The Fort Worth Press - 'Transmitting violence': Livestream video's dark side

USD -
AED 3.673015
AFN 71.913174
ALL 92.41957
AMD 387.83739
ANG 1.80347
AOA 849.000261
ARS 886.778599
AUD 1.497005
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.698703
BAM 1.800457
BBD 2.020435
BDT 117.188938
BGN 1.79877
BHD 0.376928
BIF 2866.532572
BMD 1
BND 1.346872
BOB 6.915344
BRL 5.118497
BSD 1.00069
BTN 83.345147
BWP 13.522345
BYN 3.274727
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01703
CAD 1.36243
CDF 2805.000219
CHF 0.90971
CLF 0.032344
CLP 892.460395
CNY 7.233197
CNH 7.243795
COP 3829.53
CRC 512.192652
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 101.506978
CZK 22.783003
DJF 178.165416
DKK 6.869705
DOP 58.546824
DZD 134.487027
EGP 46.669091
ERN 15
ETB 57.482119
EUR 0.920755
FJD 2.2549
FKP 0.796099
GBP 0.78768
GEL 2.749703
GGP 0.796099
GHS 14.410649
GIP 0.796099
GMD 67.897294
GNF 8601.715004
GTQ 7.775205
GYD 209.365909
HKD 7.79991
HNL 24.732361
HRK 6.979956
HTG 132.671144
HUF 355.076496
IDR 15981.05
ILS 3.706625
IMP 0.796099
INR 83.2979
IQD 1310.987959
IRR 42062.512517
ISK 138.389752
JEP 0.796099
JMD 156.348322
JOD 0.708903
JPY 155.828021
KES 131.502985
KGS 88.195505
KHR 4073.479119
KMF 452.724972
KPW 899.999697
KRW 1360.815027
KWD 0.30693
KYD 0.833947
KZT 443.799021
LAK 21358.678142
LBP 89608.689649
LKR 299.85732
LRD 193.495805
LSL 18.209978
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.836379
MAD 9.91586
MDL 17.666498
MGA 4431.352695
MKD 56.661266
MMK 2101.348552
MNT 3449.999773
MOP 8.039548
MRU 39.701507
MUR 45.940393
MVR 15.459692
MWK 1734.984121
MXN 16.60195
MYR 4.684959
MZN 63.497294
NAD 18.209731
NGN 1494.059868
NIO 36.831616
NOK 10.69096
NPR 133.356961
NZD 1.636375
OMR 0.384893
PAB 1.000755
PEN 3.740656
PGK 3.887472
PHP 57.907988
PKR 278.482533
PLN 3.91594
PYG 7491.140056
QAR 3.641497
RON 4.580703
RSD 107.852082
RUB 90.890184
RWF 1293.873982
SAR 3.750439
SBD 8.475946
SCR 13.609543
SDG 600.999734
SEK 10.69264
SGD 1.34687
SHP 1.26345
SLE 22.847303
SLL 20969.50094
SOS 570.999629
SRD 32.182972
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.75649
SYP 2512.529855
SZL 18.227091
THB 36.102027
TJS 10.857836
TMT 3.5
TND 3.115011
TOP 2.356973
TRY 32.199603
TTD 6.793828
TWD 32.253499
TZS 2589.99976
UAH 39.67064
UGX 3798.284052
UYU 38.820562
UZS 12703.906912
VEF 3622552.534434
VES 36.580745
VND 25455
VUV 118.72199
WST 2.803093
XAF 603.81737
XAG 0.031996
XAU 0.000413
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.755926
XOF 603.81737
XPF 110.350237
YER 249.897402
ZAR 18.236598
ZMK 9001.203383
ZMW 25.84158
ZWL 321.999592
  • RIO

    1.7000

    73.61

    +2.31%

  • BTI

    0.0400

    31.59

    +0.13%

  • CMSC

    -0.0360

    24.474

    -0.15%

  • SCS

    0.0500

    13.63

    +0.37%

  • BP

    0.3800

    37.49

    +1.01%

  • BCC

    -1.2400

    136.05

    -0.91%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    11.58

    0%

  • CMSD

    -0.1300

    24.17

    -0.54%

  • NGG

    -0.4800

    72.83

    -0.66%

  • RBGPF

    -2.0700

    57.63

    -3.59%

  • BCE

    0.0000

    34.34

    0%

  • AZN

    -0.1400

    76.9

    -0.18%

  • GSK

    0.1000

    44.98

    +0.22%

  • RYCEF

    0.0080

    5.298

    +0.15%

  • RELX

    0.1500

    44.07

    +0.34%

  • VOD

    -0.0100

    9.79

    -0.1%

'Transmitting violence': Livestream video's dark side
'Transmitting violence': Livestream video's dark side / Photo: © AFP/File

'Transmitting violence': Livestream video's dark side

A gunman's livestream of a mass killing in New York state was taken down in a matter of minutes -- but even that was not fast enough to prevent those images from becoming effectively impossible to erase from the internet.

Text size:

Posting horrific clips like those is not barred by US speech laws, experts told AFP, so the decision on whether to keep them online is largely left up to individual tech companies.

But even the sites that want them taken down say they struggle to do so, since once unleashed onto the internet, the videos can be edited and shared again and again.

In the case of the Buffalo shooting that killed 10 African Americans at a grocery store on Saturday, it's particularly chilling because writings attributed to the suspect noted he was in part inspired by another mass shooter's livestream.

"If (companies) are going to commit to live streaming, you are committed to transmitting a certain number of rapes, murders, suicides and other types of crimes," said Mary Anne Franks, a professor at University of Miami school of law.

"That's just what comes with that territory," she added.

The live feed of the killing on Amazon's Twitch platform was pulled down within two minutes, the company said –- far quicker than the 17 minutes New Zealand mosque shooter Brenton Tarrant's attack was streamed on Facebook in 2019.

Social media firms say they fight hard to keep these types of images off their platforms, with automated and manual efforts by workers to squelch video of the Buffalo attack and similar horrors.

But the images can be edited, titles or names changed and then re-posted on sites that are happy to have the traffic that others have decided is beyond their limit.

One tweet on Wednesday cited the Buffalo suspect's name, 18-year-old Payton Gendron, and included a link to a video about the attack, but did not show the killing.

However, once on the site viewers were offered additional videos, including one showing over 90 seconds of the attack and which said it had nearly 1,800 views since Sunday.

Websites don't have to allow this type of video but American law is mostly silent on prohibiting them.

"There is nothing illegal in the US about posting a video of the (Buffalo) livestream. It doesn't really fall into a category of speech that is unprotected," said Ari Cohn, who is free speech counsel at think tank TechFreedom.

- 'Life and death consequences' -

Once a crime like a mass shooting is broadcast on a major platform it can take various routes to perpetual life online, including being recorded by people watching it live.

A spokesperson for Facebook parent Meta said new versions of videos, which are created to dodge being removed, then become part of a whack-a-mole effort to hunt down the clips.

The same problem is seen at other platforms like Twitter, which has a policy of removing the accounts of mass attackers "and may also remove tweets disseminating manifestos or other content produced by perpetrators," it says.

Meta's vice president of integrity Guy Rosen told journalists in a briefing Tuesday the firm has to tread a fine line because too broad of a filter could end up unintentionally taking down the wrong kind of content.

Live broadcasts are one of the areas where social media platforms face accusations of fanning violence and hatred, and law professor Franks said it's not likely wise to offer that capability to the general public.

"The bigger problem here is when tech companies make these decisions for the public... that this is a tool that is useful in ways that will outweigh its disadvantages," she added.

New York's Attorney General Letitia James announced Wednesday a probe of various tech companies over the attack, including Twitch.

The general lack of up-to-date social media policies on the national level in the United States has also contributed to the problems associated with live videos online.

US states have crafted their own policies, which can reflect the heavy partisan divides along what should be allowed online.

Texas, for example, has enacted a controversial social media law that bars larger sites from "discriminating against expression," which has been heavily criticized for being so broad that it interferes with content moderation.

"The recent tragedy (in Buffalo) underscores that this is not just about partisan point scoring," Matt Schruers, president of the Computer & Communications Industry Association, told a panel discussion about the law this week.

"There are life and death consequences to tying the industry's hands to respond to bad actors on the internet," he added.

W.Lane--TFWP