The Fort Worth Press - China’s profitless push

USD -
AED 3.67325
AFN 62.999762
ALL 83.000036
AMD 377.497895
ANG 1.790083
AOA 917.000245
ARS 1395.024201
AUD 1.410517
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.705074
BAM 1.704371
BBD 2.014946
BDT 122.754882
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.377549
BIF 2970
BMD 1
BND 1.283525
BOB 6.913501
BRL 5.222398
BSD 1.000436
BTN 93.206388
BWP 13.651833
BYN 3.093542
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012088
CAD 1.37365
CDF 2275.000229
CHF 0.788201
CLF 0.023113
CLP 912.630163
CNY 6.90045
CNH 6.879945
COP 3694.49
CRC 468.079358
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.050199
CZK 21.129799
DJF 177.720433
DKK 6.44712
DOP 58.824981
DZD 132.250059
EGP 52.230699
ERN 15
ETB 157.178124
EUR 0.8627
FJD 2.207602
FKP 0.750673
GBP 0.74438
GEL 2.715001
GGP 0.750673
GHS 10.904939
GIP 0.750673
GMD 73.999737
GNF 8777.520298
GTQ 7.652926
GYD 209.305771
HKD 7.83415
HNL 26.569408
HRK 6.501702
HTG 131.227832
HUF 337.265023
IDR 16879.25
ILS 3.12734
IMP 0.750673
INR 93.11955
IQD 1310
IRR 1315124.999983
ISK 124.090259
JEP 0.750673
JMD 157.168937
JOD 0.708977
JPY 157.726002
KES 129.597209
KGS 87.447894
KHR 4010.000131
KMF 428.000281
KPW 899.987979
KRW 1490.860217
KWD 0.30618
KYD 0.833751
KZT 481.121429
LAK 21475.000295
LBP 89549.999965
LKR 311.846652
LRD 183.403468
LSL 16.830535
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.380059
MAD 9.35875
MDL 17.532561
MGA 4164.999945
MKD 53.364671
MMK 2099.739449
MNT 3585.842291
MOP 8.07209
MRU 40.109918
MUR 46.504975
MVR 15.450384
MWK 1736.999889
MXN 17.720499
MYR 3.939032
MZN 63.897936
NAD 16.830128
NGN 1357.499912
NIO 36.719703
NOK 9.483896
NPR 149.125498
NZD 1.700598
OMR 0.384509
PAB 1.000471
PEN 3.454498
PGK 4.30206
PHP 59.035961
PKR 279.149821
PLN 3.68307
PYG 6500.777741
QAR 3.644599
RON 4.396012
RSD 101.351007
RUB 86.153448
RWF 1459
SAR 3.754419
SBD 8.048583
SCR 15.185997
SDG 600.999576
SEK 9.290701
SGD 1.277602
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.650213
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 571.501827
SRD 37.501992
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.5
SVC 8.753927
SYP 110.528765
SZL 16.829774
THB 32.459803
TJS 9.579415
TMT 3.5
TND 2.91125
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.275902
TTD 6.781035
TWD 31.791502
TZS 2597.497632
UAH 43.994632
UGX 3781.362476
UYU 40.523406
UZS 12195.000296
VES 454.68563
VND 26290
VUV 119.408419
WST 2.73222
XAF 571.660014
XAG 0.013727
XAU 0.000215
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803034
XDR 0.710959
XOF 571.50261
XPF 103.578349
YER 238.549896
ZAR 16.747503
ZMK 9001.201274
ZMW 19.584125
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • CMSC

    0.0200

    22.85

    +0.09%

  • BCE

    -0.0200

    25.73

    -0.08%

  • BTI

    0.6300

    58.72

    +1.07%

  • NGG

    -1.8700

    85.53

    -2.19%

  • AZN

    0.5100

    188.93

    +0.27%

  • BP

    1.2500

    45.86

    +2.73%

  • RIO

    -2.0700

    85.65

    -2.42%

  • GSK

    0.3100

    52.37

    +0.59%

  • RYCEF

    -0.5900

    16.01

    -3.69%

  • RELX

    -0.0400

    33.82

    -0.12%

  • BCC

    -1.9800

    69.86

    -2.83%

  • JRI

    -0.1630

    12.16

    -1.34%

  • VOD

    0.0500

    14.42

    +0.35%

  • CMSD

    0.0100

    22.9

    +0.04%


China’s profitless push




Can we keep up? Chinese companies are sacrificing margins—sometimes incurring outright losses—to win global market share in strategic industries from electric vehicles and batteries to solar and consumer tech. The tactic is turbocharging exports, pressuring Western competitors and forcing policymakers in Europe and the United States to erect new defenses while they scramble to lower costs at home.

Electric vehicles: a race to the bottom on price. In late spring 2025, China’s largest carmakers unleashed another round of steep price cuts, with entry-level models reduced to mass-market price points. Regulators in Beijing have since urged manufacturers to rein in the bruising price war, citing risks to industry health and employment. Yet the incentives keep coming as dozens of brands fight for share in the world’s most competitive EV market. The financial fallout is visible: leading pure-play EV makers continue to post substantial quarterly losses, while ambitious new entrants have acknowledged that their car divisions remain in the red even as sales surge.

Green tech: overcapacity meets collapsing margins. China’s build-out in solar has morphed from a growth engine into a profitability trap. Module and polysilicon prices have fallen so far that key manufacturers forecast sizeable half-year losses, and producers are now discussing a coordinated effort to shutter older capacity. Industry reports describe spot prices for feedstocks dipping below production costs, a hallmark of cut-throat competition that spills over into export markets and undercuts rivals globally.

Trade blowback intensifies. The U.S. has moved to quadruple tariffs on Chinese-made EVs and lift duties on batteries, chips and solar cells. The European Union has imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric cars and opened additional probes across green-tech supply chains. Brussels and Beijing have even explored minimum export prices to reduce undercutting—an extraordinary step that underscores how acute the pricing pressure has become.

Deflation at the factory gate. China’s factory-gate prices remain in negative territory year on year, reflecting slack domestic demand and excess capacity. That weakness transmits abroad via cheaper exports, squeezing margins for manufacturers elsewhere and complicating central banks’ inflation-fighting calculus. Beijing has rolled out an “anti-involution” campaign to curb ruinous discounting and steer investment toward “high-quality growth,” but implementation is uneven and local governments still depend on industrial output to stabilize employment.

Scale, speed—and logistics. Chinese champions are not only cutting prices; they are redesigning logistics to keep them low. One leading EV maker has built its own fleet of car carriers and is localizing production via overseas factories to sidestep tariffs and port bottlenecks. Such vertical integration magnifies the advantage from sprawling domestic supply chains in batteries, motors and power electronics.

What this means for Western competitors. The immediate effect is a margin squeeze across autos, solar and adjacent sectors. The strategic response taking shape in Europe and the U.S. is three-pronged: (1) trade defense to buy time; (2) industrial policy to catalyze domestic gigafactories and clean-tech manufacturing; and (3) consolidation to rebuild pricing power. Companies that cannot match China’s cost curve will need to differentiate—through software, design, brand and service—or partner to gain scale. Even in China, the current “profitless prosperity” looks unsustainable: consolidation is inevitable, and state guidance now favors capacity rationalization over raw volume.

The bottom line. China’s price-first strategy is remaking global competition. Whether others can keep up will hinge on how quickly they can de-risk supply chains, compress costs and innovate without hollowing out profitability. For now, the contest is being fought as much on balance sheets as it is on assembly lines.