The Fort Worth Press - Identity crisis: Climate destroying wonders that gave US parks their names

USD -
AED 3.672965
AFN 65.999823
ALL 81.973818
AMD 378.00985
ANG 1.79008
AOA 916.511164
ARS 1442.469496
AUD 1.434278
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.699162
BAM 1.658807
BBD 2.01469
BDT 122.336816
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.376973
BIF 2964.288592
BMD 1
BND 1.274003
BOB 6.911584
BRL 5.251601
BSD 1.000305
BTN 90.399817
BWP 13.243033
BYN 2.865297
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011721
CAD 1.367115
CDF 2224.999817
CHF 0.776805
CLF 0.021856
CLP 863.009886
CNY 6.94215
CNH 6.934675
COP 3676.17
CRC 495.911928
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.521
CZK 20.552402
DJF 177.719721
DKK 6.326605
DOP 63.127629
DZD 129.973054
EGP 46.981498
ERN 15
ETB 155.859732
EUR 0.84726
FJD 2.207598
FKP 0.732184
GBP 0.737655
GEL 2.689985
GGP 0.732184
GHS 10.98271
GIP 0.732184
GMD 73.502091
GNF 8779.176279
GTQ 7.672344
GYD 209.27195
HKD 7.813565
HNL 26.422344
HRK 6.385297
HTG 131.225404
HUF 321.370501
IDR 16868
ILS 3.119945
IMP 0.732184
INR 90.26125
IQD 1310.388112
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.679683
JEP 0.732184
JMD 156.449315
JOD 0.708986
JPY 156.790501
KES 129.04009
KGS 87.450416
KHR 4037.199913
KMF 416.999986
KPW 900.030004
KRW 1464.645025
KWD 0.30738
KYD 0.833598
KZT 493.342041
LAK 21499.694667
LBP 89579.400015
LKR 309.548446
LRD 186.059136
LSL 16.159927
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.336511
MAD 9.181029
MDL 16.999495
MGA 4425.634414
MKD 52.243296
MMK 2099.783213
MNT 3569.156954
MOP 8.049755
MRU 39.901106
MUR 46.040016
MVR 15.45987
MWK 1734.461935
MXN 17.38677
MYR 3.94699
MZN 63.759665
NAD 16.159927
NGN 1368.070025
NIO 36.809608
NOK 9.75406
NPR 144.639707
NZD 1.670341
OMR 0.384513
PAB 1.000314
PEN 3.362397
PGK 4.348453
PHP 58.765016
PKR 280.076588
PLN 3.57705
PYG 6605.373863
QAR 3.645678
RON 4.314401
RSD 99.47298
RUB 76.750352
RWF 1459.984648
SAR 3.750122
SBD 8.064647
SCR 13.712043
SDG 601.500193
SEK 9.01919
SGD 1.273205
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.549692
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 570.633736
SRD 37.869854
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.779617
SVC 8.752036
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 16.152192
THB 31.761025
TJS 9.362532
TMT 3.505
TND 2.89846
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.539165
TTD 6.773307
TWD 31.651501
TZS 2585.000268
UAH 43.163845
UGX 3570.701588
UYU 38.599199
UZS 12269.30384
VES 377.98435
VND 25970
VUV 119.687673
WST 2.726344
XAF 556.374339
XAG 0.01318
XAU 0.000206
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802745
XDR 0.691101
XOF 556.348385
XPF 101.150088
YER 238.324994
ZAR 16.1985
ZMK 9001.195771
ZMW 18.580528
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • CMSC

    -0.0100

    23.51

    -0.04%

  • BCC

    -2.2600

    87.97

    -2.57%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0600

    16.62

    -0.36%

  • RIO

    -4.5550

    91.925

    -4.96%

  • NGG

    -0.9050

    86.885

    -1.04%

  • GSK

    2.0450

    59.275

    +3.45%

  • BCE

    -0.9200

    25.42

    -3.62%

  • BTI

    0.2950

    61.925

    +0.48%

  • RELX

    0.3500

    30.13

    +1.16%

  • AZN

    0.4450

    187.895

    +0.24%

  • VOD

    -1.0850

    14.625

    -7.42%

  • JRI

    -0.0500

    13.1

    -0.38%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    23.87

    0%

  • BP

    -1.1550

    38.045

    -3.04%

Identity crisis: Climate destroying wonders that gave US parks their names
Identity crisis: Climate destroying wonders that gave US parks their names / Photo: © AFP

Identity crisis: Climate destroying wonders that gave US parks their names

Glacier National Park's ice fortress is crumbling. The giant trees of Sequoia National Park are ablaze. And even the tenacious cacti of Saguaro National Park are struggling to endure a decades-long drought.

Text size:

Since their creation, national parks have embodied the pioneering spirit of America in their vast expanses and breathtaking landscapes.

But today, the climate crisis imperils the very symbols of many parks, leaving them facing a future where their names could be cruel ironies.

Deep within Montana's Glacier National Park, the once majestic Grinnell Glacier is now greatly diminished.

After a grueling trek, visitors are met with a stunning sight: a serene lake of pale blue water, nestled among towering peaks.

But as beautiful as it is, the very presence of this lake is testament to the ravages of a fast-warming planet.

Just a few decades ago, this landscape was entirely frozen.

Now the glacier itself is relegated to a small hollow, sheltered from the Sun, at the edge of the lake created through its own melting.

As he straps on his crampons, student Ryan Bergman marvels at what still remains of the ice body.

"I want to know that this stuff is here for years to come," says the 22-year-old, who has embarked on a two-month journey to explore a dozen parks.

He dreams of one day returning with his own children to see the same sights.

But time is running out.

The park has already lost 60 percent of its namesake glaciers since the 1850s, and scientists predict their complete disappearance by century's end.

- Philosophical shift -

Families from all over America and abroad flock to these natural wonders to create memories that will last.

Conserving the nation's 63 national parks is a rare point of political convergence in a sharply divided country. With tens of millions of visitors to these sites every year, it's also an economic imperative.

President Joe Biden's government recently announced nearly $200 million to help them adapt -- funding made available through his signature climate law.

Yet despite these efforts, the reality is that not everything can be saved.

This sobering truth has sparked an identity crisis for the federal agency charged with their protection, the National Park Service (NPS).

It was brought into existence by a 1916 law that called to preserve these treasured sites "unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations."

But it's now "pretty clear that it's not achievable in many places," admits John Gross, an ecologist with the NPS climate change response program.

"It's certainly possible that the parks could lose the iconic feature for which they've been named."

The climate crisis has thus brought about a profound shift in the organization's philosophy: It's no longer taboo to modify a park's natural state to stem further degradation.

- Chopper rides for bull trout -

Where battles have already been lost, strategic interventions are now underway to try to win the war.

On the shores of Glacier's Lake McDonald, Chris Downs, the park's head of aquatic resources, shares the story of the massive effort it took to rescue the beleaguered bull trout.

The fish is a native species threatened by warming waters, which are driven in part by reduced ice melt in later summer.

It is also facing competition from non-native lake trout, which were introduced for fishing and are better suited to the changing conditions.

Fifty years ago, bull trout outnumbered their invasive counterparts by a five-to-one margin. Today, the situation is reversed.

In 2014, a decision was made to relocate the native species to cooler, upstream waters where they had never previously been found.

Downs recalls workers transporting dozens of fish in backpacks filled with ice packs, with thousands more from fish farms slated to be whisked away to their new habitats via helicopter.

"They're growing really well" in their new home, says the biologist.

Critics call it a manipulation of nature. Downs calls it a "necessity."

Also as a result of climate change, the park ia conducting DNA testing of threatened whitebark pines, identifying those most resilient to drought for planting at targeted locations as part of a restoration plan.

- Rebuilding beaches -

A 2018 study revealed national parks are warming at twice the rate of the rest of the country, because they are mainly located in climate-sensitive regions like mountain ranges or in Alaska, near the North Pole.

"We're already seeing transformational impacts of anthropogenic climate change throughout parks right now," warns Gross.

At Indiana Dunes National Park, beaches are submerged, and the eponymous dunes are collapsing.

This time, park workers are fighting back.

Every year, they fill in a damaged site along the southern shore of Lake Michigan, where the park's unique biodiversity thrives amid surrounding steel mills and a coal-fired power station.

On a day in November, the battle against erosion is symbolized by the comings and goings of two large excavator trucks.

Some 80,000 tons of sand, excavated from a quarry, are used to replenish the beach at the foot of the most famous dune in the park: Mount Baldy, a popular summer spot for vacationing tourists from Chicago.

As Thomas Kanies, project manager for the Army Corps of Engineers, explains: "The goal is always to keep the beach at what it always has been" -- and doing so will also preserve the dunes behind the beach.

The proximity to Michigan City's industrial port is the main culprit for erosion, Kanies said, because the pier blocks the flow of sand along the coast.

While the situation was once manageable, climate change "is changing the game completely," says NPS geologist Erin Argyilan.

- Harsh tradeoffs -

The ice shelf that forms in winter "has been kind of our first line of defense to protect the dunes from the high waves that naturally come with fall and winter storms," Argyilan explains.

But with climate change, the ice isn't coming until at least December if not January, while the storms begin in late October.

Compounding the issue are warmer lakes, which fuel more intense storms, and increasingly severe rainwater runoff.

Another phenomenon that Argyilan is studying: a faster freeze-thaw cycle on the sands, which is causing dune segments to collapse.

"Our goal is to minimize the impact as much as possible," says Argyilan, while acknowledging that beach nourishment amounts to a "Band-Aid."

More drastic measures have also been attempted.

Lake Michigan, which has a natural 30-year cycle of fluctuations, hit a recent water level peak in 2020, amplifying the effects of violent storms.

Houses in one of the villages adjacent to the park threatened to collapse, and residents erected massive rock blocks on the beach to shield them from erosion.

This solution however sparked controversy as the obstacles worsened the degradation of dunes further along the shore.

As Betsy Maher, executive director of the group Save the Dunes, puts it: "We can't destroy the beach for the sake of a few homes."

The dilemma encapsulates the harsh tradeoff that is at times imposed by climate change: preserve the natural world, or prioritize humans?

- A Sisyphean task -

At Saguaro National Park in Arizona, home to the largest concentration of iconic saguaro cacti in the country, approximately two million of the towering desert plants cluster together like a forest, their arms outstretched towards the sky.

To the untrained eye, they appear to be thriving.

However, these resilient cacti that evolved to cope with ultra-arid environments are facing hidden threats as a result of a drought that began around 30 years ago.

In 2020 and again last year, the region experienced unusually meager rainfall in the summer, typically a time of monsoon rains.

During this period, a non-native plant, buffelgrass, began to colonize the park. This invasive weed, introduced from Africa as livestock fodder, fuels fires that have ravaged saguaros in the past, as in 1994 and 1999.

The species, which covers the mountainsides in straw-yellow clumps, "is very dry for much of the year, and it can ignite quickly and quite easily," says park biologist Frankie Foley.

Volunteers gather every weekend under Foley's direction to take on the invaders, pulling them from the ground by hand. Armed with pickaxes, they dig tirelessly, facing a daunting task given the park's vastness.

- Next generation imperiled -

The drought has become so intense that saguaros are also struggling to ensure the future of the species.

Young saguaros, which grow slowly, are particularly vulnerable due to their limited water storage capacity. By age 15, they are a mere six inches (10 centimeters) in height, making them highly susceptible to drought conditions.

As a result, "since the mid-1990s, we haven't had very many young saguaros surviving at all," says Don Swann, another biologist at the park.

Equipped with a yardstick to measure baby saguaros, Swann finds only a single specimen after a 10-minute search.

At first glance, it's hard to see anything amiss due to the longevity of the old cacti, which can live for up to two centuries.

According to the park's decennial census, the saguaro population in 2020 was only slightly higher than in 2010, and Swann expects a decline in 2030.

If current trends continue, "then at a certain point... we won't have saguaros in Saguaro National Park," he says.

- A wake-up call? -

Beyond the ecological devastation, the loss of saguaros and glaciers has far-reaching cultural consequences.

For Native American tribes, these natural wonders hold deep spiritual significance.

The Tohono O'odham people consider saguaros their ancestors, and rely on their fruit to make ceremonial syrup.

Similarly, the Blackfeet Nation reveres glaciers as sacred, recognizing their crucial role in sustaining life.

"We were placed here in this area, because of that water," says Termaine Edmo, the tribe's climate change coordinator.

Under her dedicated leadership, the Blackfeet have built snow fences to preserve snow on the Montana grasslands just below the mountains, a moisture-saving technique.

Her personal connection to the land is palpable: the Native American name of one of her daughters, Iitspigoonskoo, means "glacier."

"She's constantly asking me, 'Mommy, what happens when there's no more snow on top of the mountains? Does my Indian name change?'" Edmo says. To which she replied: "'No, then we adapt, baby, just like our ancestors adapted to this new world.'"

Could these losses serve as a wake-up call and prompt more Americans to recognize climate change as a priority?

Wylie Carr, a climate planning specialist for the NPS, agrees that national parks are "natural classrooms" for young and old alike to "really see and experience how climate change is impacting natural and cultural resources."

To this end, Glacier National Park's winding trails are dotted with signs that pose poignant questions.

"How many glaciers will be left for the next generation?" pleads one.

The hope is that raising awareness will inspire conviction -- and action.

L.Coleman--TFWP