The Fort Worth Press - British court spares Shell in climate case

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 62.99985
ALL 83.045552
AMD 377.608336
ANG 1.790083
AOA 917.000197
ARS 1391.482008
AUD 1.43098
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70083
BAM 1.692703
BBD 2.017085
BDT 122.889314
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.377777
BIF 2964.437482
BMD 1
BND 1.280822
BOB 6.920277
BRL 5.307019
BSD 1.001532
BTN 93.628346
BWP 13.656801
BYN 3.038457
BYR 19600
BZD 2.014228
CAD 1.373185
CDF 2274.99968
CHF 0.789765
CLF 0.02352
CLP 928.549806
CNY 6.886399
CNH 6.89802
COP 3710.78
CRC 467.791212
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.432004
CZK 21.174903
DJF 178.340531
DKK 6.462825
DOP 59.449729
DZD 132.443333
EGP 52.221598
ERN 15
ETB 157.836062
EUR 0.86497
FJD 2.22425
FKP 0.749521
GBP 0.748235
GEL 2.71498
GGP 0.749521
GHS 10.917148
GIP 0.749521
GMD 73.492219
GNF 8778.549977
GTQ 7.671603
GYD 209.529662
HKD 7.831425
HNL 26.509205
HRK 6.5177
HTG 131.388314
HUF 338.933503
IDR 16950
ILS 3.129499
IMP 0.749521
INR 93.445504
IQD 1311.97909
IRR 1315624.999839
ISK 124.0396
JEP 0.749521
JMD 157.346743
JOD 0.708972
JPY 158.899501
KES 129.596651
KGS 87.450016
KHR 4001.973291
KMF 426.999852
KPW 900.003974
KRW 1494.349756
KWD 0.30663
KYD 0.834581
KZT 481.491739
LAK 21506.092917
LBP 89692.06536
LKR 312.41778
LRD 183.27376
LSL 16.894603
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.411466
MAD 9.358386
MDL 17.440975
MGA 4176.061001
MKD 53.240561
MMK 2099.452431
MNT 3566.950214
MOP 8.084003
MRU 40.089837
MUR 46.569521
MVR 15.460237
MWK 1736.722073
MXN 17.85425
MYR 3.939503
MZN 63.89682
NAD 16.894749
NGN 1362.859719
NIO 36.852081
NOK 9.74475
NPR 149.804404
NZD 1.71979
OMR 0.384525
PAB 1.001519
PEN 3.46252
PGK 4.323066
PHP 60.00395
PKR 279.628351
PLN 3.69518
PYG 6541.287659
QAR 3.662273
RON 4.4104
RSD 101.574994
RUB 82.27686
RWF 1457.231632
SAR 3.754649
SBD 8.05166
SCR 13.926897
SDG 601.000176
SEK 9.399115
SGD 1.279065
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.574987
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 572.35094
SRD 37.4875
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.204227
SVC 8.762971
SYP 110.564047
SZL 16.900787
THB 32.576976
TJS 9.619362
TMT 3.51
TND 2.95786
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.316702
TTD 6.794814
TWD 31.984498
TZS 2572.49847
UAH 43.875212
UGX 3785.603628
UYU 40.356396
UZS 12210.172836
VES 454.69063
VND 26341
VUV 119.226095
WST 2.727792
XAF 567.726608
XAG 0.014835
XAU 0.000229
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.80494
XDR 0.706079
XOF 567.716781
XPF 103.216984
YER 238.598524
ZAR 16.94005
ZMK 9001.197058
ZMW 19.554625
ZWL 321.999592
  • GSK

    0.6100

    52.45

    +1.16%

  • RELX

    -0.1150

    33.245

    -0.35%

  • BP

    -1.6150

    43.165

    -3.74%

  • CMSC

    0.1120

    22.762

    +0.49%

  • BTI

    0.3400

    57.71

    +0.59%

  • BCE

    -0.0300

    25.76

    -0.12%

  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • CMSD

    0.1678

    22.8262

    +0.74%

  • AZN

    1.9700

    185.57

    +1.06%

  • BCC

    4.2900

    72.59

    +5.91%

  • RIO

    3.0900

    86.24

    +3.58%

  • RYCEF

    1.1500

    16.45

    +6.99%

  • VOD

    0.2250

    14.555

    +1.55%

  • JRI

    0.0300

    11.8

    +0.25%

  • NGG

    0.8000

    82.79

    +0.97%

British court spares Shell in climate case
British court spares Shell in climate case / Photo: © AFP/File

British court spares Shell in climate case

A British court dismissed a lawsuit that accused Shell's leadership of mismanaging climate risks to the oil giant on Monday, but the activist investor group that brought it plans to appeal.

Text size:

Corporations have faced a growing number of climate-related lawsuits in recent years as they come under pressure to step up efforts to curb global warming.

Shell was already ordered by a Dutch court in 2021 to slash its greenhouse gas emissions by 45 percent by the end of the decade after it was sued by environmental groups.

This time, ClientEarth, an environmental law NGO and a minor Shell shareholder, filed in February a lawsuit in the High Court of England and Wales against Shell bosses "for failing to manage the material and foreseeable risks posed to the company by climate change".

But the judges dismissed the case, once in May and now following a hearing earlier in July.

ClientEarth said it was disappointed by the dismissal and plans to appeal.

A Shell spokesperson said the dismissal was "the right outcome –- the court has reaffirmed its decision that this claim is fundamentally flawed".

The company said ClientEarth's "claim entirely ignores how directors of a business as large and complex as Shell must balance a range of competing considerations".

At its annual shareholders meeting in May, Shell's management received majority backing even though there were disruptions and doubts expressed about its climate transition.

Shell later announced a change of plans: instead of gradually reducing oil output it would hold it steady until 2030.

"The Board's strategy to manage the risks of the energy transition was fundamentally flawed as it was," said ClientEarth senior lawyer Paul Benson.

"Now the Board seems to be dropping even any pretence that it will take meaningful action," he added in a statement.

ClientEarth says Shell's flawed climate strategy is inconsistent with the Paris Agreement and jeopardises the company's future commercial success, and thus constitutes a breach of its legal duties under English company law.

"The Board's refusal to take decisive action to prepare the company for the fast-advancing energy transition puts Shell’s future commercial viability at risk," said Benson.

According to ClientEarth, this is the first time a company's board has been targeted by a lawsuit for failing to properly handle the climate transition.

Shell's first-quarter net profit surged 22 percent to $8.7 billion but has indicated its second quarter performance has been hit by a drop in gas sales.

T.M.Dan--TFWP