The Fort Worth Press - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 65.503991
ALL 82.870557
AMD 381.503986
ANG 1.790055
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1434.006204
AUD 1.505729
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.678705
BBD 2.013364
BDT 122.282772
BGN 1.680385
BHD 0.37694
BIF 2967
BMD 1
BND 1.294944
BOB 6.907739
BRL 5.418041
BSD 0.999601
BTN 89.876145
BWP 13.280747
BYN 2.873917
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010437
CAD 1.383405
CDF 2232.000362
CHF 0.804604
CLF 0.023471
CLP 920.770396
CNY 7.070104
CNH 7.06959
COP 3817.5
CRC 488.298936
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.103894
CZK 20.77405
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.412285
DOP 64.250393
DZD 129.962727
EGP 47.569904
ERN 15
ETB 155.051714
EUR 0.858404
FJD 2.25845
FKP 0.748861
GBP 0.74968
GEL 2.703861
GGP 0.748861
GHS 11.45039
GIP 0.748861
GMD 73.000355
GNF 8687.503848
GTQ 7.657084
GYD 209.137648
HKD 7.78484
HNL 26.328145
HRK 6.471904
HTG 130.859652
HUF 328.06704
IDR 16691.4
ILS 3.23571
IMP 0.748861
INR 89.97675
IQD 1309.540669
IRR 42112.503816
ISK 127.920386
JEP 0.748861
JMD 159.999657
JOD 0.70904
JPY 155.243504
KES 129.303801
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4005.00035
KMF 422.00035
KPW 899.993191
KRW 1472.865039
KWD 0.30668
KYD 0.833083
KZT 505.531856
LAK 21676.809119
LBP 89516.767233
LKR 308.334728
LRD 175.938682
LSL 16.941802
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.434032
MAD 9.231238
MDL 17.00842
MGA 4458.959547
MKD 52.906919
MMK 2099.939583
MNT 3546.502114
MOP 8.016033
MRU 39.863012
MUR 46.070378
MVR 15.410378
MWK 1733.372244
MXN 18.178775
MYR 4.111039
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.941802
NGN 1450.110377
NIO 36.787647
NOK 10.102304
NPR 143.802277
NZD 1.730805
OMR 0.384505
PAB 0.999682
PEN 3.360156
PGK 4.24115
PHP 58.978038
PKR 280.247111
PLN 3.633604
PYG 6875.152888
QAR 3.643659
RON 4.372204
RSD 100.804038
RUB 76.499736
RWF 1454.419048
SAR 3.753201
SBD 8.223823
SCR 13.497312
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.403825
SGD 1.295485
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.000338
SLL 20969.498139
SOS 570.266164
SRD 38.629038
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.02887
SVC 8.745763
SYP 11058.244165
SZL 16.928669
THB 31.871038
TJS 9.171638
TMT 3.5
TND 2.932369
TOP 2.40776
TRY 42.504604
TTD 6.776446
TWD 31.274038
TZS 2435.000335
UAH 41.959408
UGX 3536.283383
UYU 39.096531
UZS 11958.989413
VES 248.585904
VND 26360
VUV 122.070109
WST 2.790151
XAF 563.019389
XAG 0.017039
XAU 0.000237
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801608
XDR 0.70002
XOF 562.932418
XPF 102.347136
YER 238.403589
ZAR 16.92915
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 23.111058
ZWL 321.999592
  • RIO

    -0.7400

    72.99

    -1.01%

  • CMSC

    -0.0240

    23.456

    -0.1%

  • BTI

    -0.9250

    57.115

    -1.62%

  • NGG

    -0.4100

    75.5

    -0.54%

  • GSK

    -0.3350

    48.235

    -0.69%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1400

    14.51

    -0.96%

  • AZN

    0.1200

    90.15

    +0.13%

  • BP

    -1.2300

    36

    -3.42%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    78.35

    0%

  • VOD

    -0.1580

    12.475

    -1.27%

  • SCS

    -0.0850

    16.145

    -0.53%

  • JRI

    0.0170

    13.767

    +0.12%

  • BCC

    -0.7700

    73.49

    -1.05%

  • RELX

    -0.1950

    40.345

    -0.48%

  • BCE

    0.3740

    23.594

    +1.59%

  • CMSD

    -0.0760

    23.244

    -0.33%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.