The Fort Worth Press - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 65.503991
ALL 82.770403
AMD 381.503986
ANG 1.790055
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1434.000104
AUD 1.506058
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.678705
BBD 2.013364
BDT 122.282772
BGN 1.67998
BHD 0.376983
BIF 2967
BMD 1
BND 1.294944
BOB 6.907739
BRL 5.447304
BSD 0.999601
BTN 89.876145
BWP 13.280747
BYN 2.873917
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010437
CAD 1.382815
CDF 2232.000362
CHF 0.804205
CLF 0.0235
CLP 921.880396
CNY 7.070104
CNH 7.070055
COP 3838
CRC 488.298936
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.103894
CZK 20.780304
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.41404
DOP 64.250393
DZD 129.961958
EGP 47.566304
ERN 15
ETB 155.150392
EUR 0.858604
FJD 2.261504
FKP 0.748861
GBP 0.74994
GEL 2.69504
GGP 0.748861
GHS 11.45039
GIP 0.748861
GMD 73.000355
GNF 8687.503848
GTQ 7.657084
GYD 209.137648
HKD 7.78425
HNL 26.280388
HRK 6.471604
HTG 130.859652
HUF 328.203831
IDR 16689
ILS 3.23571
IMP 0.748861
INR 89.95455
IQD 1310
IRR 42112.503816
ISK 127.950386
JEP 0.748861
JMD 159.999657
JOD 0.70904
JPY 155.312504
KES 129.303801
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4005.00035
KMF 422.00035
KPW 899.993191
KRW 1473.603789
KWD 0.30695
KYD 0.833083
KZT 505.531856
LAK 21690.000349
LBP 89550.000349
LKR 308.334728
LRD 176.903772
LSL 16.950381
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.450381
MAD 9.236504
MDL 17.00842
MGA 4487.000347
MKD 52.906919
MMK 2099.939583
MNT 3546.502114
MOP 8.016033
MRU 39.860379
MUR 46.103741
MVR 15.403739
MWK 1737.000345
MXN 18.177904
MYR 4.111039
MZN 63.910377
NAD 16.950377
NGN 1450.210377
NIO 36.775039
NOK 10.106715
NPR 143.802277
NZD 1.731555
OMR 0.384496
PAB 0.999682
PEN 3.517504
PGK 4.187504
PHP 58.964504
PKR 280.375038
PLN 3.63271
PYG 6875.152888
QAR 3.64105
RON 4.372704
RSD 100.815038
RUB 76.500052
RWF 1451
SAR 3.753173
SBD 8.230592
SCR 13.975382
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.403415
SGD 1.29571
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.703667
SLL 20969.498139
SOS 571.503662
SRD 38.629038
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.4
SVC 8.745763
SYP 11058.244165
SZL 16.950369
THB 31.880369
TJS 9.171638
TMT 3.51
TND 2.95125
TOP 2.40776
TRY 42.528604
TTD 6.776446
TWD 31.281038
TZS 2435.000335
UAH 41.959408
UGX 3536.283383
UYU 39.096531
UZS 12005.000334
VES 254.551935
VND 26360
VUV 122.070109
WST 2.790151
XAF 563.019389
XAG 0.017116
XAU 0.000238
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801608
XDR 0.70002
XOF 562.503593
XPF 102.875037
YER 238.550363
ZAR 16.93737
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 23.111058
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    78.35

    0%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    23.43

    -0.21%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1600

    14.49

    -1.1%

  • GSK

    -0.1600

    48.41

    -0.33%

  • SCS

    -0.0900

    16.14

    -0.56%

  • RELX

    -0.2200

    40.32

    -0.55%

  • NGG

    -0.5000

    75.41

    -0.66%

  • CMSD

    -0.0700

    23.25

    -0.3%

  • VOD

    -0.1630

    12.47

    -1.31%

  • RIO

    -0.6700

    73.06

    -0.92%

  • BTI

    -1.0300

    57.01

    -1.81%

  • JRI

    0.0400

    13.79

    +0.29%

  • BCE

    0.3300

    23.55

    +1.4%

  • BCC

    -1.2100

    73.05

    -1.66%

  • AZN

    0.1500

    90.18

    +0.17%

  • BP

    -1.4000

    35.83

    -3.91%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.