The Fort Worth Press - China’s profitless push

USD -
AED 3.6725
AFN 65.492219
ALL 79.409524
AMD 365.380019
ANG 1.789783
AOA 917.999689
ARS 1509.503985
AUD 1.39763
AWG 1.795
AZN 1.698708
BAM 1.676719
BBD 2.014017
BDT 122.800475
BGN 1.696366
BHD 0.37695
BIF 2990
BMD 1
BND 1.270784
BOB 11.504747
BRL 5.155903
BSD 0.999936
BTN 95.694293
BWP 13.398831
BYN 2.996369
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011102
CAD 1.38455
CDF 2277.508288
CHF 0.802345
CLF 0.023202
CLP 913.169782
CNY 6.72215
CNH 6.719665
COP 3065.45
CRC 453.074434
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.774993
CZK 20.651998
DJF 177.720262
DKK 6.406175
DOP 58.335037
DZD 133.026019
EGP 50.808546
ERN 15
ETB 160.498945
EUR 0.85696
FJD 2.216398
FKP 0.732895
GBP 0.733195
GEL 2.604958
GGP 0.732895
GHS 11.175019
GIP 0.732895
GMD 74.000192
GNF 8777.518268
GTQ 7.630878
GYD 209.211513
HKD 7.83604
HNL 26.880236
HRK 6.456301
HTG 130.821492
HUF 310.99975
IDR 17724.95
ILS 3.001503
IMP 0.732895
INR 95.73645
IQD 1310
IRR 1374574.999769
ISK 120.830082
JEP 0.732895
JMD 158.207202
JOD 0.709028
JPY 159.134497
KES 129.420022
KGS 87.450052
KHR 4042.498917
KMF 422.999699
KPW 900.000294
KRW 1380.260233
KWD 0.30858
KYD 0.833301
KZT 457.472299
LAK 22450.000014
LBP 89549.999929
LKR 328.922495
LRD 181.650266
LSL 16.03975
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.325012
MAD 9.255037
MDL 17.279855
MGA 4324.999885
MKD 52.744379
MMK 2099.738633
MNT 3594.266195
MOP 8.071276
MRU 40.101522
MUR 46.479886
MVR 15.460195
MWK 1737.000051
MXN 16.94731
MYR 4.041098
MZN 63.905004
NAD 16.040332
NGN 1347.270146
NIO 36.697759
NOK 9.307415
NPR 153.114806
NZD 1.67649
OMR 0.384497
PAB 0.999936
PEN 3.353502
PGK 4.416504
PHP 61.693497
PKR 277.624982
PLN 3.692025
PYG 6009.713274
QAR 3.644506
RON 4.501497
RSD 100.524997
RUB 83.852864
RWF 1470
SAR 3.758391
SBD 8.019375
SCR 13.837815
SDG 601.499359
SEK 9.492175
SGD 1.269765
SHP 0.740866
SLE 24.6499
SLL 20969.499227
SOS 571.498675
SRD 37.771499
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.35
SVC 8.749662
SYP 13001.999906
SZL 16.030031
THB 32.68304
TJS 9.239956
TMT 3.51
TND 2.901501
TOP 2.40776
TRY 48.095025
TTD 6.78883
TWD 31.825897
TZS 2649.998
UAH 44.729499
UGX 3724.993463
UYU 40.079044
UZS 11844.999565
VES 783.68245
VND 26173.5
VUV 118.52355
WST 2.715906
XAF 562.341242
XAG 0.014379
XAU 0.000214
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802228
XDR 0.707052
XOF 564.999831
XPF 102.601845
YER 237.096569
ZAR 16.00648
ZMK 9001.206428
ZMW 18.97426
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    2.5700

    71.13

    +3.61%

  • CMSD

    0.0800

    21.06

    +0.38%

  • CMSC

    0.1264

    21.228

    +0.6%

  • NGG

    0.6600

    80.42

    +0.82%

  • AZN

    0.7300

    166.71

    +0.44%

  • GSK

    -0.6300

    51.78

    -1.22%

  • BP

    -1.0200

    43.74

    -2.33%

  • BCE

    0.1400

    23.85

    +0.59%

  • BTI

    0.5000

    56.71

    +0.88%

  • RIO

    -0.5000

    104.8

    -0.48%

  • RYCEF

    0.1900

    20.44

    +0.93%

  • RELX

    0.4800

    36.39

    +1.32%

  • BCC

    -0.2300

    82.24

    -0.28%

  • VOD

    0.0200

    15.98

    +0.13%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    12.37

    -0.08%


China’s profitless push




Can we keep up? Chinese companies are sacrificing margins—sometimes incurring outright losses—to win global market share in strategic industries from electric vehicles and batteries to solar and consumer tech. The tactic is turbocharging exports, pressuring Western competitors and forcing policymakers in Europe and the United States to erect new defenses while they scramble to lower costs at home.

Electric vehicles: a race to the bottom on price. In late spring 2025, China’s largest carmakers unleashed another round of steep price cuts, with entry-level models reduced to mass-market price points. Regulators in Beijing have since urged manufacturers to rein in the bruising price war, citing risks to industry health and employment. Yet the incentives keep coming as dozens of brands fight for share in the world’s most competitive EV market. The financial fallout is visible: leading pure-play EV makers continue to post substantial quarterly losses, while ambitious new entrants have acknowledged that their car divisions remain in the red even as sales surge.

Green tech: overcapacity meets collapsing margins. China’s build-out in solar has morphed from a growth engine into a profitability trap. Module and polysilicon prices have fallen so far that key manufacturers forecast sizeable half-year losses, and producers are now discussing a coordinated effort to shutter older capacity. Industry reports describe spot prices for feedstocks dipping below production costs, a hallmark of cut-throat competition that spills over into export markets and undercuts rivals globally.

Trade blowback intensifies. The U.S. has moved to quadruple tariffs on Chinese-made EVs and lift duties on batteries, chips and solar cells. The European Union has imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric cars and opened additional probes across green-tech supply chains. Brussels and Beijing have even explored minimum export prices to reduce undercutting—an extraordinary step that underscores how acute the pricing pressure has become.

Deflation at the factory gate. China’s factory-gate prices remain in negative territory year on year, reflecting slack domestic demand and excess capacity. That weakness transmits abroad via cheaper exports, squeezing margins for manufacturers elsewhere and complicating central banks’ inflation-fighting calculus. Beijing has rolled out an “anti-involution” campaign to curb ruinous discounting and steer investment toward “high-quality growth,” but implementation is uneven and local governments still depend on industrial output to stabilize employment.

Scale, speed—and logistics. Chinese champions are not only cutting prices; they are redesigning logistics to keep them low. One leading EV maker has built its own fleet of car carriers and is localizing production via overseas factories to sidestep tariffs and port bottlenecks. Such vertical integration magnifies the advantage from sprawling domestic supply chains in batteries, motors and power electronics.

What this means for Western competitors. The immediate effect is a margin squeeze across autos, solar and adjacent sectors. The strategic response taking shape in Europe and the U.S. is three-pronged: (1) trade defense to buy time; (2) industrial policy to catalyze domestic gigafactories and clean-tech manufacturing; and (3) consolidation to rebuild pricing power. Companies that cannot match China’s cost curve will need to differentiate—through software, design, brand and service—or partner to gain scale. Even in China, the current “profitless prosperity” looks unsustainable: consolidation is inevitable, and state guidance now favors capacity rationalization over raw volume.

The bottom line. China’s price-first strategy is remaking global competition. Whether others can keep up will hinge on how quickly they can de-risk supply chains, compress costs and innovate without hollowing out profitability. For now, the contest is being fought as much on balance sheets as it is on assembly lines.