The Fort Worth Press - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 62.000368
ALL 81.399019
AMD 371.778334
ANG 1.789884
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1390.462956
AUD 1.401542
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.67081
BBD 2.010834
BDT 122.673182
BGN 1.668102
BHD 0.377223
BIF 2969.673704
BMD 1
BND 1.275325
BOB 6.908482
BRL 4.980604
BSD 0.998337
BTN 94.041373
BWP 13.522713
BYN 2.828151
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007933
CAD 1.36795
CDF 2315.000362
CHF 0.787151
CLF 0.022781
CLP 896.609085
CNY 6.836304
CNH 6.83428
COP 3564.14
CRC 454.339945
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.37504
CZK 20.777504
DJF 177.786308
DKK 6.375104
DOP 59.475368
DZD 132.362551
EGP 52.572403
ERN 15
ETB 154.33875
EUR 0.85304
FJD 2.20465
FKP 0.741029
GBP 0.740988
GEL 2.680391
GGP 0.741029
GHS 11.103856
GIP 0.741029
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8763.489017
GTQ 7.643154
GYD 209.167133
HKD 7.835404
HNL 26.529324
HRK 6.429504
HTG 130.705907
HUF 311.520388
IDR 17252.7
ILS 2.98605
IMP 0.741029
INR 94.250504
IQD 1307.826829
IRR 1317000.000352
ISK 122.650386
JEP 0.741029
JMD 157.551717
JOD 0.70904
JPY 158.70504
KES 129.330385
KGS 87.403204
KHR 4000.00035
KMF 420.00035
KPW 900.025942
KRW 1476.640383
KWD 0.30776
KYD 0.83199
KZT 463.757731
LAK 21876.732779
LBP 89402.943058
LKR 318.234165
LRD 183.194711
LSL 16.601322
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.334826
MAD 9.25038
MDL 17.361484
MGA 4148.432502
MKD 52.578375
MMK 2099.863185
MNT 3580.436774
MOP 8.056729
MRU 39.846449
MUR 46.870378
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1731.200682
MXN 17.37935
MYR 3.965039
MZN 63.910377
NAD 16.601322
NGN 1357.000344
NIO 36.741309
NOK 9.317039
NPR 150.466197
NZD 1.706339
OMR 0.38415
PAB 0.999748
PEN 3.487039
PGK 4.333547
PHP 60.695038
PKR 278.317253
PLN 3.61995
PYG 6330.560887
QAR 3.645504
RON 4.340504
RSD 100.166347
RUB 75.185839
RWF 1459.245042
SAR 3.744594
SBD 8.045307
SCR 14.798038
SDG 600.503676
SEK 9.22035
SGD 1.276038
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.625038
SLL 20969.496166
SOS 570.526765
SRD 37.463504
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.899979
SVC 8.735338
SYP 110.562389
SZL 16.594583
THB 32.335038
TJS 9.384602
TMT 3.505
TND 2.881038
TOP 2.40776
TRY 45.015038
TTD 6.780124
TWD 31.483504
TZS 2598.251226
UAH 43.992664
UGX 3719.475993
UYU 39.60396
UZS 12052.503617
VES 483.16466
VND 26360
VUV 117.829836
WST 2.712269
XAF 559.570911
XAG 0.013194
XAU 0.000212
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.799275
XDR 0.695927
XOF 559.570911
XPF 102.250363
YER 238.650363
ZAR 16.534405
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.893581
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    63.0000

    63

    +100%

  • BCC

    0.3300

    84.15

    +0.39%

  • NGG

    0.4600

    87.42

    +0.53%

  • BCE

    -0.2200

    23.88

    -0.92%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1900

    15.35

    -1.24%

  • JRI

    0.0100

    12.89

    +0.08%

  • GSK

    -1.1900

    54.44

    -2.19%

  • RIO

    0.7600

    99.61

    +0.76%

  • RELX

    0.4000

    36.53

    +1.09%

  • AZN

    -2.5500

    189.75

    -1.34%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    22.95

    +0.17%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    23.32

    +0.39%

  • VOD

    0.0100

    15.63

    +0.06%

  • BTI

    0.8100

    58.09

    +1.39%

  • BP

    -0.1000

    46.25

    -0.22%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: © AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

L.Coleman--TFWP