The Fort Worth Press - UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 64.504736
ALL 81.111622
AMD 361.139634
ANG 1.789785
AOA 916.999936
ARS 1527.729515
AUD 1.42201
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.700169
BAM 1.747116
BBD 2.014302
BDT 123.686291
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377417
BIF 2997.811425
BMD 1
BND 1.278312
BOB 11.776424
BRL 5.041302
BSD 1.000138
BTN 94.895662
BWP 13.777424
BYN 2.936544
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011354
CAD 1.39822
CDF 2315.999954
CHF 0.824555
CLF 0.025138
CLP 989.480024
CNY 6.67805
CNH 6.669675
COP 3161.21
CRC 456.38687
CUC 1
CUP 24.002072
CVE 98.499703
CZK 21.7354
DJF 178.089045
DKK 6.67394
DOP 61.342898
DZD 134.832021
EGP 55.300104
ERN 15
ETB 162.670353
EUR 0.89292
FJD 2.237196
FKP 0.74735
GBP 0.747425
GEL 2.58996
GGP 0.74735
GHS 11.595977
GIP 0.74735
GMD 74.000026
GNF 8850.814466
GTQ 7.64486
GYD 209.461874
HKD 7.842315
HNL 26.849912
HRK 6.72702
HTG 131.07388
HUF 327.321501
IDR 18106.35
ILS 3.10555
IMP 0.74735
INR 94.90545
IQD 1516.108429
IRR 1832375.000257
ISK 121.790438
JEP 0.74735
JMD 158.719383
JOD 0.709022
JPY 156.738497
KES 129.839659
KGS 87.448603
KHR 4085.971557
KMF 439.500902
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1326.109783
KWD 0.31052
KYD 0.833452
KZT 454.080129
LAK 22505.002501
LBP 89558.797256
LKR 332.079753
LRD 170.513828
LSL 16.569461
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.404988
MAD 9.823308
MDL 18.051883
MGA 4522.797113
MKD 55.003393
MMK 2100.348965
MNT 3600.056668
MOP 8.079754
MRU 39.968913
MUR 47.159773
MVR 15.459709
MWK 1734.170657
MXN 18.67721
MYR 4.085301
MZN 63.90274
NAD 16.569461
NGN 1336.030074
NIO 36.803952
NOK 9.333135
NPR 151.832381
NZD 1.75391
OMR 0.384511
PAB 1.000054
PEN 3.434648
PGK 4.478945
PHP 63.625008
PKR 276.747271
PLN 3.92906
PYG 5784.116236
QAR 3.645557
RON 4.776097
RSD 104.938017
RUB 80.647831
RWF 1477.613807
SAR 3.754258
SBD 8.07458
SCR 13.824605
SDG 601.50029
SEK 9.93002
SGD 1.27815
SHP 0.7473
SLE 22.950032
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.530662
SRD 37.628024
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.885845
SVC 8.750765
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.568851
THB 33.770018
TJS 9.215947
TMT 3.51
TND 2.986391
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.737202
TTD 6.795332
TWD 32.602978
TZS 2645.15298
UAH 45.276567
UGX 4405.754637
UYU 40.108624
UZS 11968.430785
VES 879.7889
VND 25842.5
VUV 118.928057
WST 2.764707
XAF 585.717398
XAG 0.018509
XAU 0.00025024117
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802403
XDR 0.707052
XOF 585.717398
XPF 106.534935
YER 236.105142
ZAR 16.611175
ZMK 9001.197886
ZMW 20.107375
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.817056
MXV 2.107966
  • RIO

    -0.3300

    97.04

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    20.67

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    0.0000

    33.41

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67.95

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.99

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    75.66

    -0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8600

    51.08

    +1.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    11.52

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.1200

    76.68

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.54

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    -0.0800

    55.75

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    168.1

    +1.2%

  • BP

    -1.4200

    43.16

    -3.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    19.7

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    17.02

    +0.41%

UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance
UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance / Photo: © AFP/File

UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance

Apple lost a UK lawsuit Thursday which accuses the US tech giant of abusing the dominant position of its App Store, with claimants seeking more than £1.5 billion ($2 billion) in damages.

Text size:

The Competition Appeal Tribunal found that Apple shut out competition in the app distribution market and charged app developers "excessive and unfair" commissions.

Apple said it "strongly disagrees" with the ruling and intends to appeal.

The case was brought by King's College London academic Rachael Kent and the law firm Hausfeld & Co on behalf of millions of UK iPhone and iPad users.

Under UK law, in this type of class action, all potentially affected persons are included in the procedure by default, and may benefit from possible compensation, unless they voluntarily opt out.

In the trial, which opened in January, claimants argued that Apple users were overcharged by the company "due to its ban on rival app store platforms."

They said a 30-percent surcharge that the company "imposes" on apps purchased through Apple's App Store leads to consumers "paying more."

At the heart of the claimants' case was that Apple used the App Store to exclude competitors, forcing users to use its system and boosting profits in the process.

Apple, which had denounced the trial as "baseless", maintained that its App Store "faces vigorous competition from many other platforms."

S.Jones--TFWP