The Fort Worth Press - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

USD -
AED 3.673097
AFN 64.500451
ALL 81.34983
AMD 369.279941
ANG 1.789884
AOA 917.999922
ARS 1395.624804
AUD 1.38259
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.701457
BAM 1.66265
BBD 2.014749
BDT 122.739232
BGN 1.668102
BHD 0.377297
BIF 2976
BMD 1
BND 1.266375
BOB 6.912147
BRL 4.940497
BSD 1.000319
BTN 94.284014
BWP 13.393294
BYN 2.82688
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011842
CAD 1.36364
CDF 2315.999651
CHF 0.778795
CLF 0.022624
CLP 890.409986
CNY 6.80185
CNH 6.80419
COP 3741.06
CRC 458.882886
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.225027
CZK 20.693601
DJF 177.719797
DKK 6.36078
DOP 59.549955
DZD 132.081898
EGP 52.718598
ERN 15
ETB 157.29611
EUR 0.85121
FJD 2.212022
FKP 0.735472
GBP 0.736385
GEL 2.679994
GGP 0.735472
GHS 11.269915
GIP 0.735472
GMD 72.999971
GNF 8777.494952
GTQ 7.638065
GYD 209.28562
HKD 7.83245
HNL 26.609557
HRK 6.415902
HTG 131.015429
HUF 303.388008
IDR 17333.35
ILS 2.901355
IMP 0.735472
INR 94.411098
IQD 1310
IRR 1312899.999774
ISK 122.410095
JEP 0.735472
JMD 157.559837
JOD 0.708961
JPY 156.657496
KES 129.149891
KGS 87.420497
KHR 4012.517817
KMF 419.000263
KPW 900.010907
KRW 1456.689972
KWD 0.307879
KYD 0.833606
KZT 463.246483
LAK 21949.999902
LBP 89549.999964
LKR 322.106516
LRD 183.449924
LSL 16.369859
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.329955
MAD 9.142501
MDL 17.210233
MGA 4165.000253
MKD 52.491304
MMK 2099.841446
MNT 3580.445259
MOP 8.06845
MRU 39.935026
MUR 46.710186
MVR 15.455027
MWK 1742.000354
MXN 17.261435
MYR 3.910167
MZN 63.900068
NAD 16.369724
NGN 1360.640193
NIO 36.705012
NOK 9.29575
NPR 150.856686
NZD 1.67956
OMR 0.384501
PAB 1.00031
PEN 3.457501
PGK 4.340234
PHP 60.448026
PKR 278.600215
PLN 3.59908
PYG 6122.509702
QAR 3.642967
RON 4.480181
RSD 99.89701
RUB 74.662723
RWF 1460.5
SAR 3.775297
SBD 8.032258
SCR 14.060977
SDG 600.47226
SEK 9.246535
SGD 1.26803
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.605582
SLL 20969.496166
SOS 571.502518
SRD 37.431018
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.275
SVC 8.752758
SYP 110.548305
SZL 16.370219
THB 32.2515
TJS 9.348017
TMT 3.51
TND 2.869499
TOP 2.40776
TRY 45.247197
TTD 6.76678
TWD 31.3943
TZS 2597.502706
UAH 43.802978
UGX 3741.312987
UYU 39.99779
UZS 12125.000044
VES 496.20906
VND 26310
VUV 118.093701
WST 2.711513
XAF 557.627717
XAG 0.012556
XAU 0.000212
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80278
XDR 0.694413
XOF 556.497009
XPF 101.895554
YER 238.606151
ZAR 16.41005
ZMK 9001.209585
ZMW 19.055796
ZWL 321.999592
  • BCC

    -1.4800

    72.76

    -2.03%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    63.18

    0%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    22.97

    -0.17%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0500

    17.45

    -0.29%

  • NGG

    -1.9400

    85.91

    -2.26%

  • RIO

    -2.4000

    103.11

    -2.33%

  • GSK

    -0.0300

    50.5

    -0.06%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    23.42

    0%

  • BCE

    0.3400

    24.57

    +1.38%

  • AZN

    -2.4000

    182.52

    -1.31%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.15

    -0.15%

  • RELX

    -1.5900

    34.16

    -4.65%

  • VOD

    -0.4400

    15.69

    -2.8%

  • BP

    -0.8200

    43.81

    -1.87%

  • BTI

    -1.4800

    58.08

    -2.55%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: © AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

L.Davila--TFWP