The Fort Worth Press - In tiny US community, big questions about chemical recycling

USD -
AED 3.6725
AFN 65.498831
ALL 81.910095
AMD 378.010177
ANG 1.79008
AOA 917.000095
ARS 1442.232097
AUD 1.447974
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.679026
BAM 1.658807
BBD 2.01469
BDT 122.336816
BGN 1.67937
BHD 0.376968
BIF 2960
BMD 1
BND 1.274003
BOB 6.911584
BRL 5.272703
BSD 1.000305
BTN 90.399817
BWP 13.243033
BYN 2.865297
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011721
CAD 1.37165
CDF 2230.000045
CHF 0.777555
CLF 0.02195
CLP 866.710083
CNY 6.93805
CNH 6.939685
COP 3700.85
CRC 495.911928
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.825019
CZK 20.603404
DJF 177.71986
DKK 6.34081
DOP 62.995021
DZD 130.060373
EGP 46.856399
ERN 15
ETB 155.150026
EUR 0.849125
FJD 2.216898
FKP 0.732184
GBP 0.739795
GEL 2.69498
GGP 0.732184
GHS 10.974974
GIP 0.732184
GMD 72.999956
GNF 8760.500761
GTQ 7.672344
GYD 209.27195
HKD 7.81303
HNL 26.454967
HRK 6.3973
HTG 131.225404
HUF 322.782007
IDR 16886.95
ILS 3.119945
IMP 0.732184
INR 90.321502
IQD 1310.5
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.900592
JEP 0.732184
JMD 156.449315
JOD 0.708997
JPY 156.633502
KES 129.000438
KGS 87.449771
KHR 4033.000063
KMF 419.000058
KPW 900.030004
KRW 1471.989986
KWD 0.30744
KYD 0.833598
KZT 493.342041
LAK 21500.000573
LBP 85550.000319
LKR 309.548446
LRD 186.150152
LSL 16.260081
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.324959
MAD 9.185022
MDL 16.999495
MGA 4440.000275
MKD 52.338218
MMK 2099.783213
MNT 3569.156954
MOP 8.049755
MRU 39.849936
MUR 46.050157
MVR 15.450164
MWK 1737.000329
MXN 17.55195
MYR 3.951299
MZN 63.749722
NAD 16.285115
NGN 1367.09822
NIO 36.701015
NOK 9.81742
NPR 144.639707
NZD 1.684896
OMR 0.384507
PAB 1.000314
PEN 3.367497
PGK 4.265974
PHP 58.815021
PKR 279.737212
PLN 3.587406
PYG 6605.373863
QAR 3.641349
RON 4.3236
RSD 99.675965
RUB 76.750999
RWF 1453
SAR 3.750175
SBD 8.058149
SCR 14.65365
SDG 601.502308
SEK 9.06708
SGD 1.27589
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.450569
SLL 20969.499267
SOS 571.484438
SRD 37.870144
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.05
SVC 8.752036
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 16.305262
THB 31.850216
TJS 9.362532
TMT 3.505
TND 2.847496
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.61304
TTD 6.773307
TWD 31.665034
TZS 2584.999947
UAH 43.163845
UGX 3570.701588
UYU 38.599199
UZS 12275.000276
VES 377.985125
VND 25955
VUV 119.687673
WST 2.726344
XAF 556.374339
XAG 0.015352
XAU 0.000213
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802745
XDR 0.691101
XOF 554.499549
XPF 101.697491
YER 238.401353
ZAR 16.34654
ZMK 9001.196933
ZMW 18.580528
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0300

    23.55

    +0.13%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • RIO

    -5.3600

    91.12

    -5.88%

  • NGG

    -0.9000

    86.89

    -1.04%

  • CMSD

    0.0200

    23.89

    +0.08%

  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • BCC

    -1.0700

    89.16

    -1.2%

  • GSK

    1.9400

    59.17

    +3.28%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0600

    16.62

    -0.36%

  • BTI

    0.3300

    61.96

    +0.53%

  • BCE

    -0.7700

    25.57

    -3.01%

  • VOD

    -1.0900

    14.62

    -7.46%

  • JRI

    -0.1500

    13

    -1.15%

  • RELX

    0.3100

    30.09

    +1.03%

  • BP

    -1.0300

    38.17

    -2.7%

  • AZN

    -0.2900

    187.16

    -0.15%

In tiny US community, big questions about chemical recycling
In tiny US community, big questions about chemical recycling / Photo: © AFP

In tiny US community, big questions about chemical recycling

On the banks of the Susquehanna river in rural Pennsylvania, a quiet, unassuming plot of land is the unlikely backdrop for a simmering debate over chemical recycling, a controversial process for dealing with plastic waste.

Text size:

The technology promises to transform hard-to-recycle containers, food packaging, lids, mailers and endless other items into usable petrochemicals and is championed in particular by the plastic-producing fossil fuel industry.

But environmentalists call it a diversion endorsed by those with a vested interest in promoting plastic's continual use -- counter to the key priority of reduction.

Residents near the Pennsylvania plot meanwhile have their own concerns: The brush-covered terrain is the proposed site for the chemical recycling plant by a Texas-based company called Encina and has left those living nearby afraid of toxic contamination.

"They are acting as a refinery," Point Township resident Annmarie Weber told AFP from her kitchen about a half mile from the site, adding that she fears "air pollution, water pollution, toxic chemicals."

Unlike standard mechanical recycling, chemical recycling uses heat and chemical solvents to break plastic down into its most basic petrochemical building blocks.

According to Encina's chief sustainability officer Sheida Sahandy, chemical recycling offers a valuable solution to turn "what was trash into a productive material" -- a critical task as oceans and landfills fill up with plastic.

The raw materials created by chemical recycling can be used to make a variety of products like more plastic -- but also fuel. While Encina says it won't produce fuel, many chemical recycling facilities do.

Creation of fuel, says the nonprofit Beyond Plastics, only perpetuates "a cycle of petrochemical extraction, plastic production and burning."

According to Veena Singla, senior scientist with the Natural Resources Defense Council, chemical recycling plants are often "permitted to release health-harming air pollution. And many of them are large-quantity hazardous waste generators as well."

- 'Indistinguishable materials' -

Only nine percent of US plastic waste is recycled annually, according to latest government figures from 2018 -- with the majority of plastic ending up in landfills, incinerated or littered, including multitudes of single-use items.

At ExxonMobil, which has a chemical recycling plant inside its sprawling Baytown, Texas petrochemical complex, senior sustainability advisor Melanie Bower says the process is "a technology that's complementary to mechanical recycling."

ExxonMobil's facility is one of only 11 US chemical recycling plants constructed, according to an October report by Beyond Plastics, which said the small number is indicative of a process that is "energy-intensive, expensive, and infeasible."

Even if all 11 were operating at full capacity, the report said, they would handle less than 1.3 percent of US plastic waste generated per year.

Exactly how each facility operates and precisely what it produces varies.

At ExxonMobil, raw materials produced by chemical recycling are mixed with raw materials derived from fossil fuels to become "indistinguishable from one another," Bower told AFP.

While ExxonMobil uses the mixed materials to make things like new plastics, chemicals, alcohols and transportation fuels, it attributes the recycled content to "certified circular plastic."

Beyond Plastics alleges flexible accounting at some chemical recycling plants could mean plastics with minimal recycled content are unfairly labeled as recycled.

From Dow to the American Chemistry Council industry group, corporate behemoths have thrown their weight behind chemical recycling.

It's in the petrochemical industry's best interest to convince consumers: "Hey, we have a sustainable, green way to manage plastic waste," Singla said.

"A really critical solution is: We need less plastic, period."

- Public resources -

Back in Point Township, residents say they are alarmed by plans to use large amounts of river water to wash plastics before returning it to the Susquehanna.

When the water goes back it "will have had a filtration process that it wouldn't otherwise have," Encina's Sahandy said. "And we have to comply with all sorts of requirements for making sure there's nothing sort of harmful in there."

But according to the company and local experts, there are no regulations that would apply to the plant on microplastics and PFAS "forever chemicals" -- common additives in plastic that do not easily break down and have been linked to cancer, fertility issues and environmental damage.

On top of that, among the petrochemicals produced by Encina is benzene, a known carcinogen which residents fear could be released in the event of an accident or disaster, like flooding of the Susquehanna.

When a company "proposes to use public resources like air, water and soil, it's only fair that their track record and the proposal is heavily scrutinized," Andrew Stuhl, chair of environmental studies and sciences at nearby Bucknell University told AFP.

"I'm firmly on the side that there are way too many risks and unknowns."

C.M.Harper--TFWP