The Fort Worth Press - The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 64.000133
ALL 81.449833
AMD 370.780115
ANG 1.789884
AOA 917.999952
ARS 1392.898304
AUD 1.38715
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.701353
BAM 1.669697
BBD 2.01454
BDT 122.725158
BGN 1.668102
BHD 0.37765
BIF 2976
BMD 1
BND 1.275896
BOB 6.911331
BRL 4.959401
BSD 1.000226
BTN 94.881811
BWP 13.592996
BYN 2.822528
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011629
CAD 1.35919
CDF 2319.999957
CHF 0.781075
CLF 0.022861
CLP 899.749887
CNY 6.82825
CNH 6.82093
COP 3657.25
CRC 454.73562
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.450261
CZK 20.77465
DJF 177.720342
DKK 6.371475
DOP 59.501326
DZD 132.503944
EGP 53.630598
ERN 15
ETB 157.000246
EUR 0.852703
FJD 2.1921
FKP 0.736618
GBP 0.736033
GEL 2.680008
GGP 0.736618
GHS 11.201104
GIP 0.736618
GMD 72.999839
GNF 8774.999886
GTQ 7.641507
GYD 209.25239
HKD 7.83325
HNL 26.619836
HRK 6.424698
HTG 131.024649
HUF 308.862969
IDR 17358.1
ILS 2.94383
IMP 0.736618
INR 94.875749
IQD 1310
IRR 1313999.999829
ISK 122.620124
JEP 0.736618
JMD 156.725146
JOD 0.708996
JPY 157.179011
KES 129.149625
KGS 87.420501
KHR 4012.563599
KMF 420.000126
KPW 899.999976
KRW 1472.459582
KWD 0.30729
KYD 0.833543
KZT 463.288124
LAK 21979.999798
LBP 89550.0002
LKR 319.671116
LRD 183.875013
LSL 16.660164
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.350319
MAD 9.25125
MDL 17.233504
MGA 4149.999872
MKD 52.564485
MMK 2099.490131
MNT 3577.850535
MOP 8.070846
MRU 39.970034
MUR 47.029868
MVR 15.454953
MWK 1741.497048
MXN 17.438702
MYR 3.956014
MZN 63.896617
NAD 16.659749
NGN 1375.649619
NIO 36.709996
NOK 9.27205
NPR 151.803598
NZD 1.691035
OMR 0.384745
PAB 1.000201
PEN 3.507501
PGK 4.33875
PHP 61.425501
PKR 278.775027
PLN 3.62035
PYG 6151.626275
QAR 3.643503
RON 4.422997
RSD 100.106587
RUB 74.972266
RWF 1461.5
SAR 3.74998
SBD 8.04211
SCR 13.746323
SDG 600.50009
SEK 9.21681
SGD 1.273275
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.605886
SLL 20969.496166
SOS 570.999785
SRD 37.457994
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.21
SVC 8.7523
SYP 110.524981
SZL 16.659978
THB 32.480242
TJS 9.381822
TMT 3.505
TND 2.88175
TOP 2.40776
TRY 45.190399
TTD 6.789386
TWD 31.599034
TZS 2604.999871
UAH 43.949336
UGX 3760.987334
UYU 39.889518
UZS 11950.000291
VES 488.942755
VND 26337
VUV 117.651389
WST 2.715189
XAF 560.041494
XAG 0.013203
XAU 0.000217
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80265
XDR 0.69563
XOF 559.999647
XPF 102.149866
YER 238.603963
ZAR 16.59765
ZMK 9001.20319
ZMW 18.67895
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.5000

    63.1

    +0.79%

  • BCE

    0.1800

    23.96

    +0.75%

  • GSK

    -0.7000

    51.61

    -1.36%

  • RELX

    -0.2400

    36.35

    -0.66%

  • RYCEF

    0.5500

    16.35

    +3.36%

  • BP

    -0.9700

    46.41

    -2.09%

  • VOD

    0.3500

    16.15

    +2.17%

  • RIO

    0.1000

    100.58

    +0.1%

  • CMSC

    0.0600

    22.88

    +0.26%

  • JRI

    -0.0100

    12.98

    -0.08%

  • BTI

    -0.0900

    58.71

    -0.15%

  • CMSD

    0.1500

    23.28

    +0.64%

  • BCC

    -1.1400

    78.13

    -1.46%

  • NGG

    -1.0600

    88.48

    -1.2%

  • AZN

    -2.6300

    184.74

    -1.42%

The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst
The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst / Photo: © AFP/File

The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst

For thousands of years, predictions of apocalypse have borne little fruit. But with dangers rising from nuclear war and climate change, does the planet need to at least begin contemplating the worst?

Text size:

When the world rang in 2022, few would have expected the year to feature the US president speaking of the risk of doomsday, following Russia's threats to go nuclear in its invasion of Ukraine.

"We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban missile crisis" in 1962, Joe Biden said in October.

And on the year that humanity welcomed its eighth billion member, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned that the planet was on a "highway to climate hell."

In extremes widely attributed to climate change, floods submerged one-third of Pakistan, China sweat under an unprecedented 70-day heatwave and crops failed in the Horn of Africa, all while the world lagged behind on the UN-blessed goal of checking warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels.

- Biggest risk yet of nuclear war? -

The Global Challenges Foundation, a Swedish group that assesses catastrophic risks, warned in an annual report that the threat of nuclear weapons use was the greatest since 1945 when the United States destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in history's only atomic attacks.

The report warned that an all-out exchange of nuclear weapons, besides causing an enormous loss of life, would trigger clouds of dust that would obscure the sun, reducing the capacity to grow food and ushering in "a period of chaos and violence, during which most of the surviving world population would die from hunger."

Kennette Benedict, a lecturer at the University of Chicago who led the report's nuclear section, said risks were even greater than during the Cuban Missile Crisis as Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared less restrained by advisors.

While any Russian nuclear strike would likely involve small "tactical" weapons, experts fear a quick escalation if the United States responds.

"Then we're in a completely different ballgame," said Benedict, a senior advisor to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which in January will unveil its latest assessment of the "doomsday clock" set since 2021 at 100 seconds to midnight.

Amid the focus on Ukraine, US intelligence believes North Korea is ready for a seventh nuclear test, diplomacy has been at a standstill on Iran's contested nuclear work and tensions between India and Pakistan have remained at a low boil.

But Benedict also faulted the Biden administration's nuclear posture review which reserved the right for the United States to use nuclear weapons in "extreme circumstances."

"I think there's been a kind of steady erosion of the ability to manage nuclear weapons," she said.

- Charting worst-case climate risks -

UN experts estimated ahead of November talks in Egypt that the world was on track to warming of 2.1 to 2.9 C -- but some outside analysts put the figure well higher, with greenhouse gas emissions in 2021 again hitting a record despite pushes to renewable energy.

Luke Kemp, a Cambridge University expert on existential risks, said the possibility of higher warming was getting insufficient attention, which he blamed on the consensus culture of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and scientists' fears of being branded alarmist.

"There has been a strong incentive to err on the side of least drama," he said.

"What we really need are more complex assessments of how risks would cascade around the world."

Climate change could cause ripple effects on food, with multiple breadbasket regions failing, fueling hunger and eventually political unrest and conflict.

Kemp warned against extrapolating from a single year or event. But a research paper he co-authored noted that even a two-degree temperature rise would put the Earth in territory uncharted since the Ice Age.

Using a medium-high scenario on emissions and population growth, it found that two billion people by 2070 could live in areas with a mean temperature of 29 C (84.2 F), straining water resources -- including between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan.

- Cases for optimism -

The year, however, was not all grim. Vaccinations helped much of the world turn the page on Covid-19, which the World Health Organization estimated in May contributed to the deaths of 14.9 million people in 2020 and 2021.

The world has seen previous warnings of worst-case scenarios, from Thomas Malthus predicting in the 18th century that food production would not keep up with population growth to the 1968 US bestseller "The Population Bomb."

One of the most prominent current-day critics of pessimism is Harvard professor Steven Pinker, who has argued that violence has declined massively in the modern era.

Speaking after the Ukraine invasion, Pinker acknowledged Putin had brought back interstate war. But he said a failed invasion could also reinforce the positive trends.

Drawing a parallel, he said, "After the biblical Israelites abandoned human sacrifice, they kept having to take measures to prevent backsliding."

D.Ford--TFWP