The Fort Worth Press - UK top court rules definition of 'woman' based on sex at birth

USD -
AED 3.672498
AFN 66.278316
ALL 82.286767
AMD 381.405623
ANG 1.790403
AOA 917.00002
ARS 1450.564198
AUD 1.514417
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.697242
BAM 1.668053
BBD 2.013416
BDT 122.25212
BGN 1.66944
BHD 0.37697
BIF 2955.517555
BMD 1
BND 1.290672
BOB 6.907492
BRL 5.527305
BSD 0.999672
BTN 90.191513
BWP 13.210404
BYN 2.933001
BYR 19600
BZD 2.010516
CAD 1.379755
CDF 2263.999888
CHF 0.795601
CLF 0.023236
CLP 911.550398
CNY 7.04125
CNH 7.036685
COP 3863.71
CRC 498.08952
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 94.043045
CZK 20.766403
DJF 178.015071
DKK 6.37969
DOP 62.81557
DZD 129.63396
EGP 47.590799
ERN 15
ETB 155.468002
EUR 0.8539
FJD 2.283699
FKP 0.746974
GBP 0.747803
GEL 2.68995
GGP 0.746974
GHS 11.495998
GIP 0.746974
GMD 73.501218
GNF 8739.594705
GTQ 7.656257
GYD 209.143749
HKD 7.780745
HNL 26.330401
HRK 6.432501
HTG 130.92649
HUF 330.323966
IDR 16735.5
ILS 3.210505
IMP 0.746974
INR 89.672804
IQD 1309.515179
IRR 42125.000006
ISK 126.029813
JEP 0.746974
JMD 159.951556
JOD 0.708992
JPY 157.294501
KES 128.901985
KGS 87.449865
KHR 4003.445658
KMF 420.999696
KPW 899.985447
KRW 1478.840165
KWD 0.30732
KYD 0.83301
KZT 515.774122
LAK 21648.038141
LBP 89518.671881
LKR 309.300332
LRD 176.937412
LSL 16.761238
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.418406
MAD 9.162342
MDL 16.859064
MGA 4495.599072
MKD 52.551585
MMK 2099.831872
MNT 3551.409668
MOP 8.012145
MRU 39.906011
MUR 46.149573
MVR 15.459728
MWK 1733.41976
MXN 18.031765
MYR 4.077032
MZN 63.910399
NAD 16.761166
NGN 1457.903065
NIO 36.785119
NOK 10.18185
NPR 144.308882
NZD 1.74121
OMR 0.384499
PAB 0.999663
PEN 3.365814
PGK 4.308816
PHP 58.725048
PKR 280.102006
PLN 3.59715
PYG 6673.859367
QAR 3.645474
RON 4.3458
RSD 100.228971
RUB 80.525675
RWF 1455.461927
SAR 3.75079
SBD 8.140117
SCR 13.762717
SDG 601.497808
SEK 9.316225
SGD 1.292755
SHP 0.750259
SLE 24.096097
SLL 20969.503664
SOS 570.329558
SRD 38.67796
STD 20697.981008
STN 20.895879
SVC 8.747159
SYP 11057.107339
SZL 16.766099
THB 31.460123
TJS 9.231602
TMT 3.51
TND 2.921974
TOP 2.40776
TRY 42.80983
TTD 6.783
TWD 31.5475
TZS 2494.99991
UAH 42.222895
UGX 3571.01736
UYU 39.172541
UZS 12055.48851
VES 279.213402
VND 26312.5
VUV 121.400054
WST 2.789362
XAF 559.461142
XAG 0.015229
XAU 0.000231
XCD 2.70255
XCG 1.801636
XDR 0.695787
XOF 559.458756
XPF 101.714719
YER 238.450186
ZAR 16.77835
ZMK 9001.204375
ZMW 22.742295
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.0200

    16.14

    +0.12%

  • BCC

    1.4100

    77.7

    +1.81%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    80.22

    0%

  • CMSD

    0.0000

    23.28

    0%

  • RIO

    0.4400

    77.63

    +0.57%

  • CMSC

    0.0300

    23.29

    +0.13%

  • BCE

    -0.3000

    22.85

    -1.31%

  • AZN

    0.7500

    90.61

    +0.83%

  • GSK

    -0.4200

    48.29

    -0.87%

  • NGG

    -0.7700

    76.39

    -1.01%

  • BTI

    -0.1300

    57.04

    -0.23%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    13.43

    0%

  • RYCEF

    0.5400

    15.4

    +3.51%

  • RELX

    0.0900

    40.65

    +0.22%

  • VOD

    -0.0100

    12.8

    -0.08%

  • BP

    -1.1600

    33.31

    -3.48%

UK top court rules definition of 'woman' based on sex at birth
UK top court rules definition of 'woman' based on sex at birth / Photo: © AFP

UK top court rules definition of 'woman' based on sex at birth

Britain's Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the legal definition of a "woman" is based on a person's sex at birth, a landmark decision with far-reaching implications for the bitter debate over trans rights.

Text size:

In a win for Scottish gender-critical campaigners who brought the case to the UK's highest court, five London judges unanimously ruled that "the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman, and biological sex".

However, the act also "gives transgender people protection" against discrimination in their acquired gender, Justice Patrick Hodge said in handing down the verdict.

The UK government welcomed the ruling for bringing "clarity" to the debate.

It is the culmination of a years-long battle between the Scottish government and the campaign group For Women Scotland (FWS) -- which launched an appeal to the Supreme Court after losing pleas in Scottish courts over an obscure legislation aimed at hiring more women in public-sector bodies.

Dozens of FWS and other gender-critical campaigners, who argue that biological sex cannot be changed, cheered the ruling, hugging and crying outside the court.

"This has been a really, really long ride," said Susan Smith, co-director of For Women Scotland, adding that the campaigners were "enormously grateful for this ruling".

"Today, the judges have said what we always believed to be the case: that women are protected by their biological sex," she said. "Women can now feel safe that services and spaces designated for women are for women".

Ahead of the verdict, trans rights activists raised concerns that a ruling in favour of FWS could risk discrimination against trans people in their chosen gender.

"The court is well aware of the strength of feeling on all sides which lies behind this appeal," Hodge said, recognising the fight of women against sex discrimination as well as a "vulnerable" position of the trans community.

- Single-sex spaces -

Scottish Greens activist and trans woman Ellie Gomersall, 25, told Sky News the ruling was "yet another attack on the rights of trans people to live our lives in peace".

She called on the Labour government "to step up, and defend one of the most vulnerable minorities in the country".

At the heart of the legal battle were clashing interpretations of the Equality Act.

While the Scottish government argued that the Equality Act (EA) gave trans women with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) the same protections as a biological female, FWS disagreed.

In its judgement, the Supreme Court ruled that the devolved Scottish government's "interpretation is not correct" and that the Equality Act was inconsistent with the 2004 Gender Recognition Act that introduced GRC certificates.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), which is responsible for enforcing the Equality Act, said it was "pleased" the ruling addressed complicated issues of maintaining single-sex spaces.

Single-sex spaces and services including changing rooms, hostels and medical services "will function properly only if sex is interpreted as biological sex", the judgement said.

The Labour government said the ruling brought "clarity and confidence for women and service providers such as hospitals, refuges, and sports clubs".

"We have always supported the protection of single-sex spaces based on biological sex," a government spokesperson said.

Opposition Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch hailed the "victory" for FWS.

"Saying 'trans women are women' was never true in fact, and now isn't true in law either," Badenoch said.

- Online discourse -

The ruling will be a blow for transgender women and their ability to access single-sex spaces, a significant point of contention.

LGBTQ charity Stonewall said the ruling was "incredibly worrying for the trans community".

"Stonewall shares the deep concern at the widespread implications for today's ruling," its chief executive Simon Blake said.

The debate has been particularly vicious in the UK, pitting gender-critical activists against trans rights campaigners.

One of the most prominent supporters of gender-critical campaigns is "Harry Potter" author JK Rowling, who has been the target of hate and accused of transphobia.

The ruling also comes at a time when transgender rights are under threat in the United States under President Donald Trump.

Since retaking office, Trump has declared the federal government will recognise only two sexes, male and female; sought to bar trans athletes from women's sports; and curbed treatments for trans children.

The latest UK ruling could pile pressure on Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who has remained largely silent on trans issues since coming into power last July, to further clarify legislation.

M.Delgado--TFWP