The Fort Worth Press - US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 66.498782
ALL 80.629676
AMD 365.091035
AOA 917.000408
ARS 1492.336499
AUD 1.414877
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.701052
BAM 1.691649
BBD 2.00813
BDT 123.418242
BHD 0.375989
BIF 2985.079791
BMD 1
BND 1.277602
BOB 11.849673
BRL 5.083698
BSD 0.997016
BTN 94.875232
BWP 13.457596
BYN 2.968819
BYR 19600
BZD 2.00519
CAD 1.39518
CDF 2262.499098
CHF 0.808199
CLF 0.023198
CLP 912.999827
CNY 6.747602
CNH 6.743155
COP 3157.68
CRC 453.228387
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.372573
CZK 20.984797
DJF 177.546166
DKK 6.46806
DOP 58.20179
DZD 132.308956
EGP 49.569799
ERN 15
ETB 160.923669
EUR 0.86521
FJD 2.20855
FKP 0.74148
GBP 0.741195
GEL 2.610161
GGP 0.74148
GHS 11.700039
GIP 0.74148
GMD 73.496802
GNF 8756.649224
GTQ 7.607144
GYD 208.588851
HKD 7.845875
HNL 26.723176
HRK 6.519601
HTG 130.363707
HUF 314.212956
IDR 17801
ILS 2.99985
IMP 0.74148
INR 95.21055
IQD 1306.058902
IRR 1375550.000465
ISK 123.37984
JEP 0.74148
JMD 158.335856
JOD 0.708953
JPY 157.888997
KES 128.789741
KGS 87.449779
KHR 4049.647537
KMF 425.999543
KRW 1411.360366
KWD 0.30866
KYD 0.830861
KZT 467.275008
LAK 22510.919863
LBP 89282.792025
LKR 334.420274
LRD 179.959348
LSL 16.197552
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.341738
MAD 9.29222
MDL 17.337716
MGA 4254.638239
MKD 53.219738
MMK 2099.549369
MNT 3595.852714
MOP 8.056654
MRU 40.080439
MUR 46.795264
MVR 15.450064
MWK 1728.841413
MXN 17.138497
MYR 4.085099
MZN 63.904996
NAD 16.197552
NGN 1361.789707
NIO 36.690741
NOK 9.50157
NPR 151.800372
NZD 1.69811
OMR 0.382693
PAB 0.997016
PEN 3.376465
PGK 4.406003
PHP 60.814978
PKR 276.796523
PLN 3.719555
PYG 5928.296501
QAR 3.644596
RON 4.541503
RSD 101.492021
RUB 81.61994
RWF 1466.072741
SAR 3.744756
SBD 8.065696
SCR 14.449077
SDG 600.504962
SEK 9.48365
SGD 1.278665
SLE 24.60377
SOS 569.822255
SRD 37.866499
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.191022
SVC 8.723782
SZL 16.194265
THB 32.970555
TJS 9.197509
TMT 3.51
TND 2.929032
TRY 47.714698
TTD 6.757774
TWD 32.250104
TZS 2643.563029
UAH 44.653894
UGX 3714.050945
UYU 40.133201
UZS 11924.058297
VES 755.762399
VND 26204.5
VUV 118.557141
WST 2.733716
XAF 567.363231
XAG 0.015658
XAU 0.00023
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.796912
XDR 0.705618
XOF 567.363231
XPF 103.152705
YER 238.395817
ZAR 16.14803
ZMK 9001.197294
ZMW 18.818492
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0240

    21.744

    +0.11%

  • BCC

    2.3400

    86.6

    +2.7%

  • BCE

    -0.0200

    22.75

    -0.09%

  • JRI

    0.1500

    12.81

    +1.17%

  • RIO

    1.4500

    101.1

    +1.43%

  • CMSD

    -0.1600

    21.82

    -0.73%

  • GSK

    0.7900

    52.96

    +1.49%

  • BTI

    0.6000

    59.33

    +1.01%

  • NGG

    0.4700

    80.88

    +0.58%

  • RBGPF

    0.7600

    70.5

    +1.08%

  • RELX

    0.0485

    35.52

    +0.14%

  • BP

    -0.6000

    41.63

    -1.44%

  • RYCEF

    0.2300

    20.85

    +1.1%

  • VOD

    0.1900

    16.19

    +1.17%

  • AZN

    1.4100

    161.42

    +0.87%

US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors
US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors / Photo: © AFP

US Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors

The US Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a state law banning gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender minors -– an issue at the heart of the American culture wars.

Text size:

The court voted 6-3 to uphold a Tennessee law barring hormone therapy, puberty blockers and gender transition surgery for those under the age of 18.

The six conservative justices on the top court rejected a challenge to the law while the three liberals dissented.

Two dozen Republican-led states have enacted laws restricting medical care for transgender youth, and the case will have repercussions for the prohibitions across the country.

"This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field," wrote Chief Justice John Roberts, author of the majority opinion.

"The Court's role is not 'to judge the wisdom, fairness, or logic' (of the law) but only to ensure that the law does not violate equal protection guarantees," Roberts said.

"It does not. Questions regarding the law's policy are thus appropriately left to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process."

The Supreme Court heard the case in December and the Justice Department of then-president Joe Biden joined opponents of the law, arguing that it violated the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause since it denies transgender minors access to medical treatments permitted to others.

Republican President Donald Trump has since taken office and he signed an executive order in January restricting gender transition procedures for people under the age of 19.

While there is no US-wide law against gender-affirming medical treatments for transgender youth, the Trump order ended any federal backing for such procedures.

Reacting to the ruling, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) said it "sets a dangerous precedent for legislative interference in the practice of medicine."

"Gender-affirming care is medically necessary for treating gender dysphoria and is backed by decades of peer-reviewed research, clinical experience, and scientific consensus," the AAP said.

"Denying patients access to this care not only undermines their health and safety, it robs them of basic human dignity."

- 'Must end' -

The Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal group, welcomed the ruling as a "huge win for children" and a "step toward ending dangerous experiments on kids."

During oral arguments in December, Tennessee Solicitor General Matthew Rice told the court the law was designed to "protect minors from risky, unproven medical interventions" with "often irreversible and life-altering consequences."

Chase Strangio, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney representing three transgender adolescents, their parents, and a Memphis-based doctor, countered that the law has "taken away the only treatment that relieved years of suffering."

"What they've done is impose a blunderbuss ban, overriding the very careful judgment of parents who love and care for their children and the doctors who have recommended the treatment," said Strangio, the first openly transgender lawyer to argue before the court.

Trump, in his inauguration speech, said his government would henceforth only recognize two genders -- male and female -- and he issued his executive order a week later restricting gender transition procedures for minors.

"Across the country today, medical professionals are maiming and sterilizing a growing number of impressionable children," the executive order said. "This dangerous trend will be a stain on our Nation's history, and it must end."

Trump's order said it would now be US policy that it would "not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called 'transition' of a child from one sex to another."

The order bars funding for gender transition under the Medicaid health insurance program for poor families, the Medicare scheme used by retirees, and Defense Department health insurance that covers some two million children.

According to a study by UCLA's Williams Institute, an estimated 1.6 million people aged 13 and older in the United States identify as transgender.

S.Jordan--TFWP