The Fort Worth Press - Pressure on UK PM mounts over Afghan pet evacuations

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 66.495457
ALL 80.629676
AMD 365.091035
AOA 917.000132
ARS 1491.937897
AUD 1.417435
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.700356
BAM 1.691649
BBD 2.00813
BDT 123.418242
BHD 0.375989
BIF 2985.079791
BMD 1
BND 1.277602
BOB 11.849673
BRL 5.083303
BSD 0.997016
BTN 94.875232
BWP 13.457596
BYN 2.968819
BYR 19600
BZD 2.00519
CAD 1.39515
CDF 2262.487483
CHF 0.80949
CLF 0.023206
CLP 913.315746
CNY 6.747602
CNH 6.743285
COP 3142.844787
CRC 453.228387
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.372573
CZK 20.982098
DJF 177.546166
DKK 6.467982
DOP 58.20179
DZD 132.308956
EGP 49.555853
ERN 15
ETB 160.923669
EUR 0.86495
FJD 2.20855
FKP 0.74148
GBP 0.742583
GEL 2.610266
GGP 0.74148
GHS 11.700039
GIP 0.74148
GMD 73.510995
GNF 8756.649224
GTQ 7.607144
GYD 208.588851
HKD 7.842299
HNL 26.723176
HRK 6.518802
HTG 130.363707
HUF 314.060243
IDR 17801
ILS 2.99985
IMP 0.74148
INR 95.210501
IQD 1306.058902
IRR 1375550.000156
ISK 123.339642
JEP 0.74148
JMD 158.335856
JOD 0.709022
JPY 157.806026
KES 129.014401
KGS 87.450366
KHR 4049.647537
KMF 425.999772
KRW 1407.860324
KWD 0.30866
KYD 0.830861
KZT 467.275008
LAK 22510.919863
LBP 89282.792025
LKR 334.420274
LRD 179.959348
LSL 16.197552
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.341738
MAD 9.29222
MDL 17.337716
MGA 4254.638239
MKD 53.219738
MMK 2099.549369
MNT 3595.852714
MOP 8.056654
MRU 40.080439
MUR 47.070197
MVR 15.450094
MWK 1728.841413
MXN 17.380226
MYR 4.090101
MZN 63.905023
NAD 16.197552
NGN 1364.859559
NIO 36.690741
NOK 9.51237
NPR 151.800372
NZD 1.701115
OMR 0.382693
PAB 0.997016
PEN 3.376465
PGK 4.406003
PHP 60.705001
PKR 276.796523
PLN 3.719205
PYG 5928.296501
QAR 3.644596
RON 4.536302
RSD 101.492021
RUB 81.598409
RWF 1466.072741
SAR 3.744756
SBD 8.065696
SCR 14.449077
SDG 600.501055
SEK 9.480801
SGD 1.269501
SLE 24.601635
SOS 569.822255
SRD 37.866504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.191022
SVC 8.723782
SZL 16.194265
THB 33.050449
TJS 9.197509
TMT 3.51
TND 2.929032
TRY 47.697498
TTD 6.757774
TWD 32.250597
TZS 2639.622886
UAH 44.653894
UGX 3714.050945
UYU 40.133201
UZS 11924.058297
VES 755.762402
VND 26204.5
VUV 118.557141
WST 2.733716
XAF 567.363231
XAG 0.015731
XAU 0.00023
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.796912
XDR 0.705618
XOF 567.363231
XPF 103.152705
YER 238.410014
ZAR 16.14632
ZMK 9001.199539
ZMW 18.818492
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0240

    21.744

    +0.11%

  • CMSD

    -0.1600

    21.82

    -0.73%

  • BCE

    -0.0200

    22.75

    -0.09%

  • GSK

    0.7900

    52.96

    +1.49%

  • BTI

    0.6000

    59.33

    +1.01%

  • RIO

    1.4500

    101.1

    +1.43%

  • RBGPF

    0.7600

    70.5

    +1.08%

  • BP

    -0.6000

    41.63

    -1.44%

  • BCC

    2.3400

    86.6

    +2.7%

  • AZN

    1.4100

    161.42

    +0.87%

  • NGG

    0.4700

    80.88

    +0.58%

  • RELX

    0.0485

    35.52

    +0.14%

  • JRI

    0.1500

    12.81

    +1.17%

  • RYCEF

    0.2300

    20.85

    +1.1%

  • VOD

    0.1900

    16.19

    +1.17%

Pressure on UK PM mounts over Afghan pet evacuations
Pressure on UK PM mounts over Afghan pet evacuations

Pressure on UK PM mounts over Afghan pet evacuations

The UK government denied Thursday that embattled Prime Minister Boris Johnson had prioritised pets over people in the chaotic evacuation out of Afghanistan as Kabul fell to the Taliban.

Text size:

The issue involving a British animal charity fuelled questions about Johnson's truthfulness as he awaits an internal inquiry into lockdown-breaching parties that could determine his fate as leader.

After launching its own investigation, London's Metropolitan Police force was said to be poring over the "partygate" findings by a senior civil servant, holding up the report's release.

Foreign ministry emails from August, newly released by a parliamentary committee, showed diplomats referring to a decision taken by Johnson to evacuate the staff and animals of the Nowzad animal charity.

Johnson at the time denied insisting on preferential treatment for the charity, which sheltered dogs and cats in Afghanistan and was run by a media-savvy former soldier, Paul "Pen" Farthing.

"Equivalent charity Nowzad, run by an ex-Royal Marine, has received a lot of publicity and the PM has just authorised their staff and animals to be evacuated," one email said, referring to other charities wanting the same treatment.

The rushed nature of the evacuation meant many Afghans, who had served the British in various capacities, were left behind.

The UK has been working since to repatriate those it can reach under Taliban control.

Downing Street on Wednesday reiterated Johnson's denials about Nowzad in light of the leaked emails, and Defence Secretary Ben Wallace insisted he had been given no order from the prime minister to prioritise pets.

- 'Tell the truth' -

"The PM didn't make any individual decisions about evacuations," cabinet minister Therese Coffey told Sky News on Thursday.

"A lot of people will claim that the PM is involved in supporting their particular pet projects, but the PM said he wasn't involved in individual decisions," she said.

Senior Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat agreed it was possible that some civil servants had exploited Johnson's name after his wife Carrie -- an animal rights campaigner and friend of Farthing -- reportedly intervened.

"You'll have to read the emails and see whether you think that there were others who were working around the system -– that I can't answer," the foreign affairs committee chairman told BBC radio.

"But it's certainly true that the defence secretary has been extremely clear on this and I definitely take him at his word."

Nevertheless, the Nowzad affair raised anew questions about Johnson's track record on honesty, amid the "partygate" scandal and other allegations of sleaze in his government.

Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokeswoman Layla Moran called for the prime minister to "immediately make a public statement (about Nowzad) to correct the record and for once tell the truth".

There was uncertainty about when civil servant Sue Gray's report into the Downing Street parties would come out.

Johnson's spokesman said the government had yet to receive it, and remained committed to publishing it in full.

But the government also wants reassurance from the Met police that it does "not cut across" their probe, he said, for fear of prejudging future legal proceedings.

Government lawyers and human resources officers, along with civil service trades unions, are also reportedly vetting the report.

T.Dixon--TFWP