The Fort Worth Press - The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst

USD -
AED 3.672495
AFN 63.50249
ALL 82.604372
AMD 368.069876
ANG 1.790403
AOA 916.99992
ARS 1461.503901
AUD 1.434679
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.700059
BAM 1.707839
BBD 2.019173
BDT 122.896637
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.378044
BIF 2989.634336
BMD 1
BND 1.296533
BOB 6.91239
BRL 5.158599
BSD 1.002494
BTN 94.655909
BWP 13.605776
BYN 2.805013
BYR 19600
BZD 2.016285
CAD 1.417103
CDF 2264.999362
CHF 0.80891
CLF 0.023028
CLP 906.309758
CNY 6.774796
CNH 6.78161
COP 3440.13
CRC 454.784115
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.875016
CZK 21.185897
DJF 178.525487
DKK 6.54331
DOP 58.604757
DZD 133.545006
EGP 49.745801
ERN 15
ETB 159.15013
EUR 0.8754
FJD 2.24285
FKP 0.755695
GBP 0.755385
GEL 2.644977
GGP 0.755695
GHS 11.229785
GIP 0.755695
GMD 72.999896
GNF 8784.035073
GTQ 7.628428
GYD 209.275317
HKD 7.839815
HNL 26.670162
HRK 6.593101
HTG 130.960611
HUF 308.5845
IDR 17869
ILS 2.97135
IMP 0.755695
INR 94.65845
IQD 1310
IRR 1375000.000372
ISK 126.020547
JEP 0.755695
JMD 158.408737
JOD 0.709025
JPY 161.577501
KES 129.40203
KGS 87.449915
KHR 4012.500926
KMF 430.999605
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1537.979828
KWD 0.30867
KYD 0.835444
KZT 488.630447
LAK 22050.000183
LBP 89550.00026
LKR 335.219143
LRD 182.197355
LSL 16.472163
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.427478
MAD 9.349442
MDL 17.629557
MGA 4229.999486
MKD 53.957653
MMK 2099.917974
MNT 3579.231668
MOP 8.095209
MRU 40.069708
MUR 47.810215
MVR 15.459879
MWK 1738.365682
MXN 17.386099
MYR 4.140298
MZN 63.903112
NAD 16.472091
NGN 1368.10971
NIO 36.630142
NOK 9.72043
NPR 151.770486
NZD 1.75542
OMR 0.384502
PAB 1.000358
PEN 3.682982
PGK 4.36375
PHP 61.424993
PKR 278.150172
PLN 3.74414
PYG 6111.57296
QAR 3.645987
RON 4.584104
RSD 102.724985
RUB 74.249047
RWF 1464.5
SAR 3.753691
SBD 8.065041
SCR 13.258842
SDG 600.5051
SEK 9.639005
SGD 1.294095
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.749964
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 572.921224
SRD 37.4305
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.6
SVC 8.771861
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.410369
THB 33.0335
TJS 9.278635
TMT 3.51
TND 2.911501
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.4774
TTD 6.798512
TWD 31.632401
TZS 2628.231945
UAH 45.088297
UGX 3651.795772
UYU 40.002096
UZS 11995.000532
VES 616.865275
VND 26328
VUV 118.352303
WST 2.751796
XAF 574.021212
XAG 0.015817
XAU 0.000242
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80679
XDR 0.713895
XOF 574.016189
XPF 104.849881
YER 238.649846
ZAR 16.43185
ZMK 9001.203866
ZMW 17.769494
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.2100

    22.16

    -0.95%

  • CMSD

    -0.2100

    22.08

    -0.95%

  • BCC

    -2.1200

    72.54

    -2.92%

  • RIO

    -0.7200

    99.36

    -0.72%

  • NGG

    1.5300

    80.97

    +1.89%

  • BTI

    -0.0100

    58.9

    -0.02%

  • BCE

    -0.6300

    22.65

    -2.78%

  • BP

    0.6800

    39.78

    +1.71%

  • RBGPF

    -0.2700

    60.34

    -0.45%

  • GSK

    0.0700

    50.74

    +0.14%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    12.65

    -0.16%

  • RELX

    -0.3500

    30.83

    -1.14%

  • RYCEF

    0.2300

    18.63

    +1.23%

  • AZN

    1.5000

    176.43

    +0.85%

  • VOD

    -0.1800

    14.12

    -1.27%

The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst
The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst / Photo: © AFP/File

The end is nigh? Climate, nuclear crises spark fears of worst

For thousands of years, predictions of apocalypse have borne little fruit. But with dangers rising from nuclear war and climate change, does the planet need to at least begin contemplating the worst?

Text size:

When the world rang in 2022, few would have expected the year to feature the US president speaking of the risk of doomsday, following Russia's threats to go nuclear in its invasion of Ukraine.

"We have not faced the prospect of Armageddon since Kennedy and the Cuban missile crisis" in 1962, Joe Biden said in October.

And on the year that humanity welcomed its eighth billion member, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned that the planet was on a "highway to climate hell."

In extremes widely attributed to climate change, floods submerged one-third of Pakistan, China sweat under an unprecedented 70-day heatwave and crops failed in the Horn of Africa, all while the world lagged behind on the UN-blessed goal of checking warming at 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels.

- Biggest risk yet of nuclear war? -

The Global Challenges Foundation, a Swedish group that assesses catastrophic risks, warned in an annual report that the threat of nuclear weapons use was the greatest since 1945 when the United States destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in history's only atomic attacks.

The report warned that an all-out exchange of nuclear weapons, besides causing an enormous loss of life, would trigger clouds of dust that would obscure the sun, reducing the capacity to grow food and ushering in "a period of chaos and violence, during which most of the surviving world population would die from hunger."

Kennette Benedict, a lecturer at the University of Chicago who led the report's nuclear section, said risks were even greater than during the Cuban Missile Crisis as Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared less restrained by advisors.

While any Russian nuclear strike would likely involve small "tactical" weapons, experts fear a quick escalation if the United States responds.

"Then we're in a completely different ballgame," said Benedict, a senior advisor to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, which in January will unveil its latest assessment of the "doomsday clock" set since 2021 at 100 seconds to midnight.

Amid the focus on Ukraine, US intelligence believes North Korea is ready for a seventh nuclear test, diplomacy has been at a standstill on Iran's contested nuclear work and tensions between India and Pakistan have remained at a low boil.

But Benedict also faulted the Biden administration's nuclear posture review which reserved the right for the United States to use nuclear weapons in "extreme circumstances."

"I think there's been a kind of steady erosion of the ability to manage nuclear weapons," she said.

- Charting worst-case climate risks -

UN experts estimated ahead of November talks in Egypt that the world was on track to warming of 2.1 to 2.9 C -- but some outside analysts put the figure well higher, with greenhouse gas emissions in 2021 again hitting a record despite pushes to renewable energy.

Luke Kemp, a Cambridge University expert on existential risks, said the possibility of higher warming was getting insufficient attention, which he blamed on the consensus culture of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and scientists' fears of being branded alarmist.

"There has been a strong incentive to err on the side of least drama," he said.

"What we really need are more complex assessments of how risks would cascade around the world."

Climate change could cause ripple effects on food, with multiple breadbasket regions failing, fueling hunger and eventually political unrest and conflict.

Kemp warned against extrapolating from a single year or event. But a research paper he co-authored noted that even a two-degree temperature rise would put the Earth in territory uncharted since the Ice Age.

Using a medium-high scenario on emissions and population growth, it found that two billion people by 2070 could live in areas with a mean temperature of 29 C (84.2 F), straining water resources -- including between nuclear-armed India and Pakistan.

- Cases for optimism -

The year, however, was not all grim. Vaccinations helped much of the world turn the page on Covid-19, which the World Health Organization estimated in May contributed to the deaths of 14.9 million people in 2020 and 2021.

The world has seen previous warnings of worst-case scenarios, from Thomas Malthus predicting in the 18th century that food production would not keep up with population growth to the 1968 US bestseller "The Population Bomb."

One of the most prominent current-day critics of pessimism is Harvard professor Steven Pinker, who has argued that violence has declined massively in the modern era.

Speaking after the Ukraine invasion, Pinker acknowledged Putin had brought back interstate war. But he said a failed invasion could also reinforce the positive trends.

Drawing a parallel, he said, "After the biblical Israelites abandoned human sacrifice, they kept having to take measures to prevent backsliding."

D.Ford--TFWP