The Fort Worth Press - Plastic recycling remains a 'myth': Greenpeace study

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 64.498896
ALL 80.819685
AMD 361.12818
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.000381
ARS 1526.750902
AUD 1.423315
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.699594
BAM 1.741787
BBD 2.015015
BDT 123.745402
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377604
BIF 3000.997453
BMD 1
BND 1.278059
BOB 11.730759
BRL 5.028301
BSD 1.000472
BTN 94.559477
BWP 13.70595
BYN 2.971479
BYR 19600
BZD 2.012094
CAD 1.406545
CDF 2315.999851
CHF 0.825725
CLF 0.024811
CLP 976.49913
CNY 6.67805
CNH 6.675525
COP 3192.79
CRC 455.529135
CUC 1
CUP 24.010794
CVE 98.199695
CZK 21.63385
DJF 178.150632
DKK 6.66144
DOP 61.440772
DZD 134.662028
EGP 54.377015
ERN 15
ETB 163.87083
EUR 0.89118
FJD 2.253802
FKP 0.747587
GBP 0.747345
GEL 2.590236
GGP 0.747587
GHS 11.660299
GIP 0.747587
GMD 73.499938
GNF 8854.987666
GTQ 7.645587
GYD 209.311853
HKD 7.84711
HNL 26.857072
HRK 6.713802
HTG 131.084908
HUF 325.705016
IDR 18036.35
ILS 3.088399
IMP 0.747587
INR 94.41245
IQD 1516.6493
IRR 1832374.999948
ISK 121.249953
JEP 0.747587
JMD 158.780625
JOD 0.708993
JPY 158.136498
KES 129.840126
KGS 87.450123
KHR 4068.146802
KMF 439.499662
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1327.950601
KWD 0.31022
KYD 0.833753
KZT 446.890557
LAK 22518.390538
LBP 89591.044298
LKR 332.14739
LRD 170.580744
LSL 16.412051
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.419294
MAD 9.819615
MDL 17.998442
MGA 4521.489767
MKD 54.903951
MMK 2099.21541
MNT 3597.533576
MOP 8.085932
MRU 40.128421
MUR 47.289758
MVR 15.460082
MWK 1734.751129
MXN 18.66087
MYR 4.081197
MZN 63.906631
NAD 16.412051
NGN 1332.149805
NIO 36.816372
NOK 9.37735
NPR 151.295341
NZD 1.757855
OMR 0.384502
PAB 1.000481
PEN 3.438421
PGK 4.479652
PHP 63.480996
PKR 276.89823
PLN 3.88389
PYG 5756.677086
QAR 3.647261
RON 4.759496
RSD 104.65099
RUB 81.825408
RWF 1478.615162
SAR 3.748965
SBD 8.07458
SCR 13.83198
SDG 601.509134
SEK 9.90143
SGD 1.27805
SHP 0.7473
SLE 23.919955
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.749178
SRD 37.661506
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.819089
SVC 8.754392
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.418788
THB 33.614498
TJS 9.214157
TMT 3.51
TND 2.986543
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.602797
TTD 6.792416
TWD 32.423502
TZS 2644.999727
UAH 45.047334
UGX 4207.076509
UYU 40.164934
UZS 11975.562621
VES 879.788903
VND 25856.5
VUV 119.136032
WST 2.774679
XAF 584.575977
XAG 0.017399
XAU 0.000242255985
XCD 2.702551
XCG 1.803058
XDR 0.707052
XOF 584.575977
XPF 106.20998
YER 236.103383
ZAR 16.397965
ZMK 9001.203567
ZMW 20.069287
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5787.554334
MXV 2.106372
  • RIO

    -0.3300

    97.04

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    20.67

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    0.0000

    33.41

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67.95

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.99

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    75.66

    -0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8600

    51.08

    +1.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    11.52

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.1200

    76.68

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.54

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    -0.0800

    55.75

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    168.1

    +1.2%

  • BP

    -1.4200

    43.16

    -3.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    19.7

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    17.02

    +0.41%

Plastic recycling remains a 'myth': Greenpeace study
Plastic recycling remains a 'myth': Greenpeace study / Photo: © AFP/File

Plastic recycling remains a 'myth': Greenpeace study

Plastic recycling rates are declining even as production shoots up, according to a Greenpeace USA report out Monday that blasted industry claims of creating an efficient, circular economy as "fiction."

Text size:

Titled "Circular Claims Fall Flat Again," the study found that of 51 million tons of plastic waste generated by US households in 2021, only 2.4 million tons were recycled, or around five percent.

After peaking in 2014 at 10 percent, the trend has been decreasing, especially since China stopped accepting the West's plastic waste in 2018.

Virgin production -- of non-recycled plastic, that is -- meanwhile is rapidly rising as the petrochemical industry expands, lowering costs.

"Industry groups and big corporations have been pushing for recycling as a solution," Greenpeace USA campaigner Lisa Ramsden told AFP.

"By doing that, they have shirked all responsibility" for ensuring that recycling actually works, she added. She named Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Unilever and Nestle as prime offenders.

According to Greenpeace USA's survey, only two types of plastic are widely accepted at the nation's 375 material recovery facilities.

The first is polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which is commonly used in water and soda bottles; and the second is high density polyethylene (HDPE), seen in milk jugs, shampoo bottles and cleaning product containers.

These are numbered "1" and "2" according to a standardized system in which there are seven plastic types.

But being recyclable in theory doesn't mean products are being recycled in practice.

The report found that PET and HDPE products had actual reprocessing rates of 20.9 percent and 10.3 percent, respectively -- both down slightly from Greenpeace USA's last survey in 2020.

Plastic types "3" through "7" -- including children's toys, plastic bags, produce wrappings, yogurt and margarine tubs, coffee cups and to-go food containers -- were reprocessed at rates of less than five percent.

Despite often carrying the recycling symbol on their labels, products that use plastic types "3" through "7" fail to meet the Federal Trade Commission classification of recyclable.

This is because recycling facilities for these types aren't available to a "substantial majority" of the population, defined as 60 percent, and because the collected products are not being used in the manufacturing or assembly of new items.

According to the report, there were five main reasons why plastic recycling is a "failed concept."

- Economically unfeasible -

First, plastic waste is generated in vast quantities and is extremely difficult to collect -- as becomes clear during what the report called ineffective "volunteer cleanup stunts" funded by nonprofits such as "Keep America Beautiful."

Second, even if it were all collected, mixed plastic waste cannot be recycled together, and it would be "functionally impossible to sort the trillions of pieces of consumer plastic waste produced each year," the report said.

Third, the recycling process itself is environmentally harmful, exposing workers to toxic chemicals and itself generating microplastics.

Fourth, recycled plastic carries toxicity risks through contamination with other plastic types in collection bins, preventing it from becoming food-grade material again.

Fifth and finally, the process of recycling is prohibitively expensive.

"New plastic directly competes with recycled plastic, and it's far cheaper to produce and of higher quality," said the report.

Ramsden called on corporations to support a Global Plastics Treaty, which United Nations members agreed to create in February, and move toward refill and reuse strategies.

"This isn't actually a new concept -- it's how the milkman used to be, it's how Coca-Cola used to get its beverages to people. They would drink their beverage, give the glass bottle back, and it would be sanitized and reused," she said.

Some countries are leading the way, including India, which recently banned 19 single-use plastic items. Austria has set reuse targets of 25 percent by 2025 and at least 30 percent by 2030 for beverage packaging, while Portugal has also set the 30 percent by 2030 goal.

Chile is moving to phase out single-use cutlery and mandating refillable bottles.

G.Dominguez--TFWP