The Fort Worth Press - Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 65.000368
ALL 82.203989
AMD 367.380403
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1487.956748
AUD 1.437401
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.711104
BBD 2.014725
BDT 123.291207
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.37707
BIF 2985
BMD 1
BND 1.291257
BOB 6.923833
BRL 5.125804
BSD 1.000276
BTN 95.289131
BWP 13.527665
BYN 2.859418
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011811
CAD 1.41745
CDF 2258.000362
CHF 0.808387
CLF 0.023491
CLP 924.560396
CNY 6.77695
CNH 6.782275
COP 3253.61
CRC 455.032612
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.903894
CZK 21.248804
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.548975
DOP 58.703884
DZD 133.256578
EGP 49.625706
ERN 15
ETB 159.37504
EUR 0.875804
FJD 2.233204
FKP 0.745889
GBP 0.746157
GEL 2.64504
GGP 0.745889
GHS 11.46504
GIP 0.745889
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8777.503848
GTQ 7.632579
GYD 209.249425
HKD 7.83925
HNL 26.88504
HRK 6.600204
HTG 130.910459
HUF 311.790388
IDR 18080.55
ILS 3.010904
IMP 0.745889
INR 95.53215
IQD 1309.5
IRR 1374750.000352
ISK 125.640386
JEP 0.745889
JMD 158.048994
JOD 0.70904
JPY 161.67604
KES 129.203801
KGS 87.448804
KHR 4007.503796
KMF 432.00035
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1499.070383
KWD 0.30956
KYD 0.833548
KZT 471.568117
LAK 22558.503779
LBP 89550.000349
LKR 335.597832
LRD 181.503772
LSL 16.315039
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.405039
MAD 9.345039
MDL 17.579053
MGA 4295.000347
MKD 53.998301
MMK 2099.308371
MNT 3585.696251
MOP 8.076444
MRU 40.060379
MUR 47.080378
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1737.000345
MXN 17.468104
MYR 4.070377
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.320377
NGN 1377.920377
NIO 36.660377
NOK 9.782604
NPR 152.453273
NZD 1.735208
OMR 0.384819
PAB 1.000262
PEN 3.392504
PGK 4.380375
PHP 61.447038
PKR 278.150374
PLN 3.79005
PYG 6081.391432
QAR 3.643504
RON 4.587104
RSD 102.723038
RUB 77.024822
RWF 1465
SAR 3.753865
SBD 8.048583
SCR 14.724861
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.714225
SGD 1.292904
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.350371
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.503662
SRD 37.610504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.65
SVC 8.752483
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.320369
THB 33.290369
TJS 9.257824
TMT 3.5
TND 2.957504
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.972038
TTD 6.79618
TWD 32.113504
TZS 2630.003038
UAH 44.5007
UGX 3680.71322
UYU 40.332811
UZS 12027.503617
VES 708.806404
VND 26267.5
VUV 120.437365
WST 2.769308
XAF 573.893149
XAG 0.016727
XAU 0.000243
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802808
XDR 0.713149
XOF 573.000332
XPF 104.875037
YER 237.075037
ZAR 16.455565
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.030621
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0650

    22.085

    +0.29%

  • RBGPF

    5.8500

    67.35

    +8.69%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.01

    -0.15%

  • BCC

    3.8200

    76.06

    +5.02%

  • RIO

    1.0500

    90.54

    +1.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0700

    22.38

    +0.31%

  • RYCEF

    0.0000

    19.25

    0%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    21.38

    +0.28%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    82.59

    +0.33%

  • RELX

    0.3700

    32.44

    +1.14%

  • GSK

    0.3100

    52.78

    +0.59%

  • BTI

    -0.0151

    60.02

    -0.03%

  • BP

    0.6500

    39.2

    +1.66%

  • AZN

    -6.8800

    171.61

    -4.01%

  • VOD

    1.6400

    14.72

    +11.14%


Nuclear weapons for Poland against Russia?




As Donald Trump’s second term as U.S. President intensifies global tensions, a volatile mix of international defiance and regional military posturing is emerging, with Poland at the centre of a brewing storm. Amidst protests against Trump’s policies, speculation about nuclear escalation and Poland’s strategic moves against Russia have raised alarms, encapsulated in the provocative phrase circulating among activists and commentators: "We are ready for war." Yet, the reality behind these developments remains grounded in diplomatic friction and military preparedness rather than imminent conflict.

Trump’s inauguration on 20 January 2025 marked a return to his "America First" stance, including a pledge to reassess U.S. commitments to NATO, announced in a speech in Texas on 25 January. This has sparked outrage across Europe, with protests erupting in cities like Paris and Berlin. On 28 January, French activist Élise Moreau told a crowd of 12,000 outside the U.S. Embassy in Paris—according to police estimates—that "we are ready for war" against Trump’s "disruptive unilateralism." Similar sentiments have echoed in Warsaw, where Polish citizens and officials fear that a weakened NATO could embolden Russia’s ambitions in Eastern Europe.

Poland’s response has been swift and assertive. On 5 March, the Polish Ministry of Defence confirmed the deployment of an additional 10,000 troops to its eastern border with Belarus and Ukraine, citing "heightened Russian military activity" in the region. This followed reports from the Ukrainian General Staff on 2 March that Russia had amassed 50,000 troops near its western frontier, though Moscow denied any aggressive intent. Poland’s Foreign Minister, Anna Kowalska, stated on 7 March that "Warsaw will not wait for threats to materialise," framing the troop surge as a defensive "gambit" to deter Russian advances.

The spectre of nuclear weapons has further inflamed rhetoric. On 10 March, a senior Polish MP from the ruling Law and Justice Party, Janusz Kowalski, suggested in a televised debate that Poland might seek NATO nuclear sharing agreements "if the U.S. wavers." This echoed Trump’s own comments on 8 March in Florida, where he hinted at reconsidering America’s nuclear umbrella over Europe, stating, "Allies need to pay their share, or they’re on their own." No evidence suggests nuclear weapons are currently "on the way" to Poland, but the remarks have fuelled speculation and alarm, amplified by posts on X claiming "nukes" are imminent.

Across the Atlantic, Trump has dismissed the backlash. At a rally in Michigan on 15 March, attended by an estimated 18,000 supporters according to local authorities, he called European critics "freeloaders" and reiterated his intent to renegotiate defence pacts. The White House followed this with a statement on 16 March, asserting that "no changes to NATO’s nuclear posture are under consideration," attempting to quell fears of escalation.

In Europe, reactions vary. Germany’s Foreign Ministry expressed "deep concern" on 12 March about Poland’s troop movements, urging restraint to avoid provoking Moscow. Meanwhile, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced on 17 March that the alliance would hold emergency talks in Brussels next week to address "cohesion and deterrence" amid Trump’s pressures. Analysts note that Poland’s actions align with its long-standing policy of bolstering its military—its defence budget reached 4% of GDP in 2024, per World Bank data—reflecting fears rooted in Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

The "ready for war" rhetoric, while widespread, remains symbolic. Dr. Katarzyna Zielinska, a security expert at Jagiellonian University in Krakow, told this publication, "Poland’s gambit is about deterrence, not aggression. Talk of war—or nukes—is an expression of anxiety, not a plan." Still, the situation is precarious. The International Institute for Strategic Studies reported on 14 March that Russian air patrols near Polish airspace increased by 20% in February 2025 compared to the previous year, heightening regional tensions.

For now, the international rebellion against Trump and Poland’s military stance are distinct but intertwined threads in a broader tapestry of uncertainty. Protests continue—organisers in London are planning a rally for 25 March—while Poland’s border fortifications proceed. Whether these developments signal a genuine slide towards conflict or a recalibration of global alliances remains unclear. What is certain is that Trump’s shadow, and Russia’s looming presence, have set the stage for a critical test of resolve in the months ahead.