The Fort Worth Press - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 64.999694
ALL 81.642835
AMD 377.219685
ANG 1.79008
AOA 916.999786
ARS 1444.993899
AUD 1.422789
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.702618
BAM 1.653821
BBD 2.007458
BDT 121.808396
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.377
BIF 2953.360646
BMD 1
BND 1.26696
BOB 6.887396
BRL 5.239202
BSD 0.996711
BTN 90.052427
BWP 13.76724
BYN 2.855766
BYR 19600
BZD 2.004583
CAD 1.363485
CDF 2199.999823
CHF 0.77501
CLF 0.02178
CLP 860.00012
CNY 6.938198
CNH 6.932785
COP 3652
CRC 495.031923
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.239472
CZK 20.567995
DJF 177.491777
DKK 6.31131
DOP 62.762674
DZD 129.809035
EGP 47.028301
ERN 15
ETB 154.611983
EUR 0.84503
FJD 2.19785
FKP 0.732491
GBP 0.728965
GEL 2.694962
GGP 0.732491
GHS 10.919207
GIP 0.732491
GMD 72.999979
GNF 8744.661959
GTQ 7.645019
GYD 208.524474
HKD 7.815215
HNL 26.334616
HRK 6.3668
HTG 130.737911
HUF 321.873967
IDR 16773
ILS 3.090495
IMP 0.732491
INR 90.462699
IQD 1305.693436
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.529935
JEP 0.732491
JMD 156.204812
JOD 0.708953
JPY 156.310501
KES 128.530273
KGS 87.449745
KHR 4021.613211
KMF 417.999941
KPW 899.987247
KRW 1450.801658
KWD 0.30737
KYD 0.830631
KZT 499.708267
LAK 21439.292404
LBP 89256.37795
LKR 308.507985
LRD 185.387344
LSL 15.964383
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.301423
MAD 9.14286
MDL 16.878982
MGA 4417.422775
MKD 52.086943
MMK 2100.119929
MNT 3568.429082
MOP 8.020954
MRU 39.790284
MUR 45.880297
MVR 15.449965
MWK 1728.325117
MXN 17.21895
MYR 3.92694
MZN 63.749624
NAD 15.964451
NGN 1388.149904
NIO 36.682353
NOK 9.626245
NPR 144.090313
NZD 1.655395
OMR 0.384498
PAB 0.996706
PEN 3.355418
PGK 4.270433
PHP 58.955987
PKR 278.75798
PLN 3.569715
PYG 6612.604537
QAR 3.624302
RON 4.3058
RSD 99.190187
RUB 76.999649
RWF 1454.737643
SAR 3.750137
SBD 8.058101
SCR 14.239717
SDG 601.499892
SEK 8.886903
SGD 1.27032
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.47504
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 568.686313
SRD 38.114498
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.71794
SVC 8.721498
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 15.970032
THB 31.579829
TJS 9.314268
TMT 3.51
TND 2.882209
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.511602
TTD 6.751283
TWD 31.5423
TZS 2581.539917
UAH 43.134476
UGX 3553.202914
UYU 38.389826
UZS 12201.979545
VES 371.640565
VND 25997.5
VUV 119.537583
WST 2.726316
XAF 554.697053
XAG 0.011442
XAU 0.000197
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.796311
XDR 0.689842
XOF 554.678291
XPF 100.846021
YER 238.374989
ZAR 15.92825
ZMK 9001.198907
ZMW 19.560456
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • CMSD

    -0.1400

    23.94

    -0.58%

  • RBGPF

    -2.1000

    82.1

    -2.56%

  • CMSC

    -0.0900

    23.66

    -0.38%

  • NGG

    1.6200

    86.23

    +1.88%

  • AZN

    -4.0900

    184.32

    -2.22%

  • RYCEF

    0.2600

    16.93

    +1.54%

  • GSK

    0.8700

    53.34

    +1.63%

  • VOD

    0.3400

    15.25

    +2.23%

  • RIO

    3.8500

    96.37

    +4%

  • BCE

    0.2700

    26.1

    +1.03%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    13.12

    -0.23%

  • BCC

    3.1800

    84.93

    +3.74%

  • BTI

    0.8800

    61.87

    +1.42%

  • BP

    1.1200

    38.82

    +2.89%

  • RELX

    -5.0200

    30.51

    -16.45%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: © AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

S.Rocha--TFWP