The Fort Worth Press - UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance

USD -
AED 3.672904
AFN 65.503991
ALL 82.275041
AMD 381.225294
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1474.737504
AUD 1.493529
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.66801
BBD 2.013927
BDT 122.256478
BGN 1.666704
BHD 0.377035
BIF 2961
BMD 1
BND 1.286358
BOB 6.909559
BRL 5.423504
BSD 0.999714
BTN 90.094539
BWP 13.969732
BYN 2.936714
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010601
CAD 1.37313
CDF 2196.000362
CHF 0.79219
CLF 0.023097
CLP 906.090396
CNY 6.99385
CNH 6.97065
COP 3777.12
CRC 497.383873
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.37504
CZK 20.598704
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.372385
DOP 63.000359
DZD 129.72104
EGP 47.691204
ERN 15
ETB 155.203874
EUR 0.85311
FJD 2.28275
FKP 0.742037
GBP 0.742904
GEL 2.690391
GGP 0.742037
GHS 10.472182
GIP 0.742037
GMD 74.000355
GNF 8746.007582
GTQ 7.669195
GYD 209.153671
HKD 7.79075
HNL 26.450388
HRK 6.428204
HTG 130.853237
HUF 326.79904
IDR 16702.8
ILS 3.186525
IMP 0.742037
INR 90.03835
IQD 1310
IRR 42125.000352
ISK 125.740386
JEP 0.742037
JMD 158.86093
JOD 0.70904
JPY 156.832504
KES 129.000351
KGS 87.443504
KHR 4015.00035
KMF 421.00035
KPW 900.018728
KRW 1442.720383
KWD 0.30732
KYD 0.833067
KZT 507.225797
LAK 21600.000349
LBP 89869.037002
LKR 309.722098
LRD 178.650382
LSL 16.50377
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.420381
MAD 9.132504
MDL 16.82679
MGA 4580.000347
MKD 52.517522
MMK 2099.849502
MNT 3560.529231
MOP 8.024579
MRU 39.720379
MUR 46.150378
MVR 15.460378
MWK 1737.000345
MXN 17.907404
MYR 4.054039
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.503727
NGN 1434.280377
NIO 36.603722
NOK 10.06011
NPR 144.150921
NZD 1.733385
OMR 0.384501
PAB 0.999714
PEN 3.36225
PGK 4.256504
PHP 58.808038
PKR 280.050374
PLN 3.59075
PYG 6562.703885
QAR 3.641038
RON 4.343404
RSD 100.083038
RUB 80.301747
RWF 1453
SAR 3.750032
SBD 8.143457
SCR 14.950372
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.21383
SGD 1.286104
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.000338
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 571.503662
SRD 38.126504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.05
SVC 8.747713
SYP 11057.202013
SZL 16.503649
THB 31.460369
TJS 9.232304
TMT 3.5
TND 2.874038
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.022304
TTD 6.796386
TWD 31.390304
TZS 2470.000335
UAH 42.325645
UGX 3622.066719
UYU 39.043611
UZS 12030.000334
VES 300.62476
VND 26300
VUV 121.184452
WST 2.775493
XAF 559.4349
XAG 0.013794
XAU 0.000231
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802078
XDR 0.693651
XOF 557.000332
XPF 102.250363
YER 238.403589
ZAR 16.49809
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 22.068424
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • CMSC

    0.2400

    22.89

    +1.05%

  • BCC

    0.5200

    74.12

    +0.7%

  • RBGPF

    -0.3000

    80.75

    -0.37%

  • BCE

    -0.1600

    23.66

    -0.68%

  • NGG

    1.3500

    78.7

    +1.72%

  • GSK

    0.5900

    49.63

    +1.19%

  • AZN

    -0.3600

    91.57

    -0.39%

  • RIO

    1.4000

    81.43

    +1.72%

  • CMSD

    0.4400

    23.59

    +1.87%

  • RYCEF

    0.5000

    16

    +3.13%

  • RELX

    -0.6200

    39.8

    -1.56%

  • JRI

    0.0100

    13.62

    +0.07%

  • BP

    1.1000

    35.83

    +3.07%

  • VOD

    0.1300

    13.34

    +0.97%

  • BTI

    -0.0700

    56.55

    -0.12%

UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance
UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance / Photo: © AFP/File

UK court rules Apple abused App Store dominance

Apple lost a UK lawsuit Thursday which accuses the US tech giant of abusing the dominant position of its App Store, with claimants seeking more than £1.5 billion ($2 billion) in damages.

Text size:

The Competition Appeal Tribunal found that Apple shut out competition in the app distribution market and charged app developers "excessive and unfair" commissions.

Apple said it "strongly disagrees" with the ruling and intends to appeal.

The case was brought by King's College London academic Rachael Kent and the law firm Hausfeld & Co on behalf of millions of UK iPhone and iPad users.

Under UK law, in this type of class action, all potentially affected persons are included in the procedure by default, and may benefit from possible compensation, unless they voluntarily opt out.

In the trial, which opened in January, claimants argued that Apple users were overcharged by the company "due to its ban on rival app store platforms."

They said a 30-percent surcharge that the company "imposes" on apps purchased through Apple's App Store leads to consumers "paying more."

At the heart of the claimants' case was that Apple used the App Store to exclude competitors, forcing users to use its system and boosting profits in the process.

Apple, which had denounced the trial as "baseless", maintained that its App Store "faces vigorous competition from many other platforms."

S.Jones--TFWP