The Fort Worth Press - After Artemis II, NASA looks to SpaceX, Blue Origin for Moon landings

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 66.000368
ALL 81.003771
AMD 364.66866
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1485.503978
AUD 1.430206
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.695315
BBD 2.008061
BDT 123.113596
BHD 0.375937
BIF 2958.60963
BMD 1
BND 1.279591
BOB 11.838946
BRL 5.080504
BSD 0.997009
BTN 95.046158
BWP 13.594244
BYN 2.900273
BYR 19600
BZD 2.005201
CAD 1.40195
CDF 2275.000362
CHF 0.807714
CLF 0.023563
CLP 930.403912
CNY 6.751304
CNH 6.753015
COP 3101.200537
CRC 452.823647
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.579248
CZK 21.012104
DJF 177.540849
DKK 6.48427
DOP 57.8425
DZD 132.884324
EGP 50.996489
ERN 15
ETB 159.322411
EUR 0.866804
FJD 2.21395
FKP 0.741868
GBP 0.741702
GEL 2.61504
GGP 0.741868
GHS 11.655181
GIP 0.741868
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8752.221211
GTQ 7.60716
GYD 208.555454
HKD 7.842204
HNL 26.714341
HRK 6.534304
HTG 130.360161
HUF 316.550388
IDR 18029
ILS 3.06295
IMP 0.741868
INR 95.390504
IQD 1306.115373
IRR 1375125.000352
ISK 123.140386
JEP 0.741868
JMD 157.838166
JOD 0.70904
JPY 157.42504
KES 128.964591
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4034.152473
KMF 427.00035
KRW 1442.960383
KWD 0.30914
KYD 0.830841
KZT 472.43098
LAK 22578.771725
LBP 89284.705067
LKR 334.694231
LRD 179.95926
LSL 16.490877
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.378884
MAD 9.313657
MDL 17.422962
MGA 4263.858189
MKD 53.330733
MMK 2099.556709
MNT 3594.538358
MOP 8.054349
MRU 40.069345
MUR 47.000345
MVR 15.460378
MWK 1728.773892
MXN 17.347104
MYR 4.085204
MZN 63.910377
NAD 16.490877
NGN 1364.360377
NIO 36.692238
NOK 9.471104
NPR 152.073853
NZD 1.700247
OMR 0.384553
PAB 0.997009
PEN 3.378841
PGK 4.464092
PHP 61.255038
PKR 276.891432
PLN 3.73795
PYG 5944.610584
QAR 3.644606
RON 4.548604
RSD 101.755298
RUB 79.313483
RWF 1463.615481
SAR 3.744926
SBD 8.081105
SCR 13.507563
SDG 600.000339
SEK 9.522704
SGD 1.282604
SLE 24.703667
SOS 569.756859
SRD 37.781504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.236944
SVC 8.723616
SZL 16.488536
THB 33.525038
TJS 9.202271
TMT 3.51
TND 2.930958
TRY 47.512504
TTD 6.769818
TWD 32.309104
TZS 2641.52906
UAH 44.499112
UGX 3743.769774
UYU 40.116153
UZS 11934.295497
VES 745.696404
VND 26300.5
VUV 118.689846
WST 2.734491
XAF 568.592727
XAG 0.017363
XAU 0.000247
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.796819
XDR 0.707147
XOF 568.592727
XPF 103.376241
YER 238.303589
ZAR 16.55773
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.728384
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0300

    21.84

    +0.14%

  • BCC

    1.0000

    76.38

    +1.31%

  • NGG

    -0.4200

    79.97

    -0.53%

  • RIO

    -0.3300

    96.85

    -0.34%

  • GSK

    -0.3800

    51.69

    -0.74%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    22.11

    +0.41%

  • BTI

    -1.0400

    60.65

    -1.71%

  • BP

    1.0000

    45.22

    +2.21%

  • BCE

    -0.0200

    21.68

    -0.09%

  • AZN

    -1.7000

    169.64

    -1%

  • RELX

    -1.1900

    35.42

    -3.36%

  • RYCEF

    -0.3100

    19.55

    -1.59%

  • VOD

    -0.3600

    15.78

    -2.28%

  • JRI

    0.0900

    12.96

    +0.69%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.21

    0%

After Artemis II, NASA looks to SpaceX, Blue Origin for Moon landings
After Artemis II, NASA looks to SpaceX, Blue Origin for Moon landings / Photo: © AFP

After Artemis II, NASA looks to SpaceX, Blue Origin for Moon landings

With Artemis II successfully completing its historic lunar mission on Friday, NASA is banking on billionaires Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk for the next step: landing astronauts on the Moon.

Text size:

The Apollo program -- which sent the first and only humans to the Moon's surface between 1969 and 1972 -- was designed so that only two astronauts could land on the lunar surface for a maximum of a few days.

More than 50 years later, American ambitions and expertise have grown, with NASA hoping to send four people on a mission lasting several weeks and eventually building a lunar base.

For the second phase of its mission, the space agency is looking to commercial landers designed by Musk's SpaceX and Bezos's Blue Origin to get its astronauts on the Moon.

After Artemis II splashed down in the Pacific Ocean on Friday after its record-breaking journey, NASA officials urged all hands on deck for a crewed landing in 2028.

"We need all of industry to work and come along with us, and they need to accept that challenge and come with us and really start the production lines that are going to be required in order to achieve that goal," Lori Glaze, the acting associate NASA administrator, told a press conference.

The Apollo program relied on a single rocket, the Saturn V, which carried both the lunar lander and the capsule carrying the astronauts.

NASA has opted for two separate systems for Artemis: the first to launch the Orion spacecraft carrying the crew from Earth, and another to launch the lunar lander, which will be privately contracted.

- 'Camping trip' -

The decision was driven by the technical limitations of the Apollo program, Kent Chojnacki, a senior NASA official in charge of lunar lander development, told AFP.

"It was very not expandable to long-term exploration and long-term stays," he explained.

Although spectacular, the Apollo missions were like "camping trips," said Jack Kiraly, director of government relations at the Planetary Society, which encourages space exploration.

The systems NASA is looking at now are "huge compared to Apollo," said Chojnacki, noting that the new lunar landers being developed by Blue Origin and SpaceX are two to seven times larger than before.

The space agency is also drawing from external partners, such as the European companies that built the propulsion module for Orion.

The new approach opens access to more equipment and resources, but also significantly complicates operations.

To send these giant spacecrafts to the Moon, the private space exploration companies will need to master in-flight refueling, a complex maneuver that has not yet been fully tested.

After the lunar lander is launched, additional rockets will be needed to deliver the fuel required for the journey to the Moon, some 250,000 miles (400,000 kilometers) from Earth.

- 'Lose the Moon' -

Given this risky undertaking and the numerous delays -- particularly those experienced by SpaceX that was supposed to have its lander ready first -- pressure has mounted in recent months.

"We are once again about to lose the Moon," three former NASA officials warned in an article in SpaceNews last September.

China, which is hoping to send humans to the Moon by 2030, has been making progress as well, raising fears in the Trump administration that the United States could get left behind.

With that in mind, NASA raised the possibility last fall of reopening the contract awarded to SpaceX and using Blue Origin's lunar lander first, sending shockwaves through the rival companies.

Both firms announced they were realigning their strategies to prioritize the lunar project -- and keep their lucrative contracts with NASA.

But concerns remain, particularly regarding the feasibility of in-orbit refueling.

"We do have a plan," Chojnacki said, noting that NASA has a back-up plan in case of failure.

The timeline is also up in the air.

NASA says it plans to test an in-orbit rendezvous between the spacecraft and one or two lunar landers in 2027, and carry out a crewed lunar landing in 2028.

Before that, companies will need to test in-orbit refueling and send an unmanned lunar lander to the Moon to demonstrate its safety.

That all needs to happen within the next two years.

"It feels like a very small amount of time," said Clayton Swope of the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

M.McCoy--TFWP