The Fort Worth Press - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

USD -
AED 3.672502
AFN 66.374624
ALL 82.891062
AMD 382.105484
ANG 1.790055
AOA 916.999807
ARS 1445.826396
AUD 1.509662
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.695795
BAM 1.678236
BBD 2.018646
BDT 122.628476
BGN 1.677703
BHD 0.377014
BIF 2961.256275
BMD 1
BND 1.297979
BOB 6.925579
BRL 5.310804
BSD 1.002244
BTN 90.032049
BWP 13.315657
BYN 2.90153
BYR 19600
BZD 2.015729
CAD 1.394875
CDF 2230.000049
CHF 0.80302
CLF 0.023394
CLP 917.730085
CNY 7.07165
CNH 7.067097
COP 3796.99
CRC 491.421364
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.616395
CZK 20.76375
DJF 178.481789
DKK 6.40673
DOP 63.686561
DZD 129.897998
EGP 47.520501
ERN 15
ETB 156.280403
EUR 0.857898
FJD 2.261501
FKP 0.750125
GBP 0.749325
GEL 2.700162
GGP 0.750125
GHS 11.416779
GIP 0.750125
GMD 73.000063
GNF 8709.00892
GTQ 7.677291
GYD 209.68946
HKD 7.78475
HNL 26.389336
HRK 6.462901
HTG 131.282447
HUF 328.445496
IDR 16651.7
ILS 3.235525
IMP 0.750125
INR 89.888095
IQD 1312.956662
IRR 42124.999835
ISK 127.820348
JEP 0.750125
JMD 160.623651
JOD 0.708969
JPY 154.622993
KES 129.250164
KGS 87.45021
KHR 4014.227424
KMF 422.000349
KPW 899.992858
KRW 1470.020022
KWD 0.306802
KYD 0.83526
KZT 506.587952
LAK 21742.171042
LBP 89752.828464
LKR 309.374155
LRD 176.902912
LSL 17.013777
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.447985
MAD 9.247548
MDL 17.048443
MGA 4457.716053
MKD 52.892165
MMK 2099.902882
MNT 3550.784265
MOP 8.035628
MRU 39.710999
MUR 46.070267
MVR 15.409735
MWK 1737.95151
MXN 18.2142
MYR 4.114026
MZN 63.897023
NAD 17.013777
NGN 1450.250279
NIO 36.881624
NOK 10.095799
NPR 144.049872
NZD 1.732802
OMR 0.384503
PAB 1.002325
PEN 3.37046
PGK 4.251065
PHP 58.991026
PKR 283.139992
PLN 3.631841
PYG 6950.492756
QAR 3.663323
RON 4.367199
RSD 100.707975
RUB 76.00652
RWF 1458.303837
SAR 3.753008
SBD 8.223823
SCR 14.340982
SDG 601.504905
SEK 9.41351
SGD 1.29484
SHP 0.750259
SLE 22.999887
SLL 20969.498139
SOS 571.823287
SRD 38.643498
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.023817
SVC 8.769634
SYP 11056.894377
SZL 17.008825
THB 31.89005
TJS 9.210862
TMT 3.5
TND 2.941946
TOP 2.40776
TRY 42.517902
TTD 6.795179
TWD 31.297984
TZS 2449.999928
UAH 42.259148
UGX 3553.316915
UYU 39.265994
UZS 11939.350775
VES 248.585902
VND 26365
VUV 122.113889
WST 2.800321
XAF 562.862377
XAG 0.017154
XAU 0.000237
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.806356
XDR 0.70002
XOF 562.867207
XPF 102.334841
YER 238.414547
ZAR 16.960985
ZMK 9001.19956
ZMW 23.026725
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    -0.1200

    16.23

    -0.74%

  • CMSD

    -0.0300

    23.32

    -0.13%

  • BCC

    -2.3000

    74.26

    -3.1%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    78.35

    0%

  • RIO

    -0.5500

    73.73

    -0.75%

  • NGG

    -0.5800

    75.91

    -0.76%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    23.48

    +0.17%

  • GSK

    -0.4000

    48.57

    -0.82%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    14.67

    +3.14%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    13.75

    +0.36%

  • BCE

    0.0400

    23.22

    +0.17%

  • VOD

    0.0500

    12.64

    +0.4%

  • RELX

    0.3500

    40.54

    +0.86%

  • BTI

    0.5300

    58.04

    +0.91%

  • BP

    -0.0100

    37.23

    -0.03%

  • AZN

    -0.8200

    90.03

    -0.91%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: © AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

L.Davila--TFWP