The Fort Worth Press - Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

USD -
AED 3.67295
AFN 65.000248
ALL 79.791817
AMD 364.959664
ANG 1.789783
AOA 917.000068
ARS 1497.225698
AUD 1.40485
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.729093
BAM 1.685279
BBD 2.014312
BDT 122.212456
BGN 1.696366
BHD 0.376977
BIF 2986
BMD 1
BND 1.276583
BOB 11.555778
BRL 5.170898
BSD 1.000134
BTN 95.716237
BWP 13.507738
BYN 3.041998
BYR 19600
BZD 2.011383
CAD 1.38143
CDF 2272.999794
CHF 0.79884
CLF 0.023426
CLP 921.970394
CNY 6.72975
CNH 6.730415
COP 3052.99
CRC 447.54835
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.874988
CZK 20.7109
DJF 177.719871
DKK 6.406602
DOP 58.950322
DZD 132.612992
EGP 50.6512
ERN 15
ETB 160.874986
EUR 0.857019
FJD 2.199798
FKP 0.738395
GBP 0.73525
GEL 2.605045
GGP 0.738395
GHS 11.104974
GIP 0.738395
GMD 73.487145
GNF 8774.999944
GTQ 7.631759
GYD 209.237901
HKD 7.84022
HNL 26.815849
HRK 6.459802
HTG 130.81205
HUF 311.742989
IDR 17800.85
ILS 2.97705
IMP 0.738395
INR 95.573102
IQD 1310.188536
IRR 1374600.000212
ISK 121.860424
JEP 0.738395
JMD 158.032606
JOD 0.708989
JPY 158.403978
KES 129.502706
KGS 87.450202
KHR 4045.000269
KMF 422.000135
KPW 900.000294
KRW 1388.369722
KWD 0.30832
KYD 0.83342
KZT 461.963991
LAK 22526.000395
LBP 89550.000133
LKR 330.989556
LRD 181.149992
LSL 16.249004
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.365168
MAD 9.273223
MDL 17.247441
MGA 4310.043988
MKD 52.747545
MMK 2099.245957
MNT 3597.150887
MOP 8.077223
MRU 40.013098
MUR 46.979956
MVR 15.459454
MWK 1734.185232
MXN 16.95738
MYR 4.058802
MZN 63.904989
NAD 16.249004
NGN 1351.079716
NIO 36.801675
NOK 9.333815
NPR 153.14945
NZD 1.68601
OMR 0.384497
PAB 1.000134
PEN 3.367814
PGK 4.429853
PHP 61.755001
PKR 277.559111
PLN 3.70024
PYG 6016.268569
QAR 3.64621
RON 4.495497
RSD 100.528043
RUB 83.974973
RWF 1473.649743
SAR 3.756199
SBD 8.025811
SCR 14.004541
SDG 601.501286
SEK 9.442865
SGD 1.271669
SHP 0.740866
SLE 24.650083
SLL 20969.499227
SOS 571.546744
SRD 37.741968
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.110771
SVC 8.751136
SYP 13001.999906
SZL 16.253711
THB 32.873496
TJS 9.225924
TMT 3.5
TND 2.923
TOP 2.40776
TRY 47.933798
TTD 6.783882
TWD 31.868901
TZS 2647.725983
UAH 44.716187
UGX 3730.144027
UYU 40.085479
UZS 11801.606177
VES 771.57685
VND 26180.5
VUV 118.215486
WST 2.715898
XAF 565.226795
XAG 0.015189
XAU 0.000223
XCD 2.702551
XCG 1.802445
XDR 0.707052
XOF 565.219489
XPF 102.764278
YER 237.100892
ZAR 16.115195
ZMK 9001.202909
ZMW 18.726547
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSD

    0.0600

    21.15

    +0.28%

  • NGG

    -1.4900

    80.66

    -1.85%

  • RBGPF

    1.2400

    69.89

    +1.77%

  • GSK

    1.7300

    52.88

    +3.27%

  • RIO

    3.7500

    100.44

    +3.73%

  • AZN

    4.8500

    164.95

    +2.94%

  • RYCEF

    -0.6500

    20.6

    -3.16%

  • BCE

    0.3400

    23.7

    +1.43%

  • BCC

    2.9500

    83.13

    +3.55%

  • JRI

    -0.0600

    12.38

    -0.48%

  • VOD

    0.0400

    16.17

    +0.25%

  • CMSC

    0.0580

    21.298

    +0.27%

  • BP

    0.3200

    43.73

    +0.73%

  • BTI

    -0.4000

    55.98

    -0.71%

  • RELX

    0.5900

    35.1

    +1.68%

Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia
Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

As a growing list of US multinational businesses -- from Apple to Levi's -- suspend activities in Russia, some companies choose to stay in the country despite the risks to their reputation.

Text size:

But they face mounting pressure: calls for repercussions are appearing on social media under hashtags such as #BoycottMcDonalds and #BoycottPepsi -- two companies that received letters from New York state's pension fund chief.

These companies "need to consider whether doing business in Russia is worth the risk during this extraordinarily volatile time," Thomas DiNapoli said in a statement.

DiNapoli has also sent letters to snack manufacturer Mondelez; cosmetics groups Estee Lauder and Coty; and brokerage firm Bunge.

A team from Yale University that keeps a list of companies with a significant presence in Russia said about 250 have announced withdrawal from the country since it invaded Ukraine.

The group said the withdrawals call to mind "the large-scale corporate boycott of Apartheid South Africa in the 1980s."

Many US companies still in Russia remain silent. Brands including McDonald's, Bunge, Mondelez, Estee Lauder, Kimberly-Clark and Coty did not respond to an AFP request for comment.

- Legitimate reasons -

Starbucks said that its 130 coffee shops in Russia are owned by a Kuwaiti conglomerate. The coffee giant has pledged to donate any profit from its business in Russia to humanitarian efforts in Ukraine.

Yum Brands said its approximately 1,000 KFC and 50 Pizza Hut restaurants in Russia are nearly all operated by independent owners under license or franchise agreements.

It announced Monday that it "has suspended all investment and restaurant development in Russia."

Some businesses may have legitimate reasons to stay, several experts in ethics and communications strategy told AFP.

Companies may be hesitant to leave because they make essential products such as pharmaceutical ingredients, said Tim Fort, a professor of business ethics at Indiana University.

"This is a time when (you've) got to pick your side, and it doesn't strike me as this being very difficult to pick," he said.

"Any one company leaving the country isn't going to tip the balance... but there's a cumulative effect," Fort added.

- 'What's going on?' -

A company as well-known as McDonald's can have influence in Russia at a time when the general population has almost no access to sources of information other than the official messaging on the invasion.

"Russians (will) be able to survive without the Big Mac, but (ask) why is McDonald's closed? What's going on? It's a more powerful signal in that sense," Fort said.

Richard Painter, a professor at the University of Minnesota, warned of "serious risks for American and Western Europeans who are currently in Russia.

"These companies should do everything they can to bring their people home," he said.

Painter said companies "should think about the message that needs to be emphasized: that Russia cannot do this to Ukraine... while at the same time participating in the international economy."

The economic sanctions imposed on Russia with broad consensus by Western governments "is really the best way to deal with Russia, as opposed to a military confrontation," the former White House ethics lawyer said.

Some companies may be betting the criticism will rain down in the short term but ultimately subside, said Brian Berkey, who specializes in corporate ethics at the University of Pennsylvania.

Other crisis situations, such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, led to calls for boycotts against certain companies -- but without much effect.

Support for such initiatives is not always unanimous, but "mostly people in the United States and in Europe are unified in thinking that what Russia is doing is clearly unacceptable," he said.

Mark Hass, a communications specialist at Arizona State University, said the economic interest of companies that have chosen to stay in Russia "outweighs the reputational one."

McDonald's, for instance, gets nine percent of its revenue and three percent of its operating profits from Russia.

But "if social media starts identifying you as a company that's willing to do business with an autocratic aggressor, who's slaughtering thousands of people in the Ukraine, you're in big trouble," Hass said.

"And it will hurt business more broadly than just in Russia."

F.Carrillo--TFWP