The Fort Worth Press - Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 64.501353
ALL 80.797017
AMD 360.929885
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.999823
ARS 1538.269797
AUD 1.42106
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70296
BAM 1.75401
BBD 2.012923
BDT 123.983804
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.377306
BIF 2997.5
BMD 1
BND 1.280463
BOB 11.889313
BRL 5.352698
BSD 0.999466
BTN 94.999372
BWP 13.826286
BYN 2.940367
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010116
CAD 1.404275
CDF 2314.999871
CHF 0.828545
CLF 0.024979
CLP 986.302768
CNY 6.66835
CNH 6.664845
COP 3151.38
CRC 454.490425
CUC 1
CUP 23.987373
CVE 98.750015
CZK 21.852992
DJF 177.719653
DKK 6.71562
DOP 60.349916
DZD 135.338933
EGP 56.017202
ERN 15
ETB 161.050415
EUR 0.89848
FJD 2.238695
FKP 0.749223
GBP 0.75135
GEL 2.570498
GGP 0.749223
GHS 11.624999
GIP 0.749223
GMD 74.000246
GNF 8799.999875
GTQ 7.638188
GYD 209.445401
HKD 7.84465
HNL 27.000054
HRK 6.76901
HTG 130.928626
HUF 329.441962
IDR 18161.45
ILS 3.02401
IMP 0.749223
INR 95.17805
IQD 1514
IRR 1856999.999772
ISK 122.560119
JEP 0.749223
JMD 159.024972
JOD 0.709045
JPY 157.8775
KES 129.83981
KGS 87.4492
KHR 4075.000189
KMF 440.999748
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1327.739895
KWD 0.31121
KYD 0.832885
KZT 456.816419
LAK 22506.497808
LBP 89550.00032
LKR 332.273585
LRD 170.250216
LSL 16.66002
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.415003
MAD 9.848494
MDL 18.050231
MGA 4589.999714
MKD 55.320716
MMK 2099.77173
MNT 3599.40728
MOP 8.076123
MRU 40.198421
MUR 47.349802
MVR 15.450348
MWK 1741.000062
MXN 18.695855
MYR 4.08902
MZN 63.910391
NAD 16.659866
NGN 1340.659814
NIO 36.844966
NOK 9.327135
NPR 151.999677
NZD 1.759435
OMR 0.384472
PAB 0.999498
PEN 3.442502
PGK 4.488103
PHP 64.075497
PKR 277.000141
PLN 3.952497
PYG 5815.01195
QAR 3.645016
RON 4.807696
RSD 105.586978
RUB 80.548206
RWF 1478.5
SAR 3.750364
SBD 8.064647
SCR 13.944377
SDG 601.510149
SEK 9.94615
SGD 1.28119
SHP 0.749344
SLE 22.875022
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 571.498309
SRD 37.6505
STD 20697.981008
STN 22
SVC 8.745835
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.660014
THB 33.785993
TJS 9.19474
TMT 3.5
TND 3.007498
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.8366
TTD 6.784327
TWD 32.436096
TZS 2644.862988
UAH 45.626679
UGX 4382.704147
UYU 40.070132
UZS 11970.000395
VES 886.72915
VND 25834
VUV 118.743227
WST 2.764729
XAF 589.364192
XAG 0.018344
XAU 0.000245713528
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801256
XDR 0.707052
XOF 589.364192
XPF 107.149656
YER 236.15032
ZAR 16.637035
ZMK 9001.196346
ZMW 20.155866
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5745.701932
MXV 2.108742
  • RIO

    -0.3300

    97.04

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    20.67

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    0.0000

    33.41

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67.95

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.99

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    75.66

    -0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8600

    51.08

    +1.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    11.52

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.1200

    76.68

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.54

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    -0.0800

    55.75

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    168.1

    +1.2%

  • BP

    -1.4200

    43.16

    -3.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    19.7

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    17.02

    +0.41%

Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford
Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford / Photo: © KENSINGTON PALACE/AFP

Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford

When the UK's Daily Mail, a loyal champion of the monarchy, splashes the headline "How did Kate photo become a PR disaster?", it is clear the royal family has a problem.

Text size:

In an extraordinary episode for the family, Catherine, Princess of Wales, on Monday apologised and admitted to editing an official portrait of her released by the palace on Sunday.

The edits had prompted AFP and other agencies to withdraw the altered image.

Kate, 42, has not been seen at a public event since attending a Christmas Day church service, and underwent abdominal surgery in January, fuelling speculation about her health.

The photograph dominated the front pages of UK newspapers landing on doormats on Monday, which had gone to print before the alterations were detected.

The Sun tabloid ran with the headline "Looking Great, Kate", adding the picture "puts online rumours to bed".

But the rumour mill instead went into overdrive when the photographs were pulled late on Sunday.

Not only has the incident intensified speculation over Catherine's health but it has tested the bond of trust between the royal family and friendly media outlets.

Even the Press Association, which has among the closest working relationships with the monarchy, killed its distribution of the photograph.

Daily Mail columnist Richard Kay warned that "trust and integrity are precious commodities" in maintaining the public support that underpins the institution.

- 'Suspicions' -

Royal-supporting tabloids would normally have "waited for it to blow over", Laura Clancy, lecturer in media at Lancaster University, told AFP.

Other outlets have also often been reluctant to dip into royal controversy over fear they could lose access, she added.

But the rise of social media now means that "people can question and talk about it and there's news outlets around the world who don't stick to that line".

In the digital media age, "any manipulation of an image, even relatively minor edits done with no intention to mislead, can raise suspicions", Chris Morris, chief executive of fact-checking service Full Fact, said in a comment sent to AFP.

Part of the problem is that the family distributes pictures from self-described "amateur photographer" Catherine for use by professional media outlets, which have strict rules on using manipulated images.

While there have been calls to use professionals, "there are some ... individuals whose brand is based on authenticity", explained Hannah Perry, lead digital researcher at the London-based think tank Demos.

But royals must weigh that up against the fact that "trust is so low in public institutions and we know that people are becoming incredibly sceptical and also savvy" about analysing information, she added.

"The best-case scenario in that situation would be to be transparent," suggested Perry.

On the streets of London, public reaction was mixed.

- 'Obsessive need for secrecy' -

"I was actually quite shocked. I would think it would be a lot more seamless coming from such an official source," said 21-year-old student Flora Canavan.

She added that her trust in the royal family had not been eroded as "I don't think I trusted them beforehand".

However, solicitor Jen Chambers said the incident had been "massively blown up out of proportion" and that "the kids probably weren't pulling good faces in the photo".

Although the furore has caused embarrassment for loyal media outlets, they still remain supportive, for now.

The Sun's front page on Tuesday urged "social media trolls, idiotic conspiracy theorists and sniping media critics" to "lay off Kate".

It accused critics of waging "a bullying campaign against a devoted mum, recovering from a serious operation, who simply wanted to offer the public a perfect portrait of her and her kids".

While the Daily Mail's Kay said it was "easy to see why the couple acted as they did", he offered a stark warning.

"They are down to earth and unshowy. But it is this desire for ordinariness which conceals one significant flaw: a near obsessive need for secrecy.

"If pictures can be digitally altered, what else can be twisted? The British public adore the Royal Family but that adoration rests on them being told the truth.

"There are precious commodities at stake here: trust and integrity."

J.P.Estrada--TFWP