The Fort Worth Press - No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

USD -
AED 3.672497
AFN 64.999819
ALL 81.216919
AMD 362.051328
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.00025
ARS 1515.25437
AUD 1.437426
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.697326
BAM 1.739803
BBD 2.01708
BDT 123.195303
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.378775
BIF 2997.464751
BMD 1
BND 1.281146
BOB 11.69239
BRL 5.065101
BSD 1.001468
BTN 95.050483
BWP 13.720589
BYN 3.015879
BYR 19600
BZD 2.014233
CAD 1.414935
CDF 2313.499181
CHF 0.825932
CLF 0.024881
CLP 979.255437
CNY 6.691203
CNH 6.685309
COP 3173.953654
CRC 455.099408
CUC 1
CUP 24.035938
CVE 98.087444
CZK 21.685496
DJF 178.33919
DKK 6.651198
DOP 61.433083
DZD 133.824668
EGP 53.529689
ERN 15
ETB 163.585998
EUR 0.889897
FJD 2.26765
FKP 0.750253
GBP 0.752078
GEL 2.590432
GGP 0.750253
GHS 11.695058
GIP 0.750253
GMD 73.49623
GNF 8810.21216
GTQ 7.652004
GYD 209.527198
HKD 7.84815
HNL 26.885202
HRK 6.703803
HTG 131.147978
HUF 323.552009
IDR 18053
ILS 3.09465
IMP 0.750253
INR 94.965504
IQD 1518.213762
IRR 1795877.497557
ISK 121.179576
JEP 0.750253
JMD 159.195837
JOD 0.709012
JPY 158.015022
KES 130.098296
KGS 87.449938
KHR 4070.631144
KMF 439.999825
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1334.740045
KWD 0.31082
KYD 0.834586
KZT 453.195748
LAK 22534.359294
LBP 89683.40524
LKR 331.690611
LRD 170.751234
LSL 16.462394
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.431526
MAD 9.729662
MDL 17.966464
MGA 4507.405595
MKD 54.836988
MMK 2100.071343
MNT 3596.488264
MOP 8.096339
MRU 40.037362
MUR 47.229488
MVR 15.459712
MWK 1736.600987
MXN 18.472997
MYR 4.083203
MZN 63.902819
NAD 16.462394
NGN 1331.2103
NIO 36.854512
NOK 9.427699
NPR 152.081128
NZD 1.770298
OMR 0.382413
PAB 1.001468
PEN 3.444825
PGK 4.547436
PHP 62.985976
PKR 277.237468
PLN 3.894835
PYG 5719.877241
QAR 3.660721
RON 4.7306
RSD 104.461148
RUB 84.13468
RWF 1478.183516
SAR 3.752837
SBD 8.064647
SCR 13.905529
SDG 601.496371
SEK 9.912398
SGD 1.282096
SHP 0.754745
SLE 24.680036
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 572.343548
SRD 37.794503
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.794245
SVC 8.763065
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.455989
THB 33.444972
TJS 9.228751
TMT 3.51
TND 2.98768
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.513801
TTD 6.798915
TWD 32.453598
TZS 2646.44398
UAH 44.920874
UGX 4136.458658
UYU 40.314905
UZS 12073.121914
VES 878.910597
VND 25894.5
VUV 119.385856
WST 2.787824
XAF 583.73441
XAG 0.017551
XAU 0.000240063761
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.804919
XDR 0.707052
XOF 583.73441
XPF 106.089045
YER 236.150057
ZAR 16.50875
ZMK 9001.193843
ZMW 20.049815
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5750.775019
MXV 2.085785
  • RIO

    -0.3300

    97.04

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    20.67

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    0.0000

    33.41

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67.95

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.99

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    75.66

    -0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8600

    51.08

    +1.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    11.52

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.1200

    76.68

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.54

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    -0.0800

    55.75

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    168.1

    +1.2%

  • BP

    -1.4200

    43.16

    -3.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    19.7

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    17.02

    +0.41%

No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air
No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

No longer a last resort: Pulling CO2 from the air

To save the world from the worst ravages of climate change, slashing carbon pollution is no longer enough -- CO2 will also need to be sucked out of the atmosphere and buried, a landmark UN report is expected to say on Monday.

Text size:

If humanity had started to curb greenhouse gas emissions 20 years ago, an annual decrease of two percent out to 2030 would have put us on the right path. Challenging, but doable.

Instead, the emissions climbed another 20 percent to more than 40 billion tonnes of CO2 in 2021.

This means an abrupt drop in emissions of six or seven percent a year is needed to avoid breaching the Paris climate treaty's goal of capping global warming at "well below" two degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels.

Staying under the safer aspirational threshold of 1.5C would mean an even steeper decline.

To put that in perspective, the painful 2020 shutdown of the global economy due to Covid saw "only" a 5.6 percent decrease in CO2 emissions.

Hence the need for carbon dioxide removal (CDR), or "negative emissions", likely to figure prominently in the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.

Even under the most aggressive carbon-cutting scenarios, several billion tonnes of CO2 will need to be extracted each year from the atmosphere by 2050, and an accumulated total of hundreds of billions of tonnes by 2100.

As of today, however, CO2 removal is nowhere near these levels. The largest direct air capture facility in the world removes in a year what humanity emits in three or four seconds.

There are at least a dozen CDR techniques on the table, with different potentials and costs.

- Using bioenergy -

Most of the hundreds of models laying out a game plan for a liveable future reserve an important role for a negative emissions solution called BECCS, or bioenergy with carbon capture and storage.

In a nutshell, this is the recipe: grow trees, burn them for energy, and bury the CO2 underground, in an abandoned mineshaft, for example.

But what works on paper (or in so-called integrated assessment models), has not materialised in reality.

One of the few commercial-scale BECCS facilities in the world, in Britain, was dropped last year from the S&P Clean Energy Index because it failed to meet sustainability criteria.

"I don't see a BECCS boom," said Oliver Geden, a senior fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs and an expert on CDR.

- Planting trees -

Restoring forests and planting trees that absorb and stock CO2 as they grow also figure prominently in development scenarios achieving net-zero emissions, whether in 2050 or later.

Many businesses, including fossil fuel companies, rely heavily on carbon offset schemes based on afforestation to compensate for continuing carbon pollution.

But the amount of land needed to put a serious dent in CO2 levels through tree planting -- up to twice the size of India -- could clash with other priorities, such as growing food and biofuel crops.

Biodiversity could suffer as well, especially in savannahs converted to monoculture tree farms.

Newly planted forests could also fall victim to wildfires made more frequent and intense by rising temperatures, resulting in the release of all their stored CO2.

- 'DACCS' -

One of the youngest CDR technologies is also one of the hottest: direct air carbon capture and storage.

With variations, DACCS is a chemical process that extracts carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere, converting it into solid form or locking it away underground.

Because CO2 in the air is so sparse -- a few hundred parts per million -- it is a very energy-intensive and expensive process.

DACCS has benefited from a wave of corporate backing.

Last year, Tesla CEO Elon Musk launched the $100-million X-Prize for an innovative CO2 removal technology, and Breakthrough Energy founder Bill Gates unveiled a corporate partnership to turbocharge its development.

How quickly it can scale up, and at what cost, remain open questions.

- Enhanced weathering -

Enhanced weathering involves mining and crushing rocks rich in minerals that naturally absorb CO2, and then spreading them over land or sea.

It aims to vastly accelerate a process that normally unfolds on geological timescales of tens of thousands of years.

Silicate rocks with minerals rich in calcium and magnesium but lacking metal ions such as nickel and chromium are the best raw material for the job.

But, again, it's unclear if enhanced weathering can be scaled up enough, and at what cost.

- Ocean-based methods -

Oceans already take up more than 30 percent of humanity's carbon emissions, and scientists are experimenting with ways to boost that capacity.

One approach is to enhance marine alkalinity, either by directly adding natural or synthetic alkaline minerals, or the electrochemical processing of seawater.

Another approach, known as ocean fertilisation, increases the density of tiny phytoplankton that produce and sequester organic carbon through photosynthesis, like plants on land. Adding nitrogen or iron stimulate phytoplankton growth.

The main concerns here include unintended consequences on ecosystems.

S.Jordan--TFWP