The Fort Worth Press - China’s profitless push

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 63.999978
ALL 83.571528
AMD 379.306739
ANG 1.790083
AOA 917.000543
ARS 1394.5488
AUD 1.42107
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.702826
BAM 1.70403
BBD 2.026631
BDT 123.441516
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.377535
BIF 2983.464413
BMD 1
BND 1.284852
BOB 6.95265
BRL 5.249899
BSD 1.006257
BTN 93.307018
BWP 13.64595
BYN 3.067036
BYR 19600
BZD 2.023756
CAD 1.37275
CDF 2269.999671
CHF 0.792795
CLF 0.023189
CLP 915.63033
CNY 6.87305
CNH 6.902925
COP 3708.35
CRC 469.967975
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.081456
CZK 21.329798
DJF 179.186419
DKK 6.51722
DOP 60.835276
DZD 132.611748
EGP 52.238599
ERN 15
ETB 157.116838
EUR 0.87214
FJD 2.218798
FKP 0.749449
GBP 0.753801
GEL 2.71498
GGP 0.749449
GHS 10.968788
GIP 0.749449
GMD 73.99993
GNF 8818.979979
GTQ 7.707255
GYD 210.505219
HKD 7.83798
HNL 26.6321
HRK 6.568969
HTG 131.875123
HUF 343.11898
IDR 16996
ILS 3.114899
IMP 0.749449
INR 93.36525
IQD 1318.032101
IRR 1314999.999943
ISK 124.89907
JEP 0.749449
JMD 157.992201
JOD 0.709053
JPY 159.738969
KES 129.602799
KGS 87.449671
KHR 4029.54184
KMF 427.999977
KPW 899.9784
KRW 1500.204982
KWD 0.30682
KYD 0.838475
KZT 485.403559
LAK 21591.404221
LBP 90120.825254
LKR 313.313697
LRD 184.128893
LSL 16.795929
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.420803
MAD 9.415922
MDL 17.543921
MGA 4190.776631
MKD 53.767521
MMK 2100.10344
MNT 3571.101739
MOP 8.123072
MRU 40.161217
MUR 46.510185
MVR 15.460116
MWK 1744.806191
MXN 17.81945
MYR 3.937986
MZN 63.899385
NAD 16.795929
NGN 1363.679914
NIO 37.027516
NOK 9.593355
NPR 149.303937
NZD 1.71947
OMR 0.384501
PAB 1.006169
PEN 3.436114
PGK 4.341518
PHP 60.079501
PKR 281.091833
PLN 3.728215
PYG 6503.590351
QAR 3.658789
RON 4.4412
RSD 102.446978
RUB 83.875022
RWF 1468.813316
SAR 3.754759
SBD 8.04524
SCR 14.496822
SDG 601.000264
SEK 9.409825
SGD 1.283335
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.650018
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 575.063724
SRD 37.374991
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.350297
SVC 8.803744
SYP 110.58576
SZL 16.800579
THB 32.782992
TJS 9.62383
TMT 3.5
TND 2.960823
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.31915
TTD 6.820677
TWD 32.0139
TZS 2601.22963
UAH 44.250993
UGX 3785.225075
UYU 40.745194
UZS 12269.740855
VES 450.94284
VND 26315
VUV 119.592862
WST 2.733704
XAF 571.627633
XAG 0.013408
XAU 0.000207
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.813334
XDR 0.710924
XOF 571.630124
XPF 103.919416
YER 238.575013
ZAR 16.989715
ZMK 9001.167862
ZMW 19.677217
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • RYCEF

    -0.2100

    16.6

    -1.27%

  • NGG

    -3.0200

    87.4

    -3.46%

  • AZN

    -2.8700

    188.42

    -1.52%

  • VOD

    -0.3800

    14.37

    -2.64%

  • CMSC

    -0.1200

    22.83

    -0.53%

  • BCE

    -0.2600

    25.75

    -1.01%

  • RELX

    -0.4300

    33.86

    -1.27%

  • GSK

    -1.3500

    52.06

    -2.59%

  • RIO

    -2.0800

    87.72

    -2.37%

  • BTI

    -2.4600

    58.09

    -4.23%

  • JRI

    -0.1370

    12.323

    -1.11%

  • BCC

    -1.0800

    71.84

    -1.5%

  • CMSD

    0.0100

    22.89

    +0.04%

  • BP

    0.7600

    44.61

    +1.7%


China’s profitless push




Can we keep up? Chinese companies are sacrificing margins—sometimes incurring outright losses—to win global market share in strategic industries from electric vehicles and batteries to solar and consumer tech. The tactic is turbocharging exports, pressuring Western competitors and forcing policymakers in Europe and the United States to erect new defenses while they scramble to lower costs at home.

Electric vehicles: a race to the bottom on price. In late spring 2025, China’s largest carmakers unleashed another round of steep price cuts, with entry-level models reduced to mass-market price points. Regulators in Beijing have since urged manufacturers to rein in the bruising price war, citing risks to industry health and employment. Yet the incentives keep coming as dozens of brands fight for share in the world’s most competitive EV market. The financial fallout is visible: leading pure-play EV makers continue to post substantial quarterly losses, while ambitious new entrants have acknowledged that their car divisions remain in the red even as sales surge.

Green tech: overcapacity meets collapsing margins. China’s build-out in solar has morphed from a growth engine into a profitability trap. Module and polysilicon prices have fallen so far that key manufacturers forecast sizeable half-year losses, and producers are now discussing a coordinated effort to shutter older capacity. Industry reports describe spot prices for feedstocks dipping below production costs, a hallmark of cut-throat competition that spills over into export markets and undercuts rivals globally.

Trade blowback intensifies. The U.S. has moved to quadruple tariffs on Chinese-made EVs and lift duties on batteries, chips and solar cells. The European Union has imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric cars and opened additional probes across green-tech supply chains. Brussels and Beijing have even explored minimum export prices to reduce undercutting—an extraordinary step that underscores how acute the pricing pressure has become.

Deflation at the factory gate. China’s factory-gate prices remain in negative territory year on year, reflecting slack domestic demand and excess capacity. That weakness transmits abroad via cheaper exports, squeezing margins for manufacturers elsewhere and complicating central banks’ inflation-fighting calculus. Beijing has rolled out an “anti-involution” campaign to curb ruinous discounting and steer investment toward “high-quality growth,” but implementation is uneven and local governments still depend on industrial output to stabilize employment.

Scale, speed—and logistics. Chinese champions are not only cutting prices; they are redesigning logistics to keep them low. One leading EV maker has built its own fleet of car carriers and is localizing production via overseas factories to sidestep tariffs and port bottlenecks. Such vertical integration magnifies the advantage from sprawling domestic supply chains in batteries, motors and power electronics.

What this means for Western competitors. The immediate effect is a margin squeeze across autos, solar and adjacent sectors. The strategic response taking shape in Europe and the U.S. is three-pronged: (1) trade defense to buy time; (2) industrial policy to catalyze domestic gigafactories and clean-tech manufacturing; and (3) consolidation to rebuild pricing power. Companies that cannot match China’s cost curve will need to differentiate—through software, design, brand and service—or partner to gain scale. Even in China, the current “profitless prosperity” looks unsustainable: consolidation is inevitable, and state guidance now favors capacity rationalization over raw volume.

The bottom line. China’s price-first strategy is remaking global competition. Whether others can keep up will hinge on how quickly they can de-risk supply chains, compress costs and innovate without hollowing out profitability. For now, the contest is being fought as much on balance sheets as it is on assembly lines.