The Fort Worth Press - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.000368
ALL 81.431326
AMD 361.239406
ANG 1.789785
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1544.046724
AUD 1.452222
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.754002
BBD 2.018116
BDT 124.801578
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.378548
BIF 2997.982153
BMD 1
BND 1.283978
BOB 12.019192
BRL 5.504904
BSD 1.002018
BTN 94.051388
BWP 13.802968
BYN 3.000673
BYR 19600
BZD 2.015246
CAD 1.41125
CDF 2320.000362
CHF 0.819824
CLF 0.024951
CLP 981.982871
CNY 6.676504
CNH 6.670804
COP 3236.357114
CRC 454.419084
CUC 1
CUP 24.048249
CVE 98.887942
CZK 21.83445
DJF 178.43146
DKK 6.708504
DOP 60.885162
DZD 136.261154
EGP 53.769786
ERN 15
ETB 164.454778
EUR 0.896804
FJD 2.265604
FKP 0.748808
GBP 0.748083
GEL 2.59504
GGP 0.748808
GHS 11.707995
GIP 0.748808
GMD 74.503851
GNF 8874.938344
GTQ 7.657056
GYD 210.062329
HKD 7.84204
HNL 26.930631
HRK 6.76901
HTG 131.321465
HUF 326.000354
IDR 18108.5
ILS 3.18593
IMP 0.748808
INR 93.910504
IQD 1519.035021
IRR 1891353.000352
ISK 122.790386
JEP 0.748808
JMD 159.024259
JOD 0.70904
JPY 158.47504
KES 130.209408
KGS 87.447804
KHR 4082.328147
KMF 442.00035
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1363.803789
KWD 0.31098
KYD 0.83512
KZT 449.127842
LAK 22542.486884
LBP 89728.711717
LKR 333.213757
LRD 170.342137
LSL 16.570826
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.412269
MAD 9.794718
MDL 17.910408
MGA 4553.159051
MKD 55.203803
MMK 2099.945107
MNT 3601.130253
MOP 8.088606
MRU 40.453791
MUR 47.030378
MVR 15.403739
MWK 1737.500561
MXN 18.62354
MYR 4.061504
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.570826
NGN 1347.210377
NIO 36.87727
NOK 9.459904
NPR 150.482041
NZD 1.807175
OMR 0.384144
PAB 1.002108
PEN 3.451773
PGK 4.566611
PHP 63.108038
PKR 277.126855
PLN 3.94555
PYG 6263.39626
QAR 3.662795
RON 4.792204
RSD 105.484059
RUB 81.925564
RWF 1478.947132
SAR 3.756342
SBD 8.048583
SCR 13.773553
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.894504
SGD 1.282704
SHP 0.748923
SLE 22.950371
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 572.620062
SRD 37.583504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.972109
SVC 8.76732
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.565176
THB 33.550369
TJS 9.243442
TMT 3.5
TND 2.998341
TOP 2.40776
TRY 50.141304
TTD 6.795211
TWD 32.775304
TZS 2647.773642
UAH 45.39348
UGX 4098.470921
UYU 40.312094
UZS 11956.414511
VES 896.316404
VND 25582.5
VUV 118.73125
WST 2.787825
XAF 588.264929
XAG 0.019249
XAU 0.00024594347
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.805838
XDR 0.707052
XOF 588.264929
XPF 106.954845
YER 236.625037
ZAR 16.51943
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 20.360522
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.232324
MXV 2.095222
  • RIO

    -0.3300

    97.04

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    20.67

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    0.0000

    33.41

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67.95

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.99

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    75.66

    -0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8600

    51.08

    +1.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    11.52

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.1200

    76.68

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.54

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    -0.0800

    55.75

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    168.1

    +1.2%

  • BP

    -1.4200

    43.16

    -3.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    19.7

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    17.02

    +0.41%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: © AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

S.Rocha--TFWP