The Fort Worth Press - Much-maligned rats unlikely to spark next pandemic: study

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 66.498782
ALL 80.629676
AMD 365.091035
AOA 917.000408
ARS 1492.336499
AUD 1.414877
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.701052
BAM 1.691649
BBD 2.00813
BDT 123.418242
BHD 0.375989
BIF 2985.079791
BMD 1
BND 1.277602
BOB 11.849673
BRL 5.083698
BSD 0.997016
BTN 94.875232
BWP 13.457596
BYN 2.968819
BYR 19600
BZD 2.00519
CAD 1.39518
CDF 2262.499098
CHF 0.808199
CLF 0.023198
CLP 912.999827
CNY 6.747602
CNH 6.743155
COP 3157.68
CRC 453.228387
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.372573
CZK 20.984797
DJF 177.546166
DKK 6.46806
DOP 58.20179
DZD 132.308956
EGP 49.569799
ERN 15
ETB 160.923669
EUR 0.86521
FJD 2.20855
FKP 0.74148
GBP 0.741195
GEL 2.610161
GGP 0.74148
GHS 11.700039
GIP 0.74148
GMD 73.496802
GNF 8756.649224
GTQ 7.607144
GYD 208.588851
HKD 7.845875
HNL 26.723176
HRK 6.519601
HTG 130.363707
HUF 314.212956
IDR 17801
ILS 2.99985
IMP 0.74148
INR 95.21055
IQD 1306.058902
IRR 1375550.000465
ISK 123.37984
JEP 0.74148
JMD 158.335856
JOD 0.708953
JPY 157.888997
KES 128.789741
KGS 87.449779
KHR 4049.647537
KMF 425.999543
KRW 1411.360366
KWD 0.30866
KYD 0.830861
KZT 467.275008
LAK 22510.919863
LBP 89282.792025
LKR 334.420274
LRD 179.959348
LSL 16.197552
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.341738
MAD 9.29222
MDL 17.337716
MGA 4254.638239
MKD 53.219738
MMK 2099.549369
MNT 3595.852714
MOP 8.056654
MRU 40.080439
MUR 46.795264
MVR 15.450064
MWK 1728.841413
MXN 17.138497
MYR 4.085099
MZN 63.904996
NAD 16.197552
NGN 1361.789707
NIO 36.690741
NOK 9.50157
NPR 151.800372
NZD 1.69811
OMR 0.382693
PAB 0.997016
PEN 3.376465
PGK 4.406003
PHP 60.814978
PKR 276.796523
PLN 3.719555
PYG 5928.296501
QAR 3.644596
RON 4.541503
RSD 101.492021
RUB 81.61994
RWF 1466.072741
SAR 3.744756
SBD 8.065696
SCR 14.449077
SDG 600.504962
SEK 9.48365
SGD 1.278665
SLE 24.60377
SOS 569.822255
SRD 37.866499
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.191022
SVC 8.723782
SZL 16.194265
THB 32.970555
TJS 9.197509
TMT 3.51
TND 2.929032
TRY 47.714698
TTD 6.757774
TWD 32.250104
TZS 2643.563029
UAH 44.653894
UGX 3714.050945
UYU 40.133201
UZS 11924.058297
VES 755.762399
VND 26204.5
VUV 118.557141
WST 2.733716
XAF 567.363231
XAG 0.015658
XAU 0.00023
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.796912
XDR 0.705618
XOF 567.363231
XPF 103.152705
YER 238.395817
ZAR 16.14803
ZMK 9001.197294
ZMW 18.818492
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0240

    21.744

    +0.11%

  • BCC

    2.3400

    86.6

    +2.7%

  • JRI

    0.1500

    12.81

    +1.17%

  • CMSD

    -0.1600

    21.82

    -0.73%

  • BCE

    -0.0200

    22.75

    -0.09%

  • GSK

    0.7900

    52.96

    +1.49%

  • BTI

    0.6000

    59.33

    +1.01%

  • RBGPF

    0.7600

    70.5

    +1.08%

  • RIO

    1.4500

    101.1

    +1.43%

  • VOD

    0.1900

    16.19

    +1.17%

  • RYCEF

    0.2300

    20.85

    +1.1%

  • RELX

    0.0485

    35.52

    +0.14%

  • BP

    -0.6000

    41.63

    -1.44%

  • AZN

    1.4100

    161.42

    +0.87%

  • NGG

    0.4700

    80.88

    +0.58%

Much-maligned rats unlikely to spark next pandemic: study
Much-maligned rats unlikely to spark next pandemic: study / Photo: © AFP/File

Much-maligned rats unlikely to spark next pandemic: study

Rats have been seen as filthy disease-spreaders since at least the time of the plague, but new research shows that rodents and other city-dwelling animals are less likely to cause the next pandemic than previously thought.

Text size:

Researchers at Georgetown University in Washington DC studied data on about nearly 3,000 mammals, expecting to find that those living in urban environments hosted more viruses that could be caught by humans, because they were in such close contact.

They found that urban animals did in fact carry 10 times as many kinds of disease -- but also that more than 100 times as many studies had been published about them.

When the researchers corrected for this massive bias -- a long-standing scientific preference to study animals scuttling under our feet rather than hiding in rainforests -- they were surprised to find that rats were no more likely to be the source of a new human disease than other animals.

However, "it's still not good idea to get too close and friendly to urban wildlife," said Greg Albery, a disease ecologist who led the study published in the Nature Ecology and Evolution journal on Monday.

"These urban animals are unlikely to be the source of the next 'Disease X', but they're still often a source of well-known important diseases," he told AFP, giving the example of leptospirosis, a bacterial disease commonly spread by rats.

The threat from another common target of city disdain -- the pigeon -- was "almost certainly" also exaggerated due to research bias, he said.

Because we have been studying animals living in cities for so long, "we know so much about their parasites that there are relatively few unknowns there; rural wildlife is much more uncertain and more likely to provide us with the next 'Big Threat'."

Jonathan Richardson, a professor of urban ecology at the University of Richmond, said it was an important study because the authors "rightfully highlight the over-representation of data coming from urban mammal research".

But he told AFP that it is still fair to describe rats as "disease sponges" because humans are in such regular contact with them.

Richardson said his research has found that urban rats harbour more than 200 pathogens and parasites that could jump over to humans, while nearly 80 percent of rats in some cities carry leptospirosis.

- 'Important pathway into humans' -

Albery and his study co-author Colin Carlson published research last week showing climate change could increase the risk of new epidemics.

They found that as animals like bats flee to cooler areas, they will mingle with other species for the first time and create new opportunities for diseases that could later infect humans.

Albery said urban mammals could play a role in that process.

"If a bat meets a rat and gives it a novel disease, and then if that rat has greater access to human areas, that provides an important pathway into humans," he said.

His global warming research also showed that new opportunities for viruses to jump between animals would now take place closer to populated areas, rather in forests.

"The host-pathogen network is about to change substantially, so what we know now about urban parasites is likely to become outdated quickly," Albery said.

"We need improved surveillance both in urban and wild animals so that we can identify when a pathogen has jumped from one species to another -- and if the receiving host is urban or in close proximity to humans, we should get particularly concerned."

L.Coleman--TFWP