The Fort Worth Press - Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China

USD -
AED 3.672505
AFN 63.99972
ALL 82.095267
AMD 365.662073
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.000074
ARS 1487.499198
AUD 1.442554
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.697882
BAM 1.71174
BBD 2.011071
BDT 123.063593
BGN 1.69088
BHD 0.376513
BIF 2979.073492
BMD 1
BND 1.291737
BOB 6.923833
BRL 5.164101
BSD 0.998622
BTN 95.363126
BWP 13.559841
BYN 2.869333
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008183
CAD 1.416325
CDF 2262.000161
CHF 0.80741
CLF 0.023761
CLP 935.160086
CNY 6.80325
CNH 6.80222
COP 3344.94
CRC 454.231177
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 96.504855
CZK 21.238303
DJF 177.808897
DKK 6.54255
DOP 58.804996
DZD 133.189803
EGP 49.6186
ERN 15
ETB 161.159193
EUR 0.875195
FJD 2.238199
FKP 0.747893
GBP 0.74655
GEL 2.639737
GGP 0.747893
GHS 11.397889
GIP 0.747893
GMD 73.50116
GNF 8757.373663
GTQ 7.618689
GYD 208.869401
HKD 7.838835
HNL 26.726647
HRK 6.593699
HTG 130.679083
HUF 315.367986
IDR 18083
ILS 3.04275
IMP 0.747893
INR 95.59365
IQD 1307.897615
IRR 1374750.000004
ISK 125.339896
JEP 0.747893
JMD 158.171817
JOD 0.709026
JPY 162.459362
KES 129.25976
KGS 87.449958
KHR 4021.635436
KMF 430.999959
KPW 900.00035
KRW 1506.588949
KWD 0.30993
KYD 0.832068
KZT 468.476905
LAK 22494.125061
LBP 89416.532101
LKR 334.62136
LRD 181.230198
LSL 16.37001
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.406582
MAD 9.347704
MDL 17.56399
MGA 4237.629308
MKD 53.952458
MMK 2099.538185
MNT 3585.774335
MOP 8.062438
MRU 39.836858
MUR 47.180555
MVR 15.44994
MWK 1731.37176
MXN 17.56485
MYR 4.082403
MZN 63.899549
NAD 16.369866
NGN 1375.08986
NIO 36.741249
NOK 9.75595
NPR 152.579665
NZD 1.74778
OMR 0.384505
PAB 0.99853
PEN 3.401702
PGK 4.390045
PHP 61.580991
PKR 277.55841
PLN 3.772099
PYG 6068.748222
QAR 3.630364
RON 4.580983
RSD 102.698988
RUB 76.796296
RWF 1468.204652
SAR 3.755473
SBD 8.078071
SCR 13.234606
SDG 600.56157
SEK 9.687815
SGD 1.293295
SHP 0.746601
SLE 24.325022
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 570.650866
SRD 37.6055
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.442606
SVC 8.737282
SYP 110.532098
SZL 16.377918
THB 33.506497
TJS 9.246092
TMT 3.5
TND 2.952165
TOP 2.40776
TRY 46.877197
TTD 6.782049
TWD 32.107401
TZS 2628.498013
UAH 44.426056
UGX 3689.019587
UYU 40.20725
UZS 11994.783735
VES 685.08515
VND 26303
VUV 119.800928
WST 2.768482
XAF 574.081497
XAG 0.017324
XAU 0.000246
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.799256
XDR 0.713973
XOF 574.104107
XPF 104.377812
YER 237.075008
ZAR 16.39735
ZMK 9001.197529
ZMW 18.147605
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSD

    0.1600

    22.35

    +0.72%

  • CMSC

    0.0300

    22.01

    +0.14%

  • RBGPF

    -0.4600

    67.86

    -0.68%

  • BTI

    -0.4100

    61.39

    -0.67%

  • NGG

    0.4200

    83.53

    +0.5%

  • BP

    0.6000

    39.21

    +1.53%

  • BCE

    0.0500

    21.45

    +0.23%

  • GSK

    -0.8000

    52.52

    -1.52%

  • RIO

    -2.4500

    88.8

    -2.76%

  • RELX

    -0.7600

    32.05

    -2.37%

  • RYCEF

    -0.6600

    18.62

    -3.54%

  • BCC

    -2.1100

    71.29

    -2.96%

  • AZN

    -3.8400

    189.28

    -2.03%

  • VOD

    0.0400

    13.09

    +0.31%

  • JRI

    -0.1000

    13

    -0.77%

Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China
Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China / Photo: © GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP

Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China

Chomping peacefully on a fruitsicle cake in her grassy Washington zoo enclosure Mei Xiang is blissfully unaware that she and a handful of other cute pandas are at the center of a ferocious misinformation campaign driving anti-US sentiment in China.

Text size:

Evidence-free claims that pandas have been abused at US zoos have ricocheted across Chinese social media in recent months, fanning anti-American perceptions amid already fraught ties between Washington and Beijing.

The falsehoods, which researchers say were amplified by clout-chasing influencers, have cast a shadow on Beijing's "panda diplomacy," the decades-old practice of gifting or loaning the bears to other countries as a token of friendship.

In multiple posts on Chinese platforms including Weibo and Douyin, a video fuelled the narrative that Mei Xiang was abused by the Smithsonian's National Zoo in Washington DC and made to undergo a painful artificial insemination procedure dozens of times.

The posts triggered impassioned pleas for the panda to be rescued and returned to China, with the hashtag "Save Mei Xiang" viewed on Weibo hundreds of millions of times.

But according to AFP factcheckers, the video actually shows a different male panda in Singapore undergoing a health check-up in 2015, a story widely reported by local media at the time.

In other posts on the same platforms, an image purported to show Mei Xiang's mate, Tian Tian, sedated and restrained during an examination.

But the photo actually depicts a panda in China's Fujian province undergoing an examination in 2005, according to the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab).

- 'Rooted in nationalism' -

"Amid increased competition between the US and China, the deterioration of US-China relations is now echoed in Chinese narratives" alleging the mistreatment of pandas, the DFRLab said in a report last month.

"The narratives are deeply rooted in Chinese nationalism and mistrust of the West and have been amplified across Chinese media and social media."

Last week, AFP journalists in Washington saw Mei Xiang and Tian Tian, seemingly healthy and devouring frozen treats in their enclosures as the zoo hosted a nine-day "Panda Palooza" celebration with panda-themed refreshments, film screenings and music concerts.

The zoo, which declined to comment on the online misinformation, held the party to bid farewell to the bears and their three-year-old cub Xiao Qi Ji, who will be returning to China in December as its contract with the Chinese government expires.

Another panda named Ya Ya was returned to China by the Memphis zoo in April after its loan agreement ended. This followed uproar from Chinese activists and social media users who accused the zoo of abusing her.

Many also blamed the zoo for the death of Ya Ya's mate, Le Le, with accusations swirling online -- despite no evidence -- that zookeepers had stabbed the bear and sold his eyeball.

The zoo vigorously rejected what it said was "misinformation." The Chinese Association of Zoological Gardens also backed the zookeepers, saying in a joint statement that the bears at the Memphis zoo had received "excellent care."

But that did little to quell the nationalist outrage.

- 'Fan those flames' -

China's state-linked Global Times, the mouthpiece of the ruling Communist Party, linked the controversy over Ya Ya to US-China geopolitical tensions.

"If this had not happened during a period when Washington is intensifying its containment and suppression of China, this matter would not have caused such a stir," it said in an editorial in March.

Amid tense relations between the two biggest economies over issues such as Taiwan, US observers say the Chinese government appears keen to condone and encourage anti-American sentiment.

"Misinformation around panda treatment is an example of a convenient way to fan those flames," Isaac Stone Fish, chief executive of China-focused data company Strategy Risks, told AFP.

The misinformation not only bred mistrust about the United States in China but also sparked fervent calls to suspend the panda exchange, potentially closing what DFRLab called one of the few avenues of cooperation between the two countries.

Aside from Washington and Memphis, the zoos in San Diego and Atlanta have either returned or are set to return their pandas to China by next year. Without China's extension of the loan agreement, US zoos face the prospect of having no pandas for the first time in 50 years.

"This (misinformation) campaign is particularly sad given the ways in which 'panda diplomacy' previously played such a crucial role in helping to foster positive relations between China and the West," Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University, told AFP.

It is, he added, "an unfortunate sign of the current state of relations between powers."

burs-ac/sms

N.Patterson--TFWP