The Fort Worth Press - Olympic 'curse' strikes again as Beijing costs mount

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 64.000163
ALL 82.459813
AMD 376.320031
AOA 916.999894
ARS 1387.017863
AUD 1.421676
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.695079
BAM 1.671981
BBD 2.012823
BDT 122.815341
BHD 0.377276
BIF 2970.5
BMD 1
BND 1.273995
BOB 6.905365
BRL 5.1008
BSD 0.999316
BTN 92.260676
BWP 13.408103
BYN 2.916946
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009908
CAD 1.38539
CDF 2300.999702
CHF 0.791815
CLF 0.022797
CLP 897.240136
CNY 6.83625
CNH 6.835615
COP 3649.77
CRC 464.865789
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.849798
CZK 20.916898
DJF 177.720115
DKK 6.408303
DOP 60.649653
DZD 132.463001
EGP 53.252598
ERN 15
ETB 155.625045
EUR 0.85755
FJD 2.214899
FKP 0.744078
GBP 0.74685
GEL 2.685013
GGP 0.744078
GHS 11.015012
GIP 0.744078
GMD 73.000145
GNF 8780.000092
GTQ 7.645223
GYD 209.079369
HKD 7.834155
HNL 26.620024
HRK 6.460999
HTG 131.013289
HUF 324.049489
IDR 17074.9
ILS 3.096015
IMP 0.744078
INR 92.72225
IQD 1310
IRR 1315000.000268
ISK 123.320093
JEP 0.744078
JMD 157.315666
JOD 0.709021
JPY 158.856011
KES 129.195659
KGS 87.449743
KHR 4013.999891
KMF 424.500704
KPW 899.95413
KRW 1482.585038
KWD 0.30894
KYD 0.832781
KZT 477.797202
LAK 21962.506225
LBP 89531.243299
LKR 315.00748
LRD 184.201822
LSL 16.615039
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.34497
MAD 9.305006
MDL 17.208704
MGA 4137.503608
MKD 52.852464
MMK 2099.780124
MNT 3575.250437
MOP 8.062591
MRU 40.098027
MUR 46.579771
MVR 15.459947
MWK 1737.000218
MXN 17.44645
MYR 3.982973
MZN 63.959478
NAD 16.609838
NGN 1379.526725
NIO 36.730379
NOK 9.58785
NPR 147.619434
NZD 1.71528
OMR 0.384506
PAB 0.999308
PEN 3.40375
PGK 4.310187
PHP 59.732028
PKR 279.000192
PLN 3.64719
PYG 6482.581748
QAR 3.646016
RON 4.368702
RSD 100.629368
RUB 78.533888
RWF 1460.5
SAR 3.752889
SBD 8.04851
SCR 14.899105
SDG 600.999953
SEK 9.32866
SGD 1.275101
SLE 24.650265
SOS 571.502969
SRD 37.553991
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.44
SVC 8.744604
SYP 110.553826
SZL 16.615015
THB 32.049014
TJS 9.498763
TMT 3.5
TND 2.891968
TRY 44.56189
TTD 6.778082
TWD 31.824299
TZS 2605.000387
UAH 43.307786
UGX 3697.197396
UYU 40.598418
UZS 12230.0006
VES 474.416899
VND 26321
VUV 119.534712
WST 2.769292
XAF 560.735672
XAG 0.013519
XAU 0.000212
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.8011
XDR 0.698977
XOF 564.0003
XPF 102.550256
YER 238.575016
ZAR 16.425039
ZMK 9001.173951
ZMW 19.112505
ZWL 321.999592
  • RIO

    3.7900

    98.45

    +3.85%

  • CMSC

    0.1500

    22.29

    +0.67%

  • JRI

    0.1600

    12.85

    +1.25%

  • NGG

    2.4400

    89.96

    +2.71%

  • BCE

    0.2900

    24.12

    +1.2%

  • BCC

    4.5200

    79.23

    +5.7%

  • BTI

    1.1500

    59.95

    +1.92%

  • CMSD

    0.2100

    22.5

    +0.93%

  • RYCEF

    -0.5000

    15.25

    -3.28%

  • GSK

    1.5300

    57.37

    +2.67%

  • BP

    -1.3500

    45.89

    -2.94%

  • AZN

    3.4600

    204.27

    +1.69%

  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • VOD

    0.4600

    15.77

    +2.92%

  • RELX

    0.5700

    33.93

    +1.68%

Olympic 'curse' strikes again as Beijing costs mount
Olympic 'curse' strikes again as Beijing costs mount

Olympic 'curse' strikes again as Beijing costs mount

The "curse" of Olympic overspending looks set to strike again at the Beijing Games, with stringent Covid measures and loss of ticket sale revenues pushing up costs for China.

Text size:

It's not unusual for nations to find the bill for hosting an Olympics ballooning, but the pandemic and China's zero-Covid approach has made preparations for the February 4-20 Winter Games particularly difficult.

With increasingly strict rules imposed as domestic outbreaks spread in China, organisers announced last week that they will not sell tickets to the public because of the "complicated" Covid situation.

Instead, invitations will be given to select people. The organising committee had originally calculated ticketing revenue to be worth $118 million.

That total was already in question after it was confirmed last year there would be no international spectators at the Games because of China's weeks-long quarantine requirements and closed borders.

Budget was a key part of China being awarded the Games, with Beijing winning the bid over only one other contender as other cities backed out over high costs.

Beijing Olympics communications manager Zhao Weidong recently admitted to reporters that the pandemic might mean a need to "increase some expenses".

However he pointed out that others could be reduced, without giving specifics.

- 'Screwed' -

In 2015, Beijing said it was counting on a budget of just over $3 billion, which included the costs of organising and building sports facilities.

But excluded was a huge amount of new infrastructure needed, including the construction of a high-speed rail line between Beijing and the ski slopes.

The cost of hosting the Olympics usually doubles between the award date and the opening ceremony, experts say.

Wladimir Andreff, a specialist in sports economics from the University of Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne, called it the "curse" of successful Olympics bids.

"Whoever wins them gets screwed," he said.

To get the Games all candidates "systematically underestimate the costs and overestimate the profits" expected, Andreff added.

The pandemic has brought additional problems and costs.

Last summer's Covid-delayed Tokyo Olympics, the first to be held in coronavirus times, ended up at around twice the budget proposed in the city's original 2013 bid.

That was even as organisers said they had saved cash by simplifying events and avoiding the cost of hosting fans, with most events closed to spectators.

- 'Certain shortfall' -

In Beijing, athletes, support staff, volunteers and journalists will all be kept in a "closed loop" to prevent any contact with the population and limit the risk of contamination.

This "bubble" -- which is considerably stricter than the one in Tokyo -- requires a battery of measures to isolate Games participants from the outside world, as well as daily Covid screening tests.

Andreff said the absence of international spectators should not be underestimated.

"Hundreds of thousands of foreign tourists who were expected will not come," said Andreff. "There will be a certain shortfall due to the pandemic."

But Andrew Zimbalist, specialist in sports economics at Smith College in the United States, cautioned that even without the virus, assumptions the Games draw more tourists were not necessarily correct.

In 2008 -- when Beijing hosted a Summer Olympics -- tourism dropped by around a fifth, he said, amid heavy security measures.

"Normal tourists were discouraged from going to Beijing 2008 because they were concerned about congestion, high prices and the possibility of terrorism or other potentially dangerous incidents," he said.

"So normal tourism goes down as Olympic tourism goes up."

- All about image -

Beijing is hoping for a financial boost domestically that will last long beyond the Games.

The government committed to introducing 300 million Chinese to winter sports –- a goal achieved, according to official figures -- which they hope will generate a profitable future industry.

But this also means new infrastructure.

The Yanqing resort, for example, was built especially for the Olympics -- constructing the first track in China for bobsleigh, skeleton and luge from scratch.

Matthieu Llorca, lecturer at the University of Burgundy, said additional costs will probably be linked to pandemic control and not integrated into the final Olympics budget.

He said this reallocation will allow authorities to claim the Games were both "successful and at a lower cost".

Ultimately, he said, China -- the world's second-largest economy -- probably won't worry too much about the money.

"They don't look at how much it will cost," he said.

"They will look at the image of the country."

M.McCoy--TFWP