The Fort Worth Press - Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?

USD -
AED 3.6725
AFN 65.493911
ALL 80.193613
AMD 365.443623
ANG 1.789783
AOA 917.99989
ARS 1490.036389
AUD 1.415829
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.702402
BAM 1.690479
BBD 2.011669
BDT 122.606854
BGN 1.696366
BHD 0.37668
BIF 2985.954449
BMD 1
BND 1.277583
BOB 11.640953
BRL 5.222399
BSD 0.998833
BTN 95.261679
BWP 13.45607
BYN 3.037988
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008816
CAD 1.38805
CDF 2272.999923
CHF 0.813662
CLF 0.023213
CLP 913.600415
CNY 6.743197
CNH 6.74452
COP 3115.519253
CRC 449.371191
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.306625
CZK 20.930299
DJF 177.864212
DKK 6.460598
DOP 58.464065
DZD 131.663425
EGP 50.220234
ERN 15
ETB 161.573793
EUR 0.8645
FJD 2.234202
FKP 0.739036
GBP 0.73929
GEL 2.610212
GGP 0.739036
GHS 10.937378
GIP 0.739036
GMD 73.502791
GNF 8773.931458
GTQ 7.6209
GYD 208.928649
HKD 7.846703
HNL 26.775574
HRK 6.512303
HTG 130.645231
HUF 313.82998
IDR 17828.1
ILS 2.955101
IMP 0.739036
INR 95.450496
IQD 1308.440296
IRR 1374587.526387
ISK 122.901691
JEP 0.739036
JMD 158.174511
JOD 0.708958
JPY 159.303972
KES 129.09806
KGS 87.45009
KHR 4041.661265
KMF 426.999695
KPW 900.000294
KRW 1416.60954
KWD 0.30868
KYD 0.832361
KZT 463.468603
LAK 22542.892951
LBP 89443.536886
LKR 332.365271
LRD 181.287005
LSL 16.158607
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.359825
MAD 9.264013
MDL 17.319677
MGA 4300.099399
MKD 53.178616
MMK 2099.791609
MNT 3596.010349
MOP 8.073123
MRU 40.112364
MUR 47.098959
MVR 15.450212
MWK 1731.967674
MXN 17.009716
MYR 4.085899
MZN 63.910275
NAD 16.158607
NGN 1359.569785
NIO 36.760448
NOK 9.442598
NPR 152.41886
NZD 1.677149
OMR 0.381252
PAB 0.998833
PEN 3.368858
PGK 4.486797
PHP 61.464973
PKR 277.41994
PLN 3.72275
PYG 5995.073253
QAR 3.641125
RON 4.526702
RSD 101.421842
RUB 83.996716
RWF 1468.77566
SAR 3.750032
SBD 8.048583
SCR 13.755996
SDG 600.563599
SEK 9.527033
SGD 1.279696
SHP 0.740866
SLE 24.503233
SLL 20969.499227
SOS 570.811185
SRD 37.974499
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.176369
SVC 8.739358
SYP 13001.999906
SZL 16.156273
THB 33.143064
TJS 9.223994
TMT 3.51
TND 2.928476
TOP 2.40776
TRY 47.867505
TTD 6.76693
TWD 32.021601
TZS 2646.873244
UAH 44.681879
UGX 3710.618436
UYU 40.019016
UZS 11890.747223
VES 770.109102
VND 26148.5
VUV 117.940389
WST 2.73449
XAF 566.970915
XAG 0.015456
XAU 0.000229
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.800078
XDR 0.707052
XOF 566.970915
XPF 103.081378
YER 237.198588
ZAR 16.129765
ZMK 9001.2023
ZMW 18.87722
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.0250

    21.45

    -0.12%

  • CMSD

    -0.0100

    21.58

    -0.05%

  • BTI

    -0.2900

    57.06

    -0.51%

  • RIO

    -0.4100

    95.68

    -0.43%

  • NGG

    -0.1500

    81.05

    -0.19%

  • RYCEF

    0.1300

    20.84

    +0.62%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    71.34

    0%

  • AZN

    -0.7900

    156.45

    -0.5%

  • GSK

    -0.4785

    49.52

    -0.97%

  • BCE

    0.1500

    23.47

    +0.64%

  • VOD

    0.2000

    16.42

    +1.22%

  • BP

    0.2196

    42.53

    +0.52%

  • JRI

    0.0635

    12.61

    +0.5%

  • BCC

    -0.8900

    83.24

    -1.07%

  • RELX

    -0.2400

    34.43

    -0.7%

Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?
Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO? / Photo: © POOL/AFP/File

Could Trump's desire for Greenland blow up NATO?

The White House has said President Donald Trump is discussing options including military action to take Greenland -- despite a warning from Denmark that an attack would spell the end of NATO.

Text size:

But how high really is the risk that Trump's desire for the territory might end up sinking an alliance that has underpinned Western security for over seven decades?

The answer depends on whether Trump is really planning to make a move and if the spectre of military force is just a bluff to exert pressure.

Here's how the situation could break down:

- US ups threats -

In the wake of his military intervention in Venezuela, Trump set off alarm bells in Europe by repeating his insistence that he wants to take control of Greenland.

The mineral-rich semi-autonomous territory -- part of Washington's long-standing NATO ally Denmark and home already to a US military base -- has been in Trump's sights since his first term in office.

But this time around his administration has ramped up its rhetoric by insisting that "acquiring Greenland is a national security priority".

"The president and his team are discussing a range of options to pursue this important foreign policy goal, and of course, utilising the US military is always an option," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday.

That came despite a warning from Danish premier Mette Frederiksen an attack on a NATO ally would end the alliance -- and a show of support for Copenhagen from key European leaders.

- Military route? -

While Trump was willing to deploy US military might against long-standing foe Venezuela, using force against a close ally like Denmark is a different ball game.

French President Emmanuel Macron said he couldn't "imagine a scenario" under which Washington would violate Danish sovereignty.

Any US military action against Greenland would effectively tear NATO apart.

Its Article Five pledge that members will defend each other if attacked is meant to deter threats from outside -- and the idea of its key power would turn on an ally was seen as inconceivable.

Under an existing agreement with Denmark, the United States could already station more troops Greenland if it wants.

Officials at NATO have repeatedly played down the prospect Trump could invade -- but admit that with the US leader they can never be sure.

"We don't believe he would -- there is no need -- the US can get any access they want from Denmark," a senior NATO diplomat told AFP, speaking as others on condition of anonymity.

"But given the persistent rhetoric, we can't be entirely sure."

So far there has been no sign of the sort of military buildup witnessed around Venezuela and some US officials have been pressing other options.

US media reported Secretary of State Marco Rubio told lawmakers Trump wants to buy Greenland rather than attack it -- and the hope from NATO is that diplomacy will win out.

"I hope the Danes, the Greenlanders and the Americans will sit around a fire somewhere and an outcome will be reached," a second NATO diplomat said.

- NATO steers clear -

So far NATO as an organisation has tried to stay out of the Greenland issue.

"I don't think this issue will ever be brought up in a NATO framework in order to avoid any divisions," a third NATO diplomat said.

With Russia's war raging in Ukraine, European members are desperate not to jeopardise US involvement in helping to shield them from Moscow.

Alliance chief Mark Rutte has tried to deflect US interest by emphasising joint efforts to bolster security in the Arctic against threats from Russia and China, a key justification by Trump for wanting Greenland.

"The Danes are totally fine if the US would have a bigger presence than they have now," Rutte told CNN. "We have to make sure that the Arctic stays safe."

While the alliance takes a backseat, some more bullish European members may try to be more assertive.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said Paris was talking to Germany and Poland to come up with a plan for a possible response.

There are fears though that just by raising the prospect of attacking an ally -- or pressuring it to cede territory -- the United States may have already damaged NATO.

"No one has any interest in a quarrel within NATO, except our enemies," said Belgian defence minister Theo Francken.

"I'm convinced initiatives will be taken in the coming days, behind the scenes or in the open, to resolve this situation."

C.M.Harper--TFWP