The Fort Worth Press - Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 62.506428
ALL 82.669181
AMD 376.230888
ANG 1.790083
AOA 916.999898
ARS 1397.438963
AUD 1.434216
AWG 1.80225
AZN 1.698731
BAM 1.684191
BBD 2.010067
BDT 122.460754
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.377549
BIF 2964.056903
BMD 1
BND 1.276953
BOB 6.911428
BRL 5.219601
BSD 0.997972
BTN 93.511761
BWP 13.674625
BYN 2.954524
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007225
CAD 1.379045
CDF 2277.560893
CHF 0.788285
CLF 0.023168
CLP 914.819733
CNY 6.892701
CNH 6.896815
COP 3705.22
CRC 464.994123
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.953305
CZK 21.031597
DJF 177.721517
DKK 6.434015
DOP 59.786189
DZD 132.496617
EGP 52.610098
ERN 15
ETB 154.279108
EUR 0.86114
FJD 2.24025
FKP 0.747226
GBP 0.744805
GEL 2.704971
GGP 0.747226
GHS 10.903627
GIP 0.747226
GMD 73.495784
GNF 8747.24442
GTQ 7.642594
GYD 208.863457
HKD 7.816545
HNL 26.426305
HRK 6.490797
HTG 130.855608
HUF 335.092497
IDR 16874
ILS 3.11496
IMP 0.747226
INR 94.01855
IQD 1307.361768
IRR 1313025.000172
ISK 123.859562
JEP 0.747226
JMD 157.486621
JOD 0.708967
JPY 158.778019
KES 129.750191
KGS 87.449198
KHR 4005.063378
KMF 425.99973
KPW 900.014346
KRW 1496.680243
KWD 0.30647
KYD 0.831676
KZT 481.782876
LAK 21486.820464
LBP 89375.339068
LKR 313.699656
LRD 183.13807
LSL 17.013787
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.362944
MAD 9.303745
MDL 17.455028
MGA 4166.899883
MKD 53.104551
MMK 2100.167588
MNT 3569.46809
MOP 8.04266
MRU 39.802636
MUR 46.459693
MVR 15.460316
MWK 1730.481919
MXN 17.730503
MYR 3.964988
MZN 63.910023
NAD 17.013787
NGN 1377.903141
NIO 36.726715
NOK 9.725698
NPR 149.61272
NZD 1.71587
OMR 0.3845
PAB 0.997963
PEN 3.451997
PGK 4.309899
PHP 59.985973
PKR 278.8205
PLN 3.674825
PYG 6511.920293
QAR 3.639338
RON 4.388203
RSD 101.148972
RUB 80.876407
RWF 1459.995436
SAR 3.751309
SBD 8.041975
SCR 13.769339
SDG 601.000445
SEK 9.270365
SGD 1.27794
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.58613
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 570.306681
SRD 37.340127
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.09741
SVC 8.732681
SYP 110.948257
SZL 17.012336
THB 32.478014
TJS 9.575933
TMT 3.51
TND 2.927264
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.357297
TTD 6.780508
TWD 31.907202
TZS 2570.059022
UAH 43.82926
UGX 3737.239351
UYU 40.671515
UZS 12175.463071
VES 458.87816
VND 26350
VUV 119.508072
WST 2.738201
XAF 564.849586
XAG 0.01366
XAU 0.000218
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.798634
XDR 0.702492
XOF 564.869043
XPF 102.697908
YER 238.59782
ZAR 16.842011
ZMK 9001.211096
ZMW 18.887324
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0800

    22.95

    +0.35%

  • NGG

    1.7500

    84.08

    +2.08%

  • RIO

    1.2600

    88.03

    +1.43%

  • BCE

    -0.0720

    25.758

    -0.28%

  • BCC

    0.5650

    74.135

    +0.76%

  • BP

    0.4950

    45.285

    +1.09%

  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • GSK

    1.5050

    54.455

    +2.76%

  • BTI

    0.6400

    58.4

    +1.1%

  • CMSD

    0.1650

    22.795

    +0.72%

  • JRI

    0.3900

    12.25

    +3.18%

  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    16

    +2.5%

  • VOD

    0.1100

    14.77

    +0.74%

  • AZN

    2.1000

    187.88

    +1.12%

  • RELX

    -0.0700

    32.39

    -0.22%

Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?
Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO? / Photo: © POOL/AFP/File

Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?

The White House has said President Donald Trump is discussing options including military action to take Greenland -- despite a warning from Denmark that an attack would spell the end of NATO.

Text size:

But how high really is the risk that Trump's desire for the territory might end up sinking an alliance that has underpinned Western security for over seven decades?

The answer depends on whether Trump is really planning to make a move and if the spectre of military force is just a bluff to exert pressure.

Here's how the situation could break down:

- US ups threats -

In the wake of his military intervention in Venezuela, Trump set off alarm bells in Europe by repeating his insistence that he wants to take control of Greenland.

The mineral-rich semi-autonomous territory -- part of Washington's long-standing NATO ally Denmark and home already to a US military base -- has been in Trump's sights since his first term in office.

But this time around his administration has ramped up its rhetoric by insisting that "acquiring Greenland is a national security priority".

"The president and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilising the US military is always an option," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday.

That came despite a warning from Danish premier Mette Frederiksen an attack on a NATO ally would end the alliance -- and a show of support for Copenhagen from key European leaders.

- Military route? -

While Trump was willing to deploy US military might against long-standing foe Venezuela, using force against a close ally like Denmark is a different ball game.

French President Emmanuel Macron said he couldn't "imagine a scenario" under which Washington would violate Danish sovereignty.

Any US military action against Greenland would effectively tear NATO apart.

Its Article Five pledge that members will defend each other if attacked is meant to deter threats from outside -- and the idea of its key power would turn on an ally was seen as inconceivable.

Under an existing agreement with Denmark, the United States could already station more troops Greenland if it wants.

Officials at NATO have repeatedly played down the prospect Trump could invade -- but admit that with the US leader they can never be sure.

"We don't believe he would -- there is no need -- the US can get any access they want from Denmark," a senior NATO diplomat told AFP, speaking as others on condition of anonymity.

"But given the persistent rhetoric, we can't be entirely sure."

So far there has been no sign of the sort of military buildup witnessed around Venezuela and some US officials have been pressing other options.

US media reported Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers Trump wants to buy Greenland rather than attack it -- and the hope from NATO is that diplomacy will win out.

"I hope the Danes, the Greenlanders and the Americans will sit around a fire somewhere and an outcome will be reached," a second NATO diplomat said.

- NATO steers clear -

So far NATO as an organisation has tried to stay out of the Greenland issue.

"I don't think this issue will ever be brought up in a NATO framework in order to avoid any divisions," a third NATO diplomat said.

With Russia's war raging in Ukraine, European members are desperate not to jeopardise US involvement in helping to shield them from Moscow.

Alliance chief Mark Rutte has tried to deflect US interest by emphasising joint efforts to bolster security in the Arctic against threats from Russia and China, a key justification by Trump for wanting Greenland.

"The Danes are totally fine if the US would have a bigger presence than they have now," Rutte told CNN. "We have to make sure that the Arctic stays safe."

While the alliance takes a backseat, some more bullish European members may try to be more assertive.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said Paris was talking to Germany and Poland to come up with a plan for a possible response.

There are fears though that just by raising the prospect of attacking an ally -- or pressuring it to cede territory -- the United States may have already damaged NATO.

"No one has any interest in a quarrel within NATO, except our enemies," said Belgian defence minister Theo Francken.

"I'm convinced initiatives will be taken in the coming days, behind the scenes or in the open, to resolve this situation."

C.M.Harper--TFWP