The Fort Worth Press - Climate change is messing with how we measure time: study

USD -
AED 3.6725
AFN 64.494756
ALL 81.598713
AMD 359.67278
ANG 1.789785
AOA 918.000208
ARS 1538.260398
AUD 1.421858
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.693911
BAM 1.758181
BBD 2.017808
BDT 124.280834
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.378105
BIF 3005.600554
BMD 1
BND 1.283543
BOB 11.917476
BRL 5.352201
BSD 1.001892
BTN 95.226537
BWP 13.859348
BYN 2.947424
BYR 19600
BZD 2.014932
CAD 1.406275
CDF 2314.999721
CHF 0.830245
CLF 0.024972
CLP 986.040307
CNY 6.66835
CNH 6.666145
COP 3151.86
CRC 455.595609
CUC 1
CUP 24.044517
CVE 99.123517
CZK 21.881896
DJF 178.40785
DKK 6.722025
DOP 61.444278
DZD 135.369852
EGP 56.14368
ERN 15
ETB 162.972609
EUR 0.899349
FJD 2.243699
FKP 0.75114
GBP 0.75245
GEL 2.570497
GGP 0.75114
GHS 11.676555
GIP 0.75114
GMD 73.999918
GNF 8866.375106
GTQ 7.656419
GYD 209.942467
HKD 7.84472
HNL 26.89794
HRK 6.76901
HTG 131.239943
HUF 330.105013
IDR 18166
ILS 3.098303
IMP 0.75114
INR 95.22695
IQD 1518.788206
IRR 1857000.000207
ISK 122.670033
JEP 0.75114
JMD 159.404525
JOD 0.709014
JPY 157.858024
KES 129.909972
KGS 87.449204
KHR 4090.273689
KMF 441.000077
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1337.48013
KWD 0.31132
KYD 0.834862
KZT 457.910823
LAK 22548.645041
LBP 89716.422674
LKR 333.065143
LRD 170.315667
LSL 16.709083
LTL 2.952739
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.436563
MAD 9.868303
MDL 18.093068
MGA 4560.450921
MKD 55.35329
MMK 2099.630718
MNT 3601.077836
MOP 8.095253
MRU 40.249373
MUR 47.549701
MVR 15.449945
MWK 1737.250425
MXN 18.681115
MYR 4.079905
MZN 63.910092
NAD 16.709008
NGN 1344.540146
NIO 36.866069
NOK 9.334902
NPR 152.363829
NZD 1.783502
OMR 0.384498
PAB 1.001888
PEN 3.451546
PGK 4.491231
PHP 64.053502
PKR 277.234306
PLN 3.95895
PYG 5828.864747
QAR 3.652104
RON 4.811894
RSD 105.694014
RUB 80.501108
RWF 1482.753351
SAR 3.750764
SBD 8.064647
SCR 13.986932
SDG 601.515787
SEK 9.95784
SGD 1.28196
SHP 0.749344
SLE 22.874977
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 572.550994
SRD 37.6505
STD 20697.981008
STN 22.02465
SVC 8.766631
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.701501
THB 33.8175
TJS 9.217057
TMT 3.5
TND 3.000388
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.837115
TTD 6.800611
TWD 32.414703
TZS 2644.982953
UAH 45.735578
UGX 4393.203883
UYU 40.165228
UZS 11956.976101
VES 886.72915
VND 25842
VUV 118.98361
WST 2.767767
XAF 589.934591
XAG 0.018563
XAU 0.000248143884
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.805556
XDR 0.707052
XOF 589.934591
XPF 107.209637
YER 236.149824
ZAR 16.663225
ZMK 9001.205413
ZMW 20.204154
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.470209
MXV 2.10654
  • RIO

    -0.3300

    97.04

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    20.67

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    0.0000

    33.41

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67.95

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.99

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    75.66

    -0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8600

    51.08

    +1.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    11.52

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.1200

    76.68

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.54

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    -0.0800

    55.75

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    168.1

    +1.2%

  • BP

    -1.4200

    43.16

    -3.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    19.7

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    17.02

    +0.41%

Climate change is messing with how we measure time: study
Climate change is messing with how we measure time: study / Photo: © AFP/File

Climate change is messing with how we measure time: study

Struggle to wrap your head around daylight savings? Spare a thought for the world's timekeepers, who are trying to work out how climate change is affecting Earth's rotation -- and in turn, how we keep track of time.

Text size:

In a strange twist, global warming could even help out timekeepers by delaying the need for history's first "negative leap second" by three years, a study published on Wednesday suggested.

Experts fear that introducing a negative leap second -- a minute with only 59 seconds -- into standard time could cause havoc on computer systems across the world.

For most of history, time was measured by the rotation of the Earth. However in 1967, the world's timekeepers embraced atomic clocks -- which use the frequency of atoms as their tick-tock -- ushering in a more precise era of timekeeping.

But sailors, who still relied on the Sun and stars for navigation, and others wanted to retain the connection between Earth's rotation and time.

There was a problem. Our planet is an unreliable clock, and had long been rotating slightly slower than atomic time, meaning the two measurements were out of sync.

So a compromise was struck. Whenever the difference between the two measurements approached 0.9 of a second, a "leap second" was added to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), the internationally agreed standard by which the world sets its clocks.

Though most people likely have not noticed, 27 leap seconds have been added to UTC since 1972, the last coming in 2016.

But in recent years a new problem has emerged that few saw coming: Earth's rotation has been speeding up, overtaking atomic time.

This means that to bring the two measurements in sync, timekeepers may have to introduce the first ever negative leap second.

- Our unpredictable planet -

"This has never happened before, and poses a major challenge to making sure that all parts of the global timing infrastructure show the same time," said Duncan Agnew, a researcher at the University of California, San Diego.

"Many computer programs for leap seconds assume they are all positive, so these would have to be rewritten," he told AFP.

Partly using satellite data, Agnew looked at the rate of the Earth's rotation and the effect of its slowing core for the new study published in the journal Nature.

He determined that if not for climate change, a negative leap second might have needed to be added to UTC as soon as 2026.

But starting from 1990, melting ice in Greenland and Antarctica has slowed down the Earth's rotation, the study said. This has delayed the need for a negative leap second until at least 2029, it added.

"When the ice melts, the water spreads out over the whole ocean; this increases the moment of inertia, which slows the Earth down," Agnew said.

If the need for an "unprecedented" negative leap second was delayed, that would be "welcome news indeed," Patrizia Tavella, the head of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, which is responsible for UTC, commented in Nature.

Demetrios Matsakis, former chief scientist for time services at the US Naval Observatory who was not involved in the research, told AFP that he was sceptical of Agnew's analysis.

He said that "Earth is too unpredictable to be sure" if a negative leap second would be needed any time soon.

- Second nature -

But all agreed that a negative leap second would be a hop into the unknown.

"It would not bring about the downfall of civilisation, and given enough publicity some problems could be avoided," Matsakis said.

"But I would not recommend being in an airplane at that time."

Even positive leap seconds have previously caused problems for systems that require precise timekeeping.

That is partly why the world's timekeepers agreed in 2022 to scrap the leap second by 2035.

From that year, the plan is to allow the difference between atomic time and the Earth's rotation to grow up to a minute.

A subsequent leap minute to bring them into sync is not expected to be needed in the next century.

And "a negative leap minute is very, very unlikely," Agnew said.

He hopes his research will prompt the world's timekeepers to consider dropping the leap second sooner than 2035, a sentiment echoed by Tavella and Matsakis.

G.Dominguez--TFWP