The Fort Worth Press - AI's blind spot: tools fail to detect their own fakes

USD -
AED 3.6725
AFN 64.999826
ALL 80.789107
AMD 361.004402
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.000213
ARS 1525.758604
AUD 1.425161
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.699385
BAM 1.741128
BBD 2.014253
BDT 123.698583
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377454
BIF 2999.768543
BMD 1
BND 1.277535
BOB 11.726321
BRL 5.027795
BSD 1.000093
BTN 94.527066
BWP 13.700642
BYN 2.970368
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011315
CAD 1.40168
CDF 2315.999751
CHF 0.81951
CLF 0.024873
CLP 978.929973
CNY 6.67805
CNH 6.67209
COP 3198.44
CRC 455.348678
CUC 1
CUP 24.001709
CVE 98.165599
CZK 21.613603
DJF 178.083228
DKK 6.65328
DOP 61.416433
DZD 134.612287
EGP 54.612984
ERN 15
ETB 163.80737
EUR 0.890091
FJD 2.24975
FKP 0.746996
GBP 0.745725
GEL 2.589725
GGP 0.746996
GHS 11.656199
GIP 0.746996
GMD 72.999779
GNF 8851.400975
GTQ 7.642966
GYD 209.234522
HKD 7.84074
HNL 26.84691
HRK 6.706099
HTG 131.038811
HUF 326.138501
IDR 18066.75
ILS 3.101299
IMP 0.746996
INR 94.86465
IQD 1516.075474
IRR 1832374.999915
ISK 121.229907
JEP 0.746996
JMD 158.72055
JOD 0.708985
JPY 156.8955
KES 129.907292
KGS 87.450014
KHR 4066.51711
KMF 439.496719
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1321.950467
KWD 0.31019
KYD 0.833441
KZT 446.721476
LAK 22509.670211
LBP 89556.349846
LKR 332.0232
LRD 170.520759
LSL 16.405842
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.416836
MAD 9.816031
MDL 17.991712
MGA 4519.758922
MKD 54.821038
MMK 2100.035197
MNT 3598.866322
MOP 8.082872
MRU 40.112524
MUR 47.130172
MVR 15.460292
MWK 1734.102502
MXN 18.8042
MYR 4.0823
MZN 63.90174
NAD 16.405842
NGN 1332.62022
NIO 36.80146
NOK 9.35785
NPR 151.238099
NZD 1.75733
OMR 0.384505
PAB 1.000102
PEN 3.43709
PGK 4.477977
PHP 63.483498
PKR 276.794698
PLN 3.888025
PYG 5754.499041
QAR 3.646011
RON 4.759598
RSD 104.569012
RUB 81.10852
RWF 1478.068887
SAR 3.766715
SBD 8.07458
SCR 13.843313
SDG 601.49913
SEK 9.89553
SGD 1.276755
SHP 0.7473
SLE 23.91985
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.5354
SRD 37.735498
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.811222
SVC 8.75104
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.41243
THB 33.687504
TJS 9.210916
TMT 3.51
TND 2.98552
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.616801
TTD 6.789846
TWD 32.552988
TZS 2644.989688
UAH 45.030491
UGX 4205.522196
UYU 40.15081
UZS 11971.031652
VES 879.7889
VND 25839.5
VUV 118.676507
WST 2.769234
XAF 583.861105
XAG 0.017901
XAU 0.000245003761
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802376
XDR 0.707052
XOF 583.861105
XPF 106.170268
YER 236.100731
ZAR 16.484435
ZMK 9001.200156
ZMW 20.061515
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.343966
MXV 2.122425
  • RIO

    -0.3300

    97.04

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    20.67

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    0.0000

    33.41

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67.95

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.99

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    75.66

    -0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8600

    51.08

    +1.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    11.52

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.1200

    76.68

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.54

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    -0.0800

    55.75

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    168.1

    +1.2%

  • BP

    -1.4200

    43.16

    -3.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    19.7

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    17.02

    +0.41%

AI's blind spot: tools fail to detect their own fakes
AI's blind spot: tools fail to detect their own fakes / Photo: © AFP

AI's blind spot: tools fail to detect their own fakes

When outraged Filipinos turned to an AI-powered chatbot to verify a viral photograph of a lawmaker embroiled in a corruption scandal, the tool failed to detect it was fabricated -- even though it had generated the image itself.

Text size:

Internet users are increasingly turning to chatbots to verify images in real time, but the tools often fail, raising questions about their visual debunking capabilities at a time when major tech platforms are scaling back human fact-checking.

In many cases, the tools wrongly identify images as real even when they are generated using the same generative models, further muddying an online information landscape awash with AI-generated fakes.

Among them is a fabricated image circulating on social media of Elizaldy Co, a former Philippine lawmaker charged by prosecutors in a multibillion-dollar flood-control corruption scam that sparked massive protests in the disaster-prone country.

The image of Co, whose whereabouts has been unknown since the official probe began, appeared to show him in Portugal.

When online sleuths tracking him asked Google's new AI mode whether the image was real, it incorrectly said it was authentic.

AFP's fact-checkers tracked down its creator and determined that the image was generated using Google AI.

"These models are trained primarily on language patterns and lack the specialized visual understanding needed to accurately identify AI-generated or manipulated imagery," Alon Yamin, chief executive of AI content detection platform Copyleaks, told AFP.

"With AI chatbots, even when an image originates from a similar generative model, the chatbot often provides inconsistent or overly generalized assessments, making them unreliable for tasks like fact-checking or verifying authenticity."

Google did not respond to AFP’s request for comment.

- 'Distinguishable from reality' -

AFP found similar examples of AI tools failing to verify their own creations.

During last month's deadly protests over lucrative benefits for senior officials in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, social media users shared a fabricated image purportedly showing men marching with flags and torches.

An AFP analysis found it was created using Google's Gemini AI model.

But Gemini and Microsoft's Copilot falsely identified it as a genuine image of the protest.

"This inability to correctly identify AI images stems from the fact that they (AI models) are programmed only to mimic well," Rossine Fallorina, from the nonprofit Sigla Research Center, told AFP.

"In a sense, they can only generate things to resemble. They cannot ascertain whether the resemblance is actually distinguishable from reality."

Earlier this year, Columbia University's Tow Center for Digital Journalism tested the ability of seven AI chatbots -- including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Grok, and Gemini -- to verify 10 images from photojournalists of news events.

All seven models failed to correctly identify the provenance of the photos, the study said.

- 'Shocked' -

AFP tracked down the source of Co's photo that garnered over a million views across social media -- a middle-aged web developer in the Philippines, who said he created it "for fun" using Nano Banana, Gemini's AI image generator.

"Sadly, a lot of people believed it," he told AFP, requesting anonymity to avoid a backlash.

"I edited my post -- and added 'AI generated' to stop the spread -- because I was shocked at how many shares it got."

Such cases show how AI-generated photos flooding social platforms can look virtually identical to real imagery.

The trend has fueled concerns as surveys show online users are increasingly shifting from traditional search engines to AI tools for information gathering and verifying information.

The shift comes as Meta announced earlier this year it was ending its third-party fact-checking program in the United States, turning over the task of debunking falsehoods to ordinary users under a model known as "Community Notes."

Human fact-checking has long been a flashpoint in hyperpolarized societies, where conservative advocates accuse professional fact-checkers of liberal bias, a charge they reject.

AFP currently works in 26 languages with Meta's fact-checking program, including in Asia, Latin America, and the European Union.

Researchers say AI models can be useful to professional fact-checkers, helping to quickly geolocate images and spot visual clues to establish authenticity. But they caution that they cannot replace the work of trained human fact-checkers.

"We can't rely on AI tools to combat AI in the long run," Fallorina said.

burs-ac/sla/sms

J.Barnes--TFWP