The Fort Worth Press - British court spares Shell in climate case

USD -
AED 3.672497
AFN 63.499117
ALL 79.869835
AMD 363.459803
ANG 1.790365
AOA 916.999954
ARS 1514.257398
AUD 1.40651
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.701383
BAM 1.706252
BBD 2.014735
BDT 122.843521
BGN 1.683441
BHD 0.376975
BIF 3000
BMD 1
BND 1.274916
BOB 11.003708
BRL 5.101301
BSD 1.000301
BTN 95.56554
BWP 13.547596
BYN 3.03039
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011865
CAD 1.40693
CDF 2310.999992
CHF 0.821125
CLF 0.02399
CLP 947.249912
CNY 6.699803
CNH 6.69654
COP 3210.67
CRC 446.324973
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.197131
CZK 21.271797
DJF 177.719842
DKK 6.53145
DOP 59.25017
DZD 133.876781
EGP 51.629701
ERN 15
ETB 161.774656
EUR 0.873697
FJD 2.237198
FKP 0.747949
GBP 0.74955
GEL 2.59497
GGP 0.747949
GHS 11.570234
GIP 0.747949
GMD 73.517591
GNF 8757.495212
GTQ 7.633554
GYD 209.220461
HKD 7.843035
HNL 26.851323
HRK 6.581098
HTG 130.739368
HUF 316.344001
IDR 17821.25
ILS 3.014604
IMP 0.747949
INR 95.69185
IQD 1310.441394
IRR 1374650.000077
ISK 120.920415
JEP 0.747949
JMD 157.757218
JOD 0.708975
JPY 157.5345
KES 129.480139
KGS 87.450247
KHR 4051.999738
KMF 430.000103
KPW 900.000318
KRW 1350.25026
KWD 0.30857
KYD 0.833584
KZT 447.358319
LAK 22408.7241
LBP 89579.323882
LKR 329.228662
LRD 173.059223
LSL 16.226232
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.376417
MAD 9.55311
MDL 17.590327
MGA 4381.243184
MKD 53.73644
MMK 2099.019807
MNT 3596.806502
MOP 8.081186
MRU 40.053042
MUR 47.659917
MVR 15.459878
MWK 1734.612868
MXN 17.301325
MYR 4.080601
MZN 63.905152
NAD 16.225949
NGN 1323.799265
NIO 36.815543
NOK 9.44695
NPR 152.891351
NZD 1.748605
OMR 0.384502
PAB 1.000305
PEN 3.379266
PGK 4.456251
PHP 62.476031
PKR 277.214494
PLN 3.79919
PYG 5952.427688
QAR 3.636364
RON 4.609902
RSD 102.573512
RUB 84.248188
RWF 1476.460299
SAR 3.755168
SBD 8.026013
SCR 13.851793
SDG 601.499188
SEK 9.835705
SGD 1.27517
SHP 0.74758
SLE 24.650222
SLL 20969.491881
SOS 571.640424
SRD 37.739747
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.373953
SVC 8.752852
SYP 13002.000254
SZL 16.221592
THB 33.110238
TJS 9.227964
TMT 3.5
TND 2.947861
TOP 2.40776
TRY 48.840298
TTD 6.797006
TWD 31.690899
TZS 2645.00299
UAH 44.815682
UGX 3901.400648
UYU 40.165583
UZS 11818.48716
VES 851.341303
VND 26015
VUV 118.301728
WST 2.751033
XAF 573.107697
XAG 0.014846
XAU 0.000229
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802851
XDR 0.707052
XOF 573.107697
XPF 104.043167
YER 236.549794
ZAR 16.18001
ZMK 9001.201714
ZMW 19.481788
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5712.529845
MXV 1.96099
  • RIO

    -0.3300

    97.04

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    20.67

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    0.0000

    33.41

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67.95

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.99

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    75.66

    -0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8600

    51.08

    +1.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    11.52

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.1200

    76.68

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.54

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    -0.0800

    55.75

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    168.1

    +1.2%

  • BP

    -1.4200

    43.16

    -3.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    19.7

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    17.02

    +0.41%

British court spares Shell in climate case
British court spares Shell in climate case / Photo: © AFP/File

British court spares Shell in climate case

A British court dismissed a lawsuit that accused Shell's leadership of mismanaging climate risks to the oil giant on Monday, but the activist investor group that brought it plans to appeal.

Text size:

Corporations have faced a growing number of climate-related lawsuits in recent years as they come under pressure to step up efforts to curb global warming.

Shell was already ordered by a Dutch court in 2021 to slash its greenhouse gas emissions by 45 percent by the end of the decade after it was sued by environmental groups.

This time, ClientEarth, an environmental law NGO and a minor Shell shareholder, filed in February a lawsuit in the High Court of England and Wales against Shell bosses "for failing to manage the material and foreseeable risks posed to the company by climate change".

But the judges dismissed the case, once in May and now following a hearing earlier in July.

ClientEarth said it was disappointed by the dismissal and plans to appeal.

A Shell spokesperson said the dismissal was "the right outcome –- the court has reaffirmed its decision that this claim is fundamentally flawed".

The company said ClientEarth's "claim entirely ignores how directors of a business as large and complex as Shell must balance a range of competing considerations".

At its annual shareholders meeting in May, Shell's management received majority backing even though there were disruptions and doubts expressed about its climate transition.

Shell later announced a change of plans: instead of gradually reducing oil output it would hold it steady until 2030.

"The Board's strategy to manage the risks of the energy transition was fundamentally flawed as it was," said ClientEarth senior lawyer Paul Benson.

"Now the Board seems to be dropping even any pretence that it will take meaningful action," he added in a statement.

ClientEarth says Shell's flawed climate strategy is inconsistent with the Paris Agreement and jeopardises the company's future commercial success, and thus constitutes a breach of its legal duties under English company law.

"The Board's refusal to take decisive action to prepare the company for the fast-advancing energy transition puts Shell’s future commercial viability at risk," said Benson.

According to ClientEarth, this is the first time a company's board has been targeted by a lawsuit for failing to properly handle the climate transition.

Shell's first-quarter net profit surged 22 percent to $8.7 billion but has indicated its second quarter performance has been hit by a drop in gas sales.

T.M.Dan--TFWP