The Fort Worth Press - In China, climate litigation starts with the state

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 63.503991
ALL 82.403989
AMD 368.150403
ANG 1.790403
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1465.449815
AUD 1.42747
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.705709
BBD 2.013483
BDT 122.708482
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.37702
BIF 2985
BMD 1
BND 1.290663
BOB 6.90816
BRL 5.152304
BSD 0.999721
BTN 94.239742
BWP 13.585663
BYN 2.777729
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010527
CAD 1.41808
CDF 2280.000362
CHF 0.807795
CLF 0.02293
CLP 902.460396
CNY 6.769604
CNH 6.77389
COP 3452.68
CRC 453.506829
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.403894
CZK 21.091104
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.516504
DOP 58.403884
DZD 133.34504
EGP 49.986489
ERN 15
ETB 158.37504
EUR 0.8723
FJD 2.235504
FKP 0.755711
GBP 0.756332
GEL 2.650391
GGP 0.755711
GHS 11.22504
GIP 0.755711
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8775.000355
GTQ 7.625892
GYD 209.119888
HKD 7.83843
HNL 26.68504
HRK 6.5697
HTG 130.583803
HUF 306.820388
IDR 17826.3
ILS 2.958195
IMP 0.755711
INR 94.330504
IQD 1310
IRR 1375000.000352
ISK 125.530386
JEP 0.755711
JMD 157.959917
JOD 0.70904
JPY 161.30504
KES 129.403801
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4010.00035
KMF 429.503794
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1527.650383
KWD 0.30793
KYD 0.833035
KZT 487.855928
LAK 22055.000349
LBP 89550.000349
LKR 333.641485
LRD 182.150382
LSL 16.405039
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.375039
MAD 9.225039
MDL 17.654036
MGA 4200.000347
MKD 53.732839
MMK 2099.479867
MNT 3580.422334
MOP 8.070939
MRU 40.060379
MUR 47.850378
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1737.000345
MXN 17.33726
MYR 4.137904
MZN 63.910377
NAD 16.403727
NGN 1360.440377
NIO 36.610377
NOK 9.69935
NPR 150.787532
NZD 1.745079
OMR 0.384983
PAB 0.999725
PEN 3.384039
PGK 4.38775
PHP 60.716504
PKR 278.325038
PLN 3.71375
PYG 6138.96617
QAR 3.640504
RON 4.568104
RSD 102.170373
RUB 73.103247
RWF 1464
SAR 3.74824
SBD 8.061424
SCR 13.683262
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.590705
SGD 1.292404
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.750371
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.503662
SRD 37.402504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.4
SVC 8.747449
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.403649
THB 32.890369
TJS 9.272075
TMT 3.5
TND 2.91175
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.458745
TTD 6.779085
TWD 31.715038
TZS 2630.985038
UAH 44.909735
UGX 3638.520172
UYU 39.96965
UZS 12005.000334
VES 606.63266
VND 26310
VUV 118.132932
WST 2.751795
XAF 572.078806
XAG 0.015159
XAU 0.000239
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801643
XDR 0.703697
XOF 565.000332
XPF 104.250363
YER 238.603589
ZAR 16.429065
ZMK 9001.203654
ZMW 17.919703
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0500

    22.37

    +0.22%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    22.29

    0%

  • NGG

    -1.2400

    79.44

    -1.56%

  • VOD

    -0.2300

    14.3

    -1.61%

  • RBGPF

    -0.5300

    60.61

    -0.87%

  • RELX

    -0.8300

    31.18

    -2.66%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0300

    18.4

    -0.16%

  • BCC

    3.8500

    74.66

    +5.16%

  • JRI

    0.0500

    12.67

    +0.39%

  • RIO

    -2.5900

    100.08

    -2.59%

  • BCE

    0.0000

    23.28

    0%

  • GSK

    -1.4800

    50.67

    -2.92%

  • BTI

    -0.5800

    58.91

    -0.98%

  • BP

    -1.0400

    39.1

    -2.66%

  • AZN

    -2.9600

    174.93

    -1.69%

In China, climate litigation starts with the state
In China, climate litigation starts with the state / Photo: © AFP/File

In China, climate litigation starts with the state

With thousands of dedicated courts and more than a million recent cases, environmental and climate litigation is booming in China, but it often looks different to the trend seen elsewhere.

Text size:

Instead of a movement led by activists and NGOs, in China climate litigation is dominated by state prosecutors seeking to enforce existing regulations, rather than encourage government climate ambition.

Globally, domestic and international courts have become a new arena in the fight to pressure governments on climate.

Perhaps their most high-profile win came in July at the International Court of Justice, where countries were told they had a legal duty to tackle climate change.

In China though, cases tend to focus on regulatory enforcement and NGOs and activists are largely shut out.

"Courts in China use climate change provisions scattered across various laws and regulations to implement climate policy, rather than bring about policy changes," said Zhu Mingzhe, a legal scholar at the University of Glasgow.

Though many cases "are conducive to climate change mitigation... they don't deal with climate change directly".

China is the world's biggest greenhouse gas emitter, and will determine the planet's climate change trajectory.

Ahead of the COP30 climate talks next month, President Xi Jinping outlined China's first-ever emission targets, pledging to reduce greenhouse gases by 7-10 percent within a decade.

- 'The law grows teeth' -

Those figures fall short of what experts say is needed, but there is little chance they will be challenged in court.

Instead, "the courts and prosecutors make sure the law grows teeth", Boya Jiang, a climate lawyer at ClientEarth in Beijing, told AFP.

A decade ago, local authorities might have escaped sanction for skirting environmental obligations if they achieved economic growth.

Now, "they will be brought to court and there will be severe punishments", said Jiang.

"Companies also have to really consider environmental impacts."

Between 2019 and 2023, courts resolved more than a million cases, according to Chinese state media, up almost 20 percent from the previous five-year period.

China probably has the most comprehensive and "systematically established mechanism" for environmental justice, said Jiang.

And support for bringing cases is widespread, with the central government empowering prosecutors and public opinion in favour, said Lu Xu, a legal scholar at Lancaster University.

"If there is anything that is 'politically correct' for all audiences in China, this is it," he told AFP.

In 2020, for example, prosecutors in Huzhou, eastern China, won a public interest case against a company that had used Freon, a banned ozone-depleting substance and potent greenhouse gas. It was ordered to pay compensation.

Lawsuits on such substances are officially designated "climate change cases", making it the "first public interest litigation on climate change initiated by prosecutors", according to ClientEarth.

And last year, a court concluded that a power generation company's failure to meet carbon trading obligations violated China's climate mitigation goals and people's environmental rights.

- NGOs largely sidelined -

More than 95 percent of potential cases are settled before reaching court though, with the mere threat of litigation an effective enforcement mechanism.

NGOs meanwhile are only bit players, who cannot sue the government or officials.

They can however challenge private and state-owned firms, and in 2017 one of China's oldest environmental NGOs, Friends of Nature, accused state-owned companies of unnecessarily curtailing wind and solar power in favour of more polluting output.

One case was settled in 2023, with the state grid promising to invest in increasing renewable energy on the grid. The second is yet to conclude.

One environmental lawyer serving at an NGO concedes state prosecutors wield more power, but said other actors still play an important role.

Prosecutors will sometimes "consider some local economic interests and pressures, so they don't want to sue", the lawyer, who wished to remain anonymous due to the potential risk to their organisation, told AFP.

NGOs "may be more detached, so we can bring the case".

China's new Ecological and Environmental Code, expected to come into force in 2026, and climate law in the works for nearly a decade, could open the way for broader ambition cases, said Jiang, though it might not pass for up to five more years.

L.Davila--TFWP