The Fort Worth Press - Why go back to the Moon?

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 62.999832
ALL 83.25021
AMD 377.460122
ANG 1.790083
AOA 916.999584
ARS 1396.068797
AUD 1.40825
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.700971
BAM 1.694705
BBD 2.008318
BDT 122.350128
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.377475
BIF 2960.600993
BMD 1
BND 1.274164
BOB 6.904306
BRL 5.193197
BSD 0.997141
BTN 92.081275
BWP 13.550819
BYN 2.990815
BYR 19600
BZD 2.005372
CAD 1.36915
CDF 2265.000338
CHF 0.78487
CLF 0.022981
CLP 907.409989
CNY 6.88685
CNH 6.88399
COP 3701.27
CRC 467.377177
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.15024
CZK 21.18255
DJF 177.558271
DKK 6.476755
DOP 60.861277
DZD 132.095989
EGP 52.254002
ERN 15
ETB 157.000288
EUR 0.866735
FJD 2.20855
FKP 0.751829
GBP 0.74875
GEL 2.709491
GGP 0.751829
GHS 10.885046
GIP 0.751829
GMD 73.502255
GNF 8738.4866
GTQ 7.653371
GYD 209.039327
HKD 7.83655
HNL 26.569692
HRK 6.529303
HTG 130.795692
HUF 336.445011
IDR 16948
ILS 3.09945
IMP 0.751829
INR 93.087801
IQD 1310
IRR 1313999.999774
ISK 124.459899
JEP 0.751829
JMD 156.858158
JOD 0.709007
JPY 159.013028
KES 129.549771
KGS 87.449917
KHR 4001.403697
KMF 427.000072
KPW 900.043905
KRW 1485.860249
KWD 0.30669
KYD 0.830947
KZT 480.450219
LAK 21397.625856
LBP 89443.965349
LKR 310.510354
LRD 182.47119
LSL 16.690162
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.394962
MAD 9.36375
MDL 17.394507
MGA 4164.999806
MKD 53.421452
MMK 2100.153228
MNT 3574.497589
MOP 8.048436
MRU 40.105006
MUR 46.630174
MVR 15.449774
MWK 1736.999877
MXN 17.661301
MYR 3.92502
MZN 63.910322
NAD 16.68949
NGN 1352.88043
NIO 36.719924
NOK 9.582101
NPR 147.330387
NZD 1.707555
OMR 0.384465
PAB 0.99918
PEN 3.417496
PGK 4.30075
PHP 59.655964
PKR 279.249716
PLN 3.695065
PYG 6463.911273
QAR 3.6435
RON 4.413598
RSD 101.786047
RUB 82.356341
RWF 1459
SAR 3.754556
SBD 8.045182
SCR 15.021684
SDG 601.000554
SEK 9.280983
SGD 1.276602
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.583085
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 568.841522
SRD 37.624989
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.225904
SVC 8.724509
SYP 110.875895
SZL 16.689992
THB 32.340152
TJS 9.557442
TMT 3.51
TND 2.9325
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.194698
TTD 6.765416
TWD 31.891204
TZS 2608.729731
UAH 43.810415
UGX 3771.52085
UYU 40.615395
UZS 12137.499549
VES 447.80816
VND 26300
VUV 119.587146
WST 2.754209
XAF 568.371025
XAG 0.012612
XAU 0.0002
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.797064
XDR 0.706871
XOF 570.503061
XPF 103.849973
YER 238.549687
ZAR 16.692102
ZMK 9001.202481
ZMW 19.448921
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • RYCEF

    0.3800

    16.5

    +2.3%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    22.95

    -0.17%

  • JRI

    -0.0800

    12.46

    -0.64%

  • NGG

    -0.4700

    90.42

    -0.52%

  • BCC

    1.2000

    72.92

    +1.65%

  • RIO

    -0.0600

    89.8

    -0.07%

  • CMSD

    -0.0700

    22.88

    -0.31%

  • VOD

    0.1500

    14.75

    +1.02%

  • RELX

    -0.1800

    34.29

    -0.52%

  • GSK

    -0.3600

    53.41

    -0.67%

  • BCE

    0.1100

    26.01

    +0.42%

  • BTI

    -0.3900

    60.55

    -0.64%

  • AZN

    -0.7200

    191.29

    -0.38%

  • BP

    0.9500

    43.85

    +2.17%

Why go back to the Moon?
Why go back to the Moon? / Photo: © AFP

Why go back to the Moon?

On September 12, 1962, then US president John F Kennedy informed the public of his plan to put a man on the Moon by the end of the decade.

Text size:

It was the height of the Cold War and America needed a big victory to demonstrate its space superiority after the Soviet Union had launched the first satellite and put the first man in orbit.

"We choose to go to the Moon," Kennedy told 40,000 people at Rice University, "because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win."

Sixty years on, the United States is about to launch the first mission of its return program to the Moon, Artemis. But why repeat what has already been done?

Criticism has risen in recent years, for example from Apollo 11 astronaut Michael Collins, and the Mars Society founder Robert Zubrin, who have long advocated for America to go directly to Mars.

But NASA argues re-conquering the Moon is a must before a trip to the Red Planet. Here's why.

- Long space missions -

NASA wants to develop a sustainable human presence on the Moon, with missions lasting several weeks –- compared to just a few days for Apollo.

The goal: to better understand how to prepare for a multi-year round trip to Mars.

In deep space, radiation is much more intense and poses a real threat to health.

Low Earth Orbit, where the International Space Station (ISS) operates, is partly shielded from radiation by the Earth's magnetic field, which isn't the case on the Moon.

From the first Artemis mission, many experiments are planned to study the impact of this radiation on living organisms, and to assess the effectiveness of an anti-radiation vest.

What's more, while the ISS can often be resupplied, trips to the Moon -- a thousand times further -- are much more complex.

To avoid having to take everything with them, and to save costs, NASA wants to learn how to use the resources present on the surface.

In particular, water in the form of ice, which has been confirmed to exist on the lunar south pole, could be transformed into rocket fuel by cracking it into its separate hydrogen and oxygen atoms.

- Testing new gear -

NASA also wants to pilot on the Moon the technologies that will continue to evolve on Mars. First, new spacesuits for spacewalks.

Their design was entrusted to the company Axiom Space for the first mission which will land on the Moon, in 2025 at the earliest.

Other needs: vehicles -- both pressurized and unpressurized -- so that the astronauts can move around, as well as habitats.

Finally, for sustainable access to an energy source, NASA is working on the development of portable nuclear fission systems.

Solving any problems that arise will be much easier on the Moon, only a few days away, than on Mars, which can only be reached in at least several months.

- Establishing a waypoint -

A major pillar of the Artemis program is the construction of a space station in orbit around the Moon, called Gateway, which will serve as a relay before the trip to Mars.

All the necessary equipment can be sent there in "multiple launches," before finally being joined by the crew to set off on the long voyage, Sean Fuller, responsible for the Gateway program, told AFP.

"Kind of like you're stopping at your gas station to make sure you get all the stuff, and then you're off on your way."

- Maintaining leadership over China -

Apart from Mars, another reason put forward by the Americans for settling on the Moon is to do so before the Chinese, who plan to send taikonauts by the year 2030.

China is the United States' main competition today as the once proud Russian space program has withered.

"We don't want China suddenly getting there and saying, "This is our exclusive territory,'" NASA boss Bill Nelson said in a recent interview.

- For the sake of science -

While the Apollo missions brought back to Earth nearly 400 kilograms of lunar rock, new samples will make it possible to further deepen our knowledge of this celestial object and its formation.

"The samples that we collected during the Apollo missions changed the way we view our solar system," astronaut Jessica Meir told AFP. "I think we can expect that from the Artemis program as well."

She expects further scientific and technological breakthroughs too, just like during the Apollo era.

J.Ayala--TFWP