The Fort Worth Press - Ozone-depleting CFCs hit record despite ban: study

USD -
AED 3.67305
AFN 63.502642
ALL 82.257093
AMD 368.06994
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.999742
ARS 1461.519193
AUD 1.428194
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.695732
BAM 1.707839
BBD 2.014862
BDT 122.896637
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.37695
BIF 2985
BMD 1
BND 1.293759
BOB 6.91239
BRL 5.157899
BSD 1.000358
BTN 94.655909
BWP 13.576786
BYN 2.799012
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011981
CAD 1.41612
CDF 2265.000306
CHF 0.80895
CLF 0.023033
CLP 906.530329
CNY 6.769596
CNH 6.77754
COP 3446.13
CRC 453.811158
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.285333
CZK 21.169006
DJF 177.720283
DKK 6.53933
DOP 58.479379
DZD 133.523192
EGP 49.7701
ERN 15
ETB 161.283979
EUR 0.87491
FJD 2.24775
FKP 0.755695
GBP 0.755005
GEL 2.650427
GGP 0.755695
GHS 11.229578
GIP 0.755695
GMD 73.495715
GNF 8765.357714
GTQ 7.628428
GYD 209.275317
HKD 7.83985
HNL 26.762371
HRK 6.591987
HTG 130.677006
HUF 308.224498
IDR 17843
ILS 2.97135
IMP 0.755695
INR 94.58075
IQD 1310.524891
IRR 1374999.999926
ISK 125.989821
JEP 0.755695
JMD 158.06984
JOD 0.708999
JPY 161.517022
KES 129.439758
KGS 87.449795
KHR 4016.800706
KMF 429.499605
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1537.02501
KWD 0.30866
KYD 0.833661
KZT 487.587213
LAK 22093.277098
LBP 89584.959701
LKR 334.503445
LRD 182.07459
LSL 16.436923
LTL 2.952741
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.386739
MAD 9.325876
MDL 17.591841
MGA 4219.387176
MKD 53.934521
MMK 2099.917974
MNT 3579.231668
MOP 8.077961
MRU 40.000349
MUR 47.809814
MVR 15.459635
MWK 1736.000081
MXN 17.35533
MYR 4.149699
MZN 63.899865
NAD 16.436923
NGN 1366.730165
NIO 36.814852
NOK 9.695201
NPR 151.449105
NZD 1.75035
OMR 0.384503
PAB 1.000358
PEN 3.385028
PGK 4.456902
PHP 61.1365
PKR 278.233656
PLN 3.74035
PYG 6098.551332
QAR 3.646906
RON 4.582895
RSD 102.696018
RUB 74.250968
RWF 1465.171718
SAR 3.753791
SBD 8.061424
SCR 13.674406
SDG 600.500641
SEK 9.61687
SGD 1.29338
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.749989
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.695527
SRD 37.430496
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.39383
SVC 8.753133
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.433081
THB 32.939705
TJS 9.278635
TMT 3.5
TND 2.957937
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.4577
TTD 6.784027
TWD 31.642501
TZS 2628.232027
UAH 44.991835
UGX 3651.795772
UYU 40.002096
UZS 11989.276889
VES 606.63266
VND 26320
VUV 118.352303
WST 2.751796
XAF 572.793161
XAG 0.015293
XAU 0.000239
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802932
XDR 0.71169
XOF 571.999786
XPF 104.139924
YER 238.60233
ZAR 16.394101
ZMK 9001.201015
ZMW 17.731555
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    0.3600

    61.5

    +0.59%

  • CMSC

    -0.2100

    22.16

    -0.95%

  • RYCEF

    0.1900

    18.45

    +1.03%

  • BCC

    -2.1200

    72.54

    -2.92%

  • VOD

    -0.1800

    14.12

    -1.27%

  • RELX

    -0.3500

    30.83

    -1.14%

  • CMSD

    -0.2100

    22.08

    -0.95%

  • BCE

    -0.6300

    22.65

    -2.78%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    12.65

    -0.16%

  • NGG

    1.5300

    80.97

    +1.89%

  • RIO

    -0.7200

    99.36

    -0.72%

  • GSK

    0.0700

    50.74

    +0.14%

  • BP

    0.6800

    39.78

    +1.71%

  • AZN

    1.5000

    176.43

    +0.85%

  • BTI

    -0.0100

    58.9

    -0.02%

Ozone-depleting CFCs hit record despite ban: study
Ozone-depleting CFCs hit record despite ban: study / Photo: © AFP

Ozone-depleting CFCs hit record despite ban: study

Their power to dissolve the ozone layer shielding Earth from the Sun prompted a worldwide ban, but scientists on Monday revealed that some human-made chlorofluorocarbons have reached record levels, boosting climate-changing emissions.

Text size:

Despite being banned under the Montreal Protocol, the five chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) measured increased rapidly in the atmosphere from 2010 to 2020, reaching record-high levels in 2020, according to the study published in the journal Nature Geoscience.

It said the increase was probably due to leakage during the production of chemicals that are meant to replace CFCs, including hydrofluorocarbons (HFOs).

Although at current levels they do not threaten the recovery of the ozone layer, they contribute to a different threat, joining other emissions in heating the atmosphere.

"If you are producing greenhouse gases and ozone-depleting substances during the production of these next-generation compounds, then they do have an indirect impact on the climate and the ozone layer," said co-author Isaac Vimont of the Global Monitoring Laboratory at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

CFCs are potent greenhouse gases that trap heat up to 10,000 times more efficiently than carbon dioxide -- the biggest cause of the global warming that drives climate change, according to data from the Global Carbon Project.

In the 1970s and 1980s, CFCs were widely used as refrigerants and in aerosol sprays.

But the discovery of the hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica as a result of their use led to the global agreement in 1987 to eliminate them.

After the Montreal Protocol entered into force, global concentrations of CFCs declined steadily.

- Ozone 'early warning' -

The study analysed five CFCs with no or few current uses, beginning at the point of their total global phase-out in 2010.

In 2020 all five gases were at their highest abundance since direct measurements began.

Those emissions have so far resulted in a modest impact on the ozone layer and slightly larger climate footprint, said co-author Luke Western of Bristol University and the Global Monitoring Laboratory.

They are equivalent to the 2020 CO2 emissions of Switzerland -- about one percent of the total greenhouse gas emissions of the United States.

But if the rapid upward trend continues, their impact will increase.

The researchers called their findings "an early warning" of a new way in which CFCs are endangering the ozone layer.

The emissions are likely due to processes that are not subject to the current ban and unreported uses.

The class of industrial aerosols developed to replace those banned by the Montreal Protocol is to be phased out over the next three decades under a recent amendment to the 1987 treaty.

- Unknown source -

The protocol curbs the release of ozone-depleting substances that could disperse, but does not ban their use in the production of other chemicals as raw materials or by-products.

It was not the first time that unreported production had an impact on CFC levels. In 2018 scientists discovered that the pace of CFC slowdown had dropped by half from the preceding five years.

Evidence in that case pointed to factories in eastern China, the researchers said. Once CFC production in that region stopped, the draw-down appeared to be back on track.

The study said further research was needed to know the precise source of the recent rise in CFC emissions.

Nationwide data gaps make it difficult to determine where the gases are coming from and for some of the CFCs analysed there are no known uses.

But "eradicating these emissions is an easy win in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions," said Western.

X.Silva--TFWP