The Fort Worth Press - Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam

USD -
AED 3.672496
AFN 63.50433
ALL 83.192586
AMD 375.730804
ANG 1.790083
AOA 916.999997
ARS 1390.101098
AUD 1.460771
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.696439
BAM 1.693993
BBD 2.007535
BDT 122.298731
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.376597
BIF 2960.807241
BMD 1
BND 1.28353
BOB 6.91265
BRL 5.240403
BSD 0.996752
BTN 94.473171
BWP 13.741284
BYN 2.966957
BYR 19600
BZD 2.004591
CAD 1.390035
CDF 2282.50088
CHF 0.799635
CLF 0.023381
CLP 923.219739
CNY 6.91185
CNH 6.92254
COP 3674.03
CRC 462.864319
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.504742
CZK 21.333972
DJF 177.489065
DKK 6.500845
DOP 59.330475
DZD 133.010264
EGP 52.874602
ERN 15
ETB 154.083756
EUR 0.869898
FJD 2.257398
FKP 0.752712
GBP 0.755403
GEL 2.679573
GGP 0.752712
GHS 10.921138
GIP 0.752712
GMD 73.50089
GNF 8739.335672
GTQ 7.62808
GYD 208.64406
HKD 7.83245
HNL 26.46399
HRK 6.557007
HTG 130.656966
HUF 339.504022
IDR 16965
ILS 3.137619
IMP 0.752712
INR 94.78205
IQD 1305.703521
IRR 1313249.999923
ISK 124.940227
JEP 0.752712
JMD 156.892296
JOD 0.708969
JPY 160.0815
KES 129.650234
KGS 87.449953
KHR 3992.031527
KMF 428.000223
KPW 900.00296
KRW 1511.290246
KWD 0.30791
KYD 0.830627
KZT 481.867394
LAK 21678.576069
LBP 89256.247023
LKR 313.975142
LRD 182.893768
LSL 17.115586
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.362652
MAD 9.315751
MDL 17.507254
MGA 4153.999394
MKD 53.388766
MMK 2098.832611
MNT 3571.142668
MOP 8.042181
MRU 39.797324
MUR 46.770112
MVR 15.450254
MWK 1728.292408
MXN 18.156455
MYR 4.022502
MZN 63.950186
NAD 17.115586
NGN 1378.509666
NIO 36.680958
NOK 9.74951
NPR 151.156728
NZD 1.74604
OMR 0.38408
PAB 0.996752
PEN 3.472089
PGK 4.307306
PHP 60.530976
PKR 278.184401
PLN 3.72839
PYG 6516.824737
QAR 3.634057
RON 4.435203
RSD 101.684639
RUB 81.655379
RWF 1455.545451
SAR 3.752751
SBD 8.042037
SCR 15.03876
SDG 601.000304
SEK 9.478605
SGD 1.28959
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.550052
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 569.659175
SRD 37.60102
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.220389
SVC 8.721147
SYP 110.527654
SZL 17.114027
THB 32.960288
TJS 9.523624
TMT 3.5
TND 2.938634
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.461899
TTD 6.772336
TWD 31.991979
TZS 2579.99977
UAH 43.689489
UGX 3713.134988
UYU 40.344723
UZS 12155.385215
VES 467.928355
VND 26337.5
VUV 119.385423
WST 2.775484
XAF 568.149495
XAG 0.014713
XAU 0.000226
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.796371
XDR 0.706596
XOF 568.149495
XPF 103.295656
YER 238.600239
ZAR 17.166203
ZMK 9001.208457
ZMW 18.763154
ZWL 321.999592
  • RIO

    0.8500

    86.64

    +0.98%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    22.77

    -0.22%

  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • NGG

    -0.4800

    81.92

    -0.59%

  • BTI

    0.3749

    57.8

    +0.65%

  • GSK

    -0.1000

    53.84

    -0.19%

  • CMSD

    -0.0900

    22.66

    -0.4%

  • RYCEF

    -0.5900

    14.65

    -4.03%

  • RELX

    -0.1000

    31.97

    -0.31%

  • AZN

    5.0200

    188.42

    +2.66%

  • BCE

    -0.2200

    25.25

    -0.87%

  • BCC

    0.1400

    74.43

    +0.19%

  • VOD

    -0.1400

    14.49

    -0.97%

  • JRI

    -0.2700

    11.8

    -2.29%

  • BP

    0.5100

    46.68

    +1.09%

Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam
Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam / Photo: © AFP

Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam

Feed an Iranian news dispatch or a literary classic into some text detectors, and they return the same verdict: AI-generated. Then comes the pitch: pay to "humanize" the writing, a pattern experts say bears the hallmarks of a scam.

Text size:

As AI falsehoods explode across social media, often outpacing the capacity of professional fact-checkers, bogus detectors risk adding another layer of deception to an already fractured information ecosystem.

While even reliable AI detectors can produce false results, researchers say a crop of fraudulent tools has emerged online, easily weaponized to discredit authentic content and tarnish reputations.

AFP's fact-checkers identified three such text detectors that claim to estimate what percentage is AI-generated. The tools -- prompted in four languages -- not only misidentified authentic text as AI-generated but also attempted to monetize those errors.

One detector, JustDone AI, processed a human-written report about the US-Iran war and wrongly concluded it contained "88% AI content." It then offered to scrub any trace of AI for a fee.

"Your AI text is humanizing," the site claimed, leading to a page where "100% unique text" was locked behind a paywall charging up to $9.99.

Two other tools -- TextGuard and Refinely -- produced similar false positives and sought to monetize them.

- 'Scams' -

AFP presented its findings to all three detectors.

"Our system operates using modern AI models, and the results it provides are considered accurate within our technology," TextGuard's support team told AFP.

"At the same time, we cannot guarantee or compare results with other systems."

JustDone also reiterated that "no AI detector can guarantee 100 percent accuracy."

It acknowledged the free version of its AI detector "may provide less precise results" due to "high demand and the use of a lighter model designed for quick access."

Echoing AFP's findings, one user on a review platform complained that "even with 100% human-written material, JustDone still flags it as AI."

AFP fed the tools multiple human-written samples -- in Dutch, Greek, Hungarian, and English. All were wrongly flagged as having high AI content, including passages from an acclaimed 1916 Hungarian classic.

The tools returned AI flags regardless of input -- even for nonsensical text.

JustDone and Refinely appeared to operate even without an internet connection, suggesting their results may be scripted rather than genuine technical analysis.

"These are not AI detectors but scams to sell a 'humanizing' tool that will often return what we call 'tortured phrases'" -- unrelated jargon or nonsensical alternatives -- Debora Weber-Wulff, a Germany-based academic who has researched detection tools, told AFP.

- 'Liar's dividend' -

Illustrating how such tools can be used to discredit individuals, pro‑government influencers in Hungary claimed earlier this year that a document outlining the opposition's election campaign had been entirely created by AI.

To support the unfounded allegation, they circulated screenshots on social media showing results from JustDone.

The tools tested by AFP sought to lure students and academics as clients, with two of them claiming their users came from top institutions such as Cornell University.

Cornell University told AFP it "does not have any established relations with AI detector companies."

"Generative AI does provide an increased risk that students may use it to submit work that is not their own," the university said.

"Unfortunately, it is unlikely that detection technologies will provide a workable solution to this problem. It can be very difficult to accurately detect AI-generated content."

Fact-checkers, including those from AFP, often rely on AI visual detection tools developed by experts, which typically look for hidden watermarks and other digital clues.

However, they too can sometimes produce errors, making it necessary to supplement their findings with additional evidence such as open-source data.

The stakes are high as false readings from unreliable detectors threaten to erode trust in AI verification broadly -- and feed a disinformation tactic researchers have dubbed the "liar's dividend": dismissing authentic content as AI fabrications.

"We often report on misinformers and other hoaxsters using AI to fabricate false images and videos," said Waqar Rizvi from the misinformation tracker NewsGuard.

"Now, (we are) monitoring the opposite, but no less insidious phenomenon: claims that a visual was created by AI when in fact, it's authentic."

burs-ac/dw

K.Ibarra--TFWP