The Fort Worth Press - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 66.000172
ALL 81.915831
AMD 380.151858
ANG 1.79008
AOA 916.999991
ARS 1452.0001
AUD 1.436163
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.698478
BAM 1.655536
BBD 2.022821
BDT 122.831966
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.377077
BIF 2987.661537
BMD 1
BND 1.276711
BOB 6.964795
BRL 5.261801
BSD 1.004342
BTN 91.842522
BWP 13.228461
BYN 2.875814
BYR 19600
BZD 2.019858
CAD 1.36782
CDF 2155.000038
CHF 0.778496
CLF 0.021907
CLP 865.000438
CNY 6.946499
CNH 6.93615
COP 3612
CRC 498.70812
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.33655
CZK 20.59045
DJF 178.843207
DKK 6.32741
DOP 63.484264
DZD 129.927036
EGP 47.084604
ERN 15
ETB 156.676691
EUR 0.84724
FJD 2.206603
FKP 0.729754
GBP 0.73136
GEL 2.69496
GGP 0.729754
GHS 11.012638
GIP 0.729754
GMD 73.498019
GNF 8819.592694
GTQ 7.706307
GYD 210.120453
HKD 7.81115
HNL 26.532255
HRK 6.384199
HTG 131.728867
HUF 322.649652
IDR 16776
ILS 3.10084
IMP 0.729754
INR 90.299501
IQD 1315.670299
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 123.019691
JEP 0.729754
JMD 157.811362
JOD 0.708991
JPY 155.542502
KES 129.550374
KGS 87.450291
KHR 4046.744687
KMF 417.999937
KPW 900
KRW 1450.770151
KWD 0.30715
KYD 0.836906
KZT 507.178168
LAK 21598.652412
LBP 89936.006501
LKR 311.010475
LRD 186.300651
LSL 16.079552
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.345176
MAD 9.158604
MDL 17.00314
MGA 4482.056104
MKD 52.227297
MMK 2099.986463
MNT 3564.625242
MOP 8.079484
MRU 39.911729
MUR 45.649967
MVR 15.449833
MWK 1742.758273
MXN 17.38225
MYR 3.945497
MZN 63.749689
NAD 16.079688
NGN 1400.540255
NIO 36.985739
NOK 9.697115
NPR 147.062561
NZD 1.663355
OMR 0.3845
PAB 1.004342
PEN 3.382683
PGK 4.306869
PHP 58.866499
PKR 281.341223
PLN 3.57701
PYG 6677.840135
QAR 3.671415
RON 4.317502
RSD 99.503989
RUB 76.449696
RWF 1469.427172
SAR 3.750059
SBD 8.058101
SCR 15.05913
SDG 601.5051
SEK 8.951115
SGD 1.270985
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.475031
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 574.437084
SRD 38.025018
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.754973
SVC 8.788065
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 16.083999
THB 31.501499
TJS 9.380296
TMT 3.51
TND 2.897568
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.479195
TTD 6.79979
TWD 31.572001
TZS 2588.080817
UAH 43.28509
UGX 3587.360437
UYU 38.963238
UZS 12278.117779
VES 369.79158
VND 25997.5
VUV 119.156711
WST 2.710781
XAF 555.683849
XAG 0.012162
XAU 0.000209
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.81001
XDR 0.691072
XOF 555.251107
XPF 100.950591
YER 238.375016
ZAR 16.02862
ZMK 9001.200706
ZMW 19.709321
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • BCC

    0.9400

    81.75

    +1.15%

  • NGG

    -0.6600

    84.61

    -0.78%

  • BTI

    0.3100

    60.99

    +0.51%

  • AZN

    1.3100

    188.41

    +0.7%

  • BCE

    -0.0300

    25.83

    -0.12%

  • CMSC

    -0.0100

    23.75

    -0.04%

  • RELX

    -0.2700

    35.53

    -0.76%

  • BP

    -0.1800

    37.7

    -0.48%

  • JRI

    0.0700

    13.15

    +0.53%

  • CMSD

    0.0300

    24.08

    +0.12%

  • RIO

    1.4900

    92.52

    +1.61%

  • GSK

    0.8700

    52.47

    +1.66%

  • RYCEF

    0.7000

    16.7

    +4.19%

  • VOD

    0.2600

    14.91

    +1.74%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: © AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

L.Davila--TFWP