The Fort Worth Press - Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

USD -
AED 3.672504
AFN 65.000368
ALL 81.216919
AMD 362.051328
ANG 1.789785
AOA 917.000367
ARS 1515.25437
AUD 1.435956
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.739803
BBD 2.01708
BDT 123.195303
BGN 1.747831
BHD 0.378775
BIF 2997.464751
BMD 1
BND 1.281146
BOB 11.69239
BRL 5.065104
BSD 1.001468
BTN 95.050483
BWP 13.720589
BYN 3.015879
BYR 19600
BZD 2.014233
CAD 1.41575
CDF 2313.50392
CHF 0.825932
CLF 0.024881
CLP 979.255437
CNY 6.691204
CNH 6.686704
COP 3173.953654
CRC 455.099408
CUC 1
CUP 24.035938
CVE 98.087444
CZK 21.645304
DJF 178.33919
DKK 6.651204
DOP 61.433083
DZD 133.824668
EGP 53.529689
ERN 15
ETB 163.585998
EUR 0.889904
FJD 2.26765
FKP 0.750253
GBP 0.752078
GEL 2.590391
GGP 0.750253
GHS 11.695058
GIP 0.750253
GMD 73.503851
GNF 8810.21216
GTQ 7.652004
GYD 209.527198
HKD 7.84815
HNL 26.885202
HRK 6.703804
HTG 131.147978
HUF 323.310388
IDR 18053
ILS 3.09465
IMP 0.750253
INR 94.965504
IQD 1518.213762
IRR 1795877.503816
ISK 121.180386
JEP 0.750253
JMD 159.195837
JOD 0.70904
JPY 158.01504
KES 130.098296
KGS 87.450384
KHR 4070.631144
KMF 440.00035
KPW 899.999961
KRW 1334.740383
KWD 0.31082
KYD 0.834586
KZT 453.195748
LAK 22534.359294
LBP 89683.40524
LKR 331.690611
LRD 170.751234
LSL 16.462394
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.431526
MAD 9.729662
MDL 17.966464
MGA 4507.405595
MKD 54.836988
MMK 2100.071343
MNT 3596.488264
MOP 8.096339
MRU 40.037362
MUR 47.230378
MVR 15.460378
MWK 1736.600987
MXN 18.492904
MYR 4.083204
MZN 63.903729
NAD 16.462394
NGN 1331.210377
NIO 36.854512
NOK 9.427704
NPR 152.081128
NZD 1.767253
OMR 0.382413
PAB 1.001468
PEN 3.444825
PGK 4.547436
PHP 62.986038
PKR 277.237468
PLN 3.88825
PYG 5719.877241
QAR 3.660721
RON 4.730604
RSD 104.461148
RUB 84.13468
RWF 1478.183516
SAR 3.752837
SBD 8.064647
SCR 13.905529
SDG 601.503676
SEK 9.912404
SGD 1.282104
SHP 0.754745
SLE 24.680371
SLL 20969.504398
SOS 572.343548
SRD 37.794504
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.794245
SVC 8.763065
SYP 13001.999685
SZL 16.455989
THB 33.445038
TJS 9.228751
TMT 3.51
TND 2.98768
TOP 2.40776
TRY 49.513804
TTD 6.798915
TWD 32.453604
TZS 2646.44398
UAH 44.920874
UGX 4136.458658
UYU 40.314905
UZS 12073.121914
VES 878.910604
VND 25894.5
VUV 119.385856
WST 2.787824
XAF 583.738825
XAG 0.017551
XAU 0.000240063761
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.804919
XDR 0.707052
XOF 583.738825
XPF 106.089045
YER 236.150363
ZAR 16.494037
ZMK 9001.203584
ZMW 20.049815
ZWL 321.999592
SSP 5750.775019
MXV 2.088032
  • RIO

    -0.3300

    97.04

    -0.34%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    20.67

    -0.19%

  • RELX

    0.0000

    33.41

    0%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    67.95

    0%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    21.99

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -0.0300

    75.66

    -0.04%

  • GSK

    0.8600

    51.08

    +1.68%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    11.52

    -0.26%

  • NGG

    -0.1200

    76.68

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    20.54

    +0.44%

  • BTI

    -0.0800

    55.75

    -0.14%

  • AZN

    2.0200

    168.1

    +1.2%

  • BP

    -1.4200

    43.16

    -3.29%

  • RYCEF

    0.4600

    19.7

    +2.34%

  • VOD

    0.0700

    17.02

    +0.41%

Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia
Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

As a growing list of US multinational businesses -- from Apple to Levi's -- suspend activities in Russia, some companies choose to stay in the country despite the risks to their reputation.

Text size:

But they face mounting pressure: calls for repercussions are appearing on social media under hashtags such as #BoycottMcDonalds and #BoycottPepsi -- two companies that received letters from New York state's pension fund chief.

These companies "need to consider whether doing business in Russia is worth the risk during this extraordinarily volatile time," Thomas DiNapoli said in a statement.

DiNapoli has also sent letters to snack manufacturer Mondelez; cosmetics groups Estee Lauder and Coty; and brokerage firm Bunge.

A team from Yale University that keeps a list of companies with a significant presence in Russia said about 250 have announced withdrawal from the country since it invaded Ukraine.

The group said the withdrawals call to mind "the large-scale corporate boycott of Apartheid South Africa in the 1980s."

Many US companies still in Russia remain silent. Brands including McDonald's, Bunge, Mondelez, Estee Lauder, Kimberly-Clark and Coty did not respond to an AFP request for comment.

- Legitimate reasons -

Starbucks said that its 130 coffee shops in Russia are owned by a Kuwaiti conglomerate. The coffee giant has pledged to donate any profit from its business in Russia to humanitarian efforts in Ukraine.

Yum Brands said its approximately 1,000 KFC and 50 Pizza Hut restaurants in Russia are nearly all operated by independent owners under license or franchise agreements.

It announced Monday that it "has suspended all investment and restaurant development in Russia."

Some businesses may have legitimate reasons to stay, several experts in ethics and communications strategy told AFP.

Companies may be hesitant to leave because they make essential products such as pharmaceutical ingredients, said Tim Fort, a professor of business ethics at Indiana University.

"This is a time when (you've) got to pick your side, and it doesn't strike me as this being very difficult to pick," he said.

"Any one company leaving the country isn't going to tip the balance... but there's a cumulative effect," Fort added.

- 'What's going on?' -

A company as well-known as McDonald's can have influence in Russia at a time when the general population has almost no access to sources of information other than the official messaging on the invasion.

"Russians (will) be able to survive without the Big Mac, but (ask) why is McDonald's closed? What's going on? It's a more powerful signal in that sense," Fort said.

Richard Painter, a professor at the University of Minnesota, warned of "serious risks for American and Western Europeans who are currently in Russia.

"These companies should do everything they can to bring their people home," he said.

Painter said companies "should think about the message that needs to be emphasized: that Russia cannot do this to Ukraine... while at the same time participating in the international economy."

The economic sanctions imposed on Russia with broad consensus by Western governments "is really the best way to deal with Russia, as opposed to a military confrontation," the former White House ethics lawyer said.

Some companies may be betting the criticism will rain down in the short term but ultimately subside, said Brian Berkey, who specializes in corporate ethics at the University of Pennsylvania.

Other crisis situations, such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, led to calls for boycotts against certain companies -- but without much effect.

Support for such initiatives is not always unanimous, but "mostly people in the United States and in Europe are unified in thinking that what Russia is doing is clearly unacceptable," he said.

Mark Hass, a communications specialist at Arizona State University, said the economic interest of companies that have chosen to stay in Russia "outweighs the reputational one."

McDonald's, for instance, gets nine percent of its revenue and three percent of its operating profits from Russia.

But "if social media starts identifying you as a company that's willing to do business with an autocratic aggressor, who's slaughtering thousands of people in the Ukraine, you're in big trouble," Hass said.

"And it will hurt business more broadly than just in Russia."

F.Carrillo--TFWP