The Fort Worth Press - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 65.503991
ALL 82.770403
AMD 381.503986
ANG 1.790055
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1434.000104
AUD 1.506058
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.678705
BBD 2.013364
BDT 122.282772
BGN 1.67998
BHD 0.376983
BIF 2967
BMD 1
BND 1.294944
BOB 6.907739
BRL 5.447304
BSD 0.999601
BTN 89.876145
BWP 13.280747
BYN 2.873917
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010437
CAD 1.382815
CDF 2232.000362
CHF 0.804205
CLF 0.0235
CLP 921.880396
CNY 7.070104
CNH 7.070055
COP 3838
CRC 488.298936
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.103894
CZK 20.780304
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.41404
DOP 64.250393
DZD 129.961958
EGP 47.566304
ERN 15
ETB 155.150392
EUR 0.858604
FJD 2.261504
FKP 0.748861
GBP 0.74994
GEL 2.69504
GGP 0.748861
GHS 11.45039
GIP 0.748861
GMD 73.000355
GNF 8687.503848
GTQ 7.657084
GYD 209.137648
HKD 7.78425
HNL 26.280388
HRK 6.471604
HTG 130.859652
HUF 328.203831
IDR 16689
ILS 3.23571
IMP 0.748861
INR 89.95455
IQD 1310
IRR 42112.503816
ISK 127.950386
JEP 0.748861
JMD 159.999657
JOD 0.70904
JPY 155.312504
KES 129.303801
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4005.00035
KMF 422.00035
KPW 899.993191
KRW 1473.603789
KWD 0.30695
KYD 0.833083
KZT 505.531856
LAK 21690.000349
LBP 89550.000349
LKR 308.334728
LRD 176.903772
LSL 16.950381
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.450381
MAD 9.236504
MDL 17.00842
MGA 4487.000347
MKD 52.906919
MMK 2099.939583
MNT 3546.502114
MOP 8.016033
MRU 39.860379
MUR 46.103741
MVR 15.403739
MWK 1737.000345
MXN 18.177904
MYR 4.111039
MZN 63.910377
NAD 16.950377
NGN 1450.210377
NIO 36.775039
NOK 10.106715
NPR 143.802277
NZD 1.731555
OMR 0.384496
PAB 0.999682
PEN 3.517504
PGK 4.187504
PHP 58.964504
PKR 280.375038
PLN 3.63271
PYG 6875.152888
QAR 3.64105
RON 4.372704
RSD 100.815038
RUB 76.500052
RWF 1451
SAR 3.753173
SBD 8.230592
SCR 13.975382
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.403415
SGD 1.29571
SHP 0.750259
SLE 23.703667
SLL 20969.498139
SOS 571.503662
SRD 38.629038
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.4
SVC 8.745763
SYP 11058.244165
SZL 16.950369
THB 31.880369
TJS 9.171638
TMT 3.51
TND 2.95125
TOP 2.40776
TRY 42.528604
TTD 6.776446
TWD 31.281038
TZS 2435.000335
UAH 41.959408
UGX 3536.283383
UYU 39.096531
UZS 12005.000334
VES 254.551935
VND 26360
VUV 122.070109
WST 2.790151
XAF 563.019389
XAG 0.017116
XAU 0.000238
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801608
XDR 0.70002
XOF 562.503593
XPF 102.875037
YER 238.550363
ZAR 16.93737
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 23.111058
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    78.35

    0%

  • BCC

    -1.2100

    73.05

    -1.66%

  • SCS

    -0.0900

    16.14

    -0.56%

  • RELX

    -0.2200

    40.32

    -0.55%

  • NGG

    -0.5000

    75.41

    -0.66%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1600

    14.49

    -1.1%

  • RIO

    -0.6700

    73.06

    -0.92%

  • CMSC

    -0.0500

    23.43

    -0.21%

  • JRI

    0.0400

    13.79

    +0.29%

  • VOD

    -0.1630

    12.47

    -1.31%

  • CMSD

    -0.0700

    23.25

    -0.3%

  • BCE

    0.3300

    23.55

    +1.4%

  • BTI

    -1.0300

    57.01

    -1.81%

  • GSK

    -0.1600

    48.41

    -0.33%

  • BP

    -1.4000

    35.83

    -3.91%

  • AZN

    0.1500

    90.18

    +0.17%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: © AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

S.Rocha--TFWP