The Fort Worth Press - Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 64.000368
ALL 81.218818
AMD 360.140403
ANG 1.789785
AOA 918.000367
ARS 1528.862404
AUD 1.422678
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.747092
BBD 2.014338
BDT 124.158076
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377606
BIF 3001.375712
BMD 1
BND 1.27771
BOB 12.126707
BRL 5.438704
BSD 1.000156
BTN 94.912544
BWP 13.81787
BYN 2.946066
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011399
CAD 1.39755
CDF 2315.000362
CHF 0.823841
CLF 0.025146
CLP 992.920396
CNY 6.661104
CNH 6.65272
COP 3219.41
CRC 454.787056
CUC 1
CUP 24.001751
CVE 98.497943
CZK 21.81604
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.697404
DOP 60.620679
DZD 135.802679
EGP 55.738436
ERN 15
ETB 161.461739
EUR 0.892404
FJD 2.243704
FKP 0.746437
GBP 0.746436
GEL 2.603861
GGP 0.746437
GHS 11.651465
GIP 0.746437
GMD 74.000355
GNF 8851.589159
GTQ 7.645651
GYD 209.633474
HKD 7.84625
HNL 26.880818
HRK 6.76901
HTG 131.032142
HUF 327.940388
IDR 18133.75
ILS 3.14456
IMP 0.746437
INR 94.917504
IQD 1516.088114
IRR 1868415.000352
ISK 121.830386
JEP 0.746437
JMD 158.924129
JOD 0.70904
JPY 157.580385
KES 129.870385
KGS 87.448704
KHR 4080.593508
KMF 441.00035
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1333.420383
KWD 0.31117
KYD 0.833434
KZT 453.459704
LAK 22517.911061
LBP 89559.597295
LKR 332.651457
LRD 170.008263
LSL 16.666696
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.428964
MAD 9.833447
MDL 17.902128
MGA 4523.771239
MKD 55.008665
MMK 2099.994593
MNT 3599.692564
MOP 8.081288
MRU 40.55493
MUR 47.280378
MVR 15.450378
MWK 1733.828824
MXN 18.786704
MYR 4.058204
MZN 63.910377
NAD 16.666696
NGN 1346.470377
NIO 36.803459
NOK 9.208504
NPR 151.859892
NZD 1.772422
OMR 0.384417
PAB 1.00025
PEN 3.46149
PGK 4.551281
PHP 63.764504
PKR 276.672235
PLN 3.94725
PYG 5859.074911
QAR 3.645686
RON 4.782204
RSD 105.25382
RUB 80.300995
RWF 1476.317024
SAR 3.7544
SBD 8.058206
SCR 13.759577
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.826204
SGD 1.278704
SHP 0.748335
SLE 22.903667
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.533215
SRD 37.619504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.886236
SVC 8.750648
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.6622
THB 33.720369
TJS 9.205654
TMT 3.5
TND 2.990728
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.934904
TTD 6.780948
TWD 32.621404
TZS 2641.198038
UAH 45.361884
UGX 4250.396409
UYU 40.208322
UZS 11995.497668
VES 887.479804
VND 25803.5
VUV 119.284453
WST 2.776099
XAF 585.378718
XAG 0.020359
XAU 0.000258029557
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802387
XDR 0.707052
XOF 585.378718
XPF 106.533507
YER 236.203589
ZAR 16.727445
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 20.167407
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.299168
MXV 2.117364
  • RIO

    -0.3300

    97.04

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    20.67

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    0.0000

    33.41

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67.95

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.99

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    75.66

    -0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8600

    51.08

    +1.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    11.52

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.1200

    76.68

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.54

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    -0.0800

    55.75

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    168.1

    +1.2%

  • BP

    -1.4200

    43.16

    -3.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    19.7

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    17.02

    +0.41%

Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling
Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling / Photo: © AFP

Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling

The EU's top court said on Friday some international football rules regulating player transfers are contrary to the bloc's laws, in a landmark decision that could shake up the system.

Text size:

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) was called on to decide a long-running dispute between former French footballer Lassana Diarra and FIFA, over what happens when players unilaterally terminate their contract.

In a highly anticipated verdict, judges found that by restricting a footballers' ability to seek further employment, current FIFA rules hinder the EU's free movement and competition between clubs.

"The Court holds that all of those rules are contrary to EU law," it said.

The ruling could have far-reaching implications for the lucrative transfer market, allowing players to leave their club without fear of being legally trapped afterwards.

"In a way, the Lassana Diarra affair is the Bosman 2.0 affair," Diarra's Belgian lawyer Jean-Louis Dupont, said ahead of the judgement, predicting the "end" of the current system in case of a favourable verdict.

Dupont was also involved in the 1995 case of footballer Jean-Marc Bosman, which allowed players to move to another club at the end of their contract without a transfer fee being paid and also ended quotas on foreign players at clubs.

On Friday, he hailed the new ruling as "a total victory".

- Ten-year saga -

The Diarra saga goes back 10 years.

In August 2014, Lokomotiv terminated the midfielder's contract citing contractual breaches by the player. The Russian club also sought 20 million euros ($22m) compensation from Diarra.

Diarra, now 39, refused and requested that Lokomotiv pay him compensation.

He was eventually ordered to pay his former club 10 million euros by FIFA, a fine that was upheld by the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Diarra also received a backdated 15-month suspension.

According to FIFA regulations, if a player terminates his contract unilaterally and "without just cause", he must pay compensation which includes his remuneration and benefits until the end of his contract.

Additionally, a purchasing club could be held jointly liable for any compensation and, in certain cases, be banned from signing any new players for a given period.

National football associations are also forced to refuse to issue a certificate needed to complete a transfer while a dispute is pending.

As a result clubs were not rushing to recruit Diarra after he left Lokomotiv.

His lawyers argued the rules violated the EU's free movement of workers, and by limiting the ability of clubs to recruit, were contrary to the principle of free competition within the 27-nation bloc.

Diarra requested six million euros from FIFA, on the grounds that he was prevented from playing during most of the 2014-2015 season.

Belgian side Charleroi rescinded their contract offer, afraid of the possible legal and financial consequences.

- Considerable risk -

After several twists and turns, a Belgian court asked the CJEU its opinion on the matter.

On Friday, the CJEU found that the rules impede the free movement of players by "imposing considerable legal risks, unforeseeable and potentially very high financial risks as well as major sporting risks on those players and clubs wishing to employ them".

Although some restrictions could be justified to allow a certain degree of stability in the player rosters of football clubs, the rules in question went beyond "what is necessary to pursue that objective", it said.

Judges said the burden put on purchasing clubs had as object the restriction, and even prevention, of cross-border competition, and as such did "not appear to be indispensable or necessary".

The ruling throws the world of football transfers into uncertainty.

Smaller teams often rely on trading players to sustain their finances -- recruiting young prospects on the cheap to later sell them at a high price.

Clubs currently have no obligation to let players go before the end of their contract, which gives management power in transfer negotiations, a lever they seem to stand to lose.

Capped 34 times by France, Diarra also played for Chelsea, Arsenal, Portsmouth and Real Madrid before ending his career at Paris Saint-Germain in 2019.

P.Grant--TFWP