JustDone and Refinely appeared to operate even without an internet connection, suggesting their results may be scripted rather than genuine technical analysis.

"These are not AI detectors but scams to sell a 'humanizing' tool that will often return what we call 'tortured phrases'" -- unrelated jargon or nonsensical alternatives -- Debora Weber-Wulff, a Germany-based academic who has researched detection tools, told AFP.

- 'Liar's dividend' -

Illustrating how such tools can be used to discredit individuals, pro‑government influencers in Hungary claimed earlier this year that a document outlining the opposition's election campaign had been entirely created by AI.

To support the unfounded allegation, they circulated screenshots on social media showing results from JustDone.

The tools tested by AFP sought to lure students and academics as clients, with two of them claiming their users came from top institutions such as Cornell University.

Cornell University told AFP it "does not have any established relations with AI detector companies."

"Generative AI does provide an increased risk that students may use it to submit work that is not their own," the university said.

"Unfortunately, it is unlikely that detection technologies will provide a workable solution to this problem. It can be very difficult to accurately detect AI-generated content."

Fact-checkers, including those from AFP, often rely on AI visual detection tools developed by experts, which typically look for hidden watermarks and other digital clues.

However, they too can sometimes produce errors, making it necessary to supplement their findings with additional evidence such as open-source data.

The stakes are high as false readings from unreliable detectors threaten to erode trust in AI verification broadly -- and feed a disinformation tactic researchers have dubbed the "liar's dividend": dismissing authentic content as AI fabrications.

"We often report on misinformers and other hoaxsters using AI to fabricate false images and videos," said Waqar Rizvi from the misinformation tracker NewsGuard.

"Now, (we are) monitoring the opposite, but no less insidious phenomenon: claims that a visual was created by AI when in fact, it's authentic."

burs-ac/dw

K.Ibarra--TFWP