The Fort Worth Press - Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

USD -
AED 3.67305
AFN 63.502642
ALL 82.257093
AMD 368.06994
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.999742
ARS 1461.519193
AUD 1.428194
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.695732
BAM 1.707839
BBD 2.014862
BDT 122.896637
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.37695
BIF 2985
BMD 1
BND 1.293759
BOB 6.91239
BRL 5.157899
BSD 1.000358
BTN 94.655909
BWP 13.576786
BYN 2.799012
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011981
CAD 1.41612
CDF 2265.000306
CHF 0.80895
CLF 0.023033
CLP 906.530329
CNY 6.769596
CNH 6.77754
COP 3446.13
CRC 453.811158
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.285333
CZK 21.169006
DJF 177.720283
DKK 6.53933
DOP 58.479379
DZD 133.523192
EGP 49.7701
ERN 15
ETB 161.283979
EUR 0.87491
FJD 2.24775
FKP 0.755695
GBP 0.755005
GEL 2.650427
GGP 0.755695
GHS 11.229578
GIP 0.755695
GMD 73.495715
GNF 8765.357714
GTQ 7.628428
GYD 209.275317
HKD 7.83985
HNL 26.762371
HRK 6.591987
HTG 130.677006
HUF 308.224498
IDR 17843
ILS 2.97135
IMP 0.755695
INR 94.58075
IQD 1310.524891
IRR 1374999.999926
ISK 125.989821
JEP 0.755695
JMD 158.06984
JOD 0.708999
JPY 161.517022
KES 129.439758
KGS 87.449795
KHR 4016.800706
KMF 429.499605
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1537.02501
KWD 0.30866
KYD 0.833661
KZT 487.587213
LAK 22093.277098
LBP 89584.959701
LKR 334.503445
LRD 182.07459
LSL 16.436923
LTL 2.952741
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.386739
MAD 9.325876
MDL 17.591841
MGA 4219.387176
MKD 53.934521
MMK 2099.917974
MNT 3579.231668
MOP 8.077961
MRU 40.000349
MUR 47.809814
MVR 15.459635
MWK 1736.000081
MXN 17.35533
MYR 4.149699
MZN 63.899865
NAD 16.436923
NGN 1366.730165
NIO 36.814852
NOK 9.695201
NPR 151.449105
NZD 1.75035
OMR 0.384503
PAB 1.000358
PEN 3.385028
PGK 4.456902
PHP 61.1365
PKR 278.233656
PLN 3.74035
PYG 6098.551332
QAR 3.646906
RON 4.582895
RSD 102.696018
RUB 74.250968
RWF 1465.171718
SAR 3.753791
SBD 8.061424
SCR 13.674406
SDG 600.500641
SEK 9.61687
SGD 1.29338
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.749989
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.695527
SRD 37.430496
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.39383
SVC 8.753133
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.433081
THB 32.939705
TJS 9.278635
TMT 3.5
TND 2.957937
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.4577
TTD 6.784027
TWD 31.642501
TZS 2628.232027
UAH 44.991835
UGX 3651.795772
UYU 40.002096
UZS 11989.276889
VES 606.63266
VND 26320
VUV 118.352303
WST 2.751796
XAF 572.793161
XAG 0.015293
XAU 0.000239
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802932
XDR 0.71169
XOF 571.999786
XPF 104.139924
YER 238.60233
ZAR 16.394101
ZMK 9001.201015
ZMW 17.731555
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.3600

    61.5

    +0.59%

  • CMSC

    -0.2100

    22.16

    -0.95%

  • GSK

    0.0700

    50.74

    +0.14%

  • AZN

    1.5000

    176.43

    +0.85%

  • NGG

    1.5300

    80.97

    +1.89%

  • RIO

    -0.7200

    99.36

    -0.72%

  • RELX

    -0.3500

    30.83

    -1.14%

  • BCC

    -2.1200

    72.54

    -2.92%

  • BCE

    -0.6300

    22.65

    -2.78%

  • CMSD

    -0.2100

    22.08

    -0.95%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    12.65

    -0.16%

  • BTI

    -0.0100

    58.9

    -0.02%

  • RYCEF

    0.1900

    18.45

    +1.03%

  • VOD

    -0.1800

    14.12

    -1.27%

  • BP

    0.6800

    39.78

    +1.71%

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?
Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming? / Photo: © AFP

Did cuts to shipping emissions spur more global warming?

Could a sudden drop in pollution from cargo vessels criss-crossing global shipping lanes be inadvertently making the world hotter?

Text size:

The main reason for global warming is the heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.

But scientists have been looking at the extent to which a shift to cleaner, lower-sulphur shipping fuels in 2020 may have fuelled warming by reducing the amount of particles in the atmosphere that reflect heat back into space.

This theory surfaced again when January was declared the hottest on record, extending a streak of exceptional global temperatures that has persisted since mid-2023.

- Why did shipping emissions drop? -

On January 1, 2020, the sulphur content in engine fuel used to power container vessels, oil tankers and other ships in global trade was slashed by decree from 3.5 percent to 0.5 percent.

This was mandated by the International Maritime Organization (IMO), a UN agency that regulates the global shipping sector, including its environmental impact.

Sulphur oxides in fuels are tiny airborne particles harmful to human health and linked to strokes and the development of lung and cardiovascular diseases.

Some jurisdictions have even tighter restrictions in so-called "emissions control areas" in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the North American zone and the US marine Caribbean area.

- Is it working? -

The IMO estimated its fuel mandate would cut emissions of sulphur oxide by 8.5 million tonnes a year.

Last June, research published in the academic journal Earth System Science Data reported that sulphur oxide emissions from the shipping industry declined 7.4 million tonnes between 2019 and 2020.

The IMO said that in 2023 just two vessels flagged for inspection were found to be using fuel with a sulphur level above the 0.5 percent requirement.

Since the new regulation came into force, only 67 violations have been recorded.

- Is there a link to global warming? -

Sulphur oxides are not greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide or methane which are effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere, raising global temperatures.

On the contrary, they boost the reflectivity of clouds by making them more mirror-like and capable of bouncing incoming heat from the Sun back into space.

The sudden decline in these particles may have spurred recent warming "but we can't quantify it in an ultra-precise manner", said Olivier Boucher from the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS)

He said studies had detected changes in clouds above major shipping lanes since 2020, including a greater presence of larger particles less reflective of sunlight.

Scientists could say shipping emissions had aided warming to some degree "but we are not able to say that it contributes a lot", Boucher added.

One study published in August in the journal Earth's Future concluded that the IMO regulation could increase global surface temperatures by nearly 0.05 degrees Celsius a year up until 2029.

The drastic reduction in airborne sulphur pollution helps to explain the exceptional heat of 2023 but the authors said the magnitude of the temperature extremes meant other factors were likely also at play.

S.Rocha--TFWP