The Fort Worth Press - Why are the US and China fighting over chips?

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 66.150161
ALL 82.071137
AMD 381.637168
ANG 1.790403
AOA 916.999774
ARS 1438.243899
AUD 1.507807
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.69797
BAM 1.664227
BBD 2.01353
BDT 122.174949
BGN 1.664685
BHD 0.376991
BIF 2953.186891
BMD 1
BND 1.288882
BOB 6.933288
BRL 5.414603
BSD 0.999745
BTN 90.68295
BWP 13.20371
BYN 2.923673
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010636
CAD 1.376995
CDF 2250.000265
CHF 0.795455
CLF 0.023307
CLP 914.329745
CNY 7.04725
CNH 7.03837
COP 3818
CRC 500.085092
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.826583
CZK 20.69665
DJF 178.029272
DKK 6.35325
DOP 63.504084
DZD 129.648007
EGP 47.42397
ERN 15
ETB 155.599813
EUR 0.85055
FJD 2.30425
FKP 0.747395
GBP 0.747835
GEL 2.694987
GGP 0.747395
GHS 11.496767
GIP 0.747395
GMD 73.496448
GNF 8693.802358
GTQ 7.658271
GYD 209.155888
HKD 7.780235
HNL 26.33339
HRK 6.408702
HTG 130.989912
HUF 327.028501
IDR 16683.3
ILS 3.21285
IMP 0.747395
INR 90.88735
IQD 1309.654993
IRR 42109.99962
ISK 126.049797
JEP 0.747395
JMD 159.76855
JOD 0.708988
JPY 154.732061
KES 128.914227
KGS 87.450078
KHR 4000.153165
KMF 420.000406
KPW 900.00025
KRW 1471.859667
KWD 0.30674
KYD 0.833138
KZT 515.642085
LAK 21663.54663
LBP 89542.083418
LKR 309.121852
LRD 176.477597
LSL 16.773656
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.419503
MAD 9.176481
MDL 16.875425
MGA 4456.262764
MKD 52.359562
MMK 2099.766038
MNT 3546.841984
MOP 8.014159
MRU 39.76855
MUR 45.949883
MVR 15.397532
MWK 1733.577263
MXN 17.98549
MYR 4.085501
MZN 63.904127
NAD 16.773727
NGN 1451.189663
NIO 36.793581
NOK 10.159396
NPR 145.07403
NZD 1.732605
OMR 0.384492
PAB 0.999745
PEN 3.36659
PGK 4.24862
PHP 58.863028
PKR 280.175459
PLN 3.58829
PYG 6714.60177
QAR 3.643635
RON 4.331098
RSD 99.848015
RUB 79.502014
RWF 1455.582029
SAR 3.752122
SBD 8.160045
SCR 15.103409
SDG 601.500301
SEK 9.287197
SGD 1.289685
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.050474
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 570.371001
SRD 38.610158
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.847427
SVC 8.747484
SYP 11058.470992
SZL 16.776719
THB 31.490055
TJS 9.193736
TMT 3.5
TND 2.923758
TOP 2.40776
TRY 42.699596
TTD 6.785228
TWD 31.459
TZS 2482.484664
UAH 42.257233
UGX 3561.095984
UYU 39.181311
UZS 12095.014019
VES 267.43975
VND 26301
VUV 121.461818
WST 2.779313
XAF 558.16627
XAG 0.015937
XAU 0.000233
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801744
XDR 0.69418
XOF 558.16627
XPF 101.481031
YER 238.449994
ZAR 16.80125
ZMK 9001.203343
ZMW 23.168822
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • JRI

    -0.0065

    13.56

    -0.05%

  • BCC

    -1.1800

    75.33

    -1.57%

  • NGG

    1.1000

    76.03

    +1.45%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    23.3

    0%

  • BCE

    0.2161

    23.61

    +0.92%

  • CMSD

    0.1150

    23.365

    +0.49%

  • GSK

    0.4300

    49.24

    +0.87%

  • RBGPF

    0.4300

    81.6

    +0.53%

  • AZN

    1.7300

    91.56

    +1.89%

  • RIO

    0.1600

    75.82

    +0.21%

  • BTI

    0.6400

    57.74

    +1.11%

  • BP

    -0.0100

    35.25

    -0.03%

  • RYCEF

    0.0100

    14.65

    +0.07%

  • VOD

    0.1100

    12.7

    +0.87%

  • RELX

    0.7000

    41.08

    +1.7%

Why are the US and China fighting over chips?
Why are the US and China fighting over chips? / Photo: © AFP/File

Why are the US and China fighting over chips?

The United States has moved to block China's access to the most advanced semiconductors and the equipment and talent needed to make them in recent months, citing national security.

Text size:

China has dismissed those concerns, accusing the United States of "technological terrorism" and unfairly hindering its economic growth. It has sought to counter the US containment measures.

AFP takes a look at the key issues in the so-called "semiconductor wars":

- Why are chips important? -

Microchips are the lifeblood of the modern global economy: the tiny slices of silicon are found in all types of electronics -- from LED lightbulbs and washing machines to cars and smartphones.

They are also critical to core services such as healthcare, law and order and utilities.

Globally, semiconductors are forecast to become a $1-trillion industry by 2030, according to a McKinsey report published last year.

Nowhere is their essential nature more visible than in China, the world's second-largest economy, which relies on a steady supply of foreign chips for its huge electronics manufacturing base.

In 2021, China imported semiconductors worth $430 billion -- more than it spent on oil.

- Why target China? -

Beyond iPhones, Teslas and PlayStations, the most potent chips are crucial to the development of advanced technology such as artificial intelligence, as well as cutting-edge weapons including hypersonic missiles and stealth fighter jets.

Washington imposed a series of export controls last year, saying they were meant to prevent "sensitive technologies with military applications" from being acquired by China's armed forces and its intelligence and security services.

The Dutch government followed suit in March this year, citing national security while imposing controls on foreign sales to prevent military use.

The same month, Japan unveiled similar measures aimed at preventing "the military diversion of technologies".

The Netherlands, a NATO member, and Japan -- a US treaty ally -- did not name China, but their restrictions infuriated Beijing.

The restrictions target the most advanced chips and chip-making tech that can be used for, among other applications, supercomputers, high-end military equipment and AI development.

- Why is China concerned? -

The production of chips is fiendishly complex, and typically spans numerous countries.

But many stages depend on US inputs, while the other major players are Japanese companies and the Netherlands' ASML -- which dominates the production of lithography machines that print patterns on silicon wafers.

This gives the trio an outsized influence on the global semiconductor industry.

"It will take years for China to develop domestic alternatives that are equally capable to the tools it is losing access to," Chris Miller, author of "Chip War: The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology", told AFP.

"If it was easy, Chinese firms would already have done it."

- How have the sanctions hit? -

Chinese chip companies stockpiled components and machines ahead of US export controls in October last year to soften the blow.

But one major chip firm told AFP that once that inventory runs out, or needs repairs, the controls will start to hurt.

Some Chinese companies that were suddenly left unable to guarantee access to chips saw lucrative foreign contracts evaporate, forcing them to slash jobs and freeze expansion plans.

The US, Dutch and Japanese curbs have directly hit some of China's biggest chip manufacturers, including the Yangtze Memory Technology Corp (YMTC).

One of the biggest ways the sanctions have started to bite is by drying up a talent pool China had relied on.

A recent semi-official survey of Chinese chip companies estimated a need for 800,000 foreign workers by 2024, a gap Washington made harder to plug by restricting "US persons" from working in China's semiconductor industry.

- How has China responded? -

Beijing has reacted with anger and defiance, vowing to accelerate its efforts to become self-reliant on semiconductors.

To transcend US curbs, two semiconductor researchers at the influential Chinese Academy of Sciences offered a blueprint in February that advised Beijing to more effectively funnel investments into high-quality talent and original research.

It signalled a potential strategy rethink, and one of its main beneficiaries appears to be YMTC.

Company records show the US-sanctioned firm has received an injection of $7.1 billion since the new export controls took effect.

- Is more investment the answer for China? -

The tens of billions of dollars China has pumped into the development of a domestic industry have yet to bear much fruit.

China had aimed by 2025 to reach 70 percent chip self-sufficiency, but some think tanks estimate it currently meets below 20 percent of demand.

"Money is not the problem," said Qi Wang, co-founder of Hong Kong-based MegaTrust Investment, pointing instead at waste, fraud and talent shortages.

"China has no good options, except to double down on state support for the industry," said John Lee, director of East-West Futures consulting.

Experts say China may well reach its self-sufficiency target but it will take much longer in the face of such curbs.

"I don't think the US will ever be successful at preventing China from having great chips," Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates said on a podcast in March.

"We are going to force them to spend time and a bunch of money to make their own."

burs-lb-qan/dva

S.Palmer--TFWP