The Fort Worth Press - Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

USD -
AED 3.672497
AFN 65.500398
ALL 79.204108
AMD 364.314781
ANG 1.789783
AOA 917.000077
ARS 1499.493697
AUD 1.394982
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.69681
BAM 1.673712
BBD 2.017022
BDT 122.374929
BGN 1.696366
BHD 0.377578
BIF 2980.342151
BMD 1
BND 1.270785
BOB 11.56657
BRL 5.138698
BSD 1.001455
BTN 95.83952
BWP 13.418971
BYN 2.995905
BYR 19600
BZD 2.014112
CAD 1.380755
CDF 2275.000063
CHF 0.80036
CLF 0.023408
CLP 921.290155
CNY 6.72125
CNH 6.72368
COP 3045.98
CRC 455.712452
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.364974
CZK 20.650302
DJF 178.330431
DKK 6.400355
DOP 58.674768
DZD 132.951023
EGP 50.8008
ERN 15
ETB 161.967094
EUR 0.85622
FJD 2.191601
FKP 0.73304
GBP 0.732955
GEL 2.604981
GGP 0.73304
GHS 11.140397
GIP 0.73304
GMD 73.501461
GNF 8799.353014
GTQ 7.642309
GYD 209.509302
HKD 7.838315
HNL 26.856373
HRK 6.450957
HTG 131.016363
HUF 310.202501
IDR 17701.4
ILS 2.99245
IMP 0.73304
INR 95.70245
IQD 1311.910314
IRR 1374600.000135
ISK 121.23987
JEP 0.73304
JMD 158.93881
JOD 0.709008
JPY 158.883996
KES 129.370055
KGS 87.450257
KHR 4042.859099
KMF 421.999807
KPW 900.000294
KRW 1380.260021
KWD 0.30847
KYD 0.834556
KZT 461.080278
LAK 22557.4977
LBP 89684.251965
LKR 329.680486
LRD 181.763722
LSL 16.058776
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.364543
MAD 9.249063
MDL 17.240125
MGA 4282.431675
MKD 52.682054
MMK 2099.810874
MNT 3595.778501
MOP 8.086862
MRU 39.905862
MUR 46.670311
MVR 15.449602
MWK 1736.499786
MXN 16.935899
MYR 4.040976
MZN 63.879922
NAD 16.058776
NGN 1348.850024
NIO 36.851452
NOK 9.30541
NPR 153.346028
NZD 1.67312
OMR 0.384514
PAB 1.001421
PEN 3.357352
PGK 4.438188
PHP 61.728021
PKR 277.878648
PLN 3.69387
PYG 6032.494512
QAR 3.64058
RON 4.498702
RSD 100.436008
RUB 82.699324
RWF 1475.652546
SAR 3.760291
SBD 8.032258
SCR 13.881049
SDG 601.497078
SEK 9.470505
SGD 1.26943
SHP 0.740866
SLE 24.599369
SLL 20969.499227
SOS 572.357724
SRD 37.769737
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.967141
SVC 8.762329
SYP 13001.999906
SZL 16.047925
THB 32.657967
TJS 9.238465
TMT 3.5
TND 2.912721
TOP 2.40776
TRY 48.080699
TTD 6.792498
TWD 31.824003
TZS 2645.012977
UAH 44.748823
UGX 3725.161312
UYU 40.282413
UZS 11872.384582
VES 778.98225
VND 26144
VUV 117.750183
WST 2.715908
XAF 561.366709
XAG 0.014455
XAU 0.000215
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.804839
XDR 0.707052
XOF 561.364307
XPF 102.0616
YER 237.075006
ZAR 16.005905
ZMK 9001.198647
ZMW 19.002914
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.1780

    21.102

    -0.84%

  • CMSD

    -0.1400

    20.98

    -0.67%

  • BCE

    -0.0700

    23.71

    -0.3%

  • RIO

    3.1300

    105.3

    +2.97%

  • BP

    -0.3800

    44.76

    -0.85%

  • BTI

    -0.4900

    56.21

    -0.87%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    68.56

    0%

  • NGG

    -0.8600

    79.76

    -1.08%

  • GSK

    0.4500

    52.41

    +0.86%

  • RELX

    0.5300

    35.91

    +1.48%

  • VOD

    -0.0500

    15.96

    -0.31%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    12.38

    -0.24%

  • AZN

    1.4900

    165.98

    +0.9%

  • BCC

    0.7000

    82.47

    +0.85%

  • RYCEF

    -0.2500

    20.25

    -1.23%

Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia
Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

As a growing list of US multinational businesses -- from Apple to Levi's -- suspend activities in Russia, some companies choose to stay in the country despite the risks to their reputation.

Text size:

But they face mounting pressure: calls for repercussions are appearing on social media under hashtags such as #BoycottMcDonalds and #BoycottPepsi -- two companies that received letters from New York state's pension fund chief.

These companies "need to consider whether doing business in Russia is worth the risk during this extraordinarily volatile time," Thomas DiNapoli said in a statement.

DiNapoli has also sent letters to snack manufacturer Mondelez; cosmetics groups Estee Lauder and Coty; and brokerage firm Bunge.

A team from Yale University that keeps a list of companies with a significant presence in Russia said about 250 have announced withdrawal from the country since it invaded Ukraine.

The group said the withdrawals call to mind "the large-scale corporate boycott of Apartheid South Africa in the 1980s."

Many US companies still in Russia remain silent. Brands including McDonald's, Bunge, Mondelez, Estee Lauder, Kimberly-Clark and Coty did not respond to an AFP request for comment.

- Legitimate reasons -

Starbucks said that its 130 coffee shops in Russia are owned by a Kuwaiti conglomerate. The coffee giant has pledged to donate any profit from its business in Russia to humanitarian efforts in Ukraine.

Yum Brands said its approximately 1,000 KFC and 50 Pizza Hut restaurants in Russia are nearly all operated by independent owners under license or franchise agreements.

It announced Monday that it "has suspended all investment and restaurant development in Russia."

Some businesses may have legitimate reasons to stay, several experts in ethics and communications strategy told AFP.

Companies may be hesitant to leave because they make essential products such as pharmaceutical ingredients, said Tim Fort, a professor of business ethics at Indiana University.

"This is a time when (you've) got to pick your side, and it doesn't strike me as this being very difficult to pick," he said.

"Any one company leaving the country isn't going to tip the balance... but there's a cumulative effect," Fort added.

- 'What's going on?' -

A company as well-known as McDonald's can have influence in Russia at a time when the general population has almost no access to sources of information other than the official messaging on the invasion.

"Russians (will) be able to survive without the Big Mac, but (ask) why is McDonald's closed? What's going on? It's a more powerful signal in that sense," Fort said.

Richard Painter, a professor at the University of Minnesota, warned of "serious risks for American and Western Europeans who are currently in Russia.

"These companies should do everything they can to bring their people home," he said.

Painter said companies "should think about the message that needs to be emphasized: that Russia cannot do this to Ukraine... while at the same time participating in the international economy."

The economic sanctions imposed on Russia with broad consensus by Western governments "is really the best way to deal with Russia, as opposed to a military confrontation," the former White House ethics lawyer said.

Some companies may be betting the criticism will rain down in the short term but ultimately subside, said Brian Berkey, who specializes in corporate ethics at the University of Pennsylvania.

Other crisis situations, such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, led to calls for boycotts against certain companies -- but without much effect.

Support for such initiatives is not always unanimous, but "mostly people in the United States and in Europe are unified in thinking that what Russia is doing is clearly unacceptable," he said.

Mark Hass, a communications specialist at Arizona State University, said the economic interest of companies that have chosen to stay in Russia "outweighs the reputational one."

McDonald's, for instance, gets nine percent of its revenue and three percent of its operating profits from Russia.

But "if social media starts identifying you as a company that's willing to do business with an autocratic aggressor, who's slaughtering thousands of people in the Ukraine, you're in big trouble," Hass said.

"And it will hurt business more broadly than just in Russia."

F.Carrillo--TFWP