The Fort Worth Press - 'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.503991
ALL 80.193613
AMD 365.443623
ANG 1.789783
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1475.150612
AUD 1.415829
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.690479
BBD 2.011669
BDT 122.606854
BGN 1.696366
BHD 0.37668
BIF 2985.954449
BMD 1
BND 1.277583
BOB 11.640953
BRL 5.222404
BSD 0.998833
BTN 95.261679
BWP 13.45607
BYN 3.037988
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008816
CAD 1.38765
CDF 2273.000362
CHF 0.813662
CLF 0.023213
CLP 913.600415
CNY 6.743204
CNH 6.74452
COP 3115.519253
CRC 449.371191
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.306625
CZK 20.930304
DJF 177.864212
DKK 6.460604
DOP 58.464065
DZD 131.663425
EGP 49.854358
ERN 15
ETB 161.573793
EUR 0.864504
FJD 2.234204
FKP 0.739036
GBP 0.73929
GEL 2.610391
GGP 0.739036
GHS 10.937378
GIP 0.739036
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8773.931458
GTQ 7.6209
GYD 208.928649
HKD 7.84715
HNL 26.775574
HRK 6.512304
HTG 130.645231
HUF 313.830388
IDR 17828.1
ILS 2.955104
IMP 0.739036
INR 95.450504
IQD 1308.440296
IRR 1374587.503816
ISK 122.903814
JEP 0.739036
JMD 158.174511
JOD 0.70904
JPY 159.30404
KES 129.09806
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4041.661265
KMF 427.00035
KPW 900.000294
KRW 1416.610383
KWD 0.30868
KYD 0.832361
KZT 463.468603
LAK 22542.892951
LBP 89443.536886
LKR 332.365271
LRD 181.287005
LSL 16.158607
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.359825
MAD 9.264013
MDL 17.319677
MGA 4300.099399
MKD 53.178616
MMK 2099.791609
MNT 3596.010349
MOP 8.073123
MRU 40.112364
MUR 47.103741
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1731.967674
MXN 17.023504
MYR 4.085904
MZN 63.910377
NAD 16.158607
NGN 1359.570377
NIO 36.760448
NOK 9.442604
NPR 152.41886
NZD 1.677149
OMR 0.381252
PAB 0.998833
PEN 3.368858
PGK 4.486797
PHP 61.465038
PKR 277.41994
PLN 3.72275
PYG 5995.073253
QAR 3.641125
RON 4.526704
RSD 101.421842
RUB 83.996716
RWF 1468.77566
SAR 3.752773
SBD 8.048583
SCR 13.755996
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.527038
SGD 1.279604
SHP 0.740866
SLE 24.503667
SLL 20969.499227
SOS 570.811185
SRD 37.974504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.176369
SVC 8.739358
SYP 13001.999906
SZL 16.156273
THB 33.143038
TJS 9.223994
TMT 3.51
TND 2.928476
TOP 2.40776
TRY 47.867504
TTD 6.76693
TWD 32.021604
TZS 2646.873244
UAH 44.681879
UGX 3710.618436
UYU 40.019016
UZS 11890.747223
VES 770.109104
VND 26148.5
VUV 117.940389
WST 2.73449
XAF 566.970915
XAG 0.015456
XAU 0.000229
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.800078
XDR 0.707052
XOF 566.970915
XPF 103.081378
YER 237.203589
ZAR 16.16923
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.87722
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.0250

    21.45

    -0.12%

  • CMSD

    -0.0100

    21.58

    -0.05%

  • BCE

    0.1500

    23.47

    +0.64%

  • RELX

    -0.2400

    34.43

    -0.7%

  • NGG

    -0.1500

    81.05

    -0.19%

  • GSK

    -0.4785

    49.52

    -0.97%

  • RIO

    -0.4100

    95.68

    -0.43%

  • BCC

    -0.8900

    83.24

    -1.07%

  • AZN

    -0.7900

    156.45

    -0.5%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    71.34

    0%

  • BTI

    -0.2900

    57.06

    -0.51%

  • JRI

    0.0635

    12.61

    +0.5%

  • BP

    0.2196

    42.53

    +0.52%

  • RYCEF

    0.1300

    20.84

    +0.62%

  • VOD

    0.2000

    16.42

    +1.22%

'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals
'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals / Photo: © AFP/File

'People could get hurt': Conservationists decry AI wildlife visuals

The black-and-white image appears to show the unlikeliest of interactions: an orangutan cradling endangered leopard cubs deep in the jungles of Malaysia's Sabah state.

Text size:

But the viral image is not just unlikely, it is fake, part of a trend of wildlife images generated by artificial intelligence that experts warn endanger animals and people.

AFP fact-checkers have debunked scores of similar synthetic visuals, from an elephant climbing a tree to escape flooding in Myanmar to a pink dolphin leaping out of water in the Philippines.

The images are often accompanied by heartwarming anecdotes and have circulated widely in multiple languages on platforms such as Facebook, TikTok and X.

They may seem more like feel-good fiction than dangerous misinformation, but experts warn hyper-realistic visuals of wild animals behaving like pets, or even like humans, can distort public perceptions of wildlife and harm conservation efforts.

"This misunderstanding can lead people to approach animals too closely or interact with them in unsafe ways," Jose Guerrero-Casado, a zoology professor at Spain's University of Cordoba, told AFP.

He cited a widely reported incident in China's northwest Xinjiang region in January, where a woman was attacked by a rare snow leopard after trying to get closer for a photo.

China's forestry department said it stepped up patrols after the incident and warned the public to maintain a safe distance when encountering wild animals.

- Sowing doubt -

Conservationists say AI visuals portraying wild animals as cute or cuddly make it harder for social media users to discern what is real and can fuel exploitation.

They increase demand for certain species "to be used in the tourism industry as photo props, exploited to make social media content or to be kept as pets", said Chris Lewis, a researcher at the international wildlife charity Born Free.

And while the visuals could encourage some people to support animal protection, "the negative impacts outweigh that completely," said Jenny Roberts of conservation group WWF.

"People could get hurt," she told AFP.

WWF uses real images for its fundraising efforts, but fake content online "desensitises" people to even the most incredible original visuals, she said.

"When you do have something remarkable, people question it," Roberts said, recounting an incident where a camera trap set up by her charity captured a tiger with five cubs in China.

Such footage had never been filmed before in the East Asian country, she said.

"But when we put the content out there, we were questioned on social media: 'Is this AI-generated?'"

- 'Major threat' -

A September study in the journal Conservation Biology, co-authored by Guerrero-Casado, concluded that the rapid spread of AI misinformation and its potential to harm environmental efforts is a "major threat" to society.

The researchers highlighted another challenge for those working in conservation: AI images "could affect the ability of people to identify species" and cause misunderstandings about the abundance and distribution of wildlife.

Scientists often mine data from citizen science platforms that accept photos and recordings of wildlife submitted by users.

But AI generation and manipulation could lead to flawed research, several experts warned in a recent commentary in the journal Nature.

They called for more robust authentication of submissions, and education of users about the risks of manipulating images and recordings.

Meta, Facebook's parent company, and TikTok require users to label realistic visuals that have been generated or significantly altered using AI. They also say their platforms have tools that automatically label content as AI-generated.

However, AFP fact-checkers spotted multiple wildlife posts without clear labels -- even when users had already said in their captions that they were fake.

Meta and TikTok pay AFP to fact-check posts with potentially false information.

"Conservation depends on a well-informed society that understands the ecological and conservation needs of wild species," Guerrero-Casado said.

"AI-generated fake content does not contribute to this goal."

M.McCoy--TFWP