The Fort Worth Press - Internet providers not liable for music piracy by users: top US court

USD -
AED 3.672499
AFN 66.498782
ALL 80.629676
AMD 365.091035
AOA 917.000408
ARS 1492.336499
AUD 1.414877
AWG 1.80125
AZN 1.701052
BAM 1.691649
BBD 2.00813
BDT 123.418242
BHD 0.375989
BIF 2985.079791
BMD 1
BND 1.277602
BOB 11.849673
BRL 5.083698
BSD 0.997016
BTN 94.875232
BWP 13.457596
BYN 2.968819
BYR 19600
BZD 2.00519
CAD 1.39518
CDF 2262.499098
CHF 0.808199
CLF 0.023198
CLP 912.999827
CNY 6.747602
CNH 6.743155
COP 3157.68
CRC 453.228387
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 95.372573
CZK 20.984797
DJF 177.546166
DKK 6.46806
DOP 58.20179
DZD 132.308956
EGP 49.569799
ERN 15
ETB 160.923669
EUR 0.86521
FJD 2.20855
FKP 0.74148
GBP 0.741195
GEL 2.610161
GGP 0.74148
GHS 11.700039
GIP 0.74148
GMD 73.496802
GNF 8756.649224
GTQ 7.607144
GYD 208.588851
HKD 7.845875
HNL 26.723176
HRK 6.519601
HTG 130.363707
HUF 314.212956
IDR 17801
ILS 2.99985
IMP 0.74148
INR 95.21055
IQD 1306.058902
IRR 1375550.000465
ISK 123.37984
JEP 0.74148
JMD 158.335856
JOD 0.708953
JPY 157.888997
KES 128.789741
KGS 87.449779
KHR 4049.647537
KMF 425.999543
KRW 1411.360366
KWD 0.30866
KYD 0.830861
KZT 467.275008
LAK 22510.919863
LBP 89282.792025
LKR 334.420274
LRD 179.959348
LSL 16.197552
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 6.341738
MAD 9.29222
MDL 17.337716
MGA 4254.638239
MKD 53.219738
MMK 2099.549369
MNT 3595.852714
MOP 8.056654
MRU 40.080439
MUR 46.795264
MVR 15.450064
MWK 1728.841413
MXN 17.138497
MYR 4.085099
MZN 63.904996
NAD 16.197552
NGN 1361.789707
NIO 36.690741
NOK 9.50157
NPR 151.800372
NZD 1.69811
OMR 0.382693
PAB 0.997016
PEN 3.376465
PGK 4.406003
PHP 60.814978
PKR 276.796523
PLN 3.719555
PYG 5928.296501
QAR 3.644596
RON 4.541503
RSD 101.492021
RUB 81.61994
RWF 1466.072741
SAR 3.744756
SBD 8.065696
SCR 14.449077
SDG 600.504962
SEK 9.48365
SGD 1.278665
SLE 24.60377
SOS 569.822255
SRD 37.866499
STD 20697.981008
STN 21.191022
SVC 8.723782
SZL 16.194265
THB 32.970555
TJS 9.197509
TMT 3.51
TND 2.929032
TRY 47.714698
TTD 6.757774
TWD 32.250104
TZS 2643.563029
UAH 44.653894
UGX 3714.050945
UYU 40.133201
UZS 11924.058297
VES 755.762399
VND 26204.5
VUV 118.557141
WST 2.733716
XAF 567.363231
XAG 0.015658
XAU 0.00023
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.796912
XDR 0.705618
XOF 567.363231
XPF 103.152705
YER 238.395817
ZAR 16.14803
ZMK 9001.197294
ZMW 18.818492
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    0.0240

    21.744

    +0.11%

  • BCC

    2.3400

    86.6

    +2.7%

  • BCE

    -0.0200

    22.75

    -0.09%

  • JRI

    0.1500

    12.81

    +1.17%

  • RIO

    1.4500

    101.1

    +1.43%

  • CMSD

    -0.1600

    21.82

    -0.73%

  • GSK

    0.7900

    52.96

    +1.49%

  • BTI

    0.6000

    59.33

    +1.01%

  • NGG

    0.4700

    80.88

    +0.58%

  • RBGPF

    0.7600

    70.5

    +1.08%

  • RELX

    0.0485

    35.52

    +0.14%

  • BP

    -0.6000

    41.63

    -1.44%

  • RYCEF

    0.2300

    20.85

    +1.1%

  • VOD

    0.1900

    16.19

    +1.17%

  • AZN

    1.4100

    161.42

    +0.87%

Internet providers not liable for music piracy by users: top US court
Internet providers not liable for music piracy by users: top US court / Photo: © AFP/File

Internet providers not liable for music piracy by users: top US court

The US Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday in a landmark copyright case that internet service providers (ISPs) are not liable for online pirating of music by their users.

Text size:

Cox Communications, a major broadband ISP, had asked the top court to throw out a jury verdict awarding $1 billion in damages to Sony Music Entertainment and other record labels.

Cox was accused in the case of failing to take action against customers accused of illegally downloading copyrighted music.

In a unanimous 9-0 ruling, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Cox and said an ISP was liable "only if it intended that the provided service be used for infringement."

"A company is not liable as a copyright infringer for merely providing a service to the general public with knowledge that it will be used by some to infringe copyrights," the court said in an opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas.

"Cox repeatedly discouraged copyright infringement by sending warnings, suspending services, and terminating accounts," the court said.

"A provider induces infringement if it actively encourages infringement through specific acts," it said. "Cox neither induced its users' infringement nor provided a service tailored to infringement."

Cox Communications welcomed the court's decision, calling it a "decisive victory for the broadband industry and for the American people who depend on reliable internet service."

"This opinion affirms that internet service providers are not copyright police and should not be held liable for the actions of their customers," the company said in a statement.

The ruling was also welcomed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which called it a "win for freedom of expression online."

"If defined too broadly, secondary copyright liability for internet service providers can pose a serious threat to free speech online," Evelyn Danforth-Scott, an ACLU attorney, said in a statement.

The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) meanwhile expressed disappointment.

"To be effective, copyright law must protect creators and markets from harmful infringement," RIAA chairman and CEO Mitch Glazier said.

During oral arguments before the Supreme Court in December, Joshua Rosenkranz, an attorney representing Cox, had warned of "cataclysmic" consequences if the court did not limit the company's copyright liability.

The only way for an ISP to avoid liability is to "cut off the internet, not just for the accused infringer, but for anyone else who happens to use the same connection," Rosenkranz said.

"That could be entire towns, universities or hospitals, turning internet providers into internet police," he said.

H.Carroll--TFWP