The Fort Worth Press - China’s profitless push

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 65.000368
ALL 82.050403
AMD 367.380403
ANG 1.790403
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1487.484504
AUD 1.438342
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.711104
BBD 2.014725
BDT 123.291207
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.37707
BIF 2985
BMD 1
BND 1.291257
BOB 6.923833
BRL 5.122804
BSD 1.000276
BTN 95.289131
BWP 13.527665
BYN 2.859418
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011811
CAD 1.414715
CDF 2258.000362
CHF 0.80843
CLF 0.023501
CLP 924.910396
CNY 6.77695
CNH 6.781985
COP 3253.1
CRC 455.032612
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.903894
CZK 21.237604
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.547704
DOP 58.703884
DZD 133.20304
EGP 49.611604
ERN 15
ETB 159.37504
EUR 0.87595
FJD 2.232704
FKP 0.745889
GBP 0.74635
GEL 2.640391
GGP 0.745889
GHS 11.46504
GIP 0.745889
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8777.503848
GTQ 7.632579
GYD 209.249425
HKD 7.840655
HNL 26.87504
HRK 6.598304
HTG 130.910459
HUF 311.66704
IDR 18067.2
ILS 3.010904
IMP 0.745889
INR 95.412304
IQD 1310.5
IRR 1374750.000352
ISK 125.603814
JEP 0.745889
JMD 158.048994
JOD 0.70904
JPY 161.692504
KES 129.220385
KGS 87.448804
KHR 4010.00035
KMF 431.00035
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1501.390383
KWD 0.30956
KYD 0.833548
KZT 471.568117
LAK 22550.000349
LBP 89550.000349
LKR 335.597832
LRD 181.625039
LSL 16.320381
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.405039
MAD 9.355039
MDL 17.579053
MGA 4295.000347
MKD 53.985522
MMK 2099.308371
MNT 3585.696251
MOP 8.076444
MRU 40.075039
MUR 47.150378
MVR 15.460378
MWK 1736.000345
MXN 17.480775
MYR 4.073904
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.320377
NGN 1378.410377
NIO 36.655039
NOK 9.780376
NPR 152.453273
NZD 1.734955
OMR 0.384484
PAB 1.000262
PEN 3.401039
PGK 4.37975
PHP 61.550504
PKR 278.175038
PLN 3.79105
PYG 6081.391432
QAR 3.646704
RON 4.584404
RSD 102.790373
RUB 77.000311
RWF 1466.5
SAR 3.753815
SBD 8.065041
SCR 14.724861
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.66049
SGD 1.291704
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.350371
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.503662
SRD 37.610504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.6
SVC 8.752483
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.330369
THB 33.302504
TJS 9.257824
TMT 3.51
TND 2.94375
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.983104
TTD 6.79618
TWD 32.120304
TZS 2630.003038
UAH 44.5007
UGX 3680.71322
UYU 40.332811
UZS 12015.000334
VES 699.349604
VND 26267.5
VUV 120.437365
WST 2.769308
XAF 573.893149
XAG 0.01678
XAU 0.000244
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802808
XDR 0.713149
XOF 572.503593
XPF 104.825037
YER 237.103589
ZAR 16.316204
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.030621
ZWL 321.999592
  • BCC

    3.8200

    76.06

    +5.02%

  • CMSC

    0.0650

    22.085

    +0.29%

  • GSK

    0.3100

    52.78

    +0.59%

  • RBGPF

    5.8500

    67.35

    +8.69%

  • RIO

    1.0500

    90.54

    +1.16%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    21.38

    +0.28%

  • BTI

    -0.0151

    60.02

    -0.03%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    82.59

    +0.33%

  • BP

    0.6500

    39.2

    +1.66%

  • AZN

    -6.8800

    171.61

    -4.01%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.01

    -0.15%

  • RYCEF

    0.0000

    19.25

    0%

  • CMSD

    0.0700

    22.38

    +0.31%

  • RELX

    0.3700

    32.44

    +1.14%

  • VOD

    1.6400

    14.72

    +11.14%


China’s profitless push




Can we keep up? Chinese companies are sacrificing margins—sometimes incurring outright losses—to win global market share in strategic industries from electric vehicles and batteries to solar and consumer tech. The tactic is turbocharging exports, pressuring Western competitors and forcing policymakers in Europe and the United States to erect new defenses while they scramble to lower costs at home.

Electric vehicles: a race to the bottom on price. In late spring 2025, China’s largest carmakers unleashed another round of steep price cuts, with entry-level models reduced to mass-market price points. Regulators in Beijing have since urged manufacturers to rein in the bruising price war, citing risks to industry health and employment. Yet the incentives keep coming as dozens of brands fight for share in the world’s most competitive EV market. The financial fallout is visible: leading pure-play EV makers continue to post substantial quarterly losses, while ambitious new entrants have acknowledged that their car divisions remain in the red even as sales surge.

Green tech: overcapacity meets collapsing margins. China’s build-out in solar has morphed from a growth engine into a profitability trap. Module and polysilicon prices have fallen so far that key manufacturers forecast sizeable half-year losses, and producers are now discussing a coordinated effort to shutter older capacity. Industry reports describe spot prices for feedstocks dipping below production costs, a hallmark of cut-throat competition that spills over into export markets and undercuts rivals globally.

Trade blowback intensifies. The U.S. has moved to quadruple tariffs on Chinese-made EVs and lift duties on batteries, chips and solar cells. The European Union has imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric cars and opened additional probes across green-tech supply chains. Brussels and Beijing have even explored minimum export prices to reduce undercutting—an extraordinary step that underscores how acute the pricing pressure has become.

Deflation at the factory gate. China’s factory-gate prices remain in negative territory year on year, reflecting slack domestic demand and excess capacity. That weakness transmits abroad via cheaper exports, squeezing margins for manufacturers elsewhere and complicating central banks’ inflation-fighting calculus. Beijing has rolled out an “anti-involution” campaign to curb ruinous discounting and steer investment toward “high-quality growth,” but implementation is uneven and local governments still depend on industrial output to stabilize employment.

Scale, speed—and logistics. Chinese champions are not only cutting prices; they are redesigning logistics to keep them low. One leading EV maker has built its own fleet of car carriers and is localizing production via overseas factories to sidestep tariffs and port bottlenecks. Such vertical integration magnifies the advantage from sprawling domestic supply chains in batteries, motors and power electronics.

What this means for Western competitors. The immediate effect is a margin squeeze across autos, solar and adjacent sectors. The strategic response taking shape in Europe and the U.S. is three-pronged: (1) trade defense to buy time; (2) industrial policy to catalyze domestic gigafactories and clean-tech manufacturing; and (3) consolidation to rebuild pricing power. Companies that cannot match China’s cost curve will need to differentiate—through software, design, brand and service—or partner to gain scale. Even in China, the current “profitless prosperity” looks unsustainable: consolidation is inevitable, and state guidance now favors capacity rationalization over raw volume.

The bottom line. China’s price-first strategy is remaking global competition. Whether others can keep up will hinge on how quickly they can de-risk supply chains, compress costs and innovate without hollowing out profitability. For now, the contest is being fought as much on balance sheets as it is on assembly lines.