The Fort Worth Press - Making smartphone data anonymous no longer enough: study

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 64.000163
ALL 82.459813
AMD 376.320031
AOA 916.999894
ARS 1387.017863
AUD 1.421676
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.695079
BAM 1.671981
BBD 2.012823
BDT 122.815341
BHD 0.377276
BIF 2970.5
BMD 1
BND 1.273995
BOB 6.905365
BRL 5.1008
BSD 0.999316
BTN 92.260676
BWP 13.408103
BYN 2.916946
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009908
CAD 1.38539
CDF 2300.999702
CHF 0.791815
CLF 0.022797
CLP 897.240136
CNY 6.83625
CNH 6.835615
COP 3649.77
CRC 464.865789
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.849798
CZK 20.916898
DJF 177.720115
DKK 6.408303
DOP 60.649653
DZD 132.463001
EGP 53.252598
ERN 15
ETB 155.625045
EUR 0.85755
FJD 2.214899
FKP 0.744078
GBP 0.74685
GEL 2.685013
GGP 0.744078
GHS 11.015012
GIP 0.744078
GMD 73.000145
GNF 8780.000092
GTQ 7.645223
GYD 209.079369
HKD 7.834155
HNL 26.620024
HRK 6.460999
HTG 131.013289
HUF 324.049489
IDR 17074.9
ILS 3.096015
IMP 0.744078
INR 92.72225
IQD 1310
IRR 1315000.000268
ISK 123.320093
JEP 0.744078
JMD 157.315666
JOD 0.709021
JPY 158.856011
KES 129.195659
KGS 87.449743
KHR 4013.999891
KMF 424.500704
KPW 899.95413
KRW 1482.585038
KWD 0.30894
KYD 0.832781
KZT 477.797202
LAK 21962.506225
LBP 89531.243299
LKR 315.00748
LRD 184.201822
LSL 16.615039
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.34497
MAD 9.305006
MDL 17.208704
MGA 4137.503608
MKD 52.852464
MMK 2099.780124
MNT 3575.250437
MOP 8.062591
MRU 40.098027
MUR 46.579771
MVR 15.459947
MWK 1737.000218
MXN 17.44645
MYR 3.982973
MZN 63.959478
NAD 16.609838
NGN 1379.526725
NIO 36.730379
NOK 9.58785
NPR 147.619434
NZD 1.71528
OMR 0.384506
PAB 0.999308
PEN 3.40375
PGK 4.310187
PHP 59.732028
PKR 279.000192
PLN 3.64719
PYG 6482.581748
QAR 3.646016
RON 4.368702
RSD 100.629368
RUB 78.533888
RWF 1460.5
SAR 3.752889
SBD 8.04851
SCR 14.899105
SDG 600.999953
SEK 9.32866
SGD 1.275101
SLE 24.650265
SOS 571.502969
SRD 37.553991
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.44
SVC 8.744604
SYP 110.553826
SZL 16.615015
THB 32.049014
TJS 9.498763
TMT 3.5
TND 2.891968
TRY 44.56189
TTD 6.778082
TWD 31.824299
TZS 2605.000387
UAH 43.307786
UGX 3697.197396
UYU 40.598418
UZS 12230.0006
VES 474.416899
VND 26321
VUV 119.534712
WST 2.769292
XAF 560.735672
XAG 0.013519
XAU 0.000212
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.8011
XDR 0.698977
XOF 564.0003
XPF 102.550256
YER 238.575016
ZAR 16.425039
ZMK 9001.173951
ZMW 19.112505
ZWL 321.999592
  • RIO

    3.7900

    98.45

    +3.85%

  • CMSC

    0.1500

    22.29

    +0.67%

  • JRI

    0.1600

    12.85

    +1.25%

  • NGG

    2.4400

    89.96

    +2.71%

  • BCE

    0.2900

    24.12

    +1.2%

  • BCC

    4.5200

    79.23

    +5.7%

  • BTI

    1.1500

    59.95

    +1.92%

  • CMSD

    0.2100

    22.5

    +0.93%

  • RYCEF

    -0.5000

    15.25

    -3.28%

  • GSK

    1.5300

    57.37

    +2.67%

  • BP

    -1.3500

    45.89

    -2.94%

  • AZN

    3.4600

    204.27

    +1.69%

  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • VOD

    0.4600

    15.77

    +2.92%

  • RELX

    0.5700

    33.93

    +1.68%

Making smartphone data anonymous no longer enough: study
Making smartphone data anonymous no longer enough: study

Making smartphone data anonymous no longer enough: study

Privacy measures that are meant to preserve the anonymity of smartphone users are no longer suitable for the digital age, a study suggested on Tuesday.

Text size:

Vast quantities of data are scooped up from smartphone apps by firms looking to develop products, conduct research or target consumers with adverts.

In Europe and many other jurisdictions, companies are legally bound to make this data anonymous, often doing so by removing telltale details like names or phone numbers.

But the study in the Nature Communications journal says this is no longer enough to keep identities private.

The researchers say people can now be identified with just a few details of how they communicate with an app like WhatsApp.

One of the paper's authors, Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye of Imperial College London, told AFP it was time to "reinvent what anonymisation means".

- 'Rich' data -

His team took anonymised data from more than 40,000 mobile phone users, most of which was information from messaging apps and other "interaction" data.

They then "attacked" the data searching for patterns in those interactions -- a technique that could be employed by malicious actors.

With just the direct contacts of the person included in the dataset, they found they could identify the person 15 percent of the time.

When further interactions between those primary contacts were included, they could identify 52 percent of people.

"Our results provide evidence that disconnected and even re-pseudonymised interaction data remain identifiable even across long periods of time," wrote the researchers from the UK, Switzerland and Italy.

"These results strongly suggest that current practices may not satisfy the anonymisation standard set forth by (European regulators) in particular with regard to the linkability criteria."

De Montjoye stressed that the intention was not to criticise any individual company or legal regime.

Rather, he said the algorithm they were using just provided a more robust way of testing what we regard as anonymised data.

"This dataset is so rich that the traditional way we used to think about anonymisation... doesn't really work any more," he said.

"That doesn't mean we need to give up on anonymisation."

He said one promising new method was to heavily restrict access to large datasets to just simple question and answer interactions.

That would get rid of the need to classify a dataset as "anonymised" or not.

X.Silva--TFWP