The Fort Worth Press - Ozone-depleting CFCs hit record despite ban: study

USD -
AED 3.67305
AFN 63.500068
ALL 79.869835
AMD 363.460172
ANG 1.790365
AOA 917.000203
ARS 1514.226905
AUD 1.406084
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.698292
BAM 1.706252
BBD 2.014735
BDT 122.843521
BGN 1.683441
BHD 0.376975
BIF 3000
BMD 1
BND 1.274916
BOB 11.003708
BRL 5.1092
BSD 1.000301
BTN 95.56554
BWP 13.547596
BYN 3.03039
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011865
CAD 1.40745
CDF 2311.000191
CHF 0.820965
CLF 0.023993
CLP 947.430113
CNY 6.699799
CNH 6.69874
COP 3209.17
CRC 446.324973
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.197131
CZK 21.2815
DJF 177.719993
DKK 6.534525
DOP 59.250224
DZD 133.913705
EGP 51.547653
ERN 15
ETB 161.774656
EUR 0.87414
FJD 2.238205
FKP 0.747949
GBP 0.749995
GEL 2.595024
GGP 0.747949
GHS 11.570347
GIP 0.747949
GMD 73.497903
GNF 8757.500575
GTQ 7.633554
GYD 209.220461
HKD 7.843945
HNL 26.851323
HRK 6.587804
HTG 130.739368
HUF 316.359501
IDR 17826
ILS 3.014602
IMP 0.747949
INR 95.55785
IQD 1310.441394
IRR 1374849.999988
ISK 120.979944
JEP 0.747949
JMD 157.757218
JOD 0.70898
JPY 157.369501
KES 129.450262
KGS 87.450258
KHR 4052.000124
KMF 430.000514
KPW 900.000318
KRW 1357.790866
KWD 0.308601
KYD 0.833584
KZT 447.358319
LAK 22408.7241
LBP 89579.323882
LKR 329.228662
LRD 173.059223
LSL 16.226232
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.376417
MAD 9.55311
MDL 17.590327
MGA 4381.243184
MKD 53.670431
MMK 2099.019807
MNT 3596.806502
MOP 8.081186
MRU 40.053042
MUR 47.659781
MVR 15.459923
MWK 1734.612868
MXN 17.3004
MYR 4.075198
MZN 63.898252
NAD 16.225949
NGN 1323.820074
NIO 36.815543
NOK 9.446275
NPR 152.891351
NZD 1.74708
OMR 0.384488
PAB 1.000305
PEN 3.379266
PGK 4.456251
PHP 62.566032
PKR 277.214494
PLN 3.80185
PYG 5952.427688
QAR 3.636364
RON 4.612503
RSD 102.621036
RUB 84.248932
RWF 1476.460299
SAR 3.755168
SBD 8.026013
SCR 13.776759
SDG 601.502952
SEK 9.84912
SGD 1.27545
SHP 0.74758
SLE 24.64972
SLL 20969.491881
SOS 571.640424
SRD 37.739709
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.373953
SVC 8.752852
SYP 13002.000254
SZL 16.221592
THB 33.140026
TJS 9.227964
TMT 3.5
TND 2.947861
TOP 2.40776
TRY 48.819499
TTD 6.797006
TWD 31.686599
TZS 2645.003045
UAH 44.815682
UGX 3901.400648
UYU 40.165583
UZS 11818.48716
VES 851.341299
VND 26015
VUV 118.301728
WST 2.751033
XAF 573.398087
XAG 0.014921
XAU 0.000229
XCD 2.702551
XCG 1.802851
XDR 0.707052
XOF 573.398087
XPF 104.043167
YER 236.550186
ZAR 16.196498
ZMK 9001.201861
ZMW 19.481788
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5712.529845
MXV 1.960886
  • RIO

    -0.3300

    97.04

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    20.67

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    0.0000

    33.41

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67.95

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.99

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    75.66

    -0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8600

    51.08

    +1.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    11.52

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.1200

    76.68

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.54

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    -0.0800

    55.75

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    168.1

    +1.2%

  • BP

    -1.4200

    43.16

    -3.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    19.7

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    17.02

    +0.41%

Ozone-depleting CFCs hit record despite ban: study
Ozone-depleting CFCs hit record despite ban: study / Photo: © AFP

Ozone-depleting CFCs hit record despite ban: study

Their power to dissolve the ozone layer shielding Earth from the Sun prompted a worldwide ban, but scientists on Monday revealed that some human-made chlorofluorocarbons have reached record levels, boosting climate-changing emissions.

Text size:

Despite being banned under the Montreal Protocol, the five chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) measured increased rapidly in the atmosphere from 2010 to 2020, reaching record-high levels in 2020, according to the study published in the journal Nature Geoscience.

It said the increase was probably due to leakage during the production of chemicals that are meant to replace CFCs, including hydrofluorocarbons (HFOs).

Although at current levels they do not threaten the recovery of the ozone layer, they contribute to a different threat, joining other emissions in heating the atmosphere.

"If you are producing greenhouse gases and ozone-depleting substances during the production of these next-generation compounds, then they do have an indirect impact on the climate and the ozone layer," said co-author Isaac Vimont of the Global Monitoring Laboratory at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

CFCs are potent greenhouse gases that trap heat up to 10,000 times more efficiently than carbon dioxide -- the biggest cause of the global warming that drives climate change, according to data from the Global Carbon Project.

In the 1970s and 1980s, CFCs were widely used as refrigerants and in aerosol sprays.

But the discovery of the hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica as a result of their use led to the global agreement in 1987 to eliminate them.

After the Montreal Protocol entered into force, global concentrations of CFCs declined steadily.

- Ozone 'early warning' -

The study analysed five CFCs with no or few current uses, beginning at the point of their total global phase-out in 2010.

In 2020 all five gases were at their highest abundance since direct measurements began.

Those emissions have so far resulted in a modest impact on the ozone layer and slightly larger climate footprint, said co-author Luke Western of Bristol University and the Global Monitoring Laboratory.

They are equivalent to the 2020 CO2 emissions of Switzerland -- about one percent of the total greenhouse gas emissions of the United States.

But if the rapid upward trend continues, their impact will increase.

The researchers called their findings "an early warning" of a new way in which CFCs are endangering the ozone layer.

The emissions are likely due to processes that are not subject to the current ban and unreported uses.

The class of industrial aerosols developed to replace those banned by the Montreal Protocol is to be phased out over the next three decades under a recent amendment to the 1987 treaty.

- Unknown source -

The protocol curbs the release of ozone-depleting substances that could disperse, but does not ban their use in the production of other chemicals as raw materials or by-products.

It was not the first time that unreported production had an impact on CFC levels. In 2018 scientists discovered that the pace of CFC slowdown had dropped by half from the preceding five years.

Evidence in that case pointed to factories in eastern China, the researchers said. Once CFC production in that region stopped, the draw-down appeared to be back on track.

The study said further research was needed to know the precise source of the recent rise in CFC emissions.

Nationwide data gaps make it difficult to determine where the gases are coming from and for some of the CFCs analysed there are no known uses.

But "eradicating these emissions is an easy win in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions," said Western.

X.Silva--TFWP