The Fort Worth Press - Why are the US and China fighting over chips?

USD -
AED 3.672502
AFN 65.000288
ALL 79.92783
AMD 363.200558
ANG 1.790365
AOA 916.99996
ARS 1512.724296
AUD 1.405896
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.701759
BAM 1.70475
BBD 2.015105
BDT 122.866121
BGN 1.683441
BHD 0.377158
BIF 3009.975725
BMD 1
BND 1.276579
BOB 10.179685
BRL 5.132305
BSD 1.000449
BTN 95.931629
BWP 13.567684
BYN 3.041441
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012246
CAD 1.39962
CDF 2310.0002
CHF 0.82448
CLF 0.024171
CLP 954.419682
CNY 6.706402
CNH 6.70556
COP 3134.56
CRC 447.578413
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.109511
CZK 21.1723
DJF 178.159742
DKK 6.51085
DOP 59.260873
DZD 133.876605
EGP 52.161402
ERN 15
ETB 163.423038
EUR 0.87102
FJD 2.24075
FKP 0.743677
GBP 0.747565
GEL 2.604997
GGP 0.743677
GHS 11.515883
GIP 0.743677
GMD 73.999749
GNF 8795.70108
GTQ 7.633807
GYD 209.2854
HKD 7.845245
HNL 26.85343
HRK 6.5669
HTG 130.759174
HUF 316.173502
IDR 17733
ILS 3.03294
IMP 0.743677
INR 95.77355
IQD 1310.636666
IRR 1374575.000327
ISK 121.769736
JEP 0.743677
JMD 157.885791
JOD 0.70903
JPY 155.678496
KES 129.590798
KGS 87.450162
KHR 4074.837551
KMF 428.000211
KPW 900.000318
KRW 1382.815037
KWD 0.30861
KYD 0.833795
KZT 445.677328
LAK 22408.751171
LBP 89594.128747
LKR 331.841379
LRD 173.581452
LSL 16.298676
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.355114
MAD 9.52989
MDL 17.564075
MGA 4345.078556
MKD 53.623182
MMK 2099.664815
MNT 3596.851201
MOP 8.084808
MRU 40.080539
MUR 47.659514
MVR 15.409852
MWK 1734.87843
MXN 17.19097
MYR 4.0986
MZN 63.903695
NAD 16.298676
NGN 1330.980258
NIO 36.817998
NOK 9.42809
NPR 153.487582
NZD 1.74142
OMR 0.384505
PAB 1.000458
PEN 3.377685
PGK 4.451379
PHP 62.716015
PKR 277.316313
PLN 3.79595
PYG 5918.423381
QAR 3.647021
RON 4.583802
RSD 102.225971
RUB 84.725008
RWF 1476.267885
SAR 3.713538
SBD 8.000512
SCR 13.793554
SDG 601.483424
SEK 9.816345
SGD 1.27541
SHP 0.746965
SLE 24.639878
SLL 20969.491881
SOS 571.784692
SRD 37.752499
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.354764
SVC 8.754581
SYP 13002.000254
SZL 16.292377
THB 33.304993
TJS 9.229529
TMT 3.5
TND 2.943174
TOP 2.40776
TRY 48.67542
TTD 6.792558
TWD 31.893029
TZS 2653.280206
UAH 44.708507
UGX 3931.959922
UYU 40.225402
UZS 11781.061917
VES 845.45495
VND 26012
VUV 118.307083
WST 2.742913
XAF 571.351358
XAG 0.015409
XAU 0.00023
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.803158
XDR 0.707052
XOF 571.351358
XPF 103.951572
YER 236.650164
ZAR 16.254503
ZMK 9001.190528
ZMW 19.635051
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5658.175743
MXV 1.949099
  • CMSC

    0.1400

    20.48

    +0.68%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.99

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.4000

    22.5

    -1.78%

  • NGG

    1.1000

    76.03

    +1.45%

  • BCC

    -0.6200

    75.31

    -0.82%

  • RIO

    -1.4700

    95.79

    -1.53%

  • AZN

    1.0400

    162.89

    +0.64%

  • JRI

    -0.1200

    11.5

    -1.04%

  • GSK

    0.2800

    50.29

    +0.56%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0100

    19.29

    -0.05%

  • BTI

    -0.4300

    56.09

    -0.77%

  • RELX

    0.0500

    34.27

    +0.15%

  • CMSD

    0.1785

    20.29

    +0.88%

  • VOD

    -0.2200

    17.46

    -1.26%

  • BP

    -1.5800

    45.38

    -3.48%

Why are the US and China fighting over chips?
Why are the US and China fighting over chips? / Photo: © AFP/File

Why are the US and China fighting over chips?

The United States has moved to block China's access to the most advanced semiconductors and the equipment and talent needed to make them in recent months, citing national security.

Text size:

China has dismissed those concerns, accusing the United States of "technological terrorism" and unfairly hindering its economic growth. It has sought to counter the US containment measures.

AFP takes a look at the key issues in the so-called "semiconductor wars":

- Why are chips important? -

Microchips are the lifeblood of the modern global economy: the tiny slices of silicon are found in all types of electronics -- from LED lightbulbs and washing machines to cars and smartphones.

They are also critical to core services such as healthcare, law and order and utilities.

Globally, semiconductors are forecast to become a $1-trillion industry by 2030, according to a McKinsey report published last year.

Nowhere is their essential nature more visible than in China, the world's second-largest economy, which relies on a steady supply of foreign chips for its huge electronics manufacturing base.

In 2021, China imported semiconductors worth $430 billion -- more than it spent on oil.

- Why target China? -

Beyond iPhones, Teslas and PlayStations, the most potent chips are crucial to the development of advanced technology such as artificial intelligence, as well as cutting-edge weapons including hypersonic missiles and stealth fighter jets.

Washington imposed a series of export controls last year, saying they were meant to prevent "sensitive technologies with military applications" from being acquired by China's armed forces and its intelligence and security services.

The Dutch government followed suit in March this year, citing national security while imposing controls on foreign sales to prevent military use.

The same month, Japan unveiled similar measures aimed at preventing "the military diversion of technologies".

The Netherlands, a NATO member, and Japan -- a US treaty ally -- did not name China, but their restrictions infuriated Beijing.

The restrictions target the most advanced chips and chip-making tech that can be used for, among other applications, supercomputers, high-end military equipment and AI development.

- Why is China concerned? -

The production of chips is fiendishly complex, and typically spans numerous countries.

But many stages depend on US inputs, while the other major players are Japanese companies and the Netherlands' ASML -- which dominates the production of lithography machines that print patterns on silicon wafers.

This gives the trio an outsized influence on the global semiconductor industry.

"It will take years for China to develop domestic alternatives that are equally capable to the tools it is losing access to," Chris Miller, author of "Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology", told AFP.

"If it was easy, Chinese firms would already have done it."

- How have the sanctions hit? -

Chinese chip companies stockpiled components and machines ahead of US export controls in October last year to soften the blow.

But one major chip firm told AFP that once that inventory runs out, or needs repairs, the controls will start to hurt.

Some Chinese companies that were suddenly left unable to guarantee access to chips saw lucrative foreign contracts evaporate, forcing them to slash jobs and freeze expansion plans.

The US, Dutch and Japanese curbs have directly hit some of China's biggest chip manufacturers, including the Yangtze Memory Technology Corp (YMTC).

One of the biggest ways the sanctions have started to bite is by drying up a talent pool China had relied on.

A recent semi-official survey of Chinese chip companies estimated a need for 800,000 foreign workers by 2024, a gap Washington made harder to plug by restricting "US persons" from working in China's semiconductor industry.

- How has China responded? -

Beijing has reacted with anger and defiance, vowing to accelerate its efforts to become self-reliant on semiconductors.

To transcend US curbs, two semiconductor researchers at the influential Chinese Academy of Sciences offered a blueprint in February that advised Beijing to more effectively funnel investments into high-quality talent and original research.

It signalled a potential strategy rethink, and one of its main beneficiaries appears to be YMTC.

Company records show the US-sanctioned firm has received an injection of $7.1 billion since the new export controls took effect.

- Is more investment the answer for China? -

The tens of billions of dollars China has pumped into the development of a domestic industry have yet to bear much fruit.

China had aimed by 2025 to reach 70 percent chip self-sufficiency, but some think tanks estimate it currently meets below 20 percent of demand.

"Money is not the problem," said Qi Wang, co-founder of Hong Kong-based MegaTrust Investment, pointing instead at waste, fraud and talent shortages.

"China has no good options, except to double down on state support for the industry," said John Lee, director of East-West Futures consulting.

Experts say China may well reach its self-sufficiency target but it will take much longer in the face of such curbs.

"I don't think the US will ever be successful at preventing China from having great chips," Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates said on a podcast in March.

"We are going to force them to spend time and a bunch of money to make their own."

burs-lb-qan/dva

S.Palmer--TFWP