The Fort Worth Press - China’s profitless push

USD -
AED 3.67325
AFN 63.000155
ALL 83.300127
AMD 377.180904
ANG 1.790083
AOA 916.999757
ARS 1394.448599
AUD 1.417655
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.6971
BAM 1.704371
BBD 2.014946
BDT 122.754882
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.377732
BIF 2970
BMD 1
BND 1.283525
BOB 6.913501
BRL 5.246299
BSD 1.000436
BTN 93.206388
BWP 13.651833
BYN 3.093542
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012088
CAD 1.372575
CDF 2270.000396
CHF 0.791235
CLF 0.023156
CLP 914.379684
CNY 6.87305
CNH 6.89632
COP 3703.61
CRC 468.079358
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.049984
CZK 21.22835
DJF 178.150177
DKK 6.480435
DOP 58.950413
DZD 132.005031
EGP 52.2452
ERN 15
ETB 156.999641
EUR 0.86741
FJD 2.23025
FKP 0.750673
GBP 0.747055
GEL 2.715039
GGP 0.750673
GHS 10.904968
GIP 0.750673
GMD 73.999876
GNF 8779.999841
GTQ 7.652926
GYD 209.305771
HKD 7.83277
HNL 26.570028
HRK 6.531202
HTG 131.227832
HUF 339.5165
IDR 16947
ILS 3.121905
IMP 0.750673
INR 93.20245
IQD 1310
IRR 1314999.999833
ISK 124.749962
JEP 0.750673
JMD 157.168937
JOD 0.708999
JPY 158.280503
KES 129.549677
KGS 87.447903
KHR 4010.000373
KMF 428.000031
KPW 899.987979
KRW 1495.759743
KWD 0.30655
KYD 0.833751
KZT 481.121429
LAK 21449.999666
LBP 89549.999831
LKR 311.846652
LRD 183.349858
LSL 16.820347
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.380056
MAD 9.37375
MDL 17.532561
MGA 4169.999987
MKD 53.541262
MMK 2099.739449
MNT 3585.842291
MOP 8.07209
MRU 40.11977
MUR 46.509725
MVR 15.45991
MWK 1735.999806
MXN 17.82539
MYR 3.939504
MZN 63.90203
NAD 16.820186
NGN 1356.496902
NIO 36.720261
NOK 9.50675
NPR 149.125498
NZD 1.711029
OMR 0.384488
PAB 1.000471
PEN 3.427497
PGK 4.302749
PHP 59.907065
PKR 279.298917
PLN 3.70548
PYG 6500.777741
QAR 3.643992
RON 4.426802
RSD 101.887676
RUB 85.999263
RWF 1459
SAR 3.75469
SBD 8.04524
SCR 14.217553
SDG 600.99976
SEK 9.336502
SGD 1.280125
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.650087
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 571.498731
SRD 37.375029
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.5
SVC 8.753927
SYP 110.528765
SZL 16.820303
THB 32.775498
TJS 9.579415
TMT 3.5
TND 2.9175
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.318502
TTD 6.781035
TWD 31.891704
TZS 2597.513194
UAH 43.994632
UGX 3781.362476
UYU 40.523406
UZS 12174.999707
VES 450.94284
VND 26290
VUV 119.408419
WST 2.73222
XAF 571.660014
XAG 0.014177
XAU 0.000217
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803034
XDR 0.710959
XOF 566.499323
XPF 103.901218
YER 238.575027
ZAR 16.857025
ZMK 9001.199188
ZMW 19.584125
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • RYCEF

    -0.5900

    16.01

    -3.69%

  • BCC

    -2.4900

    69.35

    -3.59%

  • NGG

    -2.0750

    85.325

    -2.43%

  • CMSD

    0.0600

    22.95

    +0.26%

  • GSK

    0.1000

    52.16

    +0.19%

  • RIO

    -3.0500

    84.67

    -3.6%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    22.83

    -0%

  • BCE

    -0.1000

    25.65

    -0.39%

  • VOD

    -0.0350

    14.335

    -0.24%

  • BTI

    0.3710

    58.461

    +0.63%

  • JRI

    -0.1530

    12.17

    -1.26%

  • RELX

    -0.1900

    33.67

    -0.56%

  • BP

    1.5550

    46.165

    +3.37%

  • AZN

    -0.1730

    188.247

    -0.09%


China’s profitless push




Can we keep up? Chinese companies are sacrificing margins—sometimes incurring outright losses—to win global market share in strategic industries from electric vehicles and batteries to solar and consumer tech. The tactic is turbocharging exports, pressuring Western competitors and forcing policymakers in Europe and the United States to erect new defenses while they scramble to lower costs at home.

Electric vehicles: a race to the bottom on price. In late spring 2025, China’s largest carmakers unleashed another round of steep price cuts, with entry-level models reduced to mass-market price points. Regulators in Beijing have since urged manufacturers to rein in the bruising price war, citing risks to industry health and employment. Yet the incentives keep coming as dozens of brands fight for share in the world’s most competitive EV market. The financial fallout is visible: leading pure-play EV makers continue to post substantial quarterly losses, while ambitious new entrants have acknowledged that their car divisions remain in the red even as sales surge.

Green tech: overcapacity meets collapsing margins. China’s build-out in solar has morphed from a growth engine into a profitability trap. Module and polysilicon prices have fallen so far that key manufacturers forecast sizeable half-year losses, and producers are now discussing a coordinated effort to shutter older capacity. Industry reports describe spot prices for feedstocks dipping below production costs, a hallmark of cut-throat competition that spills over into export markets and undercuts rivals globally.

Trade blowback intensifies. The U.S. has moved to quadruple tariffs on Chinese-made EVs and lift duties on batteries, chips and solar cells. The European Union has imposed definitive countervailing duties on Chinese battery-electric cars and opened additional probes across green-tech supply chains. Brussels and Beijing have even explored minimum export prices to reduce undercutting—an extraordinary step that underscores how acute the pricing pressure has become.

Deflation at the factory gate. China’s factory-gate prices remain in negative territory year on year, reflecting slack domestic demand and excess capacity. That weakness transmits abroad via cheaper exports, squeezing margins for manufacturers elsewhere and complicating central banks’ inflation-fighting calculus. Beijing has rolled out an “anti-involution” campaign to curb ruinous discounting and steer investment toward “high-quality growth,” but implementation is uneven and local governments still depend on industrial output to stabilize employment.

Scale, speed—and logistics. Chinese champions are not only cutting prices; they are redesigning logistics to keep them low. One leading EV maker has built its own fleet of car carriers and is localizing production via overseas factories to sidestep tariffs and port bottlenecks. Such vertical integration magnifies the advantage from sprawling domestic supply chains in batteries, motors and power electronics.

What this means for Western competitors. The immediate effect is a margin squeeze across autos, solar and adjacent sectors. The strategic response taking shape in Europe and the U.S. is three-pronged: (1) trade defense to buy time; (2) industrial policy to catalyze domestic gigafactories and clean-tech manufacturing; and (3) consolidation to rebuild pricing power. Companies that cannot match China’s cost curve will need to differentiate—through software, design, brand and service—or partner to gain scale. Even in China, the current “profitless prosperity” looks unsustainable: consolidation is inevitable, and state guidance now favors capacity rationalization over raw volume.

The bottom line. China’s price-first strategy is remaking global competition. Whether others can keep up will hinge on how quickly they can de-risk supply chains, compress costs and innovate without hollowing out profitability. For now, the contest is being fought as much on balance sheets as it is on assembly lines.