The Fort Worth Press - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 64.503991
ALL 81.046102
AMD 360.780113
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1523.143125
AUD 1.422273
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.745704
BBD 2.012675
BDT 123.586379
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377114
BIF 2995.403222
BMD 1
BND 1.277279
BOB 11.766859
BRL 4.965204
BSD 0.999331
BTN 94.818583
BWP 13.766234
BYN 2.934172
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009729
CAD 1.40025
CDF 2316.000362
CHF 0.825078
CLF 0.025294
CLP 995.510396
CNY 6.67805
CNH 6.670604
COP 3150.41
CRC 456.018209
CUC 1
CUP 23.982684
CVE 98.420137
CZK 21.719504
DJF 177.944392
DKK 6.67165
DOP 61.293346
DZD 134.335699
EGP 55.079216
ERN 15
ETB 162.538225
EUR 0.89267
FJD 2.237204
FKP 0.74735
GBP 0.747692
GEL 2.590391
GGP 0.74735
GHS 11.586558
GIP 0.74735
GMD 74.000355
GNF 8843.664926
GTQ 7.638684
GYD 209.291739
HKD 7.84235
HNL 26.828223
HRK 6.728204
HTG 130.968001
HUF 327.370388
IDR 18093.85
ILS 3.10555
IMP 0.74735
INR 94.945504
IQD 1514.883742
IRR 1832375.000352
ISK 121.780386
JEP 0.74735
JMD 158.593297
JOD 0.70904
JPY 156.860385
KES 129.754095
KGS 87.448604
KHR 4082.652742
KMF 439.503794
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1323.525039
KWD 0.31069
KYD 0.832775
KZT 453.715357
LAK 22486.722899
LBP 89486.053465
LKR 331.81595
LRD 170.375329
LSL 16.556076
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.399786
MAD 9.815504
MDL 18.037221
MGA 4519.123488
MKD 54.987281
MMK 2100.348965
MNT 3600.056668
MOP 8.073191
MRU 39.936627
MUR 47.160378
MVR 15.460378
MWK 1732.762083
MXN 18.668404
MYR 4.085304
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.556076
NGN 1332.060377
NIO 36.774222
NOK 9.35739
NPR 151.709734
NZD 1.750854
OMR 0.38297
PAB 0.999241
PEN 3.431874
PGK 4.475387
PHP 63.618038
PKR 276.527424
PLN 3.92999
PYG 5779.443924
QAR 3.642612
RON 4.779804
RSD 105.321038
RUB 80.331771
RWF 1476.413621
SAR 3.751558
SBD 8.07458
SCR 13.982238
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.931804
SGD 1.276904
SHP 0.7473
SLE 22.950371
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.07154
SRD 37.628038
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.868166
SVC 8.743696
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.555541
THB 33.770369
TJS 9.208462
TMT 3.51
TND 2.983978
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.703804
TTD 6.789842
TWD 32.585804
TZS 2645.601821
UAH 45.239791
UGX 4402.195742
UYU 40.076762
UZS 11958.762887
VES 879.788904
VND 25842.5
VUV 118.928057
WST 2.764707
XAF 585.553409
XAG 0.018551
XAU 0.000250266221
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.800955
XDR 0.707052
XOF 585.553409
XPF 106.448878
YER 236.103589
ZAR 16.57373
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 20.091043
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.817056
MXV 2.106972
  • RIO

    -0.3300

    97.04

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    20.67

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    0.0000

    33.41

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67.95

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.99

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    75.66

    -0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8600

    51.08

    +1.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    11.52

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.1200

    76.68

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.54

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    -0.0800

    55.75

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    168.1

    +1.2%

  • BP

    -1.4200

    43.16

    -3.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    19.7

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    17.02

    +0.41%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: © AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

L.Coleman--TFWP