The Fort Worth Press - Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China

USD -
AED 3.672501
AFN 64.502086
ALL 81.624824
AMD 375.516815
AOA 917.000347
ARS 1387.440076
AUD 1.429195
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.699758
BAM 1.667278
BBD 2.011082
BDT 122.671668
BHD 0.376625
BIF 2967.989429
BMD 1
BND 1.272324
BOB 6.899962
BRL 5.009196
BSD 0.998508
BTN 92.62947
BWP 13.405226
BYN 2.865862
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008184
CAD 1.386455
CDF 2300.000105
CHF 0.79086
CLF 0.022686
CLP 892.843442
CNY 6.827968
CNH 6.837605
COP 3636.503133
CRC 462.128639
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 93.998551
CZK 20.890598
DJF 177.809983
DKK 6.404505
DOP 60.125314
DZD 132.246707
EGP 53.398304
ERN 15
ETB 156.679852
EUR 0.857125
FJD 2.211498
FKP 0.742933
GBP 0.74665
GEL 2.689655
GGP 0.742933
GHS 10.988449
GIP 0.742933
GMD 73.498147
GNF 8760.922382
GTQ 7.638208
GYD 208.899876
HKD 7.831105
HNL 26.518904
HRK 6.425898
HTG 130.923661
HUF 315.230987
IDR 17089.3
ILS 3.03421
IMP 0.742933
INR 93.0905
IQD 1308.043135
IRR 1316124.999757
ISK 122.190558
JEP 0.742933
JMD 157.870509
JOD 0.709044
JPY 159.652494
KES 129.210179
KGS 87.449811
KHR 3997.272069
KMF 419.999783
KPW 899.998178
KRW 1484.910271
KWD 0.30869
KYD 0.832104
KZT 471.85542
LAK 22019.52176
LBP 89419.71783
LKR 315.118708
LRD 183.726184
LSL 16.382337
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.347556
MAD 9.280849
MDL 17.20387
MGA 4143.898385
MKD 52.551042
MMK 2100.763326
MNT 3574.006152
MOP 8.05507
MRU 39.91049
MUR 46.520182
MVR 15.459583
MWK 1731.383999
MXN 17.41562
MYR 3.965038
MZN 63.959681
NAD 16.382337
NGN 1359.498022
NIO 36.741827
NOK 9.55276
NPR 148.206811
NZD 1.72387
OMR 0.38463
PAB 0.998508
PEN 3.369933
PGK 4.322066
PHP 59.876504
PKR 278.505946
PLN 3.650695
PYG 6457.525255
QAR 3.640254
RON 4.342299
RSD 100.055411
RUB 77.459115
RWF 1458.164614
SAR 3.748263
SBD 8.058149
SCR 15.185201
SDG 601.000159
SEK 9.33234
SGD 1.276095
SLE 24.625012
SOS 570.649162
SRD 37.449029
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.885725
SVC 8.737053
SYP 110.530532
SZL 16.386343
THB 32.207997
TJS 9.490729
TMT 3.505
TND 2.917693
TRY 44.689971
TTD 6.776352
TWD 31.7418
TZS 2591.108648
UAH 43.382209
UGX 3694.642172
UYU 40.288138
UZS 12141.852436
VES 475.837797
VND 26336
VUV 117.921501
WST 2.734489
XAF 559.189293
XAG 0.01312
XAU 0.00021
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.799582
XDR 0.695452
XOF 559.189293
XPF 101.666596
YER 237.149651
ZAR 16.57375
ZMK 9001.201579
ZMW 18.996633
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -13.5000

    69

    -19.57%

  • CMSD

    0.0400

    22.63

    +0.18%

  • BCC

    -0.4100

    80.17

    -0.51%

  • GSK

    -0.1500

    58.21

    -0.26%

  • JRI

    0.0400

    13.02

    +0.31%

  • AZN

    -0.9600

    204.03

    -0.47%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    22.43

    +0.18%

  • BCE

    -0.5400

    23.35

    -2.31%

  • RELX

    -0.0400

    33.3

    -0.12%

  • NGG

    -0.0300

    90.29

    -0.03%

  • RIO

    1.1300

    98.26

    +1.15%

  • RYCEF

    -0.2700

    16.96

    -1.59%

  • BTI

    -0.0400

    58.81

    -0.07%

  • VOD

    -0.1600

    15.69

    -1.02%

  • BP

    0.5400

    46.44

    +1.16%

Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China
Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China / Photo: © GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP

Not so black and white? Panda fibs fuel anti-US vibe in China

Chomping peacefully on a fruitsicle cake in her grassy Washington zoo enclosure Mei Xiang is blissfully unaware that she and a handful of other cute pandas are at the center of a ferocious misinformation campaign driving anti-US sentiment in China.

Text size:

Evidence-free claims that pandas have been abused at US zoos have ricocheted across Chinese social media in recent months, fanning anti-American perceptions amid already fraught ties between Washington and Beijing.

The falsehoods, which researchers say were amplified by clout-chasing influencers, have cast a shadow on Beijing's "panda diplomacy," the decades-old practice of gifting or loaning the bears to other countries as a token of friendship.

In multiple posts on Chinese platforms including Weibo and Douyin, a video fuelled the narrative that Mei Xiang was abused by the Smithsonian's National Zoo in Washington DC and made to undergo a painful artificial insemination procedure dozens of times.

The posts triggered impassioned pleas for the panda to be rescued and returned to China, with the hashtag "Save Mei Xiang" viewed on Weibo hundreds of millions of times.

But according to AFP factcheckers, the video actually shows a different male panda in Singapore undergoing a health check-up in 2015, a story widely reported by local media at the time.

In other posts on the same platforms, an image purported to show Mei Xiang's mate, Tian Tian, sedated and restrained during an examination.

But the photo actually depicts a panda in China's Fujian province undergoing an examination in 2005, according to the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab (DFRLab).

- 'Rooted in nationalism' -

"Amid increased competition between the US and China, the deterioration of US-China relations is now echoed in Chinese narratives" alleging the mistreatment of pandas, the DFRLab said in a report last month.

"The narratives are deeply rooted in Chinese nationalism and mistrust of the West and have been amplified across Chinese media and social media."

Last week, AFP journalists in Washington saw Mei Xiang and Tian Tian, seemingly healthy and devouring frozen treats in their enclosures as the zoo hosted a nine-day "Panda Palooza" celebration with panda-themed refreshments, film screenings and music concerts.

The zoo, which declined to comment on the online misinformation, held the party to bid farewell to the bears and their three-year-old cub Xiao Qi Ji, who will be returning to China in December as its contract with the Chinese government expires.

Another panda named Ya Ya was returned to China by the Memphis zoo in April after its loan agreement ended. This followed uproar from Chinese activists and social media users who accused the zoo of abusing her.

Many also blamed the zoo for the death of Ya Ya's mate, Le Le, with accusations swirling online -- despite no evidence -- that zookeepers had stabbed the bear and sold his eyeball.

The zoo vigorously rejected what it said was "misinformation." The Chinese Association of Zoological Gardens also backed the zookeepers, saying in a joint statement that the bears at the Memphis zoo had received "excellent care."

But that did little to quell the nationalist outrage.

- 'Fan those flames' -

China's state-linked Global Times, the mouthpiece of the ruling Communist Party, linked the controversy over Ya Ya to US-China geopolitical tensions.

"If this had not happened during a period when Washington is intensifying its containment and suppression of China, this matter would not have caused such a stir," it said in an editorial in March.

Amid tense relations between the two biggest economies over issues such as Taiwan, US observers say the Chinese government appears keen to condone and encourage anti-American sentiment.

"Misinformation around panda treatment is an example of a convenient way to fan those flames," Isaac Stone Fish, chief executive of China-focused data company Strategy Risks, told AFP.

The misinformation not only bred mistrust about the United States in China but also sparked fervent calls to suspend the panda exchange, potentially closing what DFRLab called one of the few avenues of cooperation between the two countries.

Aside from Washington and Memphis, the zoos in San Diego and Atlanta have either returned or are set to return their pandas to China by next year. Without China's extension of the loan agreement, US zoos face the prospect of having no pandas for the first time in 50 years.

"This (misinformation) campaign is particularly sad given the ways in which 'panda diplomacy' previously played such a crucial role in helping to foster positive relations between China and the West," Darren Linvill, a professor at Clemson University, told AFP.

It is, he added, "an unfortunate sign of the current state of relations between powers."

burs-ac/sms

N.Patterson--TFWP