The Fort Worth Press - Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

USD -
AED 3.673042
AFN 63.503991
ALL 81.250403
AMD 376.940403
ANG 1.789731
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1398.425804
AUD 1.414027
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.64926
BBD 2.014277
BDT 122.307345
BGN 1.647646
BHD 0.375226
BIF 2965
BMD 1
BND 1.264067
BOB 6.911004
BRL 5.219404
BSD 1.000055
BTN 90.587789
BWP 13.189806
BYN 2.866094
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011317
CAD 1.36155
CDF 2255.000362
CHF 0.767783
CLF 0.021854
CLP 862.903912
CNY 6.90865
CNH 6.901015
COP 3666.4
CRC 485.052916
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.303894
CZK 20.44504
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.293504
DOP 62.27504
DZD 129.63704
EGP 46.615845
ERN 15
ETB 155.203874
EUR 0.842404
FJD 2.21204
FKP 0.733683
GBP 0.732547
GEL 2.67504
GGP 0.733683
GHS 11.01504
GIP 0.733683
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8780.000355
GTQ 7.67035
GYD 209.236037
HKD 7.81855
HNL 26.510388
HRK 6.348604
HTG 131.126252
HUF 319.430388
IDR 16832.8
ILS 3.09073
IMP 0.733683
INR 90.56104
IQD 1310.5
IRR 42125.000158
ISK 122.170386
JEP 0.733683
JMD 156.510227
JOD 0.70904
JPY 152.70604
KES 129.000351
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4022.00035
KMF 415.00035
KPW 899.945229
KRW 1440.710383
KWD 0.30661
KYD 0.833418
KZT 494.893958
LAK 21445.000349
LBP 89550.000349
LKR 309.225755
LRD 186.403772
LSL 15.945039
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.310381
MAD 9.141039
MDL 16.981212
MGA 4395.000347
MKD 51.914306
MMK 2099.574581
MNT 3581.569872
MOP 8.053972
MRU 39.920379
MUR 45.930378
MVR 15.405039
MWK 1736.503736
MXN 17.16435
MYR 3.907504
MZN 63.910377
NAD 15.960377
NGN 1353.403725
NIO 36.710377
NOK 9.506104
NPR 144.93218
NZD 1.655355
OMR 0.382709
PAB 1.000148
PEN 3.353039
PGK 4.293039
PHP 57.848504
PKR 279.603701
PLN 3.54775
PYG 6558.925341
QAR 3.64125
RON 4.291404
RSD 99.437038
RUB 76.275534
RWF 1455
SAR 3.750258
SBD 8.045182
SCR 13.479671
SDG 601.503676
SEK 8.922504
SGD 1.263604
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.450371
SLL 20969.49935
SOS 571.503662
SRD 37.754038
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.85
SVC 8.750574
SYP 11059.574895
SZL 15.940369
THB 31.080369
TJS 9.435908
TMT 3.5
TND 2.84375
TOP 2.40776
TRY 43.649804
TTD 6.78838
TWD 31.384038
TZS 2600.000335
UAH 43.128434
UGX 3540.03196
UYU 38.554298
UZS 12150.000334
VES 392.73007
VND 25970
VUV 119.325081
WST 2.701986
XAF 553.151102
XAG 0.012937
XAU 0.000198
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802336
XDR 0.687473
XOF 553.000332
XPF 100.950363
YER 238.350363
ZAR 15.950904
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 18.176912
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSD

    0.0647

    23.64

    +0.27%

  • RBGPF

    0.1000

    82.5

    +0.12%

  • JRI

    0.2135

    13.24

    +1.61%

  • BTI

    -1.1100

    59.5

    -1.87%

  • BCC

    -1.5600

    86.5

    -1.8%

  • GSK

    0.3900

    58.93

    +0.66%

  • BCE

    -0.1200

    25.71

    -0.47%

  • CMSC

    0.0500

    23.75

    +0.21%

  • RELX

    2.2500

    31.06

    +7.24%

  • BP

    0.4700

    37.66

    +1.25%

  • NGG

    1.1800

    92.4

    +1.28%

  • AZN

    1.0300

    205.55

    +0.5%

  • RIO

    0.1600

    98.07

    +0.16%

  • RYCEF

    0.2300

    17.1

    +1.35%

  • VOD

    -0.0500

    15.57

    -0.32%

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU
Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU / Photo: © AFP

Child protection vs privacy: decision time for EU

Does protecting children justify snooping on private messages? That is the sensitive question facing EU countries Wednesday as they wrangle over a push to combat child sexual abuse material online.

Text size:

The meeting in Brussels could seal the fate of a legislative initiative that has stirred fierce debate since it was put forward by the European Commission in May 2022.

Backed by multiple child protection groups, the proposal would require online platforms and messaging services to detect and report images and videos of abuse, as well as attempts by predators to contact minors.

But critics -- including the EU's own data protection authorities, lawmakers, and countries such as Germany -- warn it poses a "disproportionate" threat to privacy.

They are particularly alarmed by the use of technology that would scan private conversations, including on encrypted apps like Signal and WhatsApp.

"This would spell the end of secrecy of correspondence, which is essential for whistleblowers," the German activist and former EU lawmaker Patrick Breyer told AFP.

His big fear? That such legislation could eventually be exploited by authoritarian regimes to "crack down on political opponents" by monitoring their conversations.

Messaging platforms themselves staunchly oppose the plans.

- Mass surveillance? -

Opponents have been flooding EU officials with messages aimed at swaying the debate as part of a campaign dubbed "Stop Chat Control" -- their nickname for the proposal.

"I've never seen anything like it, on any other file," one EU diplomat told AFP, speaking on condition of anonymity. "We're receiving thousands of emails every day."

Denmark, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency and drafted the latest version of the proposal, insists it includes the necessary safeguards.

Firstly, only images and links -- not text messages -- would be subject to scanning.

Second, the system would only be activated following a decision by an independent judicial or administrative authority.

"We have to be very clear: under this proposal, there is no general monitoring of online communications. There will be no such thing as 'chat control'," said European Commission spokesperson Markus Lammert.

"This is about protecting our children against a terrible crime, a crime that happens more and more online."

- Germany holds key -

A report by the UK-based Internet Watch Foundation found that 62 percent of the child sexual abuse material identified internationally last year was hosted on servers within the EU.

Under the bloc's current rules, platforms detect such content on a voluntary basis, which Brussels considers inadequate given the scale and rapid growth of the problem.

The existing legal framework remains in place until April 2026 -- pending adoption of the commission's new proposal making detection mandatory.

What happens next will hinge largely on Germany, with two possible scenarios following Wednesday's meeting:

-- If Berlin backs the proposal, that would likely push it past the post under the EU's qualified majority voting rules. Member states could then formally adopt the measure at a meeting in Luxembourg next week.

-- If Berlin abstains or remains opposed, that would send negotiators back to the drawing board, with no certainty the text will eventually become law.

Several EU officials involved in the talks said Germany could make its stance known in the coming hours.

L.Coleman--TFWP