The Fort Worth Press - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 65.999981
ALL 80.778943
AMD 365.649242
AOA 918.000071
ARS 1496.242501
AUD 1.420051
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70415
BAM 1.694243
BBD 2.013626
BDT 123.754743
BHD 0.376996
BIF 2988.071622
BMD 1
BND 1.281981
BOB 12.092258
BRL 5.122702
BSD 0.999753
BTN 95.145446
BWP 13.521485
BYN 2.960018
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010681
CAD 1.399755
CDF 2261.000308
CHF 0.809703
CLF 0.023153
CLP 914.220115
CNY 6.749953
CNH 6.748475
COP 3181.98
CRC 454.762008
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.518807
CZK 20.975095
DJF 178.03342
DKK 6.476797
DOP 58.256128
DZD 132.984018
EGP 49.790099
ERN 15
ETB 161.364703
EUR 0.86642
FJD 2.21245
FKP 0.742819
GBP 0.742565
GEL 2.614971
GGP 0.742819
GHS 11.751814
GIP 0.742819
GMD 73.494895
GNF 8780.470902
GTQ 7.628337
GYD 209.158083
HKD 7.84455
HNL 26.796086
HRK 6.527503
HTG 130.718954
HUF 315.163504
IDR 17899
ILS 3.01309
IMP 0.742819
INR 95.242097
IQD 1309.701703
IRR 1374799.999854
ISK 123.030031
JEP 0.742819
JMD 158.474679
JOD 0.708997
JPY 157.837501
KES 129.350358
KGS 87.450213
KHR 4056.705519
KMF 427.000174
KRW 1423.17952
KWD 0.30893
KYD 0.833171
KZT 468.495939
LAK 22589.41952
LBP 89528.70601
LKR 335.825291
LRD 180.459725
LSL 16.307022
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.373118
MAD 9.327951
MDL 17.39541
MGA 4298.392651
MKD 53.301108
MMK 2099.443841
MNT 3595.840223
MOP 8.078327
MRU 40.080389
MUR 46.93997
MVR 15.449648
MWK 1733.55625
MXN 17.24656
MYR 4.0895
MZN 63.909695
NAD 16.306951
NGN 1362.770366
NIO 36.790312
NOK 9.53125
NPR 152.231048
NZD 1.699795
OMR 0.384504
PAB 0.999749
PEN 3.37939
PGK 4.41709
PHP 60.754026
PKR 277.55765
PLN 3.7246
PYG 5946.889469
QAR 3.654602
RON 4.552104
RSD 101.643999
RUB 81.648985
RWF 1468.660802
SAR 3.755132
SBD 8.068348
SCR 14.493758
SDG 600.503789
SEK 9.464635
SGD 1.28211
SLE 24.545196
SOS 571.386496
SRD 37.667997
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.223422
SVC 8.747553
SZL 16.293454
THB 33.062964
TJS 9.222706
TMT 3.5
TND 2.932323
TRY 47.592097
TTD 6.768972
TWD 32.218008
TZS 2649.998049
UAH 44.766628
UGX 3724.060864
UYU 40.264038
UZS 11914.620835
VES 754.21125
VND 26235
VUV 119.344278
WST 2.729216
XAF 568.230703
XAG 0.016239
XAU 0.000235
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801841
XDR 0.705886
XOF 568.233164
XPF 103.310868
YER 236.874962
ZAR 16.31015
ZMK 9001.198449
ZMW 19.020435
ZWL 321.999592
  • RYCEF

    0.6000

    21

    +2.86%

  • JRI

    -0.0500

    12.67

    -0.39%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    69.74

    0%

  • BCC

    -1.6900

    84.8

    -1.99%

  • RIO

    2.5000

    101.51

    +2.46%

  • CMSD

    0.0200

    22.04

    +0.09%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    22.06

    +0.27%

  • CMSC

    -0.0600

    21.73

    -0.28%

  • GSK

    -0.0700

    51.46

    -0.14%

  • NGG

    -0.1600

    80.26

    -0.2%

  • AZN

    5.8800

    161.5

    +3.64%

  • VOD

    -0.3800

    15.31

    -2.48%

  • BP

    -1.2300

    41.21

    -2.98%

  • BTI

    0.1500

    59.27

    +0.25%

  • RELX

    -0.1900

    36.61

    -0.52%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: © AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

L.Davila--TFWP