The Fort Worth Press - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.000368
ALL 81.431326
AMD 361.239406
ANG 1.789785
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1544.046724
AUD 1.452222
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.754002
BBD 2.018116
BDT 124.801578
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.378548
BIF 2997.982153
BMD 1
BND 1.283978
BOB 12.019192
BRL 5.504904
BSD 1.002018
BTN 94.051388
BWP 13.802968
BYN 3.000673
BYR 19600
BZD 2.015246
CAD 1.41125
CDF 2320.000362
CHF 0.819824
CLF 0.024951
CLP 981.982871
CNY 6.676504
CNH 6.670804
COP 3236.357114
CRC 454.419084
CUC 1
CUP 24.048249
CVE 98.887942
CZK 21.83445
DJF 178.43146
DKK 6.708504
DOP 60.885162
DZD 136.261154
EGP 53.769786
ERN 15
ETB 164.454778
EUR 0.896804
FJD 2.265604
FKP 0.748808
GBP 0.748083
GEL 2.59504
GGP 0.748808
GHS 11.707995
GIP 0.748808
GMD 74.503851
GNF 8874.938344
GTQ 7.657056
GYD 210.062329
HKD 7.84204
HNL 26.930631
HRK 6.76901
HTG 131.321465
HUF 326.000354
IDR 18108.5
ILS 3.18593
IMP 0.748808
INR 93.910504
IQD 1519.035021
IRR 1891353.000352
ISK 122.790386
JEP 0.748808
JMD 159.024259
JOD 0.70904
JPY 158.47504
KES 130.209408
KGS 87.447804
KHR 4082.328147
KMF 442.00035
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1363.803789
KWD 0.31098
KYD 0.83512
KZT 449.127842
LAK 22542.486884
LBP 89728.711717
LKR 333.213757
LRD 170.342137
LSL 16.570826
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.412269
MAD 9.794718
MDL 17.910408
MGA 4553.159051
MKD 55.203803
MMK 2099.945107
MNT 3601.130253
MOP 8.088606
MRU 40.453791
MUR 47.030378
MVR 15.403739
MWK 1737.500561
MXN 18.62354
MYR 4.061504
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.570826
NGN 1347.210377
NIO 36.87727
NOK 9.459904
NPR 150.482041
NZD 1.807175
OMR 0.384144
PAB 1.002108
PEN 3.451773
PGK 4.566611
PHP 63.108038
PKR 277.126855
PLN 3.94555
PYG 6263.39626
QAR 3.662795
RON 4.792204
RSD 105.484059
RUB 81.925564
RWF 1478.947132
SAR 3.756342
SBD 8.048583
SCR 13.773553
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.894504
SGD 1.282704
SHP 0.748923
SLE 22.950371
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 572.620062
SRD 37.583504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.972109
SVC 8.76732
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.565176
THB 33.550369
TJS 9.243442
TMT 3.5
TND 2.998341
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.141304
TTD 6.795211
TWD 32.775304
TZS 2647.773642
UAH 45.39348
UGX 4098.470921
UYU 40.312094
UZS 11956.414511
VES 896.316404
VND 25582.5
VUV 118.73125
WST 2.787825
XAF 588.264929
XAG 0.019249
XAU 0.00024594347
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.805838
XDR 0.707052
XOF 588.264929
XPF 106.954845
YER 236.625037
ZAR 16.51943
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 20.360522
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.232324
MXV 2.095222
  • RIO

    -0.3300

    97.04

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    20.67

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    0.0000

    33.41

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67.95

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.99

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    75.66

    -0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8600

    51.08

    +1.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    11.52

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.1200

    76.68

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.54

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    -0.0800

    55.75

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    168.1

    +1.2%

  • BP

    -1.4200

    43.16

    -3.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    19.7

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    17.02

    +0.41%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: © AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

L.Davila--TFWP