The Fort Worth Press - Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 64.000368
ALL 82.099008
AMD 367.63228
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.503981
ARS 1492.901385
AUD 1.443002
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.709092
BBD 2.014681
BDT 123.336392
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.377157
BIF 2975.313497
BMD 1
BND 1.290864
BOB 6.927077
BRL 5.170399
BSD 1.000306
BTN 95.296893
BWP 13.491502
BYN 2.902259
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011797
CAD 1.41995
CDF 2246.000362
CHF 0.803085
CLF 0.023434
CLP 925.617163
CNY 6.789104
CNH 6.785505
COP 3363.656224
CRC 455.717219
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.35601
CZK 21.144704
DJF 178.127321
DKK 6.535604
DOP 59.256346
DZD 133.361297
EGP 49.283873
ERN 15
ETB 160.4018
EUR 0.873904
FJD 2.26045
FKP 0.748732
GBP 0.748727
GEL 2.63504
GGP 0.748732
GHS 11.363656
GIP 0.748732
GMD 72.503851
GNF 8772.665705
GTQ 7.634028
GYD 209.236685
HKD 7.84465
HNL 26.773277
HRK 6.587504
HTG 130.834098
HUF 308.910388
IDR 17994.4
ILS 2.99865
IMP 0.748732
INR 95.215504
IQD 1310.350854
IRR 1375950.000352
ISK 125.920386
JEP 0.748732
JMD 158.351903
JOD 0.70904
JPY 161.370385
KES 129.3398
KGS 87.447704
KHR 4005.767466
KMF 431.00035
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1528.775039
KWD 0.31029
KYD 0.833661
KZT 473.045834
LAK 22586.621226
LBP 89575.392144
LKR 335.046096
LRD 181.552847
LSL 16.224931
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.4115
MAD 9.354393
MDL 17.595141
MGA 4240.835409
MKD 53.86027
MMK 2099.691108
MNT 3584.859602
MOP 8.08057
MRU 39.921353
MUR 47.050378
MVR 15.460378
MWK 1734.609167
MXN 17.469104
MYR 4.071039
MZN 63.910377
NAD 16.224931
NGN 1370.080377
NIO 36.806921
NOK 9.841039
NPR 152.475204
NZD 1.752235
OMR 0.385704
PAB 1.000306
PEN 3.403766
PGK 4.394635
PHP 61.501038
PKR 278.103989
PLN 3.75205
PYG 6082.055315
QAR 3.656661
RON 4.568038
RSD 102.570892
RUB 77.145891
RWF 1464.412112
SAR 3.748374
SBD 8.058541
SCR 13.46616
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.65806
SGD 1.291404
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.350371
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.678245
SRD 37.566038
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.409534
SVC 8.752567
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.22231
THB 33.325038
TJS 9.2726
TMT 3.51
TND 2.952244
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.767504
TTD 6.779394
TWD 31.938038
TZS 2626.818718
UAH 44.550181
UGX 3650.980906
UYU 40.232446
UZS 11983.221916
VES 638.90327
VND 26296
VUV 119.804122
WST 2.773179
XAF 573.213615
XAG 0.016021
XAU 0.00024
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80277
XDR 0.712894
XOF 573.213615
XPF 104.216367
YER 237.050363
ZAR 16.231504
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.379866
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0400

    21.99

    +0.18%

  • JRI

    0.0600

    13

    +0.46%

  • RBGPF

    2.5400

    68.15

    +3.73%

  • RIO

    1.0700

    94.42

    +1.13%

  • GSK

    2.3600

    53.66

    +4.4%

  • BCC

    0.4500

    75.93

    +0.59%

  • BCE

    0.4000

    21.42

    +1.87%

  • RELX

    0.5500

    31.93

    +1.72%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    22.15

    -0.14%

  • NGG

    2.6700

    82.85

    +3.22%

  • RYCEF

    0.5400

    19.68

    +2.74%

  • VOD

    0.1400

    13.15

    +1.06%

  • BTI

    1.2100

    61.77

    +1.96%

  • AZN

    11.2900

    195.15

    +5.79%

  • BP

    1.2500

    37.4

    +3.34%

Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam
Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam / Photo: © AFP

Dubious AI detectors drive 'pay-to-humanize' scam

Feed an Iranian news dispatch or a literary classic into some text detectors, and they return the same verdict: AI-generated. Then comes the pitch: pay to "humanize" the writing, a pattern experts say bears the hallmarks of a scam.

Text size:

As AI falsehoods explode across social media, often outpacing the capacity of professional fact-checkers, bogus detectors risk adding another layer of deception to an already fractured information ecosystem.

While even reliable AI detectors can produce false results, researchers say a crop of fraudulent tools has emerged online, easily weaponized to discredit authentic content and tarnish reputations.

AFP's fact-checkers identified three such text detectors that claim to estimate what percentage is AI-generated. The tools -- prompted in four languages -- not only misidentified authentic text as AI-generated but also attempted to monetize those errors.

One detector, JustDone AI, processed a human-written report about the US-Iran war and wrongly concluded it contained "88% AI content." It then offered to scrub any trace of AI for a fee.

"Your AI text is humanizing," the site claimed, leading to a page where "100% unique text" was locked behind a paywall charging up to $9.99.

Two other tools -- TextGuard and Refinely -- produced similar false positives and sought to monetize them.

- 'Scams' -

AFP presented its findings to all three detectors.

"Our system operates using modern AI models, and the results it provides are considered accurate within our technology," TextGuard's support team told AFP.

"At the same time, we cannot guarantee or compare results with other systems."

JustDone also reiterated that "no AI detector can guarantee 100 percent accuracy."

It acknowledged the free version of its AI detector "may provide less precise results" due to "high demand and the use of a lighter model designed for quick access."

Echoing AFP's findings, one user on a review platform complained that "even with 100% human-written material, JustDone still flags it as AI."

AFP fed the tools multiple human-written samples -- in Dutch, Greek, Hungarian, and English. All were wrongly flagged as having high AI content, including passages from an acclaimed 1916 Hungarian classic.

The tools returned AI flags regardless of input -- even for nonsensical text.

JustDone and Refinely appeared to operate even without an internet connection, suggesting their results may be scripted rather than genuine technical analysis.

"These are not AI detectors but scams to sell a 'humanizing' tool that will often return what we call 'tortured phrases'" -- unrelated jargon or nonsensical alternatives -- Debora Weber-Wulff, a Germany-based academic who has researched detection tools, told AFP.

- 'Liar's dividend' -

Illustrating how such tools can be used to discredit individuals, pro‑government influencers in Hungary claimed earlier this year that a document outlining the opposition's election campaign had been entirely created by AI.

To support the unfounded allegation, they circulated screenshots on social media showing results from JustDone.

The tools tested by AFP sought to lure students and academics as clients, with two of them claiming their users came from top institutions such as Cornell University.

Cornell University told AFP it "does not have any established relations with AI detector companies."

"Generative AI does provide an increased risk that students may use it to submit work that is not their own," the university said.

"Unfortunately, it is unlikely that detection technologies will provide a workable solution to this problem. It can be very difficult to accurately detect AI-generated content."

Fact-checkers, including those from AFP, often rely on AI visual detection tools developed by experts, which typically look for hidden watermarks and other digital clues.

However, they too can sometimes produce errors, making it necessary to supplement their findings with additional evidence such as open-source data.

The stakes are high as false readings from unreliable detectors threaten to erode trust in AI verification broadly -- and feed a disinformation tactic researchers have dubbed the "liar's dividend": dismissing authentic content as AI fabrications.

"We often report on misinformers and other hoaxsters using AI to fabricate false images and videos," said Waqar Rizvi from the misinformation tracker NewsGuard.

"Now, (we are) monitoring the opposite, but no less insidious phenomenon: claims that a visual was created by AI when in fact, it's authentic."

burs-ac/dw

K.Ibarra--TFWP