The Fort Worth Press - Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 65.000139
ALL 83.124979
AMD 376.61999
ANG 1.790083
AOA 916.999774
ARS 1393.2501
AUD 1.439957
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70203
BAM 1.695072
BBD 2.009612
BDT 122.428639
BGN 1.709309
BHD 0.377572
BIF 2971
BMD 1
BND 1.2851
BOB 6.894519
BRL 5.144303
BSD 0.997742
BTN 92.939509
BWP 13.688562
BYN 2.956504
BYR 19600
BZD 2.006665
CAD 1.391202
CDF 2299.999821
CHF 0.79798
CLF 0.023208
CLP 916.398115
CNY 6.882601
CNH 6.85723
COP 3683.02
CRC 464.279833
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.87498
CZK 21.181701
DJF 177.719763
DKK 6.45812
DOP 60.624998
DZD 132.882317
EGP 54.447796
ERN 15
ETB 156.703383
EUR 0.86425
FJD 2.237704
FKP 0.755657
GBP 0.753045
GEL 2.680292
GGP 0.755657
GHS 11.010137
GIP 0.755657
GMD 73.498004
GNF 8777.502436
GTQ 7.632939
GYD 208.828972
HKD 7.835605
HNL 26.610296
HRK 6.511499
HTG 130.952897
HUF 329.605497
IDR 17072
ILS 3.135299
IMP 0.755657
INR 92.893495
IQD 1310
IRR 1315799.999992
ISK 124.790139
JEP 0.755657
JMD 157.303566
JOD 0.709015
JPY 159.521498
KES 130.098106
KGS 87.450464
KHR 4012.501538
KMF 427.00011
KPW 900.002378
KRW 1496.690239
KWD 0.309699
KYD 0.831502
KZT 472.805432
LAK 21960.000243
LBP 89540.13367
LKR 314.804623
LRD 184.250143
LSL 16.865021
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.374976
MAD 9.377501
MDL 17.55613
MGA 4161.000065
MKD 53.318166
MMK 2100.11256
MNT 3573.311532
MOP 8.055104
MRU 40.119955
MUR 47.019441
MVR 15.449741
MWK 1736.498711
MXN 17.710035
MYR 4.029047
MZN 63.959664
NAD 16.870206
NGN 1380.130003
NIO 36.729888
NOK 9.67525
NPR 148.701282
NZD 1.74796
OMR 0.384503
PAB 0.997734
PEN 3.42625
PGK 4.30703
PHP 60.105497
PKR 279.05014
PLN 3.687835
PYG 6454.29687
QAR 3.645103
RON 4.404017
RSD 101.420986
RUB 78.549304
RWF 1461
SAR 3.754862
SBD 8.04524
SCR 13.741322
SDG 600.999726
SEK 9.45972
SGD 1.282865
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.629093
SLL 20969.510825
SOS 571.496418
SRD 37.350965
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.55
SVC 8.730169
SYP 110.704564
SZL 16.860389
THB 32.520473
TJS 9.563492
TMT 3.5
TND 2.919027
TOP 2.40776
TRY 44.608801
TTD 6.768937
TWD 31.9215
TZS 2599.999799
UAH 43.698134
UGX 3743.234401
UYU 40.405091
UZS 12174.999751
VES 473.467201
VND 26337.5
VUV 119.244946
WST 2.76629
XAF 568.506489
XAG 0.013705
XAU 0.000213
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.798209
XDR 0.706253
XOF 568.503383
XPF 103.649687
YER 238.598615
ZAR 16.79457
ZMK 9001.189175
ZMW 19.281421
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • RYCEF

    -0.2400

    15.75

    -1.52%

  • BCC

    0.5500

    73.75

    +0.75%

  • BTI

    0.4300

    58.71

    +0.73%

  • RELX

    0.0200

    33.61

    +0.06%

  • RIO

    -0.4400

    94.01

    -0.47%

  • GSK

    -0.3200

    56.37

    -0.57%

  • BCE

    -0.1900

    24.26

    -0.78%

  • CMSC

    0.1400

    22.18

    +0.63%

  • NGG

    -0.9300

    87.06

    -1.07%

  • JRI

    0.1200

    12.73

    +0.94%

  • BP

    0.3600

    47.48

    +0.76%

  • VOD

    -0.0700

    15.14

    -0.46%

  • CMSD

    0.0900

    22.35

    +0.4%

  • AZN

    -0.6600

    202.83

    -0.33%

Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers
Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers / Photo: © AFP

Digital voting breeds distrust among overseas Filipino workers

A new online voting system aimed at boosting turnout among the Philippines' millions of overseas workers ahead of Monday's mid-term elections has been marked by confusion and fears of disenfranchisement.

Text size:

Thousands of overseas Filipino workers, or OFWs, have already cast their ballots in the race dominated by a bitter feud between President Ferdinand Marcos and his impeached vice president Sara Duterte.

While official turnout figures are not yet publicly available, data from the Commission on Elections (Comelec) show at least 134,000 of the 1.22 million registered overseas voters have signed up for the new online system, which opened April 13.

But Jun Burlasa III, a Filipino working in Singapore, says he will not vote again if he has to do it online.

"I'd rather do manual," the 50-year-old told AFP this week, describing the new system as "confusing and suspicious".

At issue is a digital QR code generated after voting that leads users to a page asking them to verify their ballot has been submitted correctly. Below that is a box containing a jumble of computer code and candidate names.

Burlasa said many of the names visible were candidates for whom he had not voted.

Similar stories about the anxiety-inducing webpage have proliferated across social media, including Facebook posts that have reached thousands.

Eman Villanueva, a Hong Kong-based activist with migrant rights group BAYAN, said he was unsure his vote had been properly counted.

"There is absolutely no way for the voters to know if the votes that went through really reflected our choices," he said.

In previous overseas elections, voters could review the names they selected after the fact, but Comelec told AFP the QR code was never supposed to serve that purpose.

The landing page was only intended to verify a ballot's receipt, the commission said, adding that the name of every candidate running in the election should appear.

"We are definitely considering the feedback and studying how to incorporate them in future elections," Ian Geonanga, Comelec's director of overseas voting, told AFP.

Election watchdogs, however, say the commission failed to properly explain the new system and warn of the confusion risks disenfranchising voters.

"It's a natural reaction of people that if you're not familiar with the system, then you won't trust it the first instance," said Ona Caritos, executive director of the nonprofit Legal Network for Truthful Elections (Lente).

- ChatGPT, disinfo and 2028 -

Since April 14, 1.5 million people have watched a video in which a Philippines-based engineer named Jaydee San Juan quizzes ChatGPT about the names visible on the ballot verification page.

"It's highly likely showing the candidates that were selected/voted for using that ballot ID," the AI chatbot replied.

Comelec, however, got the opposite answer when conducting the ChatGPT experiment itself, Geonanga told AFP.

The election commission's efforts to quell fears about the new system, meanwhile, have been misrepresented to sow more disinformation.

AFP fact-checkers recently debunked a video edited to make it appear Geonanga was saying online ballots were "designed" to rig the election's results.

The fiasco has also left election watchdogs and migrant groups sceptical that the switch to online voting will boost turnout as intended.

Danilo Arao, convenor of voting watchdog Kontra Daya, said even a small change to the ballot's design might have helped assuage fears he believes could lead to "widespread disenfranchisement".

Lente's Caritos said losing trust in the online voting system could impact OFWs' participation in the 2028 presidential election.

“We don't want that, because if election results are not trusted by our voters, then it would go into the legitimacy of the government," she said. "It's a domino effect."

M.Cunningham--TFWP