The Fort Worth Press - South Korea court recognises rights of same-sex couples

USD -
AED 3.672997
AFN 64.000164
ALL 81.403383
AMD 360.301714
ANG 1.789785
AOA 916.999952
ARS 1539.589701
AUD 1.421838
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.703834
BAM 1.755348
BBD 2.014118
BDT 124.150744
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.37735
BIF 3000
BMD 1
BND 1.281553
BOB 11.995315
BRL 5.417004
BSD 1.000013
BTN 95.207367
BWP 13.822349
BYN 2.947868
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01121
CAD 1.397803
CDF 2315.000008
CHF 0.82609
CLF 0.025058
CLP 989.409745
CNY 6.6611
CNH 6.656465
COP 3177.45
CRC 454.76167
CUC 1
CUP 24.000287
CVE 99.195576
CZK 21.806196
DJF 177.720164
DKK 6.693635
DOP 60.650084
DZD 135.330075
EGP 56.024304
ERN 15
ETB 161.250258
EUR 0.89554
FJD 2.243198
FKP 0.751792
GBP 0.74805
GEL 2.595036
GGP 0.751792
GHS 11.650329
GIP 0.751792
GMD 74.000007
GNF 8799.999856
GTQ 7.645879
GYD 209.614159
HKD 7.84615
HNL 27.000355
HRK 6.76901
HTG 131.054259
HUF 327.282498
IDR 18158
ILS 3.109045
IMP 0.751792
INR 95.152601
IQD 1515
IRR 1868415.000516
ISK 121.719613
JEP 0.751792
JMD 158.760361
JOD 0.709007
JPY 157.875031
KES 129.949529
KGS 87.447976
KHR 4075.505048
KMF 442.00014
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1339.225041
KWD 0.31094
KYD 0.833326
KZT 453.3167
LAK 22524.999961
LBP 89550.000213
LKR 332.450795
LRD 170.239896
LSL 16.67011
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.429733
MAD 9.853019
MDL 18.045072
MGA 4589.999848
MKD 55.267858
MMK 2099.638249
MNT 3597.631144
MOP 8.082337
MRU 40.205896
MUR 47.480053
MVR 15.46008
MWK 1736.999688
MXN 18.84011
MYR 4.059703
MZN 63.898681
NAD 16.669951
NGN 1345.804821
NIO 36.798275
NOK 9.26212
NPR 152.332146
NZD 1.77622
OMR 0.384504
PAB 1.000013
PEN 3.452006
PGK 4.489903
PHP 63.737009
PKR 276.6498
PLN 3.93055
PYG 5858.938516
QAR 3.64525
RON 4.782897
RSD 105.236998
RUB 81.251808
RWF 1477.5
SAR 3.7541
SBD 8.064705
SCR 13.826939
SDG 601.508796
SEK 9.85623
SGD 1.280325
SHP 0.750582
SLE 22.950016
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.50203
SRD 37.644503
STD 20697.981008
STN 22.35
SVC 8.749697
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.620279
THB 33.721987
TJS 9.190174
TMT 3.51
TND 3.00825
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.837005
TTD 6.779691
TWD 32.559103
TZS 2643.77306
UAH 45.55389
UGX 4360.137679
UYU 40.22581
UZS 11990.000202
VES 887.00815
VND 25814
VUV 119.133003
WST 2.76699
XAF 587.435889
XAG 0.019185
XAU 0.000249381223
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.802288
XDR 0.707052
XOF 587.435889
XPF 107.374973
YER 236.174996
ZAR 16.625009
ZMK 9001.201938
ZMW 20.200416
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.303054
MXV 2.123926
  • RIO

    -0.3300

    97.04

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    20.67

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    0.0000

    33.41

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67.95

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.99

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    75.66

    -0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8600

    51.08

    +1.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    11.52

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.1200

    76.68

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.54

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    -0.0800

    55.75

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    168.1

    +1.2%

  • BP

    -1.4200

    43.16

    -3.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    19.7

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    17.02

    +0.41%

South Korea court recognises rights of same-sex couples
South Korea court recognises rights of same-sex couples / Photo: © AFP/File

South Korea court recognises rights of same-sex couples

South Korea's Supreme Court recognised new rights for same-sex couples Thursday, saying the state must provide health insurance for a gay man's partner in a landmark ruling that left activists weeping for joy.

Text size:

"National Health Insurance should recognise spousal insurance coverage for same-sex couples," the court ruled, with activists breaking into cheers as the verdict was read out.

The verdict, which cannot be appealed as it comes from the country's highest court, means common-law spouses of the same sex can now register as dependents on their partners' health insurance.

"It is discrimination based on sexual orientation to exclude the couple just because they are same-sex," the court ruled.

"It is a discriminatory act that violates human dignity and values, the right to pursue happiness, freedom of privacy, and the right to be equal before the law, and the degree of infringement is serious."

The case was brought by a gay couple, So Seong-wook and Kim Yong-min, who live together and held a wedding ceremony in 2019.

It had no legal validity, however, as South Korea does not recognise same-sex marriage.

In 2021, So sued the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) because it terminated benefits for his partner -- whom he had registered as a dependent -- after discovering they were a gay couple.

In a landmark ruling last year, a Seoul High Court found in favour of the couple, mandating that the NHIS reinstate the dependent benefits.

The service, which grants spousal coverage benefits to common-law partners, appealed the decision, escalating the case to the Supreme Court.

- 'Historic victory' -

The Supreme Court ruling is a pivotal moment for the country's LGBTQI community, and people holding rainbow umbrellas walked out of the court, wiping away tears of joy.

While the country does not recognise same-sex marriages, gay relationships are not criminalised. LGBTQ people tend to live largely under the radar.

Activists have long emphasised the need for legislation against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

A much-discussed anti-discrimination law has languished in the South Korean parliament for years, due to a lack of consensus among MPs.

Outside the court ahead of the verdict, anti-LGBTQI Christian organisations staged a protest, holding up banners saying "let us repent to the Lord".

When the couple So Seong-wook and Kim Yong-min attempted to hold a press conference after the verdict, Christian activists disrupted it by speaking in tongues and shouting: "homosexuality is a sin!"

Amnesty International said the ruling was "a historic victory for equality and human rights in South Korea".

"The Court has taken a significant step towards dismantling systemic discrimination and ensuring inclusivity for all," the rights group said in a statement.

"While this decision is a major milestone, the case itself is a sobering reminder of the lengthy judicial processes that same-sex couples must endure to secure basic rights that should be universally guaranteed.

"It is disheartening that in 2024, same-sex couples still face such significant barriers to equality."

M.Delgado--TFWP