The Fort Worth Press - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 65.000368
ALL 82.203989
AMD 367.380403
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1487.956748
AUD 1.437401
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.711104
BBD 2.014725
BDT 123.291207
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.37707
BIF 2985
BMD 1
BND 1.291257
BOB 6.923833
BRL 5.111404
BSD 1.000276
BTN 95.289131
BWP 13.527665
BYN 2.859418
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011811
CAD 1.41745
CDF 2258.000362
CHF 0.808312
CLF 0.023491
CLP 924.560396
CNY 6.77695
CNH 6.782275
COP 3253.61
CRC 455.032612
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.903894
CZK 21.248804
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.548975
DOP 58.703884
DZD 133.256578
EGP 49.625706
ERN 15
ETB 159.37504
EUR 0.875804
FJD 2.233204
FKP 0.745889
GBP 0.746157
GEL 2.64504
GGP 0.745889
GHS 11.46504
GIP 0.745889
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8777.503848
GTQ 7.632579
GYD 209.249425
HKD 7.83925
HNL 26.88504
HRK 6.600504
HTG 130.910459
HUF 311.790388
IDR 18080.55
ILS 3.010904
IMP 0.745889
INR 95.53215
IQD 1309.5
IRR 1374750.000352
ISK 125.640386
JEP 0.745889
JMD 158.048994
JOD 0.70904
JPY 161.67604
KES 129.203801
KGS 87.448804
KHR 4007.503796
KMF 432.00035
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1499.070383
KWD 0.30956
KYD 0.833548
KZT 471.568117
LAK 22558.503779
LBP 89550.000349
LKR 335.597832
LRD 181.503772
LSL 16.315039
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.405039
MAD 9.345039
MDL 17.579053
MGA 4295.000347
MKD 53.998301
MMK 2099.308371
MNT 3585.696251
MOP 8.076444
MRU 40.060379
MUR 47.080378
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1737.000345
MXN 17.468104
MYR 4.070377
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.320377
NGN 1377.920377
NIO 36.660377
NOK 9.782604
NPR 152.453273
NZD 1.735208
OMR 0.384819
PAB 1.000262
PEN 3.392504
PGK 4.380375
PHP 61.447038
PKR 278.150374
PLN 3.79005
PYG 6081.391432
QAR 3.643504
RON 4.587104
RSD 102.723038
RUB 77.024822
RWF 1465
SAR 3.753865
SBD 8.048583
SCR 14.724861
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.714225
SGD 1.292904
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.350371
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.503662
SRD 37.610504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.65
SVC 8.752483
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.320369
THB 33.288038
TJS 9.257824
TMT 3.5
TND 2.957504
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.984504
TTD 6.79618
TWD 32.113504
TZS 2630.003038
UAH 44.5007
UGX 3680.71322
UYU 40.332811
UZS 12027.503617
VES 708.806404
VND 26267.5
VUV 120.437365
WST 2.769308
XAF 573.893149
XAG 0.016727
XAU 0.000243
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802808
XDR 0.713149
XOF 573.000332
XPF 104.875037
YER 237.075037
ZAR 16.455565
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.030621
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0650

    22.085

    +0.29%

  • CMSD

    0.0700

    22.38

    +0.31%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.01

    -0.15%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    21.38

    +0.28%

  • GSK

    0.3100

    52.78

    +0.59%

  • BCC

    3.8200

    76.06

    +5.02%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    82.59

    +0.33%

  • RIO

    1.0500

    90.54

    +1.16%

  • RYCEF

    0.3800

    19.46

    +1.95%

  • RBGPF

    0.3500

    67.35

    +0.52%

  • BTI

    -0.0151

    60.02

    -0.03%

  • RELX

    0.3700

    32.44

    +1.14%

  • BP

    0.6500

    39.2

    +1.66%

  • AZN

    -6.8800

    171.61

    -4.01%

  • VOD

    1.6400

    14.72

    +11.14%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.