The Fort Worth Press - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 66.374624
ALL 82.891062
AMD 382.105484
ANG 1.790055
AOA 917.000062
ARS 1446.012497
AUD 1.507159
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.696321
BAM 1.678236
BBD 2.018646
BDT 122.628476
BGN 1.678799
BHD 0.377004
BIF 2961.256275
BMD 1
BND 1.297979
BOB 6.925579
BRL 5.308276
BSD 1.002244
BTN 90.032049
BWP 13.315657
BYN 2.90153
BYR 19600
BZD 2.015729
CAD 1.39434
CDF 2229.999722
CHF 0.803265
CLF 0.023388
CLP 917.48999
CNY 7.07165
CNH 7.06845
COP 3796.99
CRC 491.421364
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.616395
CZK 20.780297
DJF 178.481789
DKK 6.41071
DOP 63.686561
DZD 130.095982
EGP 47.573803
ERN 15
ETB 156.280403
EUR 0.85834
FJD 2.25895
FKP 0.748861
GBP 0.749415
GEL 2.702791
GGP 0.748861
GHS 11.416779
GIP 0.748861
GMD 73.000197
GNF 8709.00892
GTQ 7.677291
GYD 209.68946
HKD 7.78486
HNL 26.389336
HRK 6.469717
HTG 131.282447
HUF 327.824502
IDR 16672.15
ILS 3.227675
IMP 0.748861
INR 89.943497
IQD 1312.956662
IRR 42125.000154
ISK 127.891881
JEP 0.748861
JMD 160.623651
JOD 0.708935
JPY 155.116016
KES 129.350006
KGS 87.450106
KHR 4014.227424
KMF 422.000183
KPW 899.993191
KRW 1472.790097
KWD 0.30692
KYD 0.83526
KZT 506.587952
LAK 21742.171042
LBP 89752.828464
LKR 309.374155
LRD 176.902912
LSL 17.013777
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.447985
MAD 9.247548
MDL 17.048443
MGA 4457.716053
MKD 52.892165
MMK 2099.939583
MNT 3546.502114
MOP 8.035628
MRU 39.710999
MUR 46.070021
MVR 15.410227
MWK 1737.95151
MXN 18.18323
MYR 4.110977
MZN 63.897632
NAD 17.013777
NGN 1451.00023
NIO 36.881624
NOK 10.10595
NPR 144.049872
NZD 1.731465
OMR 0.384521
PAB 1.002325
PEN 3.37046
PGK 4.251065
PHP 59.062503
PKR 283.139992
PLN 3.631096
PYG 6950.492756
QAR 3.663323
RON 4.372698
RSD 100.76903
RUB 76.754244
RWF 1458.303837
SAR 3.753032
SBD 8.223823
SCR 13.591833
SDG 601.506379
SEK 9.409525
SGD 1.295095
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.000169
SLL 20969.498139
SOS 571.823287
SRD 38.643499
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.023817
SVC 8.769634
SYP 11058.244165
SZL 17.008825
THB 31.850427
TJS 9.210862
TMT 3.5
TND 2.941946
TOP 2.40776
TRY 42.51338
TTD 6.795179
TWD 31.288803
TZS 2440.000231
UAH 42.259148
UGX 3553.316915
UYU 39.265994
UZS 11939.350775
VES 248.585899
VND 26360
VUV 122.070109
WST 2.790151
XAF 562.862377
XAG 0.017179
XAU 0.000237
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.806356
XDR 0.70002
XOF 562.867207
XPF 102.334841
YER 238.40123
ZAR 16.92185
ZMK 9001.199161
ZMW 23.026725
ZWL 321.999592
  • RYCEF

    0.0500

    14.7

    +0.34%

  • BCC

    -0.4900

    73.77

    -0.66%

  • NGG

    0.0500

    75.96

    +0.07%

  • RIO

    -0.0750

    73.655

    -0.1%

  • CMSD

    0.0200

    23.34

    +0.09%

  • RELX

    0.1600

    40.7

    +0.39%

  • GSK

    -0.2400

    48.33

    -0.5%

  • VOD

    -0.1620

    12.471

    -1.3%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    78.35

    0%

  • BTI

    -0.8650

    57.175

    -1.51%

  • AZN

    0.9500

    90.98

    +1.04%

  • SCS

    -0.0400

    16.19

    -0.25%

  • BCE

    0.1930

    23.413

    +0.82%

  • JRI

    0.0330

    13.783

    +0.24%

  • CMSC

    -0.0450

    23.43

    -0.19%

  • BP

    -0.6050

    36.625

    -1.65%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.