The Fort Worth Press - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.6725
AFN 65.497294
ALL 79.163542
AMD 364.819005
ANG 1.789783
AOA 918.000211
ARS 1509.519425
AUD 1.398993
AWG 1.795
AZN 1.695737
BAM 1.676086
BBD 2.013404
BDT 122.75417
BGN 1.696366
BHD 0.37692
BIF 2981.509652
BMD 1
BND 1.27037
BOB 11.500754
BRL 5.1567
BSD 0.999636
BTN 95.661079
BWP 13.394468
BYN 2.995445
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01049
CAD 1.38628
CDF 2277.498917
CHF 0.803755
CLF 0.023206
CLP 913.329736
CNY 6.72215
CNH 6.722575
COP 3067.59
CRC 452.93853
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.495578
CZK 20.67145
DJF 178.005356
DKK 6.41443
DOP 58.792021
DZD 133.087965
EGP 50.7903
ERN 15
ETB 163.294924
EUR 0.858097
FJD 2.216401
FKP 0.733696
GBP 0.734055
GEL 2.605046
GGP 0.733696
GHS 11.121109
GIP 0.733696
GMD 74.000474
GNF 8783.665074
GTQ 7.628034
GYD 209.1389
HKD 7.839495
HNL 26.810361
HRK 6.46498
HTG 130.776087
HUF 311.344976
IDR 17737.45
ILS 3.001702
IMP 0.733696
INR 95.705795
IQD 1309.560538
IRR 1374575.000171
ISK 121.000347
JEP 0.733696
JMD 158.148902
JOD 0.709032
JPY 159.312502
KES 129.380164
KGS 87.45011
KHR 4045.831619
KMF 422.999572
KPW 900.000294
KRW 1384.494976
KWD 0.308511
KYD 0.832994
KZT 457.315479
LAK 22458.179076
LBP 89525.413415
LKR 328.799877
LRD 181.432538
LSL 16.021613
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.331441
MAD 9.272333
MDL 17.273561
MGA 4303.987316
MKD 52.725847
MMK 2099.770766
MNT 3596.537388
MOP 8.068268
MRU 40.02314
MUR 46.770286
MVR 15.460235
MWK 1733.421893
MXN 16.94965
MYR 4.044098
MZN 63.905013
NAD 16.021682
NGN 1347.359882
NIO 36.790258
NOK 9.31419
NPR 153.055759
NZD 1.679712
OMR 0.384502
PAB 0.999589
PEN 3.356115
PGK 4.498262
PHP 61.69401
PKR 277.382812
PLN 3.69477
PYG 6007.730346
QAR 3.643991
RON 4.507401
RSD 100.649003
RUB 83.852524
RWF 1473.422603
SAR 3.751891
SBD 8.019375
SCR 13.735493
SDG 601.493911
SEK 9.503805
SGD 1.27103
SHP 0.740866
SLE 24.649742
SLL 20969.499227
SOS 571.269416
SRD 37.771498
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.995891
SVC 8.746438
SYP 13001.999906
SZL 16.016969
THB 32.746503
TJS 9.236511
TMT 3.51
TND 2.910753
TOP 2.40776
TRY 48.099103
TTD 6.786502
TWD 31.885499
TZS 2649.998015
UAH 44.714932
UGX 3723.604827
UYU 40.064103
UZS 11815.268065
VES 783.68245
VND 26125
VUV 118.301391
WST 2.715944
XAF 562.148473
XAG 0.014653
XAU 0.000215
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801564
XDR 0.707052
XOF 562.148473
XPF 102.204168
YER 237.103241
ZAR 16.01686
ZMK 9001.203248
ZMW 18.968487
ZWL 321.999592
  • BTI

    0.5000

    56.71

    +0.88%

  • AZN

    0.7300

    166.71

    +0.44%

  • RBGPF

    2.5700

    71.13

    +3.61%

  • CMSC

    0.1264

    21.228

    +0.6%

  • BCE

    0.1400

    23.85

    +0.59%

  • CMSD

    0.0800

    21.06

    +0.38%

  • GSK

    -0.6300

    51.78

    -1.22%

  • BCC

    -0.2300

    82.24

    -0.28%

  • NGG

    0.6600

    80.42

    +0.82%

  • RIO

    -0.5000

    104.8

    -0.48%

  • RYCEF

    0.1900

    20.44

    +0.93%

  • VOD

    0.0200

    15.98

    +0.13%

  • RELX

    0.4800

    36.39

    +1.32%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    12.37

    -0.08%

  • BP

    -1.0200

    43.74

    -2.33%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.